RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hiatal hernia repair (HHR) performed concurrently with vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) has been shown to improve postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, data on the optimal extent of esophageal mobilization during repair are lacking. Mobilization techniques for HHR during VSG include partial (PM) or full (FM) mobilization of the esophagus. We hypothesize that patients who undergo full mobilization will be less likely to develop postoperative reflux. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of all patients who underwent a VSG with a HHR between 2014 and 2021 was conducted. The primary outcome was postoperative reflux symptoms defined by diagnosis in the medical record, utilization of anti-reflux medications, and GERD health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) scores obtained via patient surveys. RESULTS: There were 190 patients included with 80 patients (42.1%) undergoing PM and 110 (57.9%) undergoing FM. Rates of preoperative reflux were similar between the two groups (47.5% vs. 51.8%; p = 0.55). During the GERD-HRQL survey, there were 114 patients (60.0%) contacted with a participation rate of 91.2% (104 patients). Patients with preoperative reflux who underwent PM were found to have a higher rate of reported postoperative reflux (90.0% vs. 62.5%; p = 0.03) and higher GERD-HRQL scores (16.40 ± 9.95 vs. 10.84 ± 9.01; p = 0.04). Patients without preoperative reflux did not have a significant difference in reported reflux (55.0% vs. 51.7%; p = 0.82) or GERD-HRQL scores (12.35 ± 14.14 vs. 9.93 ± 9.46; p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: Our study found that postoperative GERD was higher in patients with preexisting reflux who underwent partial esophageal mobilization during concurrent hiatal hernia repair with vertical sleeve gastrectomy. In patients without preoperative GERD, our data suggest that postoperative reflux symptoms are not dependent on the extent of esophageal mobilization during hiatal hernia repair with vertical sleeve gastrectomy.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Surgery remains the cornerstone treatment for gastric cancer. Previous studies have reported better lymphadenectomy with minimally invasive approaches. There is a paucity of data comparing robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy in the US. Herein, we examined whether oncological adequacy differs between laparoscopic and robotic approaches. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was utilized to identify patients who underwent gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2019. A propensity score-matching analysis between robotic gastrectomy (RG) versus laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) was performed. The primary outcomes were lymphadenectomy ≥ 16 nodes and surgical margins. RESULTS: A total of 11,173 patients underwent minimally invasive surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2019. Of those 8320 underwent LG and 2853 RG. Comparing the unmatched cohorts, RG was associated with a higher rate of adequate lymphadenectomy (63.5% vs 57.1%, p < .0.0001), higher rate of negative margins (93.8% vs 91.9%, p < 0.001), lower rate of prolonged length of stay (26.0% vs 29.6%, p < .0.001), lower 90-day mortality (3.7% vs 5.0%, p < 0.0001), and a better 5-year overall survival (OS) (56% vs 54%, p = 0.03). A propensity score-matching cohort with a 1:1 ratio was created utilizing the variables associated with lymphadenectomy ≥ 16 nodes. The matched analysis revealed that the rate of adequate lymphadenectomy was significantly higher for RG compared to LG, 63.5% vs 60.4% (p = 0.01), respectively. There was no longer a significant difference between RG and LG regarding the rate of negative margins, prolonged length of stay, 90-day mortality, rate of receipt of postoperative chemotherapy, and OS. CONCLUSIONS: This propensity score-matching analysis with a large US cohort shows that RG was associated with a higher rate of adequate lymphadenectomy compared to LR. RG and LG had a similar rate of negative margins, prolonged length of stay, receipt of postoperative chemotherapy, 90-day mortality, and OS, suggesting that RG is a comparable surgical approach, if not superior to LG.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Puntaje de Propensión , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Gastrectomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) may help decrease length of stay (LOS) and postoperative nausea/vomiting but implementation is often fraught with challenges. The primary aim of this pilot study was to standardize a MBS ERP with a real-time data support dashboard and checklist and assess impact on global and individual element compliance. The secondary aim was to evaluate 30 day outcomes including LOS, hospital readmissions, and re-operations. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: An ERP, paper checklist, and virtual dashboard aligned on MBS patient care elements for pre-, intra-, and post-operative phases of care were developed and sequentially deployed. The dashboard includes surgical volumes, operative times, ERP compliance, and 30 day outcomes over a rolling 18 month period. Overall and individual element ERP compliance and outcomes were compared pre- and post-implementation via two-tailed Student's t-tests. RESULTS: Overall, 471 patients were identified (pre-implementation: 193; post-implementation: 278). Baseline monthly average compliance rates for all patient care elements were 1.7%, 3.7%, and 6.2% for pre-, intra-, and post-operative phases, respectively. Following ERP integration with dashboard and checklist, the intra-operative phase achieved the highest overall monthly average compliance at 31.3% (P < 0.01). Following the intervention, pre-operative acetaminophen administration had the highest monthly mean compliance at ≥ 99.1%. Overall TAP block use increased 3.2-fold from a baseline mean rate of 25.4-80.8% post-implementation (P < 0.01). A significant decrease in average intra-operative monthly morphine milligram equivalents use was noted with a 56% drop pre- vs. post-implementation. Average LOS decreased from 2.0 to 1.7 days post-implementation with no impact on post-operative outcomes. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a checklist and dashboard facilitated ERP integration and adoption of process measures with many improvements in compliance but no impact on 30 day outcomes. Further research is required to understand how clinical support tools can impact ERP adoption among MBS patients.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Etiologies, levels, and associated factors of psychological distress in cancer patients facing surgery are poorly defined. We conducted a prospective comparative study of perioperative anxiety and depression in patients undergoing abdominal surgery for either malignant or benign disease. METHODS: With Institutional Review Board approval, patients consenting for surgery at our institution were enrolled. Surveys were completed at a preoperative visit and within 2 weeks of a postoperative appointment. Participants listed their top three sources of anxiety, and completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the General Anxiety Disorder-7. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients completed the preoperative assessment and 44 (58.7%) finished the postoperative survey. Forty-one were male (51.9%), 12 (15.2%) had a psychiatric comorbidity (PSYHx), and 47 (59.5%) had cancer. Perioperative anxiety and depression did not differ by malignancy status. Patients were most concerned about surgery (22.5%) preoperatively and finances (27.9%) postoperatively. PSYHx, frailty, insurance status, and opioid use were all associated with perioperative psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients did not have significantly higher levels of perioperative psychological distress compared with benign controls. Socioeconomic worries are prevalent throughout the perioperative period, and efforts to alleviate distress should focus on providing adequate counseling.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/etiología , Depresión/etiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Digestivo/psicología , Enfermedades del Sistema Digestivo/cirugía , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/psicología , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/cirugía , Abdomen/cirugía , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/patología , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/psicología , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/cirugía , Depresión/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Digestivo/patología , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the last decade, the robotic platform has been used in different surgical fields. However, the field of foregut and bariatric surgery is still evolving. Most surgeons still prefer laparoscopic techniques because it has proven clinical benefits, does not require complex setups, and does not have high costs compared with that of robotics. The aim of this article is to review the outcomes of foregut and bariatric surgery and its potential clinical advantages. METHODS: We performed a search on PUBMED for the most relevant articles published in the field of robotic bariatric and foregut surgery in the last 15 years. More than 40 articles were selected and included on this review. Several systematic reviews were also included. Very few randomized clinical trials are available. RESULTS: For the most part, robotic procedures were associated with better ergonomics for the surgeon, better visualization of the anatomy, easier fine dissection (i.e., lymphadenectomy) when required, and higher costs. In foregut surgery, the robotic system is associated with a significant lower rate of mucosal perforation in Heller myotomy compared to laparoscopy. In bariatric surgery, the clinical advantages have not been well documented yet; however, it seems robotics shortens the learning curve of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). CONCLUSION: Foregut and bariatric robotic surgery is a surgical field still in development. For the vast majority of the procedures in this area, the clinical outcomes of robotic surgery are the same of standard laparoscopy. However, the use of robots in selected cases may have specific advantages and may overcome the limitations of laparoscopic surgery. More research is needed, especially large and well-designed randomized clinical trials, to elucidate more accurate conclusions.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment for giant paraesophageal hernias (PEH) in morbidly obese patients (BMI > 35) continues to be a difficult problem. Prior studies have demonstrated recurrence rates of up to 40% with higher rates in morbidly obese patients. Reports have shown success combining repair with a bariatric procedure to decrease recurrence rates while achieving weight loss. We report mid-term results from a larger series with combining laparoscopic giant PEH repair with sleeve gastrectomy (SG). METHODS: We reviewed all combined cases of PEH repairs with SG done at a single institution from 2008 to 2013. The surgical technique was standardized and absorbable bio-prosthetic buttress crural closure reinforcement was used selectively. Yearly upper gastrointestinal radiographic (UGI) studies and postoperative Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaires were completed. 33 patients were enrolled; 18 patients (55%) completed the study RESULTS: No 30-day morbidity or mortality occurred. 16 patients were female; the average age was 55.3 ± 11.4 years (30-72) with follow-up from surgery of 19.9 ± 16.7 months (6-66). The average weight loss was 23.5 ± 12.7 kg (8-57); excess body weight loss was 46 ± 25.8% (18-112). Based on the UGIs, 9/18 (50%) had no evidence of hernia recurrence, while 6/18 (33%) demonstrated a small (<2 cm) recurrence. 3/18 (17%) patients had evidence of moderate recurrence (3-5 cm). Postoperative GERD-HRQL scores revealed an average score of 10 ± 7 (2-26). All patients reported being "satisfied" with their operation and weight loss and also had a significant improvement in foregut symptoms. No patient has required surgical revision and residual symptoms responded to conservative management. CONCLUSIONS: PEH in morbidly obese patients remain a complex surgical problem. Our case series shows that combination with SG may decrease recurrence rates but more importantly leads to lower rates of reoperation for symptomatic recurrence. Patients also garner the added medical benefits of weight loss.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Gastrectomía/métodos , Hernia Hiatal/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Periodo Posoperatorio , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Segunda Cirugía , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery results in long-term weight loss and significant morbidity reduction. Morbidity and mortality following bariatric surgery remain low and acceptable. This study looks to define the trend of morbidity and mortality as it relates to increasing age and body mass index (BMI) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. METHODS: We queried the ACS/NSQIP 2010-2011 Public Use File for patients who underwent elective laparoscopic adjustable banding (LAGB), sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and gastric bypass (LGBP). Total morbidity and 30-day mortality were evaluated. Logistic regression models were created to estimate the effect of increasing age and BMI on morbidity for these bariatric procedures. RESULTS: A total of 20,308 laparoscopic bariatric procedures were reviewed (11617 LGBP, 3069 LSG and 5622 LAGB). Overall mortality and morbidity rates were 0.11 and 3.84%, respectively. The odds of postoperative complications increased by 2% with each additional year of age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.02-1.03) and every point increase in BMI (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03). Multiple logistic regression identified COPD, Diabetes, Hypertension, and Dyspnea as major risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Postoperative complications were three times more likely after LGBP (OR 2.87, 95% CI 2.31-3.57) and two times more likely after LSG (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.57-2.72) when compared to patients undergoing LAGB. CONCLUSION: Morbidity and mortality increase on a predictable trend with increasing age and BMI. There is increased risk of morbidity for stapling procedures when compared to gastric banding, but this must be considered in context of surgical efficacy when choosing a bariatric procedure. These data can be used in preoperative counseling and evaluation of surgical candidacy of bariatric surgical patients.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Índice de Masa Corporal , Obesidad/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Since their adoption during the 1990s, minimally invasive surgical techniques have demonstrated postoperative surgical recovery benefits for patients. As robotic surgery platforms continue to be developed and utilized in surgical specialty areas, dexterity and visual field limitations of laparoscopy are coming under close clinical and ethical scrutiny. This article compares robotic and laparoscopic modalities, with special attention to dexterity, surgeon performance, ergonomics, and patient outcomes. This article also examines robotic platforms' advantages for surgeons' technical capacity and career longevity.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Especialidades Quirúrgicas , Cirujanos , Humanos , Robótica/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodosRESUMEN
Gastric adenocarcinoma is a complex disease that requires a thorough multidisciplinary approach for appropriate management. Management strategies vary in different regions of the world and have changed over time. In spite of improvements in chemotherapy and surgical techniques and an improvement in outcomes over the last several decades, overall survival remains low. The best outcomes are likely related to early detection, preoperative reduction of tumor burden with immunochemotherapy, consistent surgical technique for resection, and postoperative eradication of tumor cells. We aim to describe the management for gastric cancer, from the specifics of staging and imaging workup to the tenets of surgical resection and reconstruction as well as the adjuvant treatment strategies in this broad review of gastric cancer management.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , GastrectomíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of 30-day mortality after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). Multiple predictive tools exist for VTE risk assessment and extended VTE chemoprophylaxis determination. OBJECTIVE: To review existing risk-stratification tools and compare their predictive abilities. SETTING: MBSAQIP database. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database was performed (2015-2019) for primary minimally invasive MBS cases. VTE clinical factors and risk-assessment tools were evaluated: body mass index threshold of 50 kg/m2, Caprini risk-assessment model, and 3 bariatric-specific tools: the Cleveland Clinic VTE risk tool, the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative tool, and BariClot. MBS patients were deemed high risk based on criteria from each tool and further assessed for sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. RESULTS: Overall, 709,304 patients were identified with a .37% VTE rate. Bariatric-specific tools included multiple predictors: procedure, age, race, gender, operative time, length of stay, heart failure, and dyspnea at rest; operative time was the only variable common to all. The body mass index cutoff and Caprini risk-assessment model had higher sensitivity but lower specificity when compared with the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative and BariClot tools. While the sensitivity of the tools varied widely and was overall low, the Cleveland Clinic tool had the highest sensitivity. The bariatric-specific tools would have recommended extended prophylaxis for 1.1%-15.6% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Existing MBS VTE risk-assessment tools differ widely for inclusion variables, high-risk definition, and predictive performance. Further research and registry inclusion of all significant risk factors are needed to determine the optimal risk-stratified approach for predicting VTE events and determining the need for extended prophylaxis.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend harvesting 16 or more lymph nodes for the adequate staging of gastric adenocarcinoma. This study examines the rate of adequate lymphadenectomy over recent years, its predictors, and its impact on overall survival(OS). STUDY DESIGN: The National Cancer Database was utilized to identify patients who underwent surgical treatment for gastric adenocarcinoma between 2006-2019. Trend analysis was performed for lymphadenectomy rates during the study period. Logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier survival plots, and Cox proportional hazard regression were utilized. RESULTS: A total of 57,039 patients who underwent surgical treatment for gastric adenocarcinoma were identified. Only 50.5% of the patients underwent a lymphadenectomy of ≥ 16 nodes. Trend analysis showed that this rate significantly improved over the years, from 35.1% in 2006 to 63.3% in 2019 (p < .0001). The main independent predictors of adequate lymphadenectomy included high-volume facility with ≥ 31 gastrectomies/year (OR: 2.71; 95%CI:2.46-2.99), surgery between 2015-2019 (OR: 1.68; 95%CI: 1.60-1.75), and preoperative chemotherapy (OR:1.49; 95%CI:1.41-1.58). Patients with adequate lymphadenectomy had better OS than patients who did not: median survival: 59 versus 43 months (Log-Rank: p < .0001). Adequate lymphadenectomy was independently associated with improved OS (HR:0.79; 95%CI:0.77-0.81). Laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomies were independently associated with adequate lymphadenectomy compared to open, OR: 1.11, 95%CI:1.05-1.18 and OR: 1.24, 95%CI:1.13-1.35, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the rate of adequate lymphadenectomy improved over the study period, a large number of patients still lacked adequate lymph node dissection, negatively impacting their OS despite multimodality therapy. Laparoscopic and robotic surgeries were associated with a significantly higher rate of lymphadenectomy ≥ 16 nodes.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Pronóstico , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Gastrectomía , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Background: There are several reconstruction options described in the literature after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The most common laparoscopic jejunal pouch technique involves evisceration of the small bowel and extracorporeal pouch formation. Methods: We describe a completely intracorporeal technique for the Hunt-Lawrence J-pouch Roux-en-Y reconstruction. After gastrectomy and formation of the Roux limb, we create the esophagojejunal anastomosis using an end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler threaded 6-7 cm into the Roux limb to leave a tail of jejunum for the pouch. Next we form the jejunal pouch with a linear stapler and close the common enterotomy with suture or stapler. Conclusion: Our technique offers a streamlined and efficient approach to the Hunt-Lawrence reconstruction and can be effectively performed both laparoscopically and robotically.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas , Anastomosis en-Y de Roux , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Yeyuno/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The h-index is a widely utilized academic metric that measures both productivity and citation impact. The purpose of this study is to define the impact of self-citation among minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fellowship program directors. METHODS: Through the Fellowship Council's website, all program directors and associate program directors from the 148 MIS fellowship programs were identified. Using the Scopus database, we calculated the number of publications, citations, self-citations, and h-index for each surgeon. RESULTS: A total of 274 surgeons were identified. The mean number±SD of publications, citations, and h-index for the cohort were 60.5⯱â¯77.2, 1765⯱â¯4024, and 16.0⯱â¯15.0, respectively. The self-citation rate for the entire cohort was 3.23%. Excluding self-citations reduces the mean number of citations to 1708⯱â¯3887 and h-index to 15.8⯱â¯14.6. The h-index remained unchanged for 77% (210/274) of surgeons. Only 5% (15/274) of surgeons had a change in h-index of greater than one integer and no surgeon had a change greater than three integers. CONCLUSION: Self-citation is infrequent and has a minimal impact on the academic profile of program directors of MIS fellowships.
Asunto(s)
Docentes Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía General/educación , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/educación , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Edición/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos/educación , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Scrotal inguinal hernias represent a challenging surgical pathology. Although some advanced laparoscopists can repair these hernias through a minimally invasive approach, open repair is considered the technique of choice for most surgeons. The purpose of this study is to show our results of robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair of scrotal inguinal hernias. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 14 patients with inguinoscrotal hernias who underwent robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. Mean follow-up was 7 months. The European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernia Quality of Life score, a 90-point scale, was utilized to quantify patient reported outcomes. RESULTS: Robotic TAPP repair was successful in all 14 patients. Average case duration was 100 minutes (78 to 140 min) for unilateral hernias and 208 minutes (166 to 238 min) for bilateral hernias. Trainees were involved in 93% (13/14) of cases. There were no recurrences. Three patients developed postoperative seromas. The mean European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernia Quality of Life score was 3.7 (0 to 10). CONCLUSIONS: Scrotal hernias can be safely repaired using robotic-assisted TAPP methods with low morbidity and favorable patient reported outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Genitales Masculinos/cirugía , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Escroto/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols lead to expedited discharges and decreased cost. Bariatric centers have adopted such programs for safely discharging patients after sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on the first postoperative day (POD1). Despite pathways, some bariatric patients cannot be discharged on POD1. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing LSG, from 2013 through 2016, in a center of excellence, using a standardized enhanced recovery pathway. Patient variables and perioperative factors were analyzed, including multivariate regressions, for predictors of early discharge. RESULTS: There were 573 patients who underwent LSG (83% female, mean age of 46.3 ± 11.7 years, and BMI of 46.0 ± 6.6 kg/m2). Mean hospital stay was 1.7 days ± 1.0 SD. Early discharge occurred in 38.2% of patients. Independently, early operating room start times and treated obstructive sleep apnea were associated with earlier discharge (p < 0.05). In contrast, preoperative opioid use, history of psychiatric illness, chronic kidney disease, and revision cases delayed discharge (p < 0.05). Age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, diabetes, congestive heart failure, hypertension, distance to home, and insurance status were not significant. On regression modeling, early operating room start time and treated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) reduced length of stay (LOS) (p < 0.05), while creatinine >1.5 mg/dL, ejection fraction < 50%, and increased case duration increased LOS (p < 0.05). Fifteen patients were readmitted within 30 days (2.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Several clinical and operative factors affect early discharge after LSG. Knowing factors that enhance the success of ERAS as well as the causes and corrections for failed implementation allow teams to optimally direct care pathway resources.
Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Laparoscopía , Tiempo de Internación , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Vías Clínicas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Comprehensive description with illustrations of the 4 biliary reconstruction options for bile duct injury in patients with history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Vías Biliares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Biliar/métodos , Derivación Gástrica , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Constricción Patológica/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Yeyunostomía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Segunda Cirugía/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with prior Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) operations for weight loss present reconstruction challenges during a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). With over 60,000 RYGB performed annually, the increasing odds of encountering such patients during a PD make it imperative to understand the RYGB anatomy and anticipate reconstruction options. This article describes the possible reconstruction options and their rationale. METHODS: We reviewed our PD reconstruction options, compared them to what have been described in the literature, and derived a consensus from internal conferences comprising bariatric and hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons to describe known reconstruction options. RESULTS: In general, reconstruction options can include one of three options: (1) remnant gastrectomy, (2) preservation of gastric remnant, or (3) reversal of gastric bypass. CONCLUSION: This article describes individualized reconstruction options for RYGB patients undergoing PD. The reconstruction options can be tailored to the needs of the patient.
Asunto(s)
Anastomosis en-Y de Roux , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Muñón Gástrico/cirugía , Humanos , Periodo Posoperatorio , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) is a technically challenging operation. Our aim is to evaluate a standardized technique of LRH and determine variances in performance. METHODS: The procedure was deconstructed into 7 major step-wise components. All LRH followed the same surgical sequence, and used the same devices and operating room set-up. Thirty randomly selected video recordings of the procedure underwent intraoperative time analysis. The variances measured by standard deviation of each step were calculated (mean in minutes ± standard deviation). RESULTS: Mean total operative time was 114 ± 25 min. The steps with the least variance were inferior vena cava dissection (8 ± 3) and right hepatic vein ligation (9 ± 5). The longest and also the step with the greatest variance was parenchymal transection (35 ± 12). CONCLUSIONS: LRH can be performed consistently using a standardized step-wise technique. Parenchymal transection had most variation, and this could be explained by intrinsic liver factors. Surgical performance improvement should begin with deconstructing the operation into definable steps to identify areas for change.
Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía/normas , Laparoscopía/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Humanos , Tempo Operativo , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Restrictive bariatric procedures reduce gastric capacity as a primary mechanism of action. Intraoperatively, surgeons observe variability in size and compliance of specimens. We hypothesized that higher gastric specimen volume or tissue compliance would respond better to restrictive procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between September 2012 and September 2013 were enrolled. Specimens were insufflated at graduated pressure points creating pressure volume curves, and compliance was calculated. Postoperative weight loss and a hunger scores were recorded. Correlations were determined by Spearman correlation. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients consented to enrollment. Mean age, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were 45 ± 12 years, 126 ± 23 kg, and 45.4 ± 6 m/kg2, respectively. The resected specimens varied in insufflated capacity from 0.3 to 1.8 (0.71 ± 0.32) L and compliance varied from 14.3 to 85.7 (36.1 ± 14.7) cc/mm Hg. Male patients had a larger greater curvature length (GCL) (P < 0.001), staple line length (SLL) (P = 0.03), gastric volume (GV) (P = 0.002), and gastric compliance (GC) (P < 0.001). Neither GV nor GC correlated to excess body weight loss (EBWL%) as hypothesized. There was an inverse correlation between hunger score and GV (P = 0.010). The mean 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month EBWL was 17.4%, 33.2%, 43.7%, and 54.1%, respectively. Follow-up was 71.4% at 1 month, 39.3% at 3 months, 54.8% at 6 months, and 42.9% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Sleeve gastrectomy specimens exhibit nearly 6-fold variability in both volume and compliance. A large GC is anticipated in male and tall subjects. These observations do not appear to be correlated to %EBWL.
Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Cooperación del Paciente , Grapado Quirúrgico , Pérdida de Peso , Adulto , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Robótica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The modest results of nonoperative modalities for the treatment of gastroparesis necessitate greater consideration of surgical therapies. However, the role of surgery is not well defined. The aim of this study is to present our experience with laparoscopic pyloroplasty as early treatment for gastroparesis. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty patients with refractory gastroparesis underwent laparoscopic pyloroplasty (hand-sewn Heineke-Mikulicz configuration) from 2006 to 2013 at our institution. Preoperative and postoperative symptom data, gastric emptying scintigraphy, and technical outcomes of the procedure were reviewed. A single-factor ANOVA was performed for the comparison of continuous variables. Results are reported as mean ± SD or median absolute deviation. RESULTS: Thirty-four of 50 (68%) patients had previous foregut procedures and/or cholecystectomy. Thirty-two of 50 (64%) patients underwent concomitant procedures (ie, paraesophageal hernia repair and gastrostomy takedown) along with the pyloroplasty. Operative time, including combined procedures, blood loss, and length of stay were 175 ± 56 minutes, 64 ± 50 mL, 2.5 ± 2.7 days, respectively. There were no conversions to open technique or intraoperative complications. There were no suture-line leaks. The readmission rate was 14%. All patients had symptom follow-up and 33 (66%) had postoperative gastric emptying scintigraphy. Postoperative symptom improvement was reported by 82% of the patients (p < 0.001). Median preoperative T1/2 was 180 ± 73 minutes and postoperative T1/2 was 60 ± 23 minutes (p < 0.001). Five patients (10%), who had normalized postoperative T1/2 times, required other gastric emptying procedures; distal gastrectomy (n = 2), duodenojejunostomy (n = 2), and gastric stimulator placement (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic pyloroplasty is an effective early-treatment modality for selected cases of gastroparesis, with substantial improvement in objective gastric emptying times and low morbidity. The laparoscopic approach does not preclude subsequent procedures when necessary.