Association of County-level Upward Economic Mobility with Stage at Diagnosis and Receipt of Treatment Among Patients Diagnosed with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Determining the impact of county-level upward economic mobility on stage at diagnosis and receipt of treatment among Medicare beneficiaries with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The extent to which economic mobility contributes to socioeconomic disparities in health outcomes remains largely unknown. METHODS: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients diagnosed in 2004-2015 were identified from the SEER-Medicare linked database. Information on countylevel upward economic mobility was obtained from the Opportunity Atlas. Its impact on early-stage diagnosis (stage I or II), as well as receipt of chemotherapy or surgery was analyzed, stratified by patient race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Among 25,233 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 37.1% (n = 9349) were diagnosed at an early stage; only 16.7% (n = 4218) underwent resection, whereas 31.7% (n = 7996) received chemotherapy. In turn, 10,073 (39.9%) patients received any treatment. Individuals from counties with high upward economic mobility were more likely to be diagnosed at an earlier stage (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.25), as well as to receive surgery (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.41-1.77) or chemotherapy (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.39-1.63). White patients and patients who identified as neither White or Black had increased odds of being diagnosed at an early stage (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.22 and OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.02-1.80, respectively) and of receiving treatment (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.59-1.88 and OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.13-1.98, respectively) when they resided in a county of high vs low upward economic mobility. The impact of economic mobility on stage at diagnosis and receipt of treatment was much less pronounced among Black patients (high vs low, OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.96-1.71 and OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.99-1.72, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients from higher upward mobility areas were more likely to be diagnosed at an earlier stage, as well as to receive surgery or chemotherapy. The impact of county-level upward mobility was less pronounced among Black patients.

Financial Impact of Out-of-Pocket Costs Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Colorectal Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the societal burden of cancer surgical care in terms of out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. The current study sought to define OOP costs incurred by patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection. METHODS: Privately insured patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection between 2013 and 2017 were identified from the IBM MarketScan database. Total and OOP costs were calculated within 1 year prior to and 1 year post surgery. A multivariable linear regression model was used to estimate total OOP costs relative to patient demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Among 10,935 patients, 7289 (66.7%) had primary colon cancer while 3643 (33.3%) had rectal cancer. Median total costs were US$93,967 (IQR US$51027-168,251). Median OOP costs were US$4417 (IQR US$2519-6943), or 4.5% (IQR 2.2-8.1%) of total costs. OOP costs varied over the course of patient care; specifically, median OOP costs in the preoperative period were US$432 (IQR US$130-1452) versus US$2146 (IQR US$851-3525) in the perioperative period and US$969 (IQR US$327-2239) in the postoperative period. On multivariable analysis, receipt of chemotherapy (+US$1368, 95%CI +US$1211 to +US$1525) or radiotherapy (+US$842, 95% CI +US$626 to +US$1059) was associated with higher total OOP costs. Patients with a health maintenance organization (HMO) (-US$2119, 95% CI -US$2550 to -US$1689) or a point-of-service plan (-US$938, 95% CI -US$1385 to -US$491) had lower total OOP costs than patients with comprehensive insurance. In contrast, patients with a consumer-driven or a high-deductible health plan had considerably higher total OOP costs than patients with comprehensive insurance (+US$1400, 95% CI +US$972 to +US$1827 and +US$3243, 95% CI +US$2767 to +US$3717, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Privately insured colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical resection pay a median of US$4417 in OOP costs, or 4.5% of total costs. OOP costs varied with receipt of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, region of residence, and insurance plan type.

Association of Community Economic Distress and Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality Rates Among US Counties.

INTRODUCTION: Not all Americans may benefit equally from current improvements in breast and colorectal cancer screening and mortality rates. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional retrospective review of county-level screening, incidence, and mortality rates for breast and colon cancer utilizing three publicly available data sources from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and their association with the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), a measure of local economic prosperity across communities. RESULTS: After controlling for other factors, DCI was associated with county-level screening, incidence, and death rates per 100,000 for breast and colorectal cancer. There was an absolute increase of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.85, p < 0.001) in the proportion of women aged 40 years or older who had a screening mammogram for every 10-point decrease in DCI, which in turn correlated with an increase in the age-adjusted incidence by 1.68 per 100,000 (95% CI 1.37-2.00, p < 0.001). While the age-adjusted death rate for breast cancer was highest in the most distressed communities, the overall incidence of age-adjusted death decreased by 0.28 per 100,000 (95% CI -0.37 to -0.19, p < 0.001) with every 10-point decrease in DCI. For colorectal cancer, every 10-point decrease in DCI was similarly associated with an absolute 0.60 (95% CI 0.52-0.69, p < 0.001) increase in the proportion of individuals who had screening endoscopy. Increased colorectal screening in low-DCI counties was associated with a lower age-adjusted incidence rate (-0.80 per 100,000; 95% CI -0.94 to -0.65) and age-adjusted death rate (-0.55 per 100,000; 95% CI -0.62 to -0.49) of colorectal cancer per every 10-point decrease in DCI (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The association of county-level socioeconomic and healthcare factors with breast and colorectal cancer outcomes was notable, with level of community distress impacting cancer screening, incidence, and mortality rates.

Association of County-Level Upward Economic Mobility with Stage at Diagnosis and Receipt of Curative-Intent Treatment among Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Upward economic mobility represents the ability of children to surpass their parents financially and improve their economic status. The extent to which it contributes to socioeconomic disparities in health outcomes remains largely unknown. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 2004-2015 were identified from the SEER-Medicare linked database. Information on county-level upward economic mobility was obtained from the Opportunity Atlas, and its impact on early-stage diagnosis (tumor size ≤ 5 cm, no nodal involvement or distant metastases, no major vascular invasion or extrahepatic extension) and receipt of curative-intent treatment (resection, transplantation, or ablation) was examined. RESULTS: Among 9190 Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with HCC, the majority were White (64.9%, n = 5965). Overall, 44.7% (n = 4105) of patients were diagnosed with early-stage HCC and 29.7% (n = 2731) underwent curative-intent treatment. While higher upward economic mobility was not associated with HCC diagnosis at an early stage (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.83-1.06), patients with early-stage HCC from areas of high upward economic mobility had increased odds of undergoing curative-intent treatment (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.51). Upward economic mobility had no impact on the likelihood to undergo curative-intent treatment for early-stage HCC among White (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.91-1.45), Black (OR 1.94, 95% CI 0.85-4.45) or Asian patients (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.44-1.36). In contrast, non-White patients other than Blacks or Asians diagnosed with early-stage HCC had markedly higher odds of receiving curative-intent treatment if the individual resided in an area characterized by higher versus lower upward economic mobility (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.50-4.46). CONCLUSIONS: While community-level economic mobility was not associated with stage of diagnosis, it affected the likelihood of undergoing curative-intent treatment for early-stage HCC, especially among minority patients other than Black or Asian patients.

Telehealth Utilization Among Surgical Oncology Patients at a Large Academic Cancer Center.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic increased the use of telehealth within medicine. Data on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with telehealth utilization among cancer surgical patients have not been well-defined. METHODS: Cancer patients who had a surgical oncology visit at the James Cancer Hospital in March 2020-May 2021 were included. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded; access to modern information technology was measured using the Digital Divide Index (DDI). A logistic regression model was used to assess odds of receiving a telehealth. RESULTS: Among 2942 patients, median DDI was 18.2 (interquartile range 17.4-22.1). Patients were most often insured through managed care (n = 1459, 49.6%), followed by Medicare (n = 1109, 37.7%) and Medicaid (n = 267, 9.1%). Overall, 722 patients (24.5%) received at least one telehealth visit over the study period. On multivariable analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.98 per 10-year increase), sex (male vs. female: OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.45-2.32), cancer type (pancreatic vs. breast: OR 9.19, 95% CI 6.38-13.23; colorectal vs. breast: OR 5.31, 95% CI 3.71-7.58), insurance type (Medicare vs. Medicaid: OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.04-2.41) and county of residence (distant vs. neighboring: OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.06-1.66) were associated with increased odds of receiving a telehealth visit. Patients from high DDI counties were not less likely to receive telehealth visits versus patients from low DDI counties (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.85-1.57). CONCLUSIONS: Several patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics had an impact on the likelihood of receiving a telehealth visit versus an in-person visit, suggesting that telehealth may not be equally accessible to all surgical oncology patients.

Surgical treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma: Are we achieving textbook oncologic outcomes for our patients?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Composite measures are increasingly used to assess quality of care in surgical oncology. We sought to define the incidence of "textbook oncologic outcome" (TOO) following resection of gastric adenocarcinoma among a large, international cohort of patients. METHODS: Gastric adenocarcinoma patients undergoing resection between 2000 and 2020 were identified from an international database. TOO was defined as margin-negative resection, examination of ≥16 lymph nodes, no prolonged length-of-stay (LOS), no 30-day mortality, and stage-appropriate receipt of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Among a total of 910 patients, 321 patients (35.3%) achieved a postoperative TOO. While failure to evaluate ≥16 lymph nodes (n = 591, 65.0%) and receipt of chemotherapy (n = 651, 71.5%) had the greatest negative impact on the ability to obtain a TOO, no 30-day mortality (n = 880, 96.7%), margin-negative resection (n = 831, 91.3%), and no extended LOS (n = 706, 77.6%) were more commonly achieved. No postoperative complications (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.31-0.63) and T1a/T1b-stage disease (OR: 2.87; 95% CI: 1.59-5.18) were independently associated with achieving a TOO (p < 0.05). The odds of achieving a TOO improved over time (p-trend < 0.05), which was largely attributable to improved odds of evaluating ≥16 lymph nodes (2010-2014 vs. 2000-2004: OR, 5.21; 95% CI: 3.22-8.45). CONCLUSIONS: Only about one in three patients achieved a TOO following resection of gastric adenocarcinoma. Odds of TOO increased over time, largely due to improved lymph node evaluation.

Patient Social Vulnerability and Hospital Community Racial/Ethnic Integration: Do All Patients Undergoing Pancreatectomy Receive the Same Care Across Hospitals?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the current study was to characterize the role of patient social vulnerability relative to hospital racial/ethnic integration on postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing pancreatectomy. BACKGROUND: The interplay between patient- and community-level factors on outcomes after complex surgery has not been well-examined. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries who underwent a pancreatectomy between 2013 and 2017 were identified utilizing 100% Medicare inpatient files. P-SVI was determined using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, whereas H-REI was estimated using Shannon Diversity Index. Impact of P-SVI and H-REI on "TO" [ie, no surgical complication/extended length-of-stay (LOS)/90-day mortality/90-day readmission] was assessed. RESULTS: Among 24,500 beneficiaries who underwent pancreatectomy, 12,890 (52.6%) were male and median age was 72 years (Interquartile range: 68-77); 10,619 (43.3%) patients achieved a TO. The most common adverse postoperative outcome was 90-day readmission (n = 8,066, 32.9%), whereas the least common was 90-day mortality (n = 2282, 9.3%). Complications and extended LOS occurred in 30.4% (n = 7450) and 23.3% (n = 5699) of the cohort, respectively. Patients from an above average SVI county who underwent surgery at a below average REI hospital had 18% lower odds [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.95] of achieving a TO compared with patients from a below average SVI county who underwent surgery at a hospital with above average REI. Of note, patients from the highest SVI areas who underwent pancreatectomy at hospitals with the lowest REI had 30% lower odds (95% CI: 0.54-0.91) of achieving a TO compared with patients from very low SVI areas who underwent surgery at a hospital with high REI. Further comparisons of these 2 patient groups indicated 76% increased odds of 90-day mortality (95% CI: 1.10-2.82) and 50% increased odds of an extended LOS (95% CI: 1.07-2.11). CONCLUSION: Patients with high social vulnerability who underwent pancreatectomy in hospitals located in communities with low racial/ethnic integration had the lowest chance to achieve an "optimal" TO. A focus on both patient- and community-level factors is needed to ensure optimal and equitable patient outcomes.

Association of Depression with In-Patient and Post-Discharge Disposition and Expenditures Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Resection for Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The impact of depression on utilization of post-discharge care and overall episode of care expenditures remains poorly defined. We sought to define the impact of depression on postoperative outcomes, including discharge disposition, as well as overall expenditures associated with the global episode of surgical care. METHOD: The Medicare 100% Standard Analytic Files were used to identify patients undergoing resection for esophageal, colon, rectal, pancreatic, and liver cancer between 2013 and 2017. The impact of depression on inpatient outcomes, as well as home health care and skilled nursing facilities utilization and expenditures, was analyzed. RESULTS: Among 113,263 patients, 14,618 (12.9%) individuals had depression. Patients with depression were more likely to experience postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-1.42), extended length of stay (LOS) (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.36-1.47), readmission within 90 days (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.14-1.25), as well as 90-day mortality (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.27-1.42) (all p < 0.05). In turn, the proportion of patients who achieved a textbook outcome following cancer surgery was lower among patients with depression (no depression: 53.3% vs. depression: 45.3%; OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.68-0.73). Patients with a preexisting diagnosis of depression had higher odds of additional post-discharge expenditures compared with individuals without a diagnosis of depression (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.35-1.50); patients with a preexisting diagnosis of depression ($10,500, IQR $3,200-$22,500) had higher median post-discharge expenditures versus patients without depression ($6600, IQR $2100-$17,400) (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, after controlling for other factors, depression remained associated with a 19.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.7-22.3%) increase in post-discharge expenditures. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with depression undergoing resection for cancer had worse in-patient outcomes and were less likely to achieve a TO. Patients with depression were more likely to require post-discharge care and had higher post-discharge expenditures.

Impact of Residential Racial Integration on Postoperative Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Resection for Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: While social determinants of health may adversely affect various populations, the impact of residential segregation on surgical outcomes remains poorly defined. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the current study was to examine the association between residential segregation and the likelihood to achieve a textbook outcome (TO) following cancer surgery. METHODS: The Medicare 100% Standard Analytic Files were reviewed to identify Medicare beneficiaries who underwent resection of lung, esophageal, colon, or rectal cancer between 2013 and 2017. Shannon's integration index, a measure of residential segregation, was calculated at the county level and its impact on composite TO [no complications, no prolonged length of stay (LOS), no 90-day readmission, and no 90-day mortality] was examined. RESULTS: Among 200,509 patients who underwent cancer resection, the overall incidence of TO was 56.0%. The unadjusted likelihood of achieving a TO was lower among patients in low integration areas [low integration: n = 19,978 (55.0%) vs. high integration: n = 18,953 (59.3%); p < 0.001]. On multivariable analysis, patients residing in low integration areas had higher odds of complications [odds ratio (OR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.11], extended LOS (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.09-1.18), and 90-day mortality (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.22-1.38) and, in turn, lower odds of achieving a TO (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.84-0.90) versus patients from highly integrated communities. CONCLUSION: Patients who resided in counties with a lower integration index were less likely to have an optimal TO following resection of cancer compared with patients who resided in more integrated counties. The data highlight the importance of increasing residential racial diversity and integration as a means to improve patient outcomes.

Postoperative imaging surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma: How much is enough?

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to define trends in postoperative surveillance imaging following liver-directed treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and characterize the impact of high-intensity surveillance on long-term survival. METHODS: Patients who underwent liver- directed therapy for HCC between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the SEER-Medicare database. Trends in surveillance intensity over time, factors associated with high surveillance intensity and the impact of surveillance on long-term outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Utilization of high-intensity surveillance abdominal imaging (≥6 scans over 2 years) following liver-directed therapy of HCC decreased over time (2004-2007: n = 130, 36.1% vs. 2008-2011: n = 181, 29.5% vs. 2012-2016: n = 111, 24.5%; ptrend < 0.001). History of chronic viral hepatitis (hepatitis B: odds ratio [OR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-3.43; hepatitis C: OR, 1.79; 95% CI: 1.32-2.43), presence of regional (vs. local-only) disease (OR, 1.47; 95% CI: 1.09-1.98) and receipt of transplantation (OR, 2.23; 95% CI: 1.57-3.17) were associated with higher odds of high intensity surveillance. Intensity of surveillance imaging was not associated with long-term survival (5-year overall survival: low-intensity, 48.1% vs. high-intensity, 48.9%; hazards ratio, 0.94; 95% CI: 0.78-1.13). CONCLUSION: Utilization of posttreatment surveillance imaging decreased over time following liver-directed therapy for HCC. While utilization of high-intensity screening varied by HCC procedure performed, intensity of surveillance had no effect on survival.

Impact of Tumor Burden Score on Conditional Survival after Curative-Intent Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of tumor burden score (TBS) on conditional survival (CS) among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been examined to date. METHODS: Patients who underwent liver resection of HCC between 2000 and 2017 were identified from a multi-institutional database. The impact of TBS and other clinicopathologic factors on 3-year conditional survival (CS3) was examined. RESULTS: Among 1,040 patients, 263 (25.3%) patients had low TBS, 668 (64.2%) had medium TBS and 109 (10.5%) had high TBS. TBS was strongly associated with OS; 5-year OS was 39.0% among patients with high TBS compared with 61.1% and 79.4% among patients with medium and low TBS, respectively (p < 0.001). While actuarial survival decreased as time elapsed from resection, CS increased over time irrespective of TBS. The largest differences between 3-year actuarial survival and CS3 were noted among patients with high TBS (5-years postoperatively; CS3: 78.7% vs. 3-year actuarial survival: 30.7%). The effect of adverse clinicopathologic factors including high TBS, poor/undifferentiated tumor grade, microvascular invasion, liver capsule involvement, and positive margins on prognosis decreased over time. CONCLUSIONS: CS rates among patients who underwent resection for HCC increased as patients survived additional years, irrespective of TBS. CS estimates can be used to provide important dynamic information relative to the changing survival probability after resection of HCC.

Using the win ratio to compare laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Background: We sought to assess the overall benefit of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) using the win ratio, a novel methodological approach. Methods: CRLM patients undergoing curative-intent resection in 2001-2018 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. Patients were paired and matched based on age, number and size of lesions, lymph node status and receipt of preoperative chemotherapy. The win ratio was calculated based on margin status, severity of postoperative complications, 90-day mortality, time to recurrence, and time to death. Results: Among 962 patients, the majority underwent open hepatectomy (n=832, 86.5%), while a minority underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy (n=130, 13.5%). Among matched patient-to-patient pairs, the odds of the patient undergoing laparoscopic resection "winning" were 1.77 [WR: 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42-2.34]. The win ratio favored laparoscopic hepatectomy independent of low (WR: 2.94, 95% CI: 1.20-6.39), medium (WR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.16-2.10) or high (WR: 7.25, 95% CI: 1.13-32.0) tumor burden, as well as unilobar (WR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.25-2.31) or bilobar (WR: 4.57, 95% CI: 2.36-8.64) disease. The odds of "winning" were particularly pronounced relative to short-term outcomes (i.e., 90-day mortality and severity of postoperative complications) (WR: 4.06, 95% CI: 2.33-7.78). Conclusions: Patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy had 77% increased odds of "winning". Laparoscopic liver resection should be strongly considered as a preferred approach to resection in CRLM patients.

Impact of neighborhood characteristics on textbook outcome following major surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to determine the impact of neighborhood characteristics on textbook outcome (TO) following surgery. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries undergoing AAA repair, CABG, colectomy, or lung resection. Neighborhood characteristics associated with TO were identified. RESULTS: Among 852,128 Medicare beneficiaries, a 10% increase in the mean percentage of college or advanced degree residents (OR:1.04, 95% CI = 1.04-1.05) was associated with 4% greater odds of a TO, whereas 2% lower odds of TO were noted with a 10% increase in the mean percentage of single-parent households (OR: 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97-0.99). Of note, the highest odds of an extended LOS (OR:1.06, 95% CI: 1.05-1.06) and 90-d mortality (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.04-1.06) were observed with single-parent households. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing a range of common surgical procedures, increases in college or advanced degrees residents and a decrease in single-parent households led to significantly higher odds of achieving a TO.

Social vulnerability and fragmentation of postoperative surgical care among patients undergoing hepatopancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Regionalization of hepatopancreatic surgery to high-volume hospitals has been associated with fragmentation of postoperative care and, in turn, inferior outcomes after surgery. The objective of this study was to examine the association of social vulnerability with the likelihood of experiencing fragmentation of postoperative care (FPC) after hepatopancreatic surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent hepatopancreatic surgery and had at least 1 readmission within 90 days were identified using Medicare 100% Standard Analytical Files between 2013 and 2017. Fragmentation of postoperative care was defined as readmission at a hospital other than the index institution where the initial surgery was performed. The association of social vulnerability index and its components with fragmentation of postoperative care was examined. RESULTS: Among 11,142 patients, 8,053 (72.3%) underwent pancreatectomy, and 3,089 (27.7%) underwent hepatectomy. The overall incidence of fragmentation of postoperative care was 32.9% (n = 3,667). Patients who experienced fragmentation of postoperative care were older (73 years [interquartile range: 69-77]FPC vs 72 years [interquartile range: 68-77]non-FPC) and had a higher Charlson comorbidity score (4 [interquartile range: 2-8]FPC vs 3 [interquartile range: 2-8]non-FPC) (both P < .001). Median overall social vulnerability index was higher among patients who experienced fragmentation of postoperative care (52.5 [interquartile range: 29.3-70.4]FPC vs 51.3 [interquartile range: 27.9-69.4]non-FPC, P = .02). On multivariable analysis, the odds of experiencing fragmentation of postoperative care was higher with increasing overall social vulnerability index (odds ratio: 1.14; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.30). Additionally, the odds of experiencing fragmentation of postoperative care were higher among patients with high vulnerability owing to their socioeconomic status (odds ratio: 1.28; 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.45) or their household composition and disability (odds ratio: 1.35; 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.54), whereas high vulnerability owing to minority status and language was inversely associated with fragmentation of postoperative care (odds ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.84). CONCLUSION: Social vulnerability was strongly associated with the odds of experiencing fragmented postoperative care after hepatopancreatic surgery.