RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate containing cytotoxic SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. SG received accelerated US Food and Drug Administration approval for locally advanced (LA) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and a checkpoint inhibitor, based on cohort 1 of the TROPHY-U-01 study. Mutations in the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) gene are associated with increased adverse events (AEs) with irinotecan-based therapies. Whether UGT1A1 status could impact SG toxicity and efficacy remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TROPHY-U-01 (NCT03547973) is a multicohort, open-label, phase II registrational study. Cohort 1 includes patients with LA or mUC who progressed after platinum- and checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies. SG was administered at 10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per central review; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Post hoc safety analyses were exploratory with descriptive statistics. Updated analyses include longer follow-up. RESULTS: Cohort 1 included 113 patients. At a median follow-up of 10.5 months, ORR was 28% (95% CI 20.2% to 37.6%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.4 months (95% CI 3.5-6.9 months) and 10.9 months (95% CI 8.9-13.8 months), respectively. Occurrence of grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs and treatment-related discontinuation were consistent with prior reports. UGT1A1 status was wildtype (∗1|∗1) in 40%, heterozygous (∗1|∗28) in 42%, homozygous (∗28|∗28) in 12%, and missing in 6% of patients. In patients with ∗1|∗1, ∗1|∗28, and ∗28|∗28 genotypes, any grade treatment-related AEs occurred in 93%, 94%, and 100% of patients, respectively, and were managed similarly regardless of UGT1A1 status. CONCLUSIONS: With longer follow-up, the ORR remains high in patients with heavily pretreated LA or mUC. Safety data were consistent with the known SG toxicity profile. AE incidence varied across UGT1A1 subgroups; however, discontinuation rates remained relatively low for all groups.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Inmunoconjugados , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Irinotecán , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/genética , Platino (Metal)/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/genética , Inmunoconjugados/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This exploratory analysis evaluated efficacy and safety data for enfortumab vedotin versus chemotherapy over a median follow-up of â¼2 years from EV-301. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma with prior platinum-containing chemotherapy and disease progression during/after programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 inhibitor treatment were randomized to enfortumab vedotin or chemotherapy (docetaxel, paclitaxel, vinflunine). Endpoints were overall survival (primary), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response, and safety. RESULTS: In total, 608 patients were included (enfortumab vedotin, n = 301; chemotherapy, n = 307). With a median follow-up of 23.75 months, 444 deaths had occurred (enfortumab vedotin, n = 207; chemotherapy, n = 237). Risk of death was reduced by 30% with enfortumab vedotin versus chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.85); one-sided, log-rank P = 0.00015]; PFS improved with enfortumab vedotin [HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.53-0.76); one-sided, log-rank P < 0.00001]. Treatment-related adverse event rates were 93.9% for enfortumab vedotin and 91.8% for chemotherapy; grade ≥ 3 event rates were 52.4% and 50.5%, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related decreased neutrophil count (14.1% versus 6.1%), decreased white blood cell count (7.2% versus 1.4%), and anemia (7.9% versus 2.7%) were more common with chemotherapy versus enfortumab vedotin; maculopapular rash (7.4% versus 0%), fatigue (6.8% versus 4.5%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (5.1% versus 2.1%) were more common with enfortumab vedotin. Of special interest adverse events, treatment-related skin reactions occurred in 47.3% of patients receiving enfortumab vedotin and 15.8% of patients receiving chemotherapy; peripheral neuropathy occurred in 48.0% versus 31.6%, respectively, and hyperglycemia in 6.8% versus 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: After a median follow-up of â¼2 years, enfortumab vedotin maintained clinically meaningful overall survival benefit versus chemotherapy, consistent with findings from the EV-301 primary analysis; PFS and overall response benefit remained consistent. Adverse events were manageable; no new safety signals were observed.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , DocetaxelRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a standard therapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). Long-term follow-up is necessary to confirm durability of response and identify further safety concerns. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In KEYNOTE-045, patients with metastatic UC that progressed on platinum-containing chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab or investigator's choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival. In KEYNOTE-052, cisplatin-ineligible patients with metastatic UC received first-line pembrolizumab. The primary endpoint was objective response rate per RECIST version 1.1 by BICR. RESULTS: A total of 542 patients (pembrolizumab, n = 270; chemotherapy, n = 272) were randomly assigned in KEYNOTE-045. The median follow-up was 62.9 months (range 58.6-70.9 months; data cut-off 1 October 2020). At 48 months, overall survival rates were 16.7% for pembrolizumab and 10.1% for chemotherapy; progression-free survival rates were 9.5% and 2.7%, respectively. The median duration of response (DOR) was 29.7 months (range 1.6+ to 60.5+ months) for pembrolizumab and 4.4 months (range 1.4+ to 63.1+ months) for chemotherapy; 36-month DOR rates were 44.4% and 28.3%, respectively. A total of 370 patients were enrolled in KEYNOTE-052. The median follow-up was 56.3 months (range 51.2-65.3 months; data cut-off 26 September 2020). The confirmed objective response rate was 28.9% (95% confidence interval 24.3-33.8), and the median DOR was 33.4 months (range 1.4+ to 60.7+ months); the 36-month DOR rate was 44.8%. Most treatment-related adverse events for pembrolizumab in either study were grade 1 or 2 and manageable, which is consistent with prior reports. CONCLUSION: With â¼5 years of follow-up, pembrolizumab monotherapy continued to demonstrate durable efficacy with no new safety signals in patients with platinum-resistant metastatic UC and as first-line therapy in cisplatin-ineligible patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY AND ID: With ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02256436 (KEYNOTE-045); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02256436 and NCT02335424 (KEYNOTE-052); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02335424.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We have shown previously in multivariable analysis that black men had 19% lower risk of death than white men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with a docetaxel and prednisone (DP)-based regimen. The primary goal of this analysis was to compare progression-free survival (PFS), biochemical PFS, ≥50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) from baseline and objective response rate (ORR) in white, black and Asian men with mCRPC treated with a DP-based regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual patient data from 8820 mCRPC men randomized on nine phase III trials to a DP-containing regimen were combined. Race used in the analysis was based on self-report. End points were PFS, biochemical PSA, ≥50% decline in PSA from baseline and ORR. The proportional hazards and the logistic regression models were employed to assess the prognostic importance of race in predicting outcomes adjusting for established prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of 8820 patients, 7528 (85%) were white, 500 (6%) were black, 424 were Asian (5%) and 368 (4%) had race unspecified. Median PFS were 8.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.2-8.5], 8.2 (95% CI 7.4-8.8) and 8.3 (95% CI 7.6-8.8) months in white, black and Asian men, respectively. Median PSA PFS were 9.9 (95% CI 9.7-10.4), 8.5 (95% CI 8.0-10.3) and 11.1 (95% CI 9.9-12.5) months in white, black and Asian men, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no differences in clinical outcomes by race and ethnic groups in men with mCRPC enrolled on these phase III clinical trials with DP.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Etnicidad , Humanos , Masculino , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Novel second-line treatments are needed for patients with advanced urothelial cancer (UC). Interim analysis of the phase III KEYNOTE-045 study showed a superior overall survival (OS) benefit of pembrolizumab, a programmed death 1 inhibitor, versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced UC that progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy. Here we report the long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of KEYNOTE-045. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed UC whose disease progressed after first-line, platinum-containing chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive pembrolizumab [200 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W)] or investigator's choice of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 Q3W), docetaxel (75 mg/m2 Q3W), or vinflunine (320 mg/m2 Q3W). Primary end points were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) by blinded independent central radiology review (BICR). A key secondary end point was objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 by BICR. RESULTS: A total of 542 patients were enrolled (pembrolizumab, n = 270; chemotherapy, n = 272). Median follow-up as of 26 October 2017 was 27.7 months. Median 1- and 2-year OS rates were higher with pembrolizumab (44.2% and 26.9%, respectively) than chemotherapy (29.8% and 14.3%, respectively). PFS rates did not differ between treatment arms; however, 1- and 2-year PFS rates were higher with pembrolizumab. The objective response rate was also higher with pembrolizumab (21.1% versus 11.0%). Median duration of response to pembrolizumab was not reached (range 1.6+ to 30.0+ months) versus chemotherapy (4.4 months; range 1.4+ to 29.9+ months). Pembrolizumab had lower rates of any grade (62.0% versus 90.6%) and grade ≥3 (16.5% versus 50.2%) treatment-related adverse events than chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results (>2 years' follow-up) were consistent with those of previously reported analyses, demonstrating continued clinical benefit of pembrolizumab over chemotherapy for efficacy and safety for treatment of locally advanced/metastatic, platinum-refractory UC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02256436.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Criterios de Evaluación de Respuesta en Tumores Sólidos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Vinblastina/administración & dosificación , Vinblastina/análogos & derivadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Five-year survival of patients with inoperable, advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with the first-line chemotherapy is 5%-15%. We assessed whether the Hsp27 inhibitor apatorsen combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) could improve overall survival (OS) in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase II trial randomized 183 untreated urothelial carcinoma patients (North America and Europe) to receive GC plus either placebo (N = 62), 600 mg apatorsen (N = 60), or 1000 mg apatorsen (N = 61). In the experimental arm, treatment included loading doses of apatorsen followed by up to six cycles of apatorsen plus GC. Patients receiving at least four cycles could continue apatorsen monotherapy as maintenance until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was OS. RESULTS: OS was not significantly improved in the single or combined 600- or 1000-mg apatorsen arms versus placebo [hazard ratio (HR), 0.86 and 0.90, respectively]. Exploratory study of specific statistical modeling showed a trend for improved survival in patients with baseline poor prognostic features treated with 600 mg apatorsen compared with placebo (HR = 0.72). Landmark analysis of serum Hsp27 (sHsp27) levels showed a trend toward survival benefit for poor-prognosis patients in 600- and 1000-mg apatorsen arms who achieved lower area under the curve sHsp27 levels, compared with the placebo arm (HR = 0.45 and 0.62, respectively). Higher baseline circulating tumor cells (≥5 cells/7.5 ml) was observed in patients with poor prognosis in correlation with poor survival. Treatment-emergent adverse events were manageable and more common in both apatorsen-treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Even though apatorsen combined with standard chemotherapy did not demonstrate a survival benefit in the overall study population, patients with poor prognostic features might benefit from this combination. Serum Hsp27 levels may act as a biomarker to predict treatment outcome. Further exploration of apatorsen in poor-risk patients is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Proteínas de Choque Térmico HSP27/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas de Choque Térmico HSP27/genética , Proteínas de Choque Térmico HSP27/metabolismo , Proteínas de Choque Térmico , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Chaperonas Moleculares , Oligonucleótidos Antisentido/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Urológicas/genética , Neoplasias Urológicas/metabolismo , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Conventional criteria for tumor progression may not fully reflect the clinical benefit of immunotherapy or appropriately guide treatment decisions. The phase II IMvigor210 study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab, a programmed death-ligand 1-directed antibody, in patients with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Patients could continue atezolizumab beyond Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 progression at the investigator's discretion: this analysis assessed post-progression outcomes in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with atezolizumab 1200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks until loss of clinical benefit. Efficacy and safety outcomes in patients who experienced RECIST v1.1 progression and did, or did not, continue atezolizumab were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: In total, 220 patients who experienced progression from the overall cohort (n = 310) were analyzed: 137 continued atezolizumab for ≥ 1 dose after progression, 19 received other systemic therapy, and 64 received no further systemic therapy. Compared with those who discontinued, patients continuing atezolizumab beyond progression were more likely to have had a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (43.1% versus 31.3%), less likely to have had baseline liver metastases (27.0% versus 41.0%), and more likely to have had an initial response to atezolizumab (responses in 11.7% versus 1.2%). Five patients (3.6%) continuing atezolizumab after progression had subsequent responses compared with baseline measurements. Median post-progression overall survival was 8.6 months in patients continuing atezolizumab, 6.8 months in those receiving another treatment, and 1.2 months in those receiving no further treatment. Atezolizumab exposure-adjusted adverse event frequencies were generally similar before and following progression. CONCLUSION: In this single-arm study, patients who continued atezolizumab beyond RECIST v1.1 progression derived prolonged clinical benefit without additional safety signals. Identification of patients most likely to benefit from atezolizumab beyond progression remains an important challenge in the management of metastatic urothelial carcinoma. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV ID: NCT02108652.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias Urológicas/patologíaRESUMEN
Background: Abiraterone and cabazitaxel improve survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We conducted an open-label phase I/II trial of cabazitaxel plus abiraterone to assess the antitumor activity and tolerability in patients with progressive mCRPC after docetaxel (phase I), and after docetaxel and abiraterone (phase II) (NCT01511536). Patients and methods: The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of cabazitaxel plus abiraterone (phase I), and the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response defined as a ≥ 50% decrease confirmed ≥3 weeks later with this combination (phase II). Results: Ten patients were enrolled in the phase I component; nine were evaluable. No DLTs were identified. The MTD was established as the approved doses for both drugs (cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and abiraterone 1000 mg once daily). Daily abiraterone treatment did not impact on cabazitaxel clearance. Twenty-seven patients received cabazitaxel plus abiraterone plus prednisone (5 mg twice daily) in phase II. The median number of cycles administered (cabazitaxel) was seven (range: 1-28). Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events included asthenia (in 5 patients; 14%), neutropenia (in 5 patients; 14%) and diarrhea (in 3 patients; 8%). Nine patients (24%) required dose reductions of cabazitaxel. Of 26 evaluable patients, 12 achieved a PSA response [46%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 26.6-66.6%]. Median PSA-progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI: 4.1-10.3 months). Of 14 patients with measurable disease at baseline, 3 (21%) achieved a partial response per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. Conclusions: The combination of cabazitaxel and abiraterone has a manageable safety profile and shows antitumor activity in patients previously treated with docetaxel and abiraterone.
Asunto(s)
Androstenos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Androstenos/efectos adversos , Androstenos/farmacocinética , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Docetaxel , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Taxoides/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment options remain limited for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We evaluated eribulin mesylate (E7389), a nontaxane halichondrin B analog microtubule inhibitor, in patients with metastatic CRPC with or without previous taxane exposure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with histologically proven CRPC, with or without prior taxane exposure, were enrolled in an open-label, single-arm phase II trial. Patients received eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m(2) as a 2- to 5-min i.v. bolus infusion on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary efficacy end point was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate. RESULTS: In total, 108 patients were assessable for safety (50 were taxane-pretreated) and 105 for efficacy in the per-protocol population. The median age of patients was 71 years and median number of cycles was 4. PSA decreases of ≥ 50% were achieved in 22.4% and 8.5% of taxane-naive and taxane-pretreated patients, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia, seen in 22.4% of chemo-naive and 40% of taxane-pretreated men. Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in none of the taxane-naive patients and 6.0% of taxane-pretreated patients. CONCLUSION: Eribulin mesylate demonstrated activity and a relatively favorable toxicity profile in metastatic CRPC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Furanos/uso terapéutico , Cetonas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma/patología , Carcinoma/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Furanos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Cetonas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Orquiectomía , Selección de Paciente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), assessing treatment response and bone lesions with technetium-99m is limited by image resolution and subjectivity. We evaluated bone scan lesion area (BSLA), a quantitative imaging assessment of response in patients with mCRPC receiving radium-223 alone or in combination with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (abiraterone/prednisone or enzalutamide). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized, non-comparative phase IIa three-arm trial (NCT02034552) evaluated technetium-99m-based BSLA response rate (RR), safety, radiologic progression-free survival (rPFS), and time to first symptomatic skeletal event (SSE) in men with mCRPC and bone metastases receiving radium-223 with/without abiraterone/prednisone or enzalutamide. The primary endpoint was week 24 BSLA RR. RESULTS: Overall, 63 patients received treatment (abiraterone/prednisone combination, n = 22; enzalutamide combination, n = 22; radium-223 monotherapy, n = 19). Median treatment duration (first to last dose of any study treatment) was 12 months (abiraterone/prednisone combination), 10 months (enzalutamide combination), and 3 months (radium-223 monotherapy). Week 24 BSLA RR was 58% [80% confidence interval (CI) 41% to 74%; one-sided P < 0.0001; 11/19 patients] with abiraterone/prednisone combination, 50% (32% to 68%; one-sided P < 0.0001; 8/16 patients) with enzalutamide combination, and 22% (10% to 40%; one-sided P = 0.0109; 4/18 patients) with radium-223 monotherapy. Median rPFS was not evaluable for combination arms and 4 months (80% CI 4 to 12) for monotherapy. SSEs were reported in 32% of patients; median time to first SSE was not estimable. Fatigue and back pain were the most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); more patients receiving combination therapy than monotherapy had TEAEs. Fractures were reported in 18% receiving abiraterone/prednisone, 32% receiving enzalutamide, and 11% receiving radium-223 monotherapy. Fracture rates were lower in patients taking bone health agents versus not taking bone health agents at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Technetium-99m imaging BSLA may offer objective, quantifiable assessment of isotope uptake changes, and potentially treatment response, in patients with mCRPC and bone metastases treated with radium-223 alone or in combination with abiraterone/prednisone or enzalutamide. In this largely treatment-naive population, BSLA RR was numerically lower with radium-223 monotherapy versus combination therapy, indicating a limited role as first-line treatment. Use of radium-223 should follow evidence-based treatment guidelines and the licensed indication.
Asunto(s)
Acetato de Abiraterona , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Benzamidas , Humanos , Masculino , Nitrilos , Feniltiohidantoína , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/radioterapia , Radio (Elemento) , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Based on previous studies that demonstrated the safety profile and preliminary clinical activity of prostate specific antigen (PSA) targeted therapeutic vaccines, as well as recent laboratory data supporting the value of the addition of co-stimulatory molecules B7-1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3 (designated TRICOM) to these vaccines, we conducted a Phase I study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a novel vaccinia and fowlpox vaccine incorporating the PSA gene sequence and TRICOM. METHODS: In this study, ten patients with androgen independent prostate cancer with or without metastatic disease were enrolled. Patients were treated with 2 x l0(8) pfu of a recombinant vaccinia virus vaccine (PROSTVAC-V) followed by 1 x 10(9) pfu of the booster recombinant fowlpox virus (PROSTVAC-F) both with gene sequences for PSA and TRICOM. The mean age of patients enrolled in the study was 70 (range 63 to 79). The mean PSA at baseline was 434 (range 9-1424). RESULTS: There were no deaths, and no Grade 3 or 4 adverse events. The most commonly reported adverse events, regardless of causality, were injection site reactions and fatigue. One serious adverse event (SAE) occurred that was unrelated to vaccine; this patient developed progressive disease with a new sphenoid metastasis. PSA was measured at week 4 and week 8. Four patients had stable disease (with less than 25% increase in PSA) through the week 8 study period. Anti-PSA antibodies were not induced with therapy: however, anti-vaccinia titers increased in all patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that vaccination with PROSTVAC-V and PROSTVAC-F combined with TRICOM is well-tolerated and generated an immune response to vaccinia. Therefore, PROSTVAC-VF/TRICOM represents a feasible therapeutic approach for further phase II and III study in patients with prostate cancer.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos CD/genética , Genes Supresores de Tumor/genética , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/genética , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/genética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas , Humanos , Proteína Kangai-1 , Masculino , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It has been reported that 50%-70% of patients with bladder cancer experience recurrence after initial successful treatment and about 10%-20% of these patients die of the disease. Despite precise pathologic staging and grading, we are unable to predict clinical outcome in all patients. The retinoblastoma-susceptibility (RB) gene, a prototype of tumor suppressor genes, has recently been associated with development and/or progression of bladder cancer, as well as sarcoma and small-cell lung cancer. In transitional cell carcinomas of the bladder, we have observed altered expression of the Rb gene product--a nuclear phosphoprotein thought to function as a cell cycle regulator. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that altered patterns of Rb expression correlate with prognosis in bladder cancer. METHODS: Expression of the RB gene was evaluated in specimens from 48 primary bladder tumors obtained by cystectomy or transurethral resection. Rb protein expression was correlated with disease outcome in these patients. Rb expression was examined by immunohistochemistry, using the mouse monoclonal antibody Rb-PMG3-245 on frozen tissue sections. Computerized image analysis was used to quantify the level of Rb protein in individual tumor cells. RESULTS: The overall 5-year disease-free survival was 66%, with a median follow-up of 42 months. Normal levels of Rb protein expression were found in 34 patients (Rb-positive group). A spectrum of altered patterns of expression from undetectable levels to heterogeneous expression, however, was observed in 14 patients (altered Rb group). Of the 38 patients with muscle-invasive tumors, 13 were categorized as having altered expression of Rb protein. Only one of 10 patients with superficial carcinomas had altered expression of Rb protein. The 5-year survival was significantly decreased in patients with altered Rb protein compared with the survival in patients with positive Rb expression (P less than .001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that tumors exhibiting decreased expression of the RB gene-coded product (Rb protein) had a more aggressive biological behavior than those that expressed the Rb protein in the majority of their tumor cells. IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrates that altered patterns of Rb protein expression may be an important prognostic variable in patients presenting with invasive bladder cancer.
Asunto(s)
Genes de Retinoblastoma/genética , Proteína de Retinoblastoma/genética , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Proteína de Retinoblastoma/análisis , Análisis de Supervivencia , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/química , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/mortalidadRESUMEN
Activated DNA-directed DNA synthesis catalyzed by Rauscher leukemia virus (RLV) and other type C mammalian retroviral DNA polymerases is uniquely stimulated by biologically active polyamines. Cationic trypanocides may act as antagonists of polyamine function. As described here, several cationic trypanocides stimulate RLV polymerase-catalyzed DNA-directed DNA synthesis at concentrations significantly inhibiting eukaryotic DNA polymerases. Such stimulation is negated by polyamines. Kinetic analysis of the stimulation of RLV DNA polymerase by three structurally dissimilar cationic trypanocides (Antrycide, Burroughs-Wellcome Compound 64A, and Bayer Compound 1694) suggests that such stimulation is, in part, due to a drug:DNA structural interaction resembling the polyamine:DNA structural complex recognized by the RLV DNA polymerase.
Asunto(s)
Replicación del ADN/efectos de los fármacos , ADN Polimerasa Dirigida por ADN/metabolismo , Poliaminas/farmacología , Virus Rauscher/genética , Tripanocidas/farmacología , Cationes , Cinética , Virus Rauscher/efectos de los fármacos , Virus Rauscher/enzimología , Relación Estructura-ActividadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium has promising activity and acceptable toxicity. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen in a cooperative group setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with advanced TCC were treated every 21 days with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2), administered as a 3-hour infusion, followed by carboplatin dosed to an area under the curve of 5. Prior systemic adjuvant or neoadjuvant platinum-based therapy was not permitted unless completed at least 1 year before enrollment. Patients were evaluated for response every three cycles, and follow-up was conducted to determine survival. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled and were assessable. Four (14%) had received prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. Node-only disease was present in 24%, and 76% of patients had extranodal disease. The median number of cycles received was five. Grade 4 toxicity consisted primarily of neutropenia (38% of patients). Neurologic toxicity was noted in 16 patients (grade 1 in four patients, grade 2 in five patients, grade 3 in six patients, and grade 4 in one patient). Six partial responses and no complete responses were noted, for a response proportion of 20.7% (95% confidence interval, 8% to 40%). Median progression-free survival time was 4 months, and overall survival time was 9 months. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of advanced TCC is reasonably well tolerated. However, a response proportion considerably lower than that previously reported was noted. In addition, the median survival time of 9 months was less than the survival time previously reported for patients treated with the combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. Although our results may reflect enrollment of patients with poor prognostic features, they also call into question the utility of this regimen.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Neoplasias Urológicas/mortalidadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering a combination of suramin and hydrocortisone in addition to androgen deprivation in a cooperative group setting; to assess the feasibility of treatment with multiple courses of suramin; and to assess progression-free and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer who underwent such treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer who had adequate hematologic, hepatic, renal, neurologic, and coagulation parameters were treated by combined androgen deprivation and suramin plus hydrocortisone. Suramin was administered on a 78-day fixed dosing schedule (one cycle), and suramin treatment cycles were repeated every 6 months for a total of four cycles. The statistical design was developed on the basis of the feasibility of administering suramin, as judged by the number of patients who developed neurotoxicity of grade 3 or higher or by treatment interruption of 4 weeks or longer due to any persistent suramin-related toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients enrolled onto the study between August 1994 and January 1997, 59 were eligible and assessable for toxicity on the first cycle. Thirty-two (54%) of 59 patients received a second cycle, 13 (22%) of 59 patients received a third cycle, and only five patients (8%) received a fourth cycle. During the first cycle, 27 patients were removed from the study: 17 because of toxicity, five because of disease progression, two who had died, and three because of other reasons. There was one therapy-related death. Grade 4 toxicities were noted in 11 and three patients during first and second courses, respectively. Neurotoxicity of grade 3 or higher was observed in nine and seven patients during the first and second cycles, respectively. Fifteen patients had treatment interruptions of 4 weeks or longer. Overall, only 54% (95% confidence interval, 41% to 67%) of the patients demonstrated acceptable limits of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Suramin plus hydrocortisone and androgen deprivation has limited applicability in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.
Asunto(s)
Andrógenos/metabolismo , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Suramina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Andrógenos/deficiencia , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Estudios de Factibilidad , Goserelina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/uso terapéutico , Leuprolida/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Orquiectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Suramina/administración & dosificación , Suramina/efectos adversos , Suramina/sangre , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of docetaxel when combined with oral estramustine and dexamethasone in a phase I study in patients with progressive metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four men were stratified into minimally pretreated (MPT) and extensively pretreated (EPT) groups. Estramustine 280 mg PO tid was administered 1 hour before or 2 hours after meals on days 1 through 5, with escalated doses of docetaxel from 40 to 80 mg/m2 on day 2. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were assessable for toxicity and 33 for response. In the MPT patients, dose-limiting myelosuppression was reached at 80 mg/m2, with six patients experiencing grade 3/4 granulocytopenia. In EPT patients, escalation above 70 mg/m2 was not attempted. Fourteen MPT (70%) and six EPT (50%) patients had a > or = 50% decline in serum PSA on two consecutive measurements taken at least 2 weeks apart. The overall 50% PSA response rate was 63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28% to 81%). Of the 18 patients with bidimensionally measurable disease, five (28%; 95% CI, 11% to 54%) achieved a partial response. At the time of entry onto the study, 15 patients required narcotic analgesics for bone pain; after treatment, eight (53%) discontinued their pain medications. The area under the curve for docetaxel increased linearly from 40 to 70 mg/m2. At 80 mg/m2, the measured area under the curve was 8.37 (standard deviation, 0.724), which was significantly higher than the previously reported values. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II dose of docetaxel combined with estramustine is 70 mg/m2 in MPT patients and 60 mg/m2 in EPT patients. This combination is active in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Taxoides , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Andrógenos/sangre , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Docetaxel , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Estramustina/administración & dosificación , Estramustina/farmacología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Hematológicas/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/análogos & derivados , Paclitaxel/farmacocinética , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a glycoprotein that is found almost exclusively in normal and neoplastic prostate cells. For patients with metastatic disease, changes in PSA will often antedate changes in bone scan. Furthermore, many but not all investigators have observed an association between a decline in PSA levels of 50% or greater and survival. Since the majority of phase II clinical trials for patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) have used PSA as a marker, we believed it was important for investigators to agree on definitions and values for a minimum set of parameters for eligibility and PSA declines and to develop a common approach to outcome analysis and reporting. We held a consensus conference with 26 leading investigators in the field of AIPC to define these parameters. RESULT: We defined four patient groups: (1) progressive measurable disease, (2) progressive bone metastasis, (3) stable metastases and a rising PSA, and (4) rising PSA and no other evidence of metastatic disease. The purpose of determining the number of patients whose PSA level drops in a phase II trial of AIPC is to guide the selection of agents for further testing and phase III trials. We propose that investigators report at a minimum a PSA decline of at least 50% and this must be confirmed by a second PSA value 4 or more weeks later. Patients may not demonstrate clinical or radiographic evidence of disease progression during this time period. Some investigators may want to report additional measures of PSA changes (ie, 75% decline, 90% decline). Response duration and the time to PSA progression may also be important clinical end point. CONCLUSION: Through this consensus conference, we believe we have developed practical guidelines for using PSA as a measurement of outcome. Furthermore, the use of common standards is important as we determine which agents should progress to randomized trials which will use survival as an end point.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto/normas , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Selección de Paciente , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Andrógenos/metabolismo , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Valores de Referencia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The mechanism of the antineoplastic effects of suramin may involve interference with signal transduction, but in general is not well understood. We examined several polyanions to determine their effects on the kinase activity of the protein kinase C (PKC) beta1 and other PKC isoforms. Similar to suramin, a phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotide 28-mer homopolymer of cytidine (SdC28) inhibited the phosphatidylserine and Ca2+-dependent phosphorylation of an epidermal growth factor receptor octapeptide substrate. The inhibition by suramin was mixed competitive/noncompetitive with respect to ATP, but uncompetitive with respect to substrate. In contrast, the inhibition by SdC28 was competitive with respect to substrate (Ki = 5.4 microM) and not competitive with respect to ATP. The PKC alpha and beta1 isoforms were inhibited to the same extent with SdC28, while PKC epsilon was not inhibited. SdC28, in the absence of lipid cofactor, stimulated substrate phosphorylation, and in the absence of substrate induced PKC beta1 autophosphorylation. Similar behavior was seen with another polyanion, the polysulfated carbohydrate pentosan polysulfate (polyxylyl hydrogen sulfate). H4, a bis-naphthalene disulfonate tetraanion structurally related to suramin, also inhibited kinase activity but was not competitive with respect to ATP. Dianions closely related to H4 failed to inhibit PKC beta1, suggesting that multiple (>2) negative charges are required. The interactions of polyanions with PKC are complex, and are dependent on the molecular structure of the polyanion, the presence of cofactors, and the PKC isoform.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Proteína Quinasa C/antagonistas & inhibidores , Suramina/análogos & derivados , Suramina/farmacología , Animales , Línea Celular , Isoenzimas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Cinética , Ratones , Oligodesoxirribonucleótidos/farmacología , Poliéster Pentosan Sulfúrico/farmacología , Fosforilación , Proteína Quinasa C beta , Proteína Quinasa C-alfa , Proteína Quinasa C-delta , Proteínas Recombinantes/metabolismo , Relación Estructura-Actividad , TionucleótidosRESUMEN
The autocrine/paracrine interaction of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) and transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-alpha) has been implicated in prostate cancer cell growth and proliferation. To evaluate the role of EGFr and TGF-alpha in prostate cancer progression, we studied the immunohistochemical staining pattern of EGFr and TGF-alpha in malignant primary and hormone-independent metastatic prostate lesions. The specimens evaluated included 37 primary carcinomas (34 hormone-naive and 3 hormone-refractory tumors) and 22 metastases. For each specimen, the pattern of expression was evaluated and staining reactivities graded from 0-3, with 0 representing no staining and 3 representing homogeneous and intense staining. Primary malignant prostate epithelial cells in areas with discrete gland formation showed strong EGFr immunostaining, while stromal cells were generally nonreactive. In untreated primary tumors, TGF-alpha expression was primarily in the stroma, while epithelial cells were weakly positive in several cases. Malignant epithelial cells adjacent to neural elements that stained positive for TGF-alpha was frequently observed. A homogeneous staining pattern for EGFr was noted in 17 (89%) of 19 evaluable androgen-independent-refractory metastases, while TGF-alpha expression was found in 14 (78%) of 18 evaluable cases. Overall, 14 of 18 androgen-independent metastases coexpressed the receptor and the ligand. These results suggest that, unlike primary prostate tumors where a paracrine relationship between EGFr and TGF-alpha appears to predominate, the potential for autocrine stimulation may exist in the majority of metastatic androgen-independent tumors. Furthermore, the changing pattern of expression as the disease evolves from the localized hormone-naive to metastatic androgen-independent condition suggests that strategies aimed at blocking this growth factor pathway may be of therapeutic importance for androgen-independent disease.