Serological responses to Anthrax Vaccine Precipitated (AVP) increase with time interval between booster doses.

We undertook a Phase 4 clinical trial to assess the effect of time interval between booster doses on serological responses to AVP. The primary objective was to evaluate responses to a single booster dose in two groups of healthy adults who had previously received a complete 4-dose primary course. Group A had received doses on schedule while Group B had not had one for ≥2 years. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the safety and tolerability of AVP booster doses, and to gain information on correlates of protection to aid future anthrax vaccine development. Blood samples were taken on Day 1 before dosing, and on Days 8, 15, 29 and 120, to measure Toxin Neutralisation Assay (TNA) NF50 values and concentrations of IgG antibodies against Protective Antigen (PA), Lethal Factor (LF) and Edema Factor (EF) by ELISA. For each serological parameter, fold changes from baseline following the trial AVP dose were greater in Group B than Group A at every time-point studied. Peak responses correlated positively with time since last AVP dose (highest values being observed after intervals of ≥10 years), and negatively with number of previous doses (highest values occurring in individuals who had received a primary course only). In 2017, having reviewed these results, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) updated UK anthrax vaccination guidelines, extending the interval between routine AVP boosters from one to 10 years. Booster doses of AVP induce significant IgG responses against the three anthrax toxin components, particularly PA and LF. Similarly high responses were observed in TNA, a recognised surrogate for anthrax vaccine efficacy. Analysis of the 596 TNA results showed that anti-PA and anti-LF IgG make substantial independent contributions to neutralisation of anthrax lethal toxin. AVP may therefore have advantages over anthrax vaccines that depend on generating immunity to PA alone.

Reversal of cardiac vagal effects of physostigmine by adjunctive muscarinic blockade.

Pre-treatment with reversible acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors is an effective strategy for reducing lethality following organophosphate nerve agent exposure. AChE inhibition may have unwanted cardiac side effects, which could be negated by adjunctive anti-cholinergic therapy. The aims of the present study were to examine the concentration-dependent effects of physostigmine on cardiac responses to vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), to test whether adjunctive treatment with hyoscine can reverse these effects and to assess the functional interaction and electrophysiological consequences of a combined pre-treatment. Studies were performed in an isolated innervated rabbit heart preparation. The reduction in heart rate with VNS was augmented by physostigmine (1-1000nmol/L), in a concentration-dependent manner - with an EC50 of 19nmol/L. Hyoscine was shown to be effective at blocking the cardiac responses to VNS with an IC50 of 11nmol/L. With concomitant perfusion of physostigmine, the concentration-response curve for hyoscine was shifted downward and to the right, increasing the concentration of hyoscine required to normalise (to control values) the effects of physostigmine on heart rate. At the lowest concentration of hyoscine examined (1nmol/L) a modest potentiation of heart rate response to VNS (+15±3%) was observed. We found no evidence of cardiac dysfunction or severe electrophysiological abnormalities with either physostigmine or hyoscine alone, or as a combined drug-therapy. The main finding of this study is that hyoscine, at concentrations greater than 10-8M, is effective at reversing the functional effects of physostigmine on the heart. However, low-concentrations of hyoscine may augment cardiac parasympathetic control.