Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 18(9): 977-83, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16894311

RESUMEN

AIM: Esophageal capsule endoscopy is a well tolerated procedure that does not require sedation and has proved its value for the study of the esophagus. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility, accuracy, safety and acceptability of esophageal capsule endoscopy for the study of gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophageal varices in patients who refused conventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive examinations performed in 28 patients (15 men/13 women; mean age: 58.5+/-12.4 years; range: 23-87 years) were reviewed. Twenty-five examinations were performed in 23 patients presenting with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and the remaining five were carried out in patients with cirrhosis for screening of esophageal varices. The procedures were done with the new PillCam ESO that harbors two viewing cupules and takes a total of 14 frames/s. Technical data (total recording time, esophageal transit time and Z-line visualization), clinical findings (Savary-Miller grade; presence and characteristics of esophageal varices or portal hypertension gastropathy), and patient's opinion (quality and comfort questionnaire) were analyzed. RESULTS: All the patients ingested and excreted the capsule without complications. Two examinations in the gastroesophageal reflux disease group were repeated; one was issued as a follow-up and the other because no images were recorded in the first capsule endoscopy. From the former, only the satisfaction questionnaire was analyzed. Mean total recording time and esophageal transit time were 1224 and 243.79 s, respectively (range: 2-1192 s). Complete study of the Z-line was possible in 23 examinations (23/29; 79.3%). Esophageal erosions were seen in 58.33% (14/24) of the examinations carried out in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Nine out of 14 patients (64.29%) presented with grade I esophagitis and the other five (35.71%) with grade II esophagitis. Among the five patients with cirrhosis, small varices were visualized in one (1/5; 20%), while large varices with red spots were evidenced in the remaining three (3/5; 60%). All four patients showing esophageal varices were found to have portal hypertension gastropathy. In most examinations, patients found the capsule easy to swallow (28/30; 93.33%), asymptomatic (29/30; 96.66%), evaluated the procedure as comfortable (29/30; 96.66%), and would repeat it if necessary (30/30; 100%). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal capsule endoscopy is an adequate alternative diagnostic method for the study of gastroesophageal reflux disease and for the screening of esophageal varices in patients refusing to undergo conventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Capsular/métodos , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/diagnóstico , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/complicaciones , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
World J Gastroenterol ; 20(23): 7424-33, 2014 Jun 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24966612

RESUMEN

Capsule endoscopy is nowadays the diagnostic technique of choice in the study of small bowel pathologies, allowing the non-invasive study of the entire mucosa. This has led, together with new technical advances, to the creation of two new models (PillCam ESO and PillCam Colon) for the study of esophageal and colonic diseases. These two new capsules offer an interesting alternative to conventional endoscopy in the study of the upper and lower digestive tracts, because traditional endoscopy is often unpleasant and uncomfortable for the patient, can be painful, often requires moderate or deep sedation and is not without complications (hemorrhage, perforation, etc.). PillCam Colon is particularly important for its usefulness in the diagnosis of colonic polyps, and is a potentially useful tool in cases of incomplete colonoscopy or in colorectal cancer screening, even more when most patients are reluctant to undergo screening programs due to the said disadvantages of conventional colonoscopy. This article discusses the advantages of capsule endoscopy over conventional endoscopy, its current application possibilities and indications in routine clinical practice. In the various sections of the work, we assess the application of endoscopic capsule in different sections of the digestive tract (esophagus, stomach, and colon) and finally the potential role of panendoscopy with PillCam Colon.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Capsular , Colonoscopía/métodos , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Gastroscopía/métodos , Pacientes/psicología , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento , Endoscopios en Cápsulas , Endoscopía Capsular/efectos adversos , Endoscopía Capsular/instrumentación , Colonoscopios , Colonoscopía/efectos adversos , Colonoscopía/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Esofagoscopios , Esofagoscopía/efectos adversos , Esofagoscopía/instrumentación , Gastroscopios , Gastroscopía/efectos adversos , Gastroscopía/instrumentación , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA