RESUMEN
The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness and safety of the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin in patients with mild ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The methodologies employed in this meta-analysis strictly followed the commonly used reporting formats for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The methodologies employed in this meta-analysis strictly followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Until March 25, 2024, we conducted thorough searches on PubMed, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database), and the Cochrane Library to locate studies investigating the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with mild or moderate stroke or TIA. Outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included stroke (including ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke), myocardial infarction, all bleeding events, and moderate to severe bleeding events. A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The total number of enrolled patients across these studies was 35,369, with 16,957 receiving DAPT and 18,412 receiving aspirin monotherapy. The risk of developing stroke was significantly lower in patients receiving the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin compared to the aspirin monotherapy group (relative risk (RR): 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72 to 0.83, p-value<0.0001). No significant differences were there in terms of all bleeding events (RR: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.92 to 2.04, p-value: 0.12) and moderate to severe bleeding events (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.63, p-value: 0.30). These findings highlight the importance of carefully weighing the potential benefits against the risks, especially in clinical decision-making for patients with TIA or ischemic stroke. Further research is warranted to elucidate optimal strategies for balancing stroke prevention with bleeding risk mitigation in this patient population.
RESUMEN
The objective of the study is mentioned, but it could be further clarified by explicitly stating the aim to compare the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) specifically in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We conducted a thorough electronic search of the literature, encompassing databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from their inception up to March 5, 2024. Furthermore, we meticulously examined the bibliographies of included studies to identify additional relevant literature. The reporting of this meta-analysis adhered to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines. The endpoints evaluated in this meta-analysis included all-cause mortality, stroke or systemic embolism, and major bleeding. Data analysis was carried out utilizing RevMan Version 5.4 (Cochrane, London, United Kingdom). Dichotomous outcomes, including all-cause mortality, stroke or systemic embolism, and major bleeding, were presented as risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 11 studies were incorporated in this meta-analysis, comprising a pooled sample size of 44,863 participants with AF. The pooled analysis revealed no significant disparity between DOACs and VKAs concerning stroke or systemic embolism (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.14) and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.00). However, there was a noteworthy reduction in the risk of major bleeding events associated with DOACs compared to VKAs (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.96). Consequently, DOACs may be considered a viable alternative to warfarin in patients with ESRD. However, we need further larger clinical trials to validate these findings.