Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 154
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Blood ; 137(7): 929-938, 2021 02 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32871586

RESUMEN

Consolidative radiation therapy (RT) for advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains controversial, with routine practice continuing to include RT in patients with initial bulky disease or residual masses. Positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography is a sensitive modality for detecting the presence of residual disease at the end of treatment (EOT). A PET-guided approach to selectively administering RT has been the policy in British Columbia since 2005. Patients with advanced-stage DLBCL diagnosed from 1 January 2005 to 1 March 2017 and treated with at least 6 cycles of R-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone plus rituximab), who underwent EOT PET, were included in this analysis. Those with complete metabolic response (PET-negative [PET-NEG]) were observed; those with PET-positive (PET-POS) scans were offered consolidative RT, when feasible. Of the patient records reviewed, 723 were identified, with median follow-up of 4.3 years: 517 (72%) were PET-NEG; 206 (28%) were PET-POS. Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) at 3 years were 83% vs 56% and 87% vs 64%, in patients with PET-NEG and PET-POS scans, respectively. PET-POS patients with nonprogressing disease treated with consolidative RT (109 and 206; 53%) had outcomes approaching those of PET-NEG patients, with 3-year estimates of 76% and 80% for TTP and OS. PET-NEG patients who had bulky disease (≥10 cm) at diagnosis had outcomes indistinguishable from those without bulk, despite the omission of RT. These data suggest that patients with advanced-stage DLBCL who are PET-NEG at EOT and receive no RT have excellent outcomes. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET can reliably guide selective administration of consolidative RT, even in patients with initially bulky disease.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/radioterapia , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Huesos/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos/patología , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Radioisótopos de Flúor , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Radiofármacos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral , Vincristina/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven
2.
Blood ; 136(24): 2803-2811, 2020 12 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32603413

RESUMEN

Cure rates for primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) have improved with the integration of rituximab. However, the type of primary therapy and role of radiotherapy (RT) remains ill-defined. Herein, we evaluated the outcome of PMBCL primarily treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and the impact of an end-of-treatment (EOT) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) scan to guide consolidative RT. Patients ≥18 years of age with PMBCL treated with curative intent rituximab-chemotherapy were identified. Prior to 2005, patients were recommended to receive R-CHOP + RT (RT era). Beginning in 2005, EOT PET was used to guide RT and only those with a PET-positive scan received RT (PET era). In total, 159 patients were identified, 94% were treated with R-CHOP and 44% received RT (78% in RT era, 28% in PET era). The 5-year time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort were 80% and 89%, respectively, similar across treatment eras. Overall, 10% had refractory disease. In total, 113 patients had an EOT PET scan: 63% negative and 37% positive with a 5-year TTP of 90% vs 71% and 5-year OS of 97% vs 88%, respectively. For those with Deauville (D)-scored PET scans (n = 103), the 5-year TTP for PET-negative cases by Deauville criteria (D1-D3, DX) was 91%, with inferior outcomes for D5 vs D4 (5-year TTP 33% vs 87%, P = .0002). Outcomes for PMBCL treated with RCHOP are favorable and use of a PET-adapted approach reduces RT in the majority of patients. A small proportion have refractory disease and may benefit from an alternate treatment.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Neoplasias del Mediastino , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/mortalidad , Masculino , Neoplasias del Mediastino/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Mediastino/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Mediastino/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Tasa de Supervivencia , Vincristina/administración & dosificación
3.
J Urol ; 204(3): 416-426, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32096678

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Androgen deprivation therapy is an established therapy for castration sensitive prostate cancer and recent studies have observed that patients whose testosterone levels are suppressed below 0.7 nmol/l have improved outcomes. Testosterone breakthrough, or a rise in testosterone above a target threshold after the first month of androgen deprivation therapy, is generally associated with treatment deficiency. The purpose of this review is to summarize breakthrough rate data and explore the relationship to clinical outcomes in patients with castration sensitive prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our systematic search identified 45 studies with a total of 52 cohorts representing 6,047 total patients reporting testosterone breakthrough rates or derivative measures above the thresholds of 1.7 nmol/l (51 cohorts, 6,015 patients) or 0.7 nmol/l (15 cohorts, 2,495 patients). RESULTS: Significantly higher weighted mean breakthrough rates were seen for the 0.7 nmol/l threshold compared to 1.7 nmol/l (41.3% vs 6.9%, p <0.0001). A significant association between breakthrough rates and worse clinical outcomes overall was not found, although when larger trials (sample size greater than 100) and higher event rates (greater than 50%) were considered for the lowest threshold, significant associations between breakthrough rates and clinical outcomes were observed. Clinical factors such as administration and monitoring frequency, type of testosterone assay and type of androgen deprivation therapy did not significantly affect breakthrough rates, although nonvalidated assays were associated with a large degree of variability. CONCLUSIONS: Results from our analysis indicate that testosterone breakthroughs likely result in worse clinical outcomes and should be avoided. Moreover, there is a need to standardize assessment of testosterone levels both clinically and in the research context to better inform treatment decisions and improve the reliability and comparability of results across studies.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Testosterona/metabolismo , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Castración , Humanos , Masculino
4.
J Urol ; 199(1): 120-125, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28827105

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Defining biochemical failure as nadir + 2 may overestimate cure after radiotherapy. We assessed long-term prostate specific antigen stability after low dose rate prostate brachytherapy and predictors of biochemical failure when prostate specific antigen was slowly rising below the nadir + 2 ng/ml threshold. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2,339 patients with low or intermediate risk prostate cancer received 125iodine brachytherapy from 1998 to 2010 with a minimum 3-year followup. In addition, 49.7% of the patients received 6 months of androgen deprivation. Clinical, dosimetric and prostate specific antigen data were retrieved from a prospective database. Biochemical results were classified as stable or rising prostate specific antigen (0.2 ng/ml or greater and increased 0.1 ng/ml or greater during the preceding 2 years), or biochemical failure (defined as nadir + 2). Multivariate analysis was done to identify predictors of failure used to create logistic regression models. RESULTS: At a median followup of 89 months (range 37 to 199) prostate specific antigen was stable (nadir 0.03 ng/ml and at 60 months 0.04 ng/ml) in 2,004 patients (86%) and rising (nadir 0.16 ng/ml and at 60 months 0.29 ng/ml) in 145 (6%) while biochemical failure (nadir 0.51 ng/ml, p <0.001) was noted in 190 (8%). When there was no prior androgen deprivation therapy, the prostate specific antigen nadir and prostate specific antigen at 60 months were the strongest predictors of failure (OR 20.6 and 18.3, respectively, each p <0.0001). The logistic regression model had 85% sensitivity and 98% specificity, and predicted failure in 8 of 82 men (9.8%). A second model was created for the group with androgen deprivation therapy and rising prostate specific antigen using the predictive factors prostate specific antigen at 60 months (OR 53.9, p <0.0001) and T stage (OR 0.25, p = 0.0008). This model predicted biochemical failure in 30 of 56 men (54%) with 85% sensitivity and 93% specificity. The 2 predictive models yield an anticipated 90% cure rate in the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy is highly curative with stable prostate specific antigen at a surgical ablation level in 86% of patients. Rising prostate specific antigen is rare at a 6% incidence and often innocuous.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/métodos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Radioisótopos de Yodo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Br J Haematol ; 176(2): 234-240, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27766622

RESUMEN

Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PCALCL) is a rare CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder with excellent outcomes reported despite frequent cutaneous relapses. Limited information exists on the development of systemic lymphoma. The British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) Lymphoid Cancer Database was searched to identify all adults diagnosed with PCALCL from 1993 to 2013. From 2005, the BCCA endorsed radiotherapy (RT) alone for limited stage with data failing to support chemotherapy. Forty-seven patients were identified with a male predominance (n = 31, 66%), median age of 64 years and predominantly limited stage (n = 40, 85%). Median follow-up was 8·4 years. The 5-year time to progression (TTP) was 58% (64% limited versus 29% advanced stage). The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival was 86% and 75%, respectively. In an as-treated analysis, the 5-year DSS for limited stage patients was similar comparing RT to combined modality treatment or chemotherapy alone but the 5-year TTP favoured RT (82% vs. 33%, P = 0·004). The 5-year cumulative risk of developing systemic lymphoma was 14%. Our results confirm the favourable prognosis of PCALCL despite a high relapse rate. Limited stage patients treated with RT alone have excellent outcomes. There is a small risk of systemic lymphoma in PCALCL.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Linfoma Anaplásico Cutáneo Primario de Células Grandes/terapia , Radioterapia/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colombia Británica , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Terapia Combinada/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma Anaplásico Cutáneo Primario de Células Grandes/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Recurrencia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Urol ; 195(6): 1811-6, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26778712

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Radiation induced rectal ulcers and fistulas are rare but significant complications of low dose rate prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. We describe the incidence of ulcers and fistulas, and associated risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 4,690 patients with localized prostate cancer who were treated with low dose rate (125)I prostate brachytherapy to a dose of 144 Gy with or without 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy. Patient, disease, comorbidity, treatment, dosimetric and posttreatment intervention factors were analyzed for an association with ulcer or fistula formation. RESULTS: At a median followup of 53 months 21 cases were identified, including 15 rectal ulcer cases, of which 6 progressed to fistulas, and an additional 6 cases of fistulas with no prior documented ulcers. Overall 9 rectal ulcer cases (0.19%) and 12 fistula cases (0.26%) were identified. In 8 of 15 patients ulcers healed with conservative management. No fistulas healed without surgical management. Two patients with fistulas died. Eight patients diagnosed with rectal ulcers subsequently underwent rectal biopsies, after which fistulas developed in 3. One patient with a de novo fistula underwent a preceding biopsy. Urinary interventions such as transurethral resection of the prostate were performed after brachytherapy in 5 of 12 patients with fistulas compared to 0 of 9 with ulcers alone. Argon plasma coagulation of the rectum for hematochezia was performed after brachytherapy in 3 of 12 patients with fistulas. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of post-brachytherapy rectal ulcers and fistulas are low as previously described. Post-brachytherapy interventions such as rectal biopsy, argon coagulation and urinary intervention may increase the risk of fistulas.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Fístula Rectal/complicaciones , Recto/patología , Úlcera/complicaciones , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Traumatismos por Radiación/epidemiología , Fístula Rectal/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Úlcera/epidemiología
9.
BJU Int ; 118(3): 366-71, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26765682

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study the risk of serial prostate biopsies on complications in men on active surveillance (AS) and determine the effect of complications on receiving further biopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the global Prostate cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS) study, men are prospectively followed on AS and repeat prostate biopsies are scheduled at 1, 4, and 7 years after the diagnostic biopsy, or once yearly if prostate-specific antigen-doubling time is <10 years. Data on complications after biopsy, including infection, haematuria, haematospermia, and pain, were retrospectively collected for all biopsies taken during follow-up in men from several large participating centres. Generalised estimating equations were used to test predictors of infection after biopsy. Competing risk analysis was used to compare the rates of men receiving further biopsies between men with and without previous complications. RESULTS: In all, 2 184 biopsies were taken in 1 164 men. Infection was reported after 55 biopsies (2.5%), and one in five men reported any form of complication. At multivariable analysis, the number of previous biopsies was not a significant predictor of infection (odds ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.76-1.43). The only significant predictor for infection was the type of prophylaxis used. Of all men with a complication at the diagnostic or first repeat biopsy, 21% did not have a repeat biopsy at the time a repeat biopsy was scheduled according to protocol, vs 12% for men without a previous biopsy complication. CONCLUSION: In our present cohort of men on AS, we found no evidence that repeat prostate biopsy in itself posed a risk of infection. However, complications after biopsy were not uncommon and after a complication men were less likely to have further biopsies. We should aim to safely reduce the amount of repeat biopsies in men on AS.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Espera Vigilante , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia con Aguja/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
Stat Med ; 35(22): 3933-48, 2016 09 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27090611

RESUMEN

Joint modelling of longitudinal and survival data is increasingly used in clinical trials on cancer. In prostate cancer for example, these models permit to account for the link between longitudinal measures of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and time of clinical recurrence when studying the risk of relapse. In practice, multiple types of relapse may occur successively. Distinguishing these transitions between health states would allow to evaluate, for example, how PSA trajectory and classical covariates impact the risk of dying after a distant recurrence post-radiotherapy, or to predict the risk of one specific type of clinical recurrence post-radiotherapy, from the PSA history. In this context, we present a joint model for a longitudinal process and a multi-state process, which is divided into two sub-models: a linear mixed sub-model for longitudinal data and a multi-state sub-model with proportional hazards for transition times, both linked by a function of shared random effects. Parameters of this joint multi-state model are estimated within the maximum likelihood framework using an EM algorithm coupled with a quasi-Newton algorithm in case of slow convergence. It is implemented under R, by combining and extending mstate and JM packages. The estimation program is validated by simulations and applied on pooled data from two cohorts of men with localized prostate cancer. Thanks to the classical covariates available at baseline and the repeated PSA measurements, we are able to assess the biomarker's trajectory, define the risks of transitions between health states and quantify the impact of the PSA dynamics on each transition intensity. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Modelos Estadísticos , Probabilidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Antígeno Prostático Específico
11.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother ; 21(3): 156-61, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27601944

RESUMEN

AIM: To describe the first case of a secondary meningioma in a patient after radiation treatment for thyroid eye disease (TED). Secondarily to identify any additional cases of secondary malignancy resulting from radiotherapy for thyroid eye disease from our institutional experience. BACKGROUND: Thyroid eye disease (TED) is a self-limiting auto-immune disorder causing expansion of orbital soft tissue from deposition of glycosaminoglycans and collagen, leading to significant cosmetic and functional morbidity. Established management options for TED include: glucocorticosteroids, orbital radiotherapy, and surgical orbital decompression. Two large series on radiotherapy for TED have been reported without any cases of secondary malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The case of a patient with visual failure, found to have a sphenoid wing meningioma after previous TED radiotherapy is described. We then reviewed 575 patients with at least 3-year follow-up receiving radiotherapy for TED at British Columbia Cancer Agency to identify other possible secondary malignancies. RESULTS: The patient had postoperative improvement in her vision without any identified complications. Three additional cases of hematologic malignancy were identified. The calculated risk in our population of developing a radiation-induced meningioma after TED with at least 3 years of follow-up of is 0.17% (1/575); with hematopoetic malignancies the risk for secondary malignancy is 0.7% (4/575). CONCLUSIONS: Our calculated risk for secondary malignancy (0.17%, 0.7%) is similar to the reported theoretical risk published in the literature (0.3-1.2%). There is real risk for the development of a secondary malignancy after radiotherapy treatment of TED and treatment options should include consideration for this potential.

12.
World J Urol ; 33(11): 1735-40, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25822705

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of percentage of free serum PSA (%fPSA) as a predictor of adverse rebiopsy findings, treatment change and radical prostatectomy (RP) findings in a prospective active surveillance (AS) trial. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the global PRIAS study with baseline %fPSA available were included. Putative baseline predictors (e.g. PSA, %fPSA) of adverse rebiopsy findings were explored using logistic regression analysis. Association of variables with treatment change and RP findings over time were evaluated with Cox regression analysis. Active treatment-free survival was assessed with a Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of 3701 patients recruited to PRIAS, 939 had %fPSA measured at study entry. Four hundred and thirty-eight of them had %fPSA available after 1 year. Median follow-up was 17.2 months. First rebiopsy results were available for 595 patients and of those, 144 (24.2 %) had adverse findings. A total of 283 (30.1 %) patients discontinued surveillance, of those 181 (64.0 %) due to protocol-based reasons. Although median %fPSA values were significantly lower in patients who changed treatment, according to the multivariate regression analysis, initial %fPSA value was not predictive for treatment change or adverse rebiopsy findings. However, the probability of discontinuing AS was significantly lower in patients with "favourable" initial %fPSA characteristics and %fPSA during follow-up (initial %fPSA ≥15 and positive %fPSA velocity) compared to those with "adverse" %fPSA characteristics (initial %fPSA <15 and negative %fPSA velocity). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic %fPSA provides no additional prognostic value when compared to other predictors already in use in AS protocols. However, %fPSA velocity during surveillance may aid in predicting the probability for future treatment change.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Biopsia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Salud Global , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo
13.
Int J Cancer ; 135(4): 939-47, 2014 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24443367

RESUMEN

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer may reduce mortality, but it incurs considerable risk of over diagnosis and potential harm to quality of life. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of PSA screening, with and without adjustment for quality of life, for the British Columbia (BC) population. We adapted an existing natural history model using BC incidence, treatment, cost and mortality patterns. The modeled mortality benefit of screening derives from a stage-shift mechanism, assuming mortality reduction consistent with the European Study of Randomized Screening for Prostate Cancer. The model projected outcomes for 40-year-old men under 14 combinations of screening ages and frequencies. Cost and utility estimates were explored with deterministic sensitivity analysis. The incremental cost-effectiveness of regular screening ranged from $36,300/LYG, for screening every four years from ages 55 to 69 years, to $588,300/LYG, for screening every two years from ages 40 to 74 years. The marginal benefits of increasing screening frequency to 2 years or starting screening at age 40 years were small and came at significant cost. After utility adjustment, all screening strategies resulted in a loss of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs); however, this result was very sensitive to utility estimates. Plausible outcomes under a range of screening strategies inform discussion of prostate cancer screening policy in BC and similar jurisdictions. Screening may be cost-effective, but the sensitivity of results to utility values suggests individual preferences for quality versus quantity of life should be a key consideration.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/economía , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia , Colombia Británica/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Simulación por Computador , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/economía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
14.
BJU Int ; 113(2): 186-8, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24206066

RESUMEN

Various conflicting guidelines and recommendations about prostate cancer screening and early detection have left both clinicians and their patients quite confused. At the Prostate Cancer World Congress held in Melbourne in August 2013, a multidisciplinary group of the world's leading experts in this area gathered together and generated this set of consensus statements to bring some clarity to this confusion. The five consensus statements provide clear guidance for clinicians counselling their patients about the early detection of prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Tacto Rectal/estadística & datos numéricos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/organización & administración , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Australia/epidemiología , Consenso , Toma de Decisiones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo
15.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 12(1): 60-9, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24453293

RESUMEN

This investigation reports on the biochemical and clinical outcomes of a newly created pan-Canadian Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification (ProCaRS) database developed by the Genitourinary Radiation Oncologists of Canada (GUROC). GUROC ProCaRS template-compliant data on 7974 patients who underwent radiotherapy were received from 7 unique databases. Descriptive analysis, Cox proportional hazards, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed using American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), prostate cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. Multivariable modeling for the primary ASTRO BFFS end point showed that age, prostate-specific antigen, T stage, and Gleason score and components such as hormonal therapy, and radiation treatment (brachytherapy with better outcome than external-beam) were predictive of outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the existing GUROC and new NCCN classification system both showed good separation of all clinical outcome curves. The construction of a pan-Canadian database has informed important prostate cancer radiotherapy outcomes and risk stratification.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Braquiterapia , Canadá , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Riesgo
16.
Cancer ; 119(8): 1537-46, 2013 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23280183

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to report the rates of disease-free survival (DFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival after low-dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy (PB). METHODS: Data from 1006 consecutive patients with prostate cancer who received LDR-PB and underwent implantation on or before October 23, 2003 were extracted from a prospective database on November 11, 2011. The selected patients had low-risk (58%) or intermediate-risk (42%) disease according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. The Phoenix threshold was used to define biochemical relapse. Sixty-five percent of patients received 3 months of neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and 3 months of concomitant ADT. Univariate and multivariate analyses are reported in relation to patient, tumor, and treatment variables. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 7.5 years. By using Fine and Gray competing risks analysis, the 5-year and 10-year actuarial DFS rates were 96.7% (95% confidence interval, 95.2%-97.7%) and 94.1% (95% confidence interval, 92%-95.6%), respectively. When applied to the whole cohort, none of the usual prognostic variables, including dose metrics, were correlated with DFS. However, in both univariate and multivariate models, increasing dose was the only covariate that correlated with improved DFS for the subset of men (N = 348) who did not receive ADT (P = .043). The actuarial 10-year CSS rate was 99.1% (95% confidence interval, 97.3%-99.7%). The overall survival rate was 93.8% at 5 years (95% confidence interval, 92%-95.1%) and 83.5% at 10 years (95% confidence interval, 79.8%-86.6%). Only age at implantation (P = .0001) was correlated with overall survival in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In a consecutive cohort of 1006 men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network low-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, the actuarial rate of recurrent disease after LDR-PB was approximately 3% at 5 years and 6% at 10 years.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Análisis de Supervivencia
18.
Biometrics ; 69(1): 206-13, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23379600

RESUMEN

Patients who were previously treated for prostate cancer with radiation therapy are monitored at regular intervals using a laboratory test called Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA). If the value of the PSA test starts to rise, this is an indication that the prostate cancer is more likely to recur, and the patient may wish to initiate new treatments. Such patients could be helped in making medical decisions by an accurate estimate of the probability of recurrence of the cancer in the next few years. In this article, we describe the methodology for giving the probability of recurrence for a new patient, as implemented on a web-based calculator. The methods use a joint longitudinal survival model. The model is developed on a training dataset of 2386 patients and tested on a dataset of 846 patients. Bayesian estimation methods are used with one Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm developed for estimation of the parameters from the training dataset and a second quick MCMC developed for prediction of the risk of recurrence that uses the longitudinal PSA measures from a new patient.


Asunto(s)
Teorema de Bayes , Modelos Estadísticos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Algoritmos , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Método de Montecarlo , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/sangre , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia
19.
Cancer ; 118(17): 4156-65, 2012 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22252721

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For limited-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), treatment decisions are often influenced by toxicity profiles. One strategy that minimizes chemotherapy-induced toxicities is abbreviated chemotherapy plus consolidation involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT). Involved-node radiotherapy (INRT) is a new concept to DLBCL, aimed to reduce radiotherapy-induced toxicities. We retrospectively review the long-term outcomes of limited-stage DLBCL treated with abbreviated systemic therapy and radiotherapy focusing on field size: IFRT versus INRT. METHODS: The British Columbia Cancer Agency Lymphoid Cancer Database was used to identify patients diagnosed with limited-stage DLBCL (stage I/II, without B-symptoms; bulk < 10 cm) from 1981 to 2007. Patients were prescribed 3 cycles of chemotherapy plus IFRT (1981-1996) or INRT≤5 cm (1996-2007), defined as INRT to the prechemotherapy involved nodes with margins ≤ 5 cm. RESULTS: A total of 288 patients were identified: 56% were aged >60 years, 34% had stage II disease, 55% had extranodal disease, 19% had elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels, and 15% received rituximab. The two radiotherapy groups were IFRT (138 patients; 48%) and INRT≤5cm (150 patients; 52%); median follow-up was 117 and 89 months, respectively. Distant relapse was the most common site of failure in both groups. After INRT≤5 cm, marginal recurrence was infrequent (2%). Time to progression (P = .823), progression-free survival (P = .575), and overall survival (P = .417) were not significantly different between the radiotherapy cohorts. Radiotherapy field size was not a significant prognostic factor on multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This research is the first known body of work to apply the concept of INRT to limited-stage DLBCL. Reducing the field size from IFRT to INRT≤5 cm maintains a low marginal recurrence risk with no impact on overall outcome.


Asunto(s)
Irradiación Linfática , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/radioterapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/mortalidad , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
BJU Int ; 110(11 Pt B): E500-7, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22564197

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Previous reports, with small numbers of patients, have described the problem of incomplete testosterone suppression (>1.1 or 1.7 nmol/L) with LHRH agonists. Various predisposing factors have been suggested: different drug agents and patient factors such as age, pretreatment testosterone levels and weight. Such incomplete testosterone suppression has been shown in one small report to be associated with increased PSA failure rates and in another report in those with metastases, with worse survival. This study used testosterone assays that are more accurate at low levels than those used in most previous reports in a large dataset of 2196 men, and confirmed incomplete testosterone suppression (breakthrough) rates >1.7 nmol/L of 3.4% and >1.1 nmol/L of 6.6%. We showed that younger age was strongly associated with the risk of breakthrough, with a minor effect of increasing body mass index. Repeated breakthroughs were more common (16%) in those who had already had one breakthrough. Interim measures of cancer control (PSA kinetics during LHRH therapy) were inferior in those with a breakthrough, and those with breakthroughs between 1.1 and 1.7 nmol/L had worse long-term biochemical control rates. OBJECTIVES: • To describe breakthrough rates above castrate levels of testosterone, in a population-based series of men undergoing adjuvant luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist therapy with curative radiation therapy. • To explore the predisposing factors for such breakthroughs and their impact on subsequent outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • All men treated for prostate cancer between 1998 and 2007 with curative radiation in the province of British Columbia, Canada were potentially eligible (n= 11752). Of these, 2196 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. • Serial testosterone measurements were obtained during continuous LHRH therapy. • Breakthrough rates >1.1 nmol/L and >1.7 nmol/L were calculated for each LHRH injection and for each patient course. • Predisposing factors were identified, and early surrogates of oncological outcome (neoadjuvant nadir and post-treatment nadir) were determined. RESULTS: • The risk of a breakthrough >1.1 nmol/L was 6.6%, and >1.7 nmol/L was 3.4% per patient course and 5.4% and 2.2% per LHRH injection (inclusive ranges). • Repeated breakthroughs occurred in 16% of patients. • Younger men were more liable to breakthroughs (P < 0.001). • Early PSA kinetic surrogates of cancer control were inferior in those with breakthroughs. • Neither overall biochemical non-evidence of disease (bNED) nor survival were compromised, although subgroup analysis showed inferior 5-year bNED in those with breakthroughs of 1.1-1.7 nmol/L vs those without (58% vs 73%, respectively; P= 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: • Breakthroughs with LHRH agonists occur occasionally per injection, but occur commonly per patient course of treatment, and adversely affect early surrogate measures of outcome. • The monitoring of testosterone levels during therapy is therefore advised.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/administración & dosificación , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Testosterona/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice de Masa Corporal , Buserelina/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/sangre , Goserelina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Leuprolida/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Radioinmunoensayo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Testosterona/metabolismo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA