Retinoic acid syndrome: a review.

The retinoic acid syndrome (RAS) is an unpredictable but frequent complication which may develop after administration of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) most commonly in patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL). In this review, we describe the incidence, predictive factors, clinical course, outcome and treatment of RAS in patients with APL treated with ATRA. The incidence of RAS in patients receiving ATRA is about 14-16%, with an associated mortality of about 2%. Initial high white blood cell (WBC) count, rapidly increasing WBC count and/or the presence of the CD 13 expression on leukaemic cells may help in identifying patients likely to develop RAS. Concurrent chemotherapy will probably decrease the risk of developing RAS but often exacerbates bleeding, leading to leucocytosis, thrombocytopenia, disseminated intravascular coagulation and fibrinolysis. Prophylactic steroids are not recommended but prompt administration of steroids at the first sign of unexplained dyspnea, fever, weight gain or pulmonary infiltrate, is critical. Liposomal ATRA is being investigated to induce haematological cure in APL without chemotherapy and to reduce the incidence of RAS but further validation of its usefulness is necessary.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of ranitidine for gastroesophageal reflux symptoms during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ranitidine (Zantac) taken once or twice daily is effective for relieving symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux among pregnant women who had failed conservative measures. METHODS: Volunteers with heartburn despite antacids were sought among our obstetrics clinic population for this double-blind, placebo-controlled, triple crossover trial. After a baseline week, 20 patients were randomized to receive the three following weekly regimens: ranitidine 150 mg twice daily, placebo in the morning and ranitidine 150 mg in the evening, or placebo twice daily. Daily scores on symptom diaries, global assessments, and number of antacids taken were compared among the 18 patients completing the study. RESULTS: The twice-daily dosage of ranitidine was the only regimen found to reduce heartburn symptoms when compared with the baseline (P < .001) or a placebo (P < .01). Compared with ranitidine taken once daily, the twice-daily dosing prompted less need for antacid tablets compared with the placebo (P < .05 versus P > .05) and to the baseline (P < .001 versus P < .05). The average reduction of heartburn severity using twice-daily ranitidine was 55.6% when compared with baseline (95% confidence interval [CI] 34.8%, 76.5%) was 44.2% when compared with placebo (95% CI 15.4%, 72.9%). CONCLUSION: This study indicates the efficacy of ranitidine 150 mg taken twice daily, rather than once daily, for relief of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms during pregnancy.

Double-blind comparison of intracervical and intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and induction of labor.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the safety and effectiveness of prostaglandin E2 delivered sequentially as an intracervical (0.5 mg) or intravaginal (2.5 mg) gel. STUDY DESIGN: Hospitalized patients with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < or = 4) at > or = 35 weeks and requiring induction of labor were assigned to receive two 2.5 ml doses of gel intracervically and intravaginally in a double-blind, placebo-controlled manner. Second and third doses were given at 6-hour intervals until there were either regular uterine contractions or a Bishop score change > 3 points. RESULTS: The 100 evaluable cases received prostaglandin E2 either intracervically (n = 52) or intravaginally (n = 48). Difficulty with exact gel instillation was present with intracervical gel only, where spillage occurred in 85% of cases. Compared with intracervical therapy prostaglandin E2 given intravaginally was more likely to significantly change the Bishop score (60.4% vs 40.4%, p = 0.04) and stimulate regular contractions (72.9% vs 48.1%, p = 0.01). Uterine hyperstimulation was present in one case in each group. CONCLUSION: Although each was safe, instillation of prostaglandin E2 gel was better at a higher intravaginal dose than a lower intracervical dose because of its greater ease of administration and higher likelihood of cervical change.