Age of asthma onset does not impact the response to omalizumab.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: These studies were conducted before clinical trial registration was required; therefore, clinical trial registration numbers are not available.

Overlap of allergic, eosinophilic and type 2 inflammatory subtypes in moderate-to-severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Current biologic therapies target allergic, eosinophilic or type 2 inflammation phenotypic asthma. However, frequency and degree of overlap among these subtypes is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To characterize overlap among allergic, eosinophilic and type 2 asthma phenotypes. METHODS: Post hoc analyses of baseline data were performed in two adult populations: (a) not selected for any asthma subtype (N = 935) and (b) selected for allergic asthma (N = 1049). Degree of overlap was examined using commonly accepted phenotypic definitions to guide treatment for allergic asthma (skin prick-positive and/or positive serum-specific immunoglobulin E > 0.35 kU/L) and eosinophilic asthma (blood eosinophil high count ≥ 300 cells/µL; low cut-off ≥ 150 cells/µL). Consistent with previous studies, fractional exhaled nitric oxide high level of ≥ 35 ppb and low cut-off of ≥ 25 ppb were selected as local markers of type 2 inflammation and to prevent overlap with the systemic eosinophilic asthma definition. RESULTS: In the non-subtype-selected population, 78.0% had allergic asthma; of these, 39.5% had eosinophilic asthma and 29.5% had type 2 asthma. Within patients with eosinophilic asthma (40.6% of total), 75.8% had allergic asthma and 41.3% had type 2 asthma. Within patients with type 2 asthma (28.3% of total), 81.1% had allergic asthma and 59.2% had eosinophilic asthma. In the allergic asthma-selected population, 38.3% had eosinophilic asthma and 29.2% had type 2 asthma. Within patients with eosinophilic asthma, 46.3% had type 2 asthma. Within patients with type 2 asthma, 60.8% had eosinophilic asthma. Overlaps among subtypes increased at low cut-off values. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In this post hoc analysis in adults with moderate-to-severe asthma, allergic asthma was the most prevalent phenotype, followed by eosinophilic and type 2 asthma. Despite observed overlaps, a considerable proportion of patients had only a predominantly allergic subtype. Understanding the degree of overlap across phenotypes will help patient management and guide treatment options.

Omalizumab response in patients with asthma by number and type of allergen.

BACKGROUND: The anti-immunoglobulin E therapy, omalizumab, improves asthma control and reduces exacerbations in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. However, it has been suggested that omalizumab should be reserved for highly allergic patients with multiple allergen sensitivities or perennial-only sensitivities. OBJECTIVE: To examine impact of allergy burden, including number and type of allergen sensitivities, on omalizumab response in a real-world setting. METHODS: This post hoc analysis evaluated a subset of omalizumab-treated patients from the Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate Predictors of Clinical Effectiveness in Response to Omalizumab (NCT01922037) who had completed 13 allergen assessments (N=478). Patients were classified by allergen burden (nonsensitized, 1, 2-4, or ≥5 allergen sensitivities) and type of allergen (nonsensitized, seasonal, perennial, or both). Outcome measures included exacerbation rate vs previous year and improvements in lung function and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). RESULTS: Comparable adjusted exacerbation rates were observed after omalizumab initiation, regardless of number or type of allergen sensitizations (0.56-0.85/y). Improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 second from baseline at months 6 (0.03-0.09 L) and 12 (-0.08 to 0.08 L) were also similar across subgroups. Least squares mean change in AQLQ from baseline at months 6 (1.0-1.2) and 12 (1.1-1.4) was comparable across patient subgroups, and similar percentages of patients achieved AQLQ minimal clinically important difference of at least a 0.5-point improvement at month 6 (71%-75%), which was maintained or improved to month 12 (71%-89%). In all analyses, 95% confidence intervals overlapped. CONCLUSION: Overall findings suggest that patients with allergic asthma achieved comparable improvements across distinct outcome measures after omalizumab therapy in a real-world setting, regardless of number and type of allergen sensitizations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01922037.

No difference in omalizumab efficacy in patients with asthma by number of asthma-related and allergic comorbidities.

BACKGROUND: Comorbidities are common in asthma and may complicate treatment response. OBJECTIVE: To examine response to omalizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma by asthma-related and allergic comorbidities. METHODS: Patients aged 12 years or more from placebo-controlled 008/009 (n = 1071), EXTRA (n = 848), and INNOVATE (n = 419), and single-armed PROSPERO (n = 801) omalizumab studies were included. Poisson regression/analysis of covariance models were used to estimate adjusted exacerbation rates and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) change from baseline after omalizumab initiation for subgroups by number of comorbidities (0, 1 [008/009]; 0, 1, ≥2 [EXTRA and INNOVATE]; 0, 1, 2, ≥3 [PROSPERO]). Self-reported comorbidities included allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, recurrent acute sinusitis, nasal polyps, atopic and contact dermatitis, urticaria, food allergy, anaphylaxis, other allergies, gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. RESULTS: In the EXTRA and INNOVATE studies, no consistent pattern was observed for placebo-corrected relative rate reduction in normalized asthma exacerbations among omalizumab-treated comorbidity subgroups. In PROSPERO, on-study exacerbation rates in the comorbidity subgroups were similar (0, 0.68; 1, 0.70; 2, 0.77; ≥3, 0.80). FEV1 improvements were observed throughout the study for omalizumab vs placebo for all comorbidity subgroups. There were no consistent differences in FEV1 improvements among comorbidity subgroups in 008/009, EXTRA, or INNOVATE. Similarly, no among-group differences were observed for FEV1 change from baseline at month 12 in PROSPERO (0, 0.05 L; 1, 0.08 L; 2, 0.00 L; ≥3, 0.04 L). The 95% confidence intervals overlapped substantially in all instances. CONCLUSION: In these analyses of placebo-controlled/single-armed studies, on-study exacerbation rates and FEV1 improvements with omalizumab treatment were similar irrespective of comorbidity burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers are as follows: EXTRA, NCT00314574 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00314574); INNOVATE, NCT00046748 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00046748); and PROSPERO, NCT01922037 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01922037).

Baseline asthma burden, comorbidities, and biomarkers in omalizumab-treated patients in PROSPERO.

BACKGROUND: Patients included in clinical trials do not necessarily reflect the real-world population. OBJECTIVE: To understand the characteristics, including disease and comorbidity burden, of patients with asthma receiving omalizumab in a real-world setting. METHODS: The Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate Predictors of Clinical Effectiveness in Response to Omalizumab (PROSPERO) was a US-based, multicenter, single-arm, and prospective study. Patients (≥12 years of age) with allergic asthma initiating omalizumab treatment based on physician-assessed need were included and followed for 12 months. Exacerbations, health care use, adverse events, and Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores were assessed monthly. Biomarkers (blood eosinophils, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and periostin) were evaluated and patient-reported outcomes (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 Years and Older [AQLQ+12] and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Asthma questionnaire [WPAI:Asthma]) were completed at baseline and months 6 and 12. The Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniRQLQ) was completed at baseline and 12 months. RESULTS: Most of the 806 enrollees (91.4%) were adults (mean age 47.3 years, SD 17.4), white (70.3%), and female (63.5%). Allergic comorbidity was frequently reported (84.2%), as were hypertension (35.5%) and depression (22.1%). In the 12 months before study entry, 22.1% of patients reported at least 1 asthma-related hospitalization, 60.7% reported at least 2 exacerbations, and 83.3% reported ACT scores no higher than 19 (uncontrolled asthma). Most patients had low biomarker levels based on prespecified cut-points. Baseline mean patient-reported outcome scores were 4.0 (SD 1.4) for AQLQ+12, 2.7 (SD 1.4) for MiniRQLQ, and 47.7 (SD 28.9) for WPAI:Asthma percentage of activity impairment and 33.5 (SD 28.7) for percentage of overall work impairment. CONCLUSION: The population initiating omalizumab in PROSPERO reported poorly controlled asthma and a substantial disease burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01922037.

Response to Omalizumab in Black and White Patients with Allergic Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Higher asthma burden is more likely to be experienced by Black than White patients. In clinical research, underrepresentation of minority populations is observed. OBJECTIVE: To estimate response to omalizumab in Black and White patients in North America with moderate to severe asthma. METHODS: Data from placebo-controlled (EXTRA) and single-armed (PROSPERO) omalizumab studies were used for this post hoc analysis. We used a Poisson regression model to examine exacerbation rates. An analysis of covariance model was used to estimate placebo-corrected change in FEV1 and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) by racial group. RESULTS: This analysis included 631 White and 176 Black patients from EXTRA and 567 White and 130 Black patients from PROSPERO. In EXTRA, placebo-corrected exacerbation rate reductions (relative rate change [95% confidence interval], 22.6% [2.0-38.9%] vs 22.0% [-18.0% to 48.4%]) and FEV1 improvements were similar for White and Black patients. There was a trend toward greater AQLQ improvements for Black versus White patients (least squares mean treatment differences: 0.0 vs 0.3, 0.6 vs 0.4, and 0.6 vs 0.2 at weeks 16, 32, and 48, respectively) throughout the study. In PROSPERO, on-study exacerbation rates (0.76 [0.65-0.88] vs 0.77 [0.56-1.10]) and AQLQ improvements (least squares mean change from baseline: 1.2 vs 1.2 and 1.3 vs 1.2 at month 6 and end of study, respectively) were similar for White versus Black patients. A trend toward greater FEV1 improvement was observed in White versus Black patients throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of EXTRA and PROSPERO suggests that Black and White patients with moderate to severe asthma experience similar improvements in exacerbations, FEV1, and AQLQ with omalizumab.