Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Am Surg ; 88(11): 2619-2625, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35576492

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Age, race, and gender differences in coagulation status of healthy volunteers have been reported in previous case series; however, rigorous multivariate analysis adjusting for these factors is lacking. We aimed to investigate the effects of age, race, and gender on baseline coagulation status in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Thirty healthy volunteer controls with no history of bleeding or thrombotic events and no previous anticoagulant or antiplatelet use were recruited. Citrated and heparinized blood samples were drawn, and kaolin and platelet-mapping thromboelastography (TEG) assays performed. RESULTS: Thirty participants had a mean age of 37, mean body mass index of 29 kg/m2, and were 47% African-American and 70% female. Women were significantly older than men (40 ± 11 y vs 28 ± 7 y, P = .002); there were no significant differences in demographics by race. Multivariate analysis of variance for the effect of age, race, and gender across TEG parameters yielded evidence for gender differences in hypercoagulability (Pillai's trace P = .02), which appear to be driven by differences in K-time, alpha angle, maximal amplitude, and G parameter. Women were hypercoagulable compared to men, as manifested by shorter K-time, steeper alpha angle, higher maximal amplitude, and larger G parameter. DISCUSSION: Women at baseline have relatively hypercoagulable fibrin deposition kinetics, platelet contributions to clot formation, and overall clot strength compared to men, even when adjusted for age and race. Additional research is needed to specifically detail the key patient-level factors, clinical implications, and opportunities for tailored therapy related to gender-associated hypercoagulability.


Asunto(s)
Trombofilia , Trombosis , Adulto , Anticoagulantes , Femenino , Fibrina , Humanos , Caolín/farmacología , Masculino , Tromboelastografía , Trombofilia/diagnóstico
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 1(8): e186076, 2018 12 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30646314

RESUMEN

Importance: Sepsis induces profound metabolic derangements, while exogenous levocarnitine mitigates metabolic dysfunction by enhancing glucose and lactate oxidation and increasing fatty acid shuttling. Previous trials in sepsis suggest beneficial effects of levocarnitine on patient-centered outcomes. Objectives: To test the hypothesis that levocarnitine reduces cumulative organ failure in patients with septic shock at 48 hours and, if present, to estimate the probability that the most efficacious dose will decrease 28-day mortality in a pivotal phase 3 clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter adaptive, randomized, blinded, dose-finding, phase 2 clinical trial (Rapid Administration of Carnitine in Sepsis [RACE]). The setting was 16 urban US medical centers. Participants were patients aged 18 years or older admitted from March 5, 2013, to February 5, 2018, with septic shock and moderate organ dysfunction. Interventions: Within 24 hours of identification, patients were assigned to 1 of the following 4 treatments: low (6 g), medium (12 g), or high (18 g) doses of levocarnitine or an equivalent volume of saline placebo administered as a 12-hour infusion. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome required, first, a greater than 90% posterior probability that the most promising levocarnitine dose decreases the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 48 hours and, second (given having met the first condition), at least a 30% predictive probability of success in reducing 28-day mortality in a subsequent traditional superiority trial to test efficacy. Results: Of the 250 enrolled participants (mean [SD] age, 61.7 [14.8] years; 56.8% male), 35, 34, and 106 patients were adaptively randomized to the low, medium, and high levocarnitine doses, respectively, while 75 patients were randomized to placebo. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the fitted mean (SD) changes in the SOFA score for the low, medium, and high levocarnitine groups were -1.27 (0.49), -1.66 (0.38), and -1.97 (0.32), respectively, vs -1.63 (0.35) in the placebo group. The posterior probability that the 18-g dose is superior to placebo was 0.78, which did not meet the a priori threshold of 0.90. Mortality at 28 days was 45.9% (34 of 74) in the placebo group compared with 43.3% (45 of 104) for the most promising levocarnitine dose (18 g). Similar findings were noted in the per-protocol analysis. Conclusions and Relevance: In this dose-finding, phase 2 adaptive randomized trial, the most efficacious dose of levocarnitine (18 g) did not meaningfully reduce cumulative organ failure at 48 hours. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01665092.


Asunto(s)
Carnitina/uso terapéutico , Placebos/uso terapéutico , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Carnitina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Placebos/administración & dosificación , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Choque Séptico/fisiopatología
4.
J Am Osteopath Assoc ; 110(9 Suppl 8): S43-9, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20926743

RESUMEN

Alzheimer disease is a devastating neurodegenerative disorder affecting millions of Americans. It reduces the ability of the individual to remain independent, places a burden on caregivers, and substantially increases healthcare costs. New treatments are being tested in numerous clinical trials with the goal of preventing or delaying the onset of Alzheimer disease, slowing or modifying the disease's course, or finding a cure for patients with the disease. Alzheimer disease research can successfully proceed only if individuals who have this illness are willing to participate in clinical trials. However, recruitment and retention of subjects in clinical trials for Alzheimer disease is a challenging task. Furthermore, because of reductions in decision-making capacities of individuals with Alzheimer disease, clinical trials also need to involve caregivers. The present article delineates unique hurdles encountered in the recruitment process for Alzheimer disease clinical trials. The article also identifies strategies for effective recruitment of subjects in Alzheimer disease clinical trials, including guidelines to help principal investigators and clinical research coordinators reach recruitment goals.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Investigación Biomédica/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Selección de Paciente , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/patología , Comités de Ética en Investigación , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado , Pruebas Psicológicas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA