Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 97(1): E34-E39, 2021 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32319173

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To inform about contemporary PCI practice of in-stent (IS) chronic total occlusions (CTO) from a large international registry in Latin America. BACKGROUND: IS-CTO represent a distinctive challenge for PCI, but literature is limited and restricted to high-resource regions of the world. METHODS: Patients undergoing CTO PCI enrolled in the LATAM CTO registry from 42 centers in eight countries were included. We analyzed demographics, angiographic, procedure technique, success and postprocedural outcomes between IS-CTO and non-IS-CTO PCI. RESULTS: From 1,565 patients IS-CTO was present in 181 patients (11.5%). IS-CTO patients had higher prevalence of diabetes and hypertension than patients without IS-CTO. IS-CTOs had less calcification (32.5 vs. 46.7%, p < .001), lower prevalence of a proximal branch (36.3 vs. 50.1%, p < .001), more likely to be ostial (24.4 vs. 18.1%, p = .042), were longer (28.5 vs. 25.2 mm, p = .062), and had less interventional collaterals (49.1 vs. 57.3%, p = .038) compared with non-IS-CTO. CTO complexity scores were similar between both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the initial or successful strategy between IS-CTO and non-IS-CTO PCI. Technical success rates remained high in IS-CTO (86.7%) and non-IS-CTO (83.1%, p = .230). There was no independent association between IS-CTO and technical success in multivariable analysis. There were no differences between IS-CTO and non-IS-CTO groups for in-hospital clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: In a contemporary, multicenter, and international registry from Latin America, IS-CTO PCI is frequent and has comparable technical success and safety profile compared to non-IS-CTO PCI.


Asunto(s)
Oclusión Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Angioplastia , Enfermedad Crónica , Angiografía Coronaria , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión Coronaria/terapia , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Am Heart J ; 181: 52-59, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27823693

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Contemporary studies assessing the frequency, characteristics, and outcomes of serious infections (SIs) in patients presenting a ST-elevation myocardial infarction are scarce. METHODS: Prospective cohort of consecutive patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Serious infection was defined as the presence of infection that prolonged hospitalization. Community-acquired infection (CAI) was defined by SI diagnosed in the first 72 hours of hospitalization, whereas hospital-acquired infections (HAI) were those diagnosed after 72 hours of hospital admission. RESULTS: From December 2009 to November 2012, 1,486 patients were included in the analysis. Serious infection was present in 58 (3.9%) individuals; 30 (2%) patients had CAI and 28 (1.9%) patients had HAI. Respiratory tract infection was responsible for 82% of the SI. Patients with SI were older, had more comorbidities, and had worse angiographic results of the pPCI procedure when compared with those without SIs. After multivariable adjustment, SI was associated with an approximately 10-fold risk of 30-day death. Patients with CAI had more often a history of smoking, Killip III/IV on hospital admission, worse pPCI, and angiographic results than did patients with HAI. However, no differences were seen in 30-day major cardiovascular outcomes between patients with CAI and HAI. CONCLUSION: In a contemporary cohort of unselected ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients representative of the daily practice, SI was uncommon but associated with worse pPCI results and high risk of mortality. The occurrences of CAI or HAI were similar, but CAI patients presented distinctly worse angiographic outcomes than did patients with HAI.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Mortalidad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Sepsis/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Brasil/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Angiografía Coronaria , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/epidemiología , Fumar/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Am J Cardiol ; 227: 1-10, 2024 Jul 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39029723

RESUMEN

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention is a complex procedure and is associated with considerable risk of complications. Several success and complication scores have been developed; however, data regarding their external validation in other populations such as Latin America are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the main predictors of success and complications in a broad cohort of procedures in the Latin American (LATAM) CTO registry. From April 2008 to December 2023, 3,706 consecutive procedures listed in the LATAM CTO registry were screened. Of these, 2,835 procedures had sufficient information to analyze the Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan (J-CTO); Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS); Ostial location, Rentrop grade, and Age (ORA); Clinical and Lesion-related Score (CL-score); and EuroCTO Score (CASTLE) success scores. The complication scores were PROGRESS (MACE, mortality, and pericardiocentesis) and Outcomes, Patient health status, and Efficiency iN Chronic Total Occlusion hybrid procedures (OPEN-CTO),OPEN-CLEAN. The J-CTO and CASTLE scores demonstrated the highest areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.718 and 0.703, respectively. The AUC value for the CL-score was 0.685, whereas the PROGRESS score had an AUC of 0.598 and the ORA AUC was 0.545. The level of agreement between scores was low; only 4% of the procedures were classified as difficult or very difficult by all scores and <1% were classified as easy by all 5 scores. Of the complication scores, PROGRESS mortality (AUC 0.651) and PROGRESS MACE (AUC 0.588) showed the best performance, identifying groups with >10% event rate. These results may improve the selection of revascularization techniques, especially for patient demographics that are historically underrepresented in CTO research.

4.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 14(12): 1308-1319, 2021 06 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34052151

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to examine the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) chronic total occlusions (CTOs). BACKGROUND: The outcomes of PCI for ISR CTOs have received limited study. METHODS: The authors examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes of 11,961 CTO PCIs performed in 11,728 patients at 107 centers in Europe, North America, Latin America, and Asia between 2012 and 2020, pooling patient-level data from 4 multicenter registries. In-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) included death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and tamponade. Long-term MACE were defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: ISR represented 15% of the CTOs (n = 1,755). Patients with ISR CTOs had higher prevalence of diabetes (44% vs. 38%; p < 0.0001) and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (27% vs. 24%; p = 0.03). Mean J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score was 2.32 ± 1.27 in the ISR group and 2.22 ± 1.27 in the de novo group (p = 0.01). Technical (85% vs. 85%; p = 0.75) and procedural (84% vs. 84%; p = 0.82) success was similar for ISR and de novo CTOs, as was the incidence of in-hospital MACE (1.7% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.25). Antegrade wiring was the most common successful strategy, in 70% of ISR and 60% of de novo CTOs, followed by retrograde crossing (16% vs. 23%) and antegrade dissection and re-entry (15% vs. 16%; p < 0.0001). At 12 months, patients with ISR CTOs had a higher incidence of MACE (hazard ratio: 1.31; 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 1.70; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: ISR CTOs represent 15% of all CTO PCIs and can be recanalized with similar success and in-hospital MACE as de novo CTOs.


Asunto(s)
Oclusión Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Enfermedad Crónica , Angiografía Coronaria , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión Coronaria/epidemiología , Oclusión Coronaria/cirugía , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA