Rivastigmine in Parkinson's Disease Dementia with Orthostatic Hypotension.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate if the cognitive benefit of rivastigmine is affected by the presence of orthostatic hypotension (OH) in patients with Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD). METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis on 1,047 patients with PDD from 2 randomized controlled trials comparing rivastigmine versus placebo at week 24 (n = 501) and rivastigmine patch versus capsule at week 76 (n = 546). A drop ≥ 20 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure (SBP) or ≥ 10 in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) upon standing classified subjects as OH positive (OH+); otherwise, OH negative (OH-). The primary end point was the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) at week 24 and the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS) at week 76, using intention-to-treat with retrieved dropout at week 24 and observed cases at week 76, consistent with the original analyses. RESULTS: Overall safety was comparable between OH+ (n = 288, 27.5%) and OH- (n = 730, 69.7%), except for higher frequency of syncope (9.2%) in the OH+ placebo arm. The placebo-adjusted effect of rivastigmine on ADAS-Cog at week 24 was 5.6 ± 1.2 for OH+ and 1.9 ± 0.9 in OH- (p = 0.0165). Among subjects with OH, the MDRS change from baseline at week 76 was higher for rivastigmine capsules versus patch (10.6 ± 2.9 vs -1.5 ± 3.0, p = 0.031). The overall prevalence of OH was lower for rivastigmine than placebo at week 24 (28.3% vs 44.6%, p = 0.0476). INTERPRETATION: The cognitive benefit from rivastigmine is larger in patients with PDD with OH, possibly mediated by a direct antihypotensive effect. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:91-98.

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of AFQ056 for the treatment of chorea in Huntington's disease.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the hypothesis that AFQ056 (mavoglurant), a selective metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 antagonist, reduces chorea in Huntington's disease (HD). METHODS: This 32-day randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, proof-of-concept study investigated AFQ056 (25-150 mg [incremental doses], twice-daily) versus placebo in patients with HD. Primary efficacy assessments were the chorea-sum score and orientation index (nondominant hand) from the quantitative motor (Q-Motor) grasping task at day 28. Key secondary efficacy assessments included finger-tapping in the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale-Total Motor Score and Q-Motor measures. Safety and tolerability were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 42 patients were randomized. At day 28, no improvement was observed on the primary efficacy assessments (P > 0.10) with AFQ056 versus placebo. The Q-Motor speeded-tapping interonset interval variability was reduced with AFQ056 versus placebo for the nondominant hand (P = 0.01). The incidence of adverse events was 66.7% with AFQ056 and 57.1% with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: AFQ056 did not reduce choreatic movements in HD, but was well tolerated. The clinical relevance of the Q-Motor findings (speeded-tapping) are unknown and may warrant further investigation.

Randomized, multicenter trial to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a single dose of a novel AMPA receptor antagonist BGG492 for the treatment of acute migraine attacks.

BACKGROUND: Glutamate is implicated in migraine pathophysiology; amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonists represent a potential therapeutic approach because of their anti-excitatory actions. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, proof-of-concept study assessed the efficacy of the AMPA receptor antagonist, BGG492 (250 mg), vs placebo and sumatriptan (100 mg), in 75 subjects with acute migraine attacks. Efficacy was measured using the Patient Migraine Diary. Pharmacokinetic and safety data were collected. RESULTS: Improvement from severe/moderate to mild/no headache pain (primary response) was reported in 58%, 58%, and 54% of BGG492-treated subjects at 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose ( P = 0.2, 0.5, and 0.5 vs placebo), respectively, compared with 68%, 84%, and 92% sumatriptan-treated subjects, and 40%, 48%, and 44% in the placebo group. Percentages of subjects with ≥ 2-point improvement in pain score from baseline at 2 hours were 29%, 40%, and 16% for BGG492, sumatriptan, and placebo, respectively. Pain-free response at 2 hours was reported for 25%, 24%, and 16% of BGG492, sumatriptan, and placebo subjects, respectively. Adverse events were reported by 80%, 56%, and 60% of BGG492, sumatriptan, and placebo subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Proof-of-concept criterion was not met (≥ 25% BGG492 subjects with a primary response vs placebo at two timepoints). BGG492 was comparable to sumatriptan in terms of pain-free response.

Efficacy and safety of iscalimab, a novel anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, in moderate-to-severe myasthenia gravis: A phase 2 randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Increased morbidity in many patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) on long-term immunosuppression highlights the need for improved treatments. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of iscalimab (CFZ533), a fully human anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, in patients with moderate-to-severe MG receiving standard-of-care (SoC) therapies. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study, symptomatic patients (n = 44) despite SoC were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous iscalimab (10 mg/kg; n = 22) or placebo (n = 22) every 4 weeks for 6 doses in total. Patients were followed up for 6 months after the last dose. The total duration of the study was 52 weeks. RESULTS: In total, 34 of 44 patients (77.3 %) completed the study. The primary endpoint, Quantitative MG score, did not change significantly between baseline and week 25 for iscalimab (median [90 % CI], -4.07 [-5.67, -2.47]) versus placebo (-2.93 [-4.53, -1.33]); however, non-thymectomized patients (n = 29) showed more favorable results (iscalimab, -4.35 [-6.07, -2.64] vs placebo, -2.26 [-4.16, -0.36]). A statistically significant difference between iscalimab and placebo groups was observed in MG Composite score (adjusted mean change: -4.19 [-6.67, -1.72]; p = 0.007) at week 13, and MG-Activities of Daily Living score (-1.93 [-3.24, -0.62]; p = 0.018) at week 21. Adverse events were comparable between the iscalimab (91 %) and placebo (96 %) groups. CONCLUSION: Iscalimab showed favorable safety and improvements compared with placebo in non-thymectomized patients with moderate-to-severe MG. It did not show any protective effect in patients with moderate-to-severe MG.

Secukinumab, a human anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody, for moderate to severe Crohn's disease: unexpected results of a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The authors tested whether the anti-interleukin (IL)-17A monoclonal antibody secukinumab was safe and effective for the treatment of active Crohn's disease. DESIGN: In a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept study, 59 patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≥220 to ≤450) were assigned in a 2:1 ratio to 2×10 mg/kg intravenous secukinumab or placebo. The primary end point, addressed by bayesian statistics augmented with historical placebo information, was the probability that secukinumab reduces the CDAI by ≥50 points more than placebo at week 6. Ancillary analyses explored associations of 35 candidate genetic polymorphisms and faecal calprotectin response. RESULTS: 59 patients (39 secukinumab, 20 placebo, mean baseline CDAI 307 and 301, respectively) were recruited. 18/59 (31%) patients discontinued prematurely (12/39 (31%) secukinumab, 6/20 (30%) placebo), 10/59 (17%) due to insufficient therapeutic effect (8/39 (21%) secukinumab, 2/20 (10%) placebo). Fourteen serious adverse events occurred in 10 patients (seven secukinumab, three placebo); 20 infections, including four local fungal infections, were seen on secukinumab versus none on placebo. Primary end point analysis estimated <0.1% probability (CDAI (SD) =33.9 (19.7), 95% credible interval -4.9 to 72.9) that secukinumab reduces CDAI by ≥50 points more than placebo. Secondary area under the curve analysis (weeks 4-10) showed a significant difference (mean ΔCDAI=49; 95% CI (2 to 96), p=0.043) in favour of placebo. Post hoc subgroup analysis showed that unfavourable responses on secukinumab were driven by patients with elevated inflammatory markers (CRP≥10 mg/l and/or faecal calprotectin≥200 ng/ml; mean ΔCDAI=62; 95% CI (-1 to 125), p=0.054 in favour of placebo). Absence of the minor allele of tumour necrosis factor-like ligand 1A was strongly associated with lack of response measured by baseline-adjusted changes in calprotectin at week 6 (p=0.00035 Bonferroni-corrected). CONCLUSIONS: Blockade of IL-17A was ineffective and higher rates of adverse events were noted compared with placebo. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrial.gov with the number NCT01009281.

A Pooled Analysis of Three Randomized Phase I/IIa Clinical Trials Confirms Absence of a Clinically Relevant Effect on the QTc Interval by Umibecestat.

Umibecestat, an orally active ß-secretase inhibitor, reduces the production of amyloid beta-peptide that accumulates in the brain of patients with Alzheimer's disease. The echocardiogram effects of umibecestat, on QTcF (Fridericia-corrected QT), on PR and QRS and heart rate (HR), were estimated by concentration-effect modeling. Three phase I/II studies with durations up to 3 months, with 372 healthy subjects over a wide age range, including both sexes and 2 ethnicities, were pooled, providing a large data set with good statistical power. No clinically relevant effect on QTcF, PR interval, QRS duration, or HR were observed up to supratherapeutic doses. The upper bound of 90% confidence intervals of the ∆QTcF was below the 10 ms threshold of regulatory concern for all concentrations measured. Prespecified sensitivity analysis confirmed the results in both sexes, in those over and below 60 years, and in Japanese subjects. All conclusions were endorsed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Determination of Seminal Concentration of Fingolimod and Fingolimod-Phosphate in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Receiving Chronic Treatment With Fingolimod.

The safety profile of fingolimod 0.5 mg, approved therapy for relapsing multiple sclerosis, is well established in clinical and real-world studies. As fingolimod is teratogenic in rats, it was considered important to assess the concentrations of fingolimod and its active metabolite, fingolimod-phosphate, in the semen of male patients on treatment and the risk of harming a fetus in a pregnant partner. In this multicenter open-label study, 13 male patients receiving fingolimod for at least 6 months provided 1 semen and 1 blood sample for analyte concentration measurements. The steady-state seminal concentrations of fingolimod and fingolimod-phosphate were close to those simultaneously observed in blood. The amount of fingolimod-related material in 10 mL of ejaculate was estimated to be 47.5 ng. The estimated fingolimod and fingolimod-phosphate blood Cmax values in a woman having regular sexual intercourse with a male patient treated with fingolimod 0.5 mg were approximately 400 and 2400 times smaller than the estimated values in the embryo-fetal development study in rats at the no-observed-adverse-event level. Consequently, the risk of harming a fetus in a pregnant woman is considered extremely unlikely.

The BACE-1 inhibitor CNP520 for prevention trials in Alzheimer's disease.

The beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme-1 (BACE-1) initiates the generation of amyloid-ß (Aß), and the amyloid cascade leading to amyloid plaque deposition, neurodegeneration, and dementia in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Clinical failures of anti-Aß therapies in dementia stages suggest that treatment has to start in the early, asymptomatic disease states. The BACE-1 inhibitor CNP520 has a selectivity, pharmacodynamics, and distribution profile suitable for AD prevention studies. CNP520 reduced brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aß in rats and dogs, and Aß plaque deposition in APP-transgenic mice. Animal toxicology studies of CNP520 demonstrated sufficient safety margins, with no signs of hair depigmentation, retina degeneration, liver toxicity, or cardiovascular effects. In healthy adults ≥ 60 years old, treatment with CNP520 was safe and well tolerated and resulted in robust and dose-dependent Aß reduction in the cerebrospinal fluid. Thus, long-term, pivotal studies with CNP520 have been initiated in the Generation Program.

Cardiac Effects of Siponimod (BAF312) Re-initiation After Variable Periods of Drug Discontinuation in Healthy Subjects.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of siponimod treatment re-initiation on the initial negative chronotropic effects and cardiac rhythm after variable drug discontinuation periods. METHODS: This partially double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in healthy subjects. Siponimod doses (0.5-4.0 mg) and placebo were evaluated in combination with drug discontinuation periods ranging from 48 to 192 hours. Twelve-lead Holter ECGs were performed from 1.5 hours before until 24 hours after single-dose re-initiation. Atrioventricular blocks (AVBs) and sinus pauses (RR >2 seconds) were categorized according to dose level, discontinuation period, and resting and nonresting hours. FINDINGS: Of the enrolled 138 subjects, 117 were evaluated. Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable between the treatment groups. Subjects rechallenged at the combination of 4 mg/192 hours (highest investigated dose and longest discontinuation period [7 missed doses]) exhibited the highest decrease in pooled, placebo-adjusted heart rate (HR) of 14.53 beats/min. The magnitude of the negative chronotropic effect of siponimod re-initiation was dependent on both dose and duration of treatment discontinuation. Regardless of the dose, the placebo-adjusted HR reduction at re-initiation of drug treatment after up to 96 hours of drug discontinuation remained <10 beats/min. Except for 1 outlier for HR decrease under the 96-hour/placebo combination, no outliers were observed for any combination up to and including the 96-hour discontinuation periods. Most of the AVBs and sinus pauses were observed during nocturnal hours concurrent with increased vagal tone. All detected AVBs and sinus pauses were asymptomatic and not considered clinically relevant. IMPLICATIONS: Siponimod could be safely re-initiated without retitration after drug discontinuation periods up to 96 hours. Retitration is required if patients miss ≥ 4 consecutive doses.

Task-related fMRI responses to a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist in schizophrenia: A randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: AQW051, an α7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist, enhanced cognitive function in rodent models of learning and memory. This study evaluated brain activation during performance of a working memory task (WMT) and an episodic memory task (EMT), and the effect of AQW051 on task-related brain activation and performance in subjects with schizophrenia. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 2-period cross-over trial (NCT00825539) in participants with chronic, stable schizophrenia. Participants, stratified according to smoking status, were randomized (1:1:1:1:1:1) to 1 of 6 sequence groups that determined the study drug dose (AQW051 7.5mg, 50mg or 100mg) and order of administration versus placebo. The primary outcome was brain activation in a priori target regions of interest (ROIs) during performance of the WMT and EMT, measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging. The effect of AQW051 on task-related (EMT and WMT) brain activation and performance was also assessed, as were safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Overall, 60 of 68 enrolled participants completed the study (AQW051 then placebo: 7.5mg n=9; 50mg n=11; 100mg n=10. Placebo then AQW051: 7.5mg n=10; 50mg n=11; 100mg n=9). Significant task-related brain activation (5% significance level) was observed with placebo. During the WMT, a medium effect size was observed in the inferior prefrontal cortex with AQW051 100mg versus placebo (0.431; p=0.105). During the EMT encoding phase, a large effect size was observed in the anterior hippocampus (0.795; p=0.007) and a medium effect size in the posterior hippocampus (0.476; p=0.079) with AQW051 7.5mg. No other medium/large effect sizes were observed with any dose on either task. Effects on brain activation were generally not associated with changes in cognitive performance. AQW051 was well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, no consistent effects of AQW051 on brain regions involved in the performance of a WMT or EMT were observed; however, this study presents a model for evaluating potential response to pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.

Effects of Therapeutic and Supratherapeutic Doses of Siponimod (BAF312) on Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Subjects.

PURPOSE: The International Conference on Harmonisation E14 guideline mandates an intensive cardiac safety evaluation in a clinical thorough QT study, typically in healthy subjects, for all new non-antiarrhythmic drugs with systemic bioavailability. This thorough QT study investigated the effects of therapeutic (2 mg) and supratherapeutic (10 mg) doses of siponimod (BAF312) on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects. METHODS: The study was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- and moxifloxacin-controlled, multiple oral dose study. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned to 3 groups to receive siponimod (up-titration to 2 and 10 mg over 18 days), placebo (Days -1 to 18), or moxifloxacin 400 mg Days 10 and 18). Triplicate ECGs were extracted at prespecified time points from Holter ECGs recorded from 1 hour predose until 24 hours postdose at baseline and on-treatment assessment Days 10 and 18. The primary pharmacodynamic variable was the time-matched, placebo-corrected, baseline-adjusted mean QTcF (ΔΔQTcF) at steady-state conditions. In addition, the pharmacokinetic parameters of siponimod and its main circulating metabolite M3 and its metabolite M5 were evaluated. FINDINGS: Of the 304 enrolled subjects, 281 (92.4%) were included in the pharmacodynamic analysis and 270 (88.8%) completed the study. The upper bounds of the 2-sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for ΔΔQTcF at both siponimod doses were within the regulatory threshold of 10 milliseconds (ms) at all predefined on-treatment time points, with the absence of any dose-related effects. The highest observed upper limits of the 2-sided 90% CIs of 9.8 and 9.6 ms for therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses, respectively, were both observed at 3 hours postdose. No treatment-emergent QTc values >480 ms and no QTc increases of >60 ms from baseline were observed. Similar results were obtained with individualized heart rate correction of cardiac repolarization (QTcI). Assay validity was demonstrated by maximum ΔΔQTcF of >5 ms after 400 mg moxifloxacin on both on-treatment assessment days. The selected supratherapeutic dose produced approximately 5-fold higher exposures (Cmax and AUC) than the therapeutic dose, and was considered appropriate to investigate the effects of siponimod on QT/QTc at substantial multiples of the anticipated maximum therapeutic exposure. IMPLICATIONS: The findings provide evidence that siponimod is not associated with a significant arrhythmogenic potential related to QT prolongation.

AQW051, a novel, potent and selective α7 nicotinic ACh receptor partial agonist: pharmacological characterization and phase I evaluation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Activation of the α7 nicotinic ACh receptor (nACh receptor) is considered an attractive target for the treatment of cognitive impairment associated with neurological disorders. Here we describe the novel α7-nACh receptor agonist AQW051 as a promising drug candidate for this indication. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: AQW051 was functionally characterized in vitro and cognitive effects evaluated in rodent behavioural models. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability were evaluated in three phase I placebo-controlled studies in 180 healthy subjects. KEY RESULTS: In vitro, AQW051 bound with high affinity to α7-nACh receptors and stimulated calcium influx in cells recombinantly expressing the human α7-nACh receptor. In vivo, AQW051 demonstrated good oral bioavailability and rapid penetration into the rodent brain. AQW051 administered over a broad dose range facilitated learning/memory performance in the object recognition and social recognition test in mice and the water maze model in aged rats. Clinically, AQW051 was well tolerated in healthy young and elderly subjects, with an adverse event (AE) profile comparable with placebo. No serious AEs were reported and all AEs were either mild or moderate in severity at single oral doses up to 200 mg and multiple daily doses up to 75 mg. Once-daily oral administration of AQW051 resulted in continuous exposure and a two- to threefold accumulation compared with steady state was achieved by 1 week. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These data support further development of AQW051 as a cognitive-enhancing agent, as a therapeutic, for example, in Alzheimer's disease or schizophrenia.

A comparative study of milnacipran and paroxetine in outpatients with major depression.

BACKGROUND: Milnacipran is a dual-action antidepressant which inhibits both serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake with no affinity for any neurotransmitter receptor studied. METHODS: A 6-week double-blind multicentre study compared milnacipran (100 mg/day) with paroxetine (20 mg/day) in 300 outpatients with major depression. Efficacy was evaluated using HAMD17, MADRS and CGI for severity of illness and global improvement. Data were analysed on an intention to treat, last observation carried forward, basis. RESULTS: Milnacipran and paroxetine were both effective and well tolerated with no significant difference in their effects. After treatment discontinuation, milnacipran was associated with significantly less emergent symptoms. Responders, at endpoint, to milnacipran had significantly greater levels of psychomotor retardation at baseline than non-responders. LIMITATIONS: The study did not include a placebo group so that it is impossible to determine absolute levels of efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Both milnacipran and paroxetine were effective and well tolerated by outpatients with major depression treated for 6 weeks. After treatment discontinuation milnacipran was associated with less emergent symptoms. Psychomotor retardation at baseline may be a predictive factor of a favourable response to milnacipran.

Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared to enalapril in hypertensive children: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares efficacy and safety of valsartan with enalapril in hypertensive children aged 6-17 years. METHOD: This was a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled study. After a single-blind placebo run-in period (4-28 days), patients with mean sitting systolic blood pressure (BP) (MSSBP) at least 95th percentile for age, gender, and height were randomized to receive half the assigned dose for first week, and force-titrated to full dose for 11 weeks (≥18 to <35 kg - valsartan: 80 mg, enalapril: 10 mg; ≥35 to <80 kg - valsartan: 160 mg, enalapril: 20 mg; ≥80 to ≤160 kg - valsartan: 320 mg, enalapril: 40 mg). The primary efficacy variable was changed from baseline in MSSBP to show noninferiority of valsartan to enalapril. Other efficacy variables were changed from baseline in MSDBP, SBP control rate, and 24-h ambulatory BP parameters. RESULTS: Of 300 randomized patients, 281 (94%) completed the study. At week 12, MSSBP reductions were similar for valsartan and enalapril (primary endpoint of noninferiority, P < 0.0001). Least square mean BP reductions from baseline of -15.4/-9.4 mmHg were observed for valsartan compared with -14.1/-8.5 mmHg for enalapril. A similar proportion of patients achieved SBP control (valsartan: 67%; enalapril: 70%). In the subset of patients who underwent ambulatory BP assessments, valsartan provided greater reductions than enalapril in mean 24-h SBP (valsartan: -9.8 mmHg, enalapril: -7.2 mmHg: P = 0.03). The overall incidence of AEs was similar (valsartan 60%, enalapril 58%) with headache, cough, and nasopharyngitis reported most frequently. CONCLUSIONS: Valsartan and enalapril provided comparable BP reductions and effective BP control and were well tolerated in hypertensive children aged 6-17 years.