The Impact of Social Deprivation on Anterior Urethral Stricture Recurrence After Urethroplasty - A Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons (TURNS) Analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Several factors influence recurrence after urethral stricture repair. The impact of socioeconomic factors on stricture recurrence after urethroplasty is poorly understood. This study aims to assess the impact that social deprivation, an area-level measure of disadvantage, has on urethral stricture recurrence after urethroplasty. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing urethral reconstruction by surgeons participating in a collaborative research group. Home zip code was used to calculate Social Deprivation Indices (SDI; 0-100), which quantifies the level of disadvantage across several sociodemographic domains collected in the American Community Survey. Patients without zip code data were excluded from the analysis. The Cox Proportional Hazards model was used to study the association between SDI and the hazard of functional recurrence, adjusting for stricture characteristics as well as age and body mass index. RESULTS: Median age was 46.0 years with a median follow up of 367 days for the 1452 men included in the study. Patients in the fourth SDI quartile (worst social deprivation) were more likely to be active smokers with traumatic and infectious strictures compared to the first SDI quartile. Patients in the fourth SDI quartile had 1.64 times the unadjusted hazard of functional stricture recurrence vs patients in the first SDI quartile (95% CI 1.04-2.59). Compared to anastomotic ± excision, substitution only repair had 1.90 times the unadjusted hazard of recurrence. The adjusted hazard of recurrence was 1.08 per 10-point increase in SDI (95% CI 1.01-1.15, P = .027). CONCLUSIONS: Patient social deprivation identifies those at higher risk for functional recurrence after anterior urethral stricture repair, offering an opportunity for preoperative counseling and postoperative surveillance. Addressing these social determinants of health can potentially improve outcomes in reconstructive surgery.

Bladder Neck Contractures Stabilize After Placement of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter.

PURPOSE: For male cancer survivors, the combination of stress urinary incontinence and recurrent bladder neck contracture presents a management dilemma with poor consensus. Our objective was to assess the impact of artificial urinary sphincter placement on bladder neck contracture recurrence among prostate cancer survivors with stress urinary incontinence and bladder neck contracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men electing artificial urinary sphincter placement at our institution undergo synchronous bladder neck contracture treatment if indicated. An institutional database was queried for men with stress urinary incontinence and ≥1 intervention for bladder neck contracture. Records were divided according to whether an artificial urinary sphincter was ever placed. The impact of artificial urinary sphincter placement on bladder neck contracture recurrence was assessed using a multivariable conditional survival analysis, with survival defined as the recurrence-free interval following bladder neck contracture intervention. The proportional hazards assumption was assessed on the basis of Schoenfeld residuals. RESULTS: The analytic cohort consisted of 118 in the artificial urinary sphincter group and 88 in the non-artificial urinary sphincter group. Patients in both groups underwent a median of 2 (range 1-8) bladder neck contracture interventions over the entire course of their care, encompassing 445 total bladder neck contracture interventions. The artificial urinary sphincter group was on average 2.6 years younger (P = .02) and had a higher pack-year smoking history (P < .01). The presence of an artificial urinary sphincter was associated with a 61% lower bladder neck contracture re-intervention rate (HR 0.39, P < .01, CI 0.30-0.50) at any time when accounting for number of prior bladder neck contracture interventions and bladder neck contracture risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial urinary sphincter placement is associated with a lower rate of bladder neck contracture re-intervention. Artificial urinary sphincter placement should not be delayed or avoided due to the presence of bladder neck contracture.

Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Downsizing Improves Continence and Patient Satisfaction in Cases of Sub-cuff Atrophy.

PURPOSE: The management of artificial urinary sphincter sub-cuff atrophy remains controversial, and clinical outcomes are underreported. We intend to examine the impact of cuff downsizing in cases of isolated sub-cuff atrophy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our prospectively collected, institutionally approved quality improvement database for this study from 2011 to 2022. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for the analysis. Sub-cuff atrophy in patients with post-prostatectomy incontinence was diagnosed with a clinical presentation of recurrent urinary leakage, serial pelvic films, cystoscopy, and patient evaluation. Outcomes were assessed with pad use, subjective measures, and American Urological Association Symptom Score scores. RESULTS: During the study interval, 871 encounters for artificial urinary sphincter placement were identified, 229 for revision or replacement, of which cuff downsizing for isolated cases of sub-cuff atrophy occurred in 34. Downsizing took place after a median of 6.5 years after initial artificial urinary sphincter placement. Of the patients, 97% reported subjective improvement and 93% experienced a decrease in daily incontinence pad use, with a mean±SD decrease of 2.2±1.45 pads (P < .01). American Urological Association Symptom Score bother scores decreased from pre-downsizing values by a mean±SD of 1.5±1.4 (P = .01). After a median follow-up of 1.8 years after downsizing, 24 (70.6%) of downsized cuffs remained in place, 2 (5.9%) were further downsized, 2 (5.9%) required replacement for mechanical failure, 4 (11.8%) underwent removal for erosion, and 2 (5.9%) underwent replacement for a herniated pressure regulating balloon. CONCLUSIONS: When diagnosed using objective criteria, cuff downsizing improves continence and patient satisfaction in cases of sub-cuff atrophy.

Urethral Stricture Formation After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Erosion Is Uncommon in the Absence of Pelvic Radiation.

PURPOSE: Reported rates of urethral stricture development after artificial urinary sphincter erosion are highly variable. We hypothesized that the risk of stricture is commensurate with the degree of erosion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our prospectively maintained quality improvement database for all patients with artificial urinary sphincter erosion from 2011 to 2022. The incidence of postoperative stricture development was compared to the severity of erosion using a graded scale: 1, <25% circumference; 2, 25%-50% circumference; 3, >50% and <100% circumference; and 4, 100% circumference. From 862 artificial urinary sphincter surgeries, 102 erosion cases were identified, and 63 with documented erosion severity were included for analysis. Additional analysis was performed on 28 cases without documented erosion severity for validation. RESULTS: Within the main cohort, urethral stricture developed in 22 (34.9%) patients. The incidence of stricture did not vary by grade of erosion (P = .73) and was not significantly higher in men with grade 4 erosion vs lower-grade erosions (32.7% vs 50.0%, P = .34). Radiation exposure was associated with a 41.1% higher incidence of stricture (P < .01) and nearly every stricture occurred in the setting of prior radiation (21 of 22; 95.5%). In the validation group, 10 (35.7%) developed stricture, mostly in the setting of radiation (8 of 10; 80%). Overall, 29 of 32 (90.6%) cases of stricture involved a history of radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial urinary sphincter erosion does not lead to urethral stricture formation in most cases and is not associated with degree of erosion. Those who develop strictures nearly always have a history of pelvic radiation.

A Contemporary Analysis of Combat-related Urological Injuries: Data From the Department of Defense Trauma Registry.

PURPOSE: There has been little to no literature published on combat-related genitourinary injuries beyond 2013. With the goal of enhancing medical readiness prior to deployment and making recommendations to improve the long-term rehabilitation of service members as they become civilians, we sought to describe the incidence of combat-related genitourinary injuries and interventions from January 1, 2007, to March 17, 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Department of Defense Trauma Registry, which is a prospectively maintained database, for the time between 2007 and 2020. We used predefined search criteria to primarily identify any casualties that arrived at a military treatment facility with urological-based injuries. RESULTS: The registry contained 25,897 adult casualties, of which 7.2% sustained urological injuries. The median age was 25. Explosive injuries (64%) and firearms (27%) predominated. The median injury severity score was 18 (IQR 10-29). Most patients survived until hospital discharge (94%). The most frequently injured organs were the scrotum (60%), testes (53%), penis (30%), and kidneys (30%). Massive transfusion protocols were activated in 35% of all patients who sustained a urological injury and accounted for 28% of all protocols between 2007 and 2020. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of genitourinary trauma persistently increased for both military and civilian personnel as the U.S. remained actively engaged in major military conflicts during this period. Patients with genitourinary trauma in this data set were often associated with high injury severity scores and required an increased number of immediate and long-term resources for survival and rehabilitation.

Outcomes of an Algorithmic, Multidisciplinary Approach to Rectourethral Fistula Repair: A Pre- and Postintervention Quasi-Experimental Study.

BACKGROUND: Rectourethral fistulas are a rare yet severe complication of prostate surgery, pelvic irradiation therapy, or both. Multiple surgical repairs exist with widely varying success rates. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to present our institutional multidisciplinary algorithm for rectourethral fistula repair and its outcomes. DESIGN: This was a retrospective, pre- and postintervention, quasi-experimental design, comparing the frequency of fistula healing and reversal of urinary and fecal diversion before and after implementation of our algorithm. SETTING: All patients who presented to the Duke University with rectourethral fistula between 2002 and 2019 were included. PATIENTS: This study included 79 patients treated for rectourethral fistula: 36 prealgorithm and 43 postalgorithm. INTERVENTIONS: Our multidisciplinary algorithm was implemented in 2012. Patients with fistulas <2 cm and without history of radiation therapy underwent York-Mason repair, whereas those with fistulas 2-3 cm or with prior irradiation underwent transperineal repair with gracilis flap interposition. Those with nonrepairable fistulas (>3 cm or fixed tissues) underwent pelvic exenteration. Before repair, the algorithm recommended all patients to undergo urinary and bowel diversion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 2 primary outcomes were rectourethral fistula healing, defined as both radiographic and clinical resolutions, and reversal of urinary and fecal diversions. RESULTS: Frequency of fistula healing improved in the post- versus prealgorithm subgroups (93.1% vs 71.9%; p = 0.04). The relative risk of fistula healing pre- versus postintervention was 0.77 (0.61-0.98; p = 0.04) among the overall cohort. Eighteen patients (22.8%) underwent pelvic exenteration for nonrepairable fistulas and were not included in primary outcome measures. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the study's retrospective nature, possible selection bias because of algorithmic patient selection, and small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a multidisciplinary institutional algorithm improved rectourethral fistula repair success with high rates of ostomy reversal. Proper patient selection and multidisciplinary involvement are paramount to this success. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B955 . RESULTADOS DE UN ABORDAJE ALGORTMICO Y MULTIDISCIPLINARIO PARA LA REPARACIN DE FSTULAS RECTOURETRALES UN ESTUDIO CUASIEXPERIMENTAL PREVIO Y POSTERIOR A LA INTERVENCIN: ANTECEDENTES:Las fístulas rectouretrales son una complicación rara pero grave de la cirugía de próstata, la radiación pélvica o ambas. Existen múltiples reparaciones quirúrgicas con tasas de éxito muy variables.OBJETIVO:Presentar el algoritmo multidisciplinario de nuestra institución para la reparación de fístulas rectouretrales y sus resultados.DISEÑO:Este fue un diseño retrospectivo, previo y posterior a la intervención, cuasiexperimental, que comparó la frecuencia de curación de la fístula y la reversión de la derivación urinaria y fecal antes y después de la implementación de nuestro algoritmo.ESCENARIO:Se incluyeron todos los pacientes que acudieron a Duke con fístula rectouretral entre 2002 y 2019.PACIENTES:Setenta y nueve pacientes fueron tratados por fístula rectouretral; 36 pre-algoritmo y 43 post-algoritmo.INTERVENCIONES:Nuestro algoritmo multidisciplinario se implementó en 2012. Los pacientes con fístulas <2 cm y sin antecedentes de radiación se sometieron a reparación de York-Mason, mientras que aquellos con fístulas de 2-3 cm o radiación pélvica previa se sometieron a reparación transperineal con interposición de colgajo de gracilis. Aquellos con fístulas no reparables (> 3 cm o tejidos fijos) fueron sometidos a exenteración pélvica. Antes de la reparación, el algoritmo recomomendó que todos los pacientes se sometieran a una derivación urinaria y fecal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los dos resultados primarios fueron la curación de la fístula rectouretral, definida como la resolución radiográfica y clínica, y la reversión de las derivaciones urinaria y fecale.RESULTADOS:La frecuencia de curación de la fístula mejoró en el subgrupo post-algoritmo vs. pre-algoritmo (93.1% vs. 71.9%, p = 0.04). El riesgo relativo de curación de la fístula antes de la intervención en comparación con después de la intervención fue de 0.77 (0.61-0.98, p = 0.04) entre la cohorte general. Dieciocho pacientes (22.8%) se sometieron a exenteración pélvica por fístulas no reparables y, por lo tanto, no se incluyeron en las medidas de resultado primarias.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones de este estudio incluyen su naturaleza retrospectiva, posible sesgo de selección debido a la selección algorítmica de pacientes y un tamaño de muestra pequeño.CONCLUSIONES:La implementación de un algoritmo institucional multidisciplinario mejoró el éxito en la reparación de la fístula rectouretral con altas tasas de reversión de la ostomía. La selección adecuada de pacientes y la participación multidisciplinaria son fundamentales para este éxito. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B955 . (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco ).

Urethroscopic Findings following Urethroplasty Predict the Need for Secondary Intervention in the Long Term: A Multi-Institutional Study from Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons.

PURPOSE: Postoperative surveillance urethroscopy has been shown to be an effective tool to predict reoperation within 1 year after urethroplasty. We aimed to evaluate early surveillance urethroscopy findings and long-term outcomes among urethroplasty patients in order to define the value of surveillance urethroscopy to predict failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 304 patients with at least 4 years of followup after urethroplasty performed at 10 institutions across the United States and Canada. All patients were surveilled using a flexible 17Fr cystoscope and were categorized into 3 groups: 1) normal lumen, 2) large-caliber stricture (≥17Fr) defined as the ability of the cystoscope to easily pass the narrowing and 3) small-caliber stricture (<17Fr) that the cystoscope could not be passed. Failure was stricture recurrence requiring a secondary intervention. RESULTS: The median followup time was 64.4 months (range 55.3-80.6) and the time to initial surveillance urethroscopy was 3.7 months (range 3.1-4.8) following urethroplasty. Secondary interventions were performed in 29 of 194 (15%) with normal lumens, 11 of 60 (18.3%) with ≥17Fr strictures and 32 of 50 (64%) with <17Fr strictures (p <0.001). The 1-, 3- and 9-year cumulative probability of intervention was 0.01, 0.06 and 0.23 for normal, 0.05, 0.17 and 0.18 for ≥17Fr, and 0.32, 0.50 and 0.73 for <17Fr lumen groups, respectively. Patient-reported outcome measures performed poorly to differentiate the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early cystoscopic visualization of scar recurrence that narrows the lumen to <17Fr following urethroplasty is a significant long-term predictor for patients who will eventually undergo a secondary intervention.

Use of isotonic contrast solution in the artificial urinary sphincter does not impact device longevity.

AIMS: The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), the gold standard for treatment of male stress urinary incontinence, can be filled with normal saline (NS) or isotonic contrast solution. Surgeons have voiced concerns about the impact on device malfunction and longevity, but no studies address this issue. We used industry data to identify differences in outcomes between NS and contrast-filled AUS. METHODS: Our analysis included all men patients in the industry who maintained the AUS database (Boston Scientific) from 2001 to 2016. Patients were divided into two groups: AUS filled with NS or contrast. Patient demographics and device characteristics were compared. Device survival was defined as time to the need for reoperation. We compared device survival between AUS filled with NS versus contrast using a Kaplan-Meier curve adjusted for age, cuff size, and pressure regulating balloon (PRB) size. RESULTS: A total of 39,363 patients were included. 34,674 (88.1%) devices were filled with NS. The reoperation rate overall was 24.5%, with no difference between groups. The mean time to reoperation overall was 3 years (±3.0). After adjustment for age, cuff size, and PRB size, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a similar time to reoperation between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of contrast in the AUS does not appear to change rates of the device malfunction, fluid loss, or need for reoperation. Since filling the device with contrast does not appear inferior to saline in terms of longevity, we feel this should be considered a safe tool for the implanting surgeon.

The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: tips and tricks for success.

Urethral slings are a good treatment option for mild male stress urinary incontinence. There are many different sling options, but herein our group describes our techniques with the Advance® and Virtue® slings. More important than technique, we strongly think that patient selection is paramount to sling success. We only offer slings to patients who have low 24 hour pad weights, high Valsalva leak point pressure, and no history of pelvic radiation. Still, like with any surgery, we recommend that the surgeons implant the device that they are most comfortable with along with their chosen techniques.

Medical Management of Penile and Urethral Lichen Sclerosus with Topical Clobetasol Improves Long-Term Voiding Symptoms and Quality of Life.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the success of minimally invasive management of lichen sclerosus with topical and intraurethral clobetasol, as defined by improvement in patient reported outcome measures and nonprogression to surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a review of our prospective ongoing quality improvement study to determine outcomes of our current standard practice for males with penile and urethral biopsy proven lichen sclerosus. Data were collected between 2011 and 2019, and included patient demographic information, medical and surgical histories, and location and extent of lichen sclerosus related pathology. The primary outcomes for this study were voiding function and voiding related quality of life, and were assessed using the AUASS (American Urological Association Symptom Score) and quality of life bother index, respectively. RESULTS: We identified 42 patients with biopsy proven lichen sclerosus related urethral stricture disease. Of these patients 85.7% were treated with intraurethral steroids alone and did not require surgical intervention. Median AUASS significantly improved from 12 to 8, and median quality of life bother index improved from 4 ("mostly dissatisfied") to 2 ("mostly satisfied"). Average stricture length of those with penile urethral disease and bulbar urethral disease was 4.8 cm (SD 3.0) and 16.2 cm (SD 6.5), respectively. Median followup was 8.4 months (IQR 2.6-26.4). CONCLUSIONS: Lichen sclerosus related urethral stricture disease can be effectively managed with intraurethral steroids. This minimally invasive management strategy improves patient reported voiding symptoms and voiding quality of life.

Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline.

PURPOSE: Patients presenting with microhematuria represent a heterogeneous population with a broad spectrum of risk for genitourinary malignancy. Recognizing that patient-specific characteristics modify the risk of underlying malignant etiologies, this guideline sought to provide a personalized diagnostic testing strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The systematic review incorporated evidence published from January 2010 through February 2019, with an updated literature search to include studies published up to December 2019. Evidence-based statements were developed by the expert Panel, with statement type linked to evidence strength, level of certainty, and the Panel's judgment regarding the balance between benefits and risks/burdens. RESULTS: Microhematuria should be defined as ≥ 3 red blood cells per high power field on microscopic evaluation of a single specimen. In patients diagnosed with gynecologic or non-malignant genitourinary sources of microhematuria, clinicians should repeat urinalysis following resolution of the gynecologic or non-malignant genitourinary cause. The Panel created a risk classification system for patients with microhematuria, stratified as low-, intermediate-, or high-risk for genitourinary malignancy. Risk groups were based on factors including age, sex, smoking and other urothelial cancer risk factors, degree and persistence of microhematuria, as well as prior gross hematuria. Diagnostic evaluation with cystoscopy and upper tract imaging was recommended according to patient risk and involving shared decision-making. Statements also inform follow-up after a negative microhematuria evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with microhematuria should be classified based on their risk of genitourinary malignancy and evaluated with a risk-based strategy. Future high-quality studies are required to improve the care of these patients.

Intraurethral catheter placement does not change the external circumferential measurement of the urethra during AUS placement: A prospective observational trial.

AIMS: Measuring the urethral circumference accurately during artificial urethral sphincter (AUS) placement is an important technical aspect to optimize the selection of cuff size. Differing methods exist for this step with some experts recommending measurement with no urethral catheter in place. In this prospective observational trial, we compared urethral measurements with and without an indwelling catheter to determine if the presence of a catheter affects the circumferential measurement. METHODS: With IRB approval, we prospectively collected data on consecutive cases of transperineal male AUS implantation. Urethral circumference was measured with no urethral catheter (0 French [Fr]), 12Fr, and 16Fr Foley catheters in the urethra. The final measurements and cuff size chosen were recorded. A comparison was made between each measurement using Spearman's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were included, the majority of whom (92.6%) underwent AUS placement for postprostatectomy incontinence. The three urethral circumference measurements were highly correlated (0Fr vs 12Fr, ρ = 0.96, P < .001, mean difference 1 mm) (0Fr vs 16Fr, ρ = 0.94, P < .001, mean difference 2 mm) (12Fr vs 16Fr, ρ = 0.96, P < .001, mean difference 1 mm). Patients with a history of radiation had a lower mean urethral circumference than those who had never been radiated (4.78 cm vs 5.3 cm, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Urethral circumference measurement during AUS implantation is not influenced by the presence of a 12 or 16Fr Foley catheter when compared to no catheter in the urethra. Measurement of the urethral circumference can, therefore, be accurately performed with or without a catheter in place, depending on the surgeon's preference.

Timing of sacral neurostimulation is important for increasing bladder capacity in the anesthetized rat.

We assessed the effects of limited application of sacral neurostimulation (SNS) during bladder filling on bladder capacity using our previously published SNS model in rats. Female Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 24) were urethane anesthetized (1.2 g/kg sc) and implanted with jugular venous and transvesical bladder catheters. L6/S1 nerve trunks were isolated bilaterally, and two electrodes were placed on each exposed nerve. True bladder capacity (TBC) was determined using stable single-fill cystometrograms. In the first series of experiments, SNS was applied at the onset of bladder filling for 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of the previous control filling cycle duration (n = 10). In the second series of experiments, SNS was applied during the first, second, third, and fourth 25% and the first and second 50% of the control fill. In the first series, a significant increase in TBC was observed only when SNS was applied for 75% or 100% of the control fill duration (30% and 35%, respectively, P < 0.05). In the second series, significant increases in TBC only occurred during the fourth 25% period and second 50% period (32% and 43%, respectively, P < 0.001). Results from the second series also revealed an increase in subsequent single-fill bladder capacities (TBC) only when SNS was applied during the second 50% of the prior fill cycle. These data indicate that the application of SNS during the final 50% of the bladder fill cycle is necessary and sufficient for increasing bladder capacity.

Contemporary analysis of management of isolated pendulous urethral strictures using pedicled skin flap urethroplasty repair.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate contemporary outcomes of urethroplasty employing a pedicled skin flap for isolated pendulous urethral strictures. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Inclusion of males > 18 years of age with isolated pendulous urethral strictures treated between 1996 and 2012. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients with isolated pendulous urethral stricture were identified. Twenty-eight patients underwent repair with a pedicled skin flap during the study period. The median age of the patients treated with a pedicled skin flap was 47 years old (range 21-74). The etiology of the strictures was considered to be idiopathic in 10 patients (35.7%), iatrogenic in 9 patients (32.1%), as a complication of prior hypospadias repair in 6 patients (21.4%), infectious in 2 patients (7.1%), and traumatic in 1 patient (3.6%). The median follow-up was 27 months (range 1-214). Urethroplasty success was noted in 19/21 patients (90.5%). Urethral stricture recurrence occurred in 2 of the 21 patients (9.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The pedicled skin flap repair for pendulous urethral strictures remains a durable and safe technique in patients without LS.

A Critical Analysis of Bulbar Urethroplasty Stricture Recurrence: Characteristics and Management.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the management of recurrent bulbar urethral stricture disease after urethroplasty at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an institution review board approved, retrospective case study of our urethroplasty database to collect stricture related and postoperative information with an emphasis on bulbar urethral stricture disease recurrence after urethroplasty between 1996 and 2012. Repair types included primary anastomotic, augmented anastomotic and onlay repair. Recurrence, which was defined as the need for intervention, was diagnosed with cystoscopy or retrograde urethrogram. RESULTS: We identified 437 men who underwent urethroplasty of bulbar urethral stricture disease as performed by 2 surgeons from January 1996 to December 2012. Of the men 395 had available followup data. Recurrence was identified in 25 men (6.3%), of whom all presented with symptoms, including a weak stream in 23, urinary tract infection in 1 and pyelonephritis in 1. Median time to recurrence was 10 months. Recurrence was initially treated endoscopically in 23 of 25 cases (92%), dilatation in 12 and visual urethrotomy in 11. In 5 patients (22%) further recurrence developed after endoscopic treatment, which was managed by repeat urethroplasty in 2, self-calibration only in 2 and visual urethrotomy with subsequent self-calibration in 1. We identified 2 distinct phenotypes of recurrent stricture, including type A-short focal recurrence, which may be salvaged with an endoscopic procedure, and type B-the long graft length type, which is less likely to be salvaged with endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence after urethroplasty is most likely to develop within the first 12 months. Type A short focal recurrence may be managed by a salvage endoscopic procedure, including dilation or visual urethrotomy. These data on the phenotype of recurrence may be useful for patient treatment.

Urinary diversion in the genitourinary cancer survivor.

Urinary diversion has been in the scope of practice of Gynecologic Oncologists since the inception of the sub-specialty. However, many fewer urinary diversions are performed currently than in the past due to improved prevention of cervical cancer. The intent of this article is to provide a state of the art review for Gynecologic Oncologists. Surgeons performing these complex procedures must be knowledgeable about the differences between various types of continent and non-continent urinary diversions, and the principles of pre and post-operative care. This includes the indications for surgery and pre-operative considerations, types of urinary diversion including continent and non-continent diversions, and the need for long-term follow-up with patients who undergo urinary diversion requiring lifelong follow up and testing for surveillance of the upper urinary tracts and to monitor for nutritional and metabolic alterations.

AUA White Paper on Nonneurogenic Chronic Urinary Retention: Consensus Definition, Treatment Algorithm, and Outcome End Points.

PURPOSE: The AUA (American Urological Association) QIPS (Quality Improvement and Patient Safety) committee created a white paper on the diagnosis and management of nonneurogenic chronic urinary retention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Recommendations for the white paper were based on a review of the literature and consensus expert opinion from the workgroup. RESULTS: The workgroup defined nonneurogenic chronic urinary retention as an elevated post-void residual of greater than 300 mL that persisted for at least 6 months and documented on 2 or more separate occasions. It is proposed that chronic urinary retention should be categorized by risk (high vs low) and symptomatology (symptomatic versus asymptomatic). High risk chronic urinary retention was defined as hydronephrosis on imaging, stage 3 chronic kidney disease or recurrent culture proven urinary tract infection or urosepsis. Symptomatic chronic urinary retention was defined as subjectively moderate to severe urinary symptoms impacting quality of life and/or a recent history of catheterization. A treatment algorithm was developed predicated on stratifying patients with chronic urinary retention first by risk and then by symptoms. The proposed 4 primary outcomes that should be assessed to determine effectiveness of retention treatment are 1) symptom improvement, 2) risk reduction, 3) successful trial of voiding without catheterization, and 4) stability of symptoms and risk over time. CONCLUSIONS: Defining and categorizing nonneurogenic chronic urinary retention, creating a treatment algorithm and proposing treatment end points will hopefully spur comparative research that will ultimately lead to a better understanding of this challenging condition.

Male Urethral Stricture: American Urological Association Guideline.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this Guideline is to provide a clinical framework for the diagnosis and treatment of male urethral stricture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature using the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases (search dates 1/1/1990 to 12/1/2015) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed publications relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of urethral stricture. The review yielded an evidence base of 250 articles after application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. These publications were used to create the Guideline statements. Evidence-based statements of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendation were developed based on benefits and risks/burdens to patients. Additional guidance is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinion when insufficient evidence existed. RESULTS: The Panel identified the most common scenarios seen in clinical practice related to the treatment of urethral strictures. Guideline statements were developed to aid the clinician in optimal evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of patients presenting with urethral strictures. CONCLUSIONS: Successful treatment of male urethral stricture requires selection of the appropriate endoscopic or surgical procedure based on anatomic location, length of stricture, and prior interventions. Routine use of imaging to assess stricture characteristics will be required to apply evidence based recommendations, which must be applied with consideration of patient preferences and personal goals. As scientific knowledge relevant to urethral stricture evolves and improves, the strategies presented here will be amended to remain consistent with the highest standards of clinical care.

How Can We Effectively Address the Medical and Psychological Concerns of Survivors of Pelvic Malignancies?

Sexual and urinary morbidities resulting from treatment of pelvic malignancies are common. These treatment sequelae are significantly bothersome to patients and challenging to address. Awareness of these complications is critical in order to properly counsel patients regarding potential side effects and to facilitate prompt diagnosis and management. Addressing these issues often necessitates a coordinated multidisciplinary approach; however, the effort required often translates into improvement in patient quality of life. Herein we review the sexual and urinary side effects that may arise during or after treatment of pelvic malignancies.