Comparison of a manometric tear duct irrigation test with dacryoscintigraphy in the investigation of epiphora.

PURPOSE: Assessment of lacrimal resistance in patients with patent lacrimal systems is important in determining whether dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery is appropriate. Current techniques, including lacrimal syringing and dacryoscintigraphy (DSG), can be unreliable. We compare the results of a manometric tear duct test (mTDT) irrigation technique with DSG in these patients. METHODS: All symptomatic patients in a specialist lacrimal clinic had full work-up apart from syringing. Lacrimal resistance was assessed using mTDT which applies a fixed head of fluid pressure via a cannula sealed to punctum. Conventional syringing was also performed in cases with abnormal mTDT. Symptomatic patients with delayed tear clearance, no external cause for watering and patent lacrimal systems had DSG. MTDT and DSG results were compared, including in asymptomatic fellow eyes. RESULTS: 105 tear ducts were examined, 85 symptomatic. Symptomatic eyes had a significantly higher mean mTDT resistance (p = .0003) and more had abnormal mTDT (52%) compared to asymptomatic eyes (10%). Although mean tear duct resistance was higher in those with nasolacrimal duct stenosis (NLDS) than freely patent (FP) on syringing (8.5 vs 10.8 dpm), this was not significant (p = .6). High proportions of both FP and NLDS groups had no flow at all on mTDT (60% and 53%, respectively). DSG showed no significant difference in the symptomatic versus asymptomatic eyes (p = .36), nor between those with a normal or abnormal mTDT (p = .25), nor between FP and NLDS groups (p = .25). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to DSG, the mTDT provides valuable, objective information on lacrimal resistance that can guide a decision to DCR surgery.

Dry eye after Lester Jones tube insertion for epiphora.

Purpose: To report the occurrence of dry eye after Lester Jones tube (LJT) insertion. Methods: Retrospective case series from a single unit. The dacrocystorhinostomy (DCR) was carried out using both endoscopic and external approachs; however, insertion of LJT used the same method as either a primary or secondary procedure. Dry eye as an outcome measure was only confirmed after three separate visits using the presence of both patient symptoms and dry eye signs with none preceding tube insertion. Results: Fifty-four patients underwent consecutive LJT insertion over a 5-year period. Mean age was 52.6 (range 25-73 years). The majority were female 39 (72%). Revision surgery was required in 15 (27%) with 3 or more occurring in 6 (11%). In total, 9 patients developed dry eyes (17%). Mean age was 60 (range 47-73) years, 5 females and 4 males. Four of the dry eye individuals had undergone primary LJT insertion and the remaining five received their first LJT 6-24 (mean 15) months post-DCR. Two dry eye patients had previously undergone LASIK and radiotherapy. Conclusion: A risk of dry eye following LJT placement is higher than the literature suggests. This should be considered and counseled, especially in those who have underlying pre-disposing factors. Ease of removal may be a desirable attribute in such cases.

Assessment of lacrimal resistance using a manometric tear duct irrigation system.

Lacrimal surgery aims to provide a low-resistance tear drainage passage. An assessment of lacrimal resistance guides decisions on surgery. We present results of a modified tear duct irrigation system that reliably measures lacrimal outflow resistance. Patients in a specialist lacrimal clinic had a full work-up to the point of tear duct syringing. The tear ducts were irrigated using a manometric system, which applied a fixed, known head of fluid pressure to a lacrimal cannula. Fluid flow is recorded and the lacrimal resistance derived as fluid pressure/fluid flow (units cmH20 secml-1, for simplicity presented as drops per minute, dpm). Patient groups were: A: Asymptomatic, A1: subgroup where the fellow symptomatic eye had a visible cause for watering, B: external visible cause for watering (ocular surface/lid/punctum), C: no externally visible cause, D: post op DCR, E: post syringing and probing, F: mixed/other. 444 tear ducts were examined. Mean flows (dpm) were: A1 (n = 19) 55; B (n = 183) 46; C (n = 142) 22: D (n = 38) 52. Excluding complete obstruction (n = 29), tear duct syringing only detected 48% of those with impaired manometric flow. Of those with a normal tear duct syringing, 53% had impaired manometric flow; 34% had a flow of 0 dpm. Differences in A1 versus C; B versus C and pre versus post dacryocystorhinostomy were all statistically significant (p < 0.05). The manometric system presented reliably measures lacrimal resistance and provides a substantial increase in sensitivity and specificity over conventional lacrimal syringing.

Twelve-Year Experience of Lester Jones Tubes­Results and Comparison of 3 Different Tube Types.

PURPOSE: Conjunctivodacryorhinostomy with insertion of a bypass Lester Jones tube is effective in treating epiphora due to canalicular failure. There is little information in the literature that directly compares different types of tubes. We report our results of Jones tube placements over a 12-year period with comparison of 3 tube types: plain, frosted, and a new tube with an additional flexible internal silicone flange (StopLoss Jones tube). METHODS: Case notes review of a single surgeon consecutive series of patients having Jones tube placement. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven tubes were inserted in 81 eyes of 65 patients. Information on 121 tubes was available for comparison (67 plain, 25 frosted, 29 StopLoos Jones Tube [SLJT]), with flange sizes 3.5 and 4.0 mm. There were 31 males, 34 females, mean age 59 years. After mean follow up of 20 months (range 0.5-108), there were no complications in 50% of tube insertions. Forty-three percentage of tubes needed replacing. The overall rate of complications was higher with a 3.5-mm flange tube than with a 4.0-mm flange (67% vs. 43%). There were no cases of extrusion in the SLJT group after follow up to a maximum of 25 months. The risk of extrusion for both frosted and plain tubes was significantly higher than for SLJT (p = 0.0040). There was no significant difference in the risk of extrusion between frosted and plain tubes. Overall, the risk of complications requiring tube replacement was not significantly different between frosted and plain tubes; however, the risk was significantly higher with both frosted and plain tubes compared with the SLJT (p = 0.036 and p = 0.042, respectively). Patient satisfaction was full in 86% and moderate in a further 5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although patient satisfaction with LJT surgery is high, complications occur frequently, although seem to be less common with the larger 4.0 mm flange. Frosted tubes do not protect against tube displacement. The addition of the internal silicone flange on the SLJT seems to prevent the previously common problem of extrusion.

Early Experience with the StopLoss Jones Tube.

PURPOSE: Extrusion is the most common reason for failure after Jones tube placement. The StopLoss Jones tube (SLJT) is a new innovation in Jones tubes that incorporates a flexible silicone internal flange to resist extrusion. We present our early experience of using this new tube and associated introducer system. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the case notes of a single surgeon consecutive series of patients having SLJT placement from November 2011 to November 2013. RESULTS: 29 SLJTs were placed in 25 eyes of 19 patients. Tube follow-up ranged from 1-25 months (mean 10 months) with a total of 291 tube-months. The indications for SLJT placement were: previous LJT complications (52%), failed canalicular-DCR surgery (31%), primary placement for inoperable canalicular occlusion (14%) and patent non-functioning DCR (3%). Tube length ranged from 10-16 mm. The tube introducer system was simple and effective and there were no intra-operative complications. The tube extrusion rate was 0%. Complications occurred in 5 tubes: 1 was too long, and 4 others (14%) developed conjunctival overgrowth/medial tube migration. Patient satisfaction with the tube was: 86% fully satisfied, 10% was moderately satisfied, 3% not satisfied. The overall final surgical success rate at last follow-up was 92%. CONCLUSIONS: In this short follow-up initial study the SLJT is simple to use and has a high rate of success and patient satisfaction. The addition of the internal silicone flange appears to prevent the previously common problem of extrusion.

Adult alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma of the lacrimal sac.

Lacrimal sac tumours are rare, but must be considered in the diagnosis of patients presenting with masses in the medial canthal region. We report a single case of lacrimal sac rhabdomyosarcoma in a 31-year-old man. The patient self-presented to the eye department with a 4-week history of discomfort, epiphora and a medial canthal mass. After no response to 1 week of oral antibiotics for a presumed diagnosis of dacryocystitis and the presence of firm mass extending above the medial canthal tendon, surgical exploration was carried out which revealed a lacrimal sac mass. Histologically this showed an alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, which was confirmed on immunohistochemistry. After 4 rounds of chemotherapy and 50.4Gy of radical radiotherapy, the patient is well with no signs of further local or distant disease at 11-months follow-up and 20 months following initial diagnosis. To our knowledge, there are no previously reported adult cases of lacrimal sac alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma in the peer-reviewed literature. We want to highlight the unique diagnosis in this case as well as drawing attention to the possibility of malignancy in patients responding poorly to management when an initial diagnosis of dacryocystitis is made in the presence of a medial canthal mass.

Warming drives dissolved organic carbon export from pristine alpine soils.

Despite decades of research, the influence of climate on the export of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from soil remains poorly constrained, adding uncertainty to global carbon models. The limited temporal range of contemporary monitoring data, ongoing climate reorganisation and confounding anthropogenic activities muddy the waters further. Here, we reconstruct DOC leaching over the last ~14,000 years using alpine environmental archives (two speleothems and one lake sediment core) across 4° of latitude from Te Waipounamu/South Island of Aotearoa New Zealand. We selected broadly comparable palaeoenvironmental archives in mountainous catchments, free of anthropogenically-induced landscape changes prior to ~1200 C.E. We show that warmer temperatures resulted in increased allochthonous DOC export through the Holocene, most notably during the Holocene Climatic Optimum (HCO), which was some 1.5-2.5 °C warmer than the late pre-industrial period-then decreased during the cooler mid-Holocene. We propose that temperature exerted the key control on the observed doubling to tripling of soil DOC export during the HCO, presumably via temperature-mediated changes in vegetative soil C inputs and microbial degradation rates. Future warming may accelerate DOC export from mountainous catchments, with implications for the global carbon cycle and water quality.

Orbital apex syndrome from blunt ocular trauma.

Orbital apex syndrome (OAS) is a rare condition due to a range of pathological processes around the optic nerve foramen and the superior orbital fissure causing characteristic functional loss. It is a rare complication of trauma and results from penetrating injuries as well as those involving bony fractures. We present a case of OAS from non-penetrating ocular trauma without bony involvement.

Comparison of dacryocystography and lacrimal scintigraphy in the investigation of epiphora in patients with patent but nonfunctioning lacrimal systems.

PURPOSE: To assess and compare dacryocystography and lacrimal scintigraphy in the management of patients with epiphora and patent but nonfunctioning lacrimal systems. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively over a 3-year period from all patients having both dacryocystography and lacrimal scintigraphy for epiphora where clinical examination indicated delayed tear clearance but the lacrimal system was patent. Both investigations were evaluated for presence, site, and severity of delayed clearance. Dacryocystograms were also evaluated for reflux and anatomical abnormalities. The findings were assessed in a masked fashion and compared with the clinical examination. RESULTS: More than 200 lacrimal systems in 107 patients were examined. An abnormality was present in one or both investigations in 92% of systems. There was greater agreement between clinical evaluation and scintigraphy than for dacryocystography. Abnormalities were detected with scintigraphy and dacryocystography in 78% and 56% of systems (25% delay, 11% anatomical abnormalities, and 20% both), respectively. Overall agreement was 52%. Disagreement occurred mainly with a normal dacryocystogram and abnormal scintigram. There was agreement for site of blockage in 59%; however, scintigraphy detected a block at a more proximal level in 38%. CONCLUSIONS: In the investigation of epiphora in patients with apparent outflow obstruction but patent lacrimal systems, both dacryocystography and scintigraphy are often abnormal. The authors' study shows that scintigraphy is the more sensitive test, correlating more closely with the clinical examination and often detecting more proximal and severe obstruction, and appears to be the investigation of choice in these patients.

External dacryocystorhinostomy for the treatment of epiphora in patients with patent but non-functioning lacrimal systems.

AIMS: To assess the outcome of external dacryocystorhinostomies (DCRs) in patients with patent but non-functional lacrimal drainage systems and to identify any preoperative clinical or dacryocystography (DCG) and lacrimal scintigraphy (LS) factors associated with successful surgery. METHODS: A retrospective study of 46 DCRs with silicone intubation performed for patients with epiphora associated with a clinically patent lacrimal drainage system. All patients underwent preoperative DCG and LS which were evaluated for presence, site and severity of delayed clearance. DCGs were also evaluated for reflux and anatomical abnormalities. Postoperative success was determined by subjective resolution of epiphora. Patients with persistent symptoms were offered Lester Jones Tube (LJT) insertion after establishment of a patent anastomosis to syringing and normal ostium on nasal endoscopy. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi2 and Fisher exact tests to determine whether there was any association between surgical outcome and preoperative resistance to lacrimal syringing, DCG and LS findings. RESULTS: 29 cases (63%) reported subjective surgical success after 11 months' average follow-up. There was a statistically significant association between increased resistance to syringing preoperatively and successful DCR (p=0.012). Of the 17 eyes that failed, all had patent anastomoses, and seven went on to have LJT insertion with complete resolution of symptoms. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with patent but non-functional lacrimal drainage systems will be helped by DCR surgery, with greater success rates in those with significant reflux on preoperative syringing. For patients with residual epiphora, functional success can reach 100% with subsequent LJT insertion.