[Influence of trauma mechanisms on thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures]. / Einfluss des Unfallmechanismus auf die Wirbelkörperfraktur.

BACKGROUND: Vertebral body fractures (VBF) can be caused by various trauma mechanisms. The AOSpine classification system differentiates three main types of fractures according to the grade of instability. How the increasing energy of various accident mechanisms changes the complexity of the individual fracture, its localization and the occurrence of further fractures has not yet been finally investigated. OBJECTIVE: What influence do traumatic events with different kinematics have on the localization, complexity and number of VBF in the thoracic and lumbar spine? MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study data from patients with a freshly traumatized VBF were analyzed. The patients were divided into six trauma groups (UFG) depending on the trauma mechanism. The VBF were classified on the basis of computed tomography (CT) imaging according to the AOSpine classification system. Testing was performed bilaterally and a significance level of 5% was used. The statistical calculations were carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics. RESULTS: A significant increase in the severity of fractures (AO classification) was found in the high energy trauma groups (UFG III and V). In addition, the incidence of thoracic (TH) VBF was significantly increased for TH7 (p = 0.011) and TH10 (p = 0.001). In comparison to the other low energy trauma groups, the risk of a TH7 fracture was 7­times higher after a high energy trauma (odds ratio OR = 7.0; 95% confidence interval CI = 1.4; 35.2). The UFG III (falls > 3 m) showed the highest number of fractures with a median of 2.5 (SD 1.84) VBF. CONCLUSION: An exact reproduction of the traumatic event enables a distinction between high and low energy trauma groups to be made. In previous studies traffic accidents were recorded as one group, so an influence of the increasing kinematic energy could not be assessed. The accident kinematics can be taken into account by differentiating between high and low-energy trauma groups. In high-energy accidents the TH7 and TH10 vertebrae were found to be at risk vertebrae. In addition to the force direction, the force strength also has a decisive influence on the distribution pattern of VBF.

Preoperative embolization of renal cell carcinoma metastases to the bone prior to stabilization procedures does not result in reduction in intraoperative blood loss.

PURPOSE: The effect of preoperative embolization of bone metastases prior to stabilization procedures in reducing intraoperative blood loss remains controversial. This study aimed to analyze the effect of preoperative embolization on orthopedic stabilization procedures of the extremities and spine in cases with bone metastases from renal cell carcinomas. In particular, do these patients suffer less blood loss during the operation and do they need lesser fluid replacements or packed red cell bags intra- and perioperatively? Does preoperative embolization reduce the duration of surgery? METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed stabilization procedures of the spine and extremities at our institution between 2011 and 2021 for group differences (embolization vs. no embolization) in terms of blood loss, fluid substitution, need for packed red cell transfusions, tumor size, and duration of surgery. RESULTS: We reviewed 79 stabilization procedures of the spine (n = 36) and extremities (n = 43), of which 30 included preoperative embolization procedures. Surprisingly, the embolization group showed a statistically significant increase in blood loss, the need for fluid substitution, and red cell transfusions. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant negative effect of preoperative embolization on stabilization procedures of the extremities. CONCLUSION: Based on our data, preoperative embolization of renal cell carcinoma metastases of the extremities had a negative effect on intraoperative blood loss and the need for fluid substitution and should therefore be avoided. Our data did not show an effect on stabilization procedures of the spine.

Intramedullary Nailing Versus Compound Plate Osteosynthesis in Pathologic Diaphyseal Humerus Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pathologic fractures of the extremities due to carcinoma metastases require individual and patient prognosis-related stabilization procedures. Considering the anatomic features of the humerus, implant material stability is less critical than femoral fractures because of less weight-bearing stress. Therefore, operation length, blood loss, and quick recovery of function are of greater interest. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated and compared the outcomes of compound plate osteosynthesis and intramedullary (IM) nailing while managing diaphyseal pathologic fractures of the humerus. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated at our institution for pathologic fractures of the diaphyseal humerus between 2010 and 2021 for group differences (plate osteosynthesis vs. IM nailing) in terms of blood loss, length of operation, implant survival, and upper extremity function. RESULTS: We reviewed 42 stabilization procedures due to pathologic diaphyseal humerus fractures, with a mean follow-up of 8.5±15.4  months. IM nailing (n=20) showed a significantly lower blood loss (266.7±23.7 mL) than plate osteosynthesis (n=22, 571.1±92.6 mL). We did not detect statistically significant differences in the complication rate, length of operation, or Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggested that diaphyseal fractures of the humerus should be stabilized using an IM nail rather than plate osteosynthesis due to lower blood loss, while complication rate, implant survival, and length of operation remain indifferent.

How Should Postoperative Cellulitis Be Treated in Patients With Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA) in Place?

RECOMMENDATION: In the absence of evidence, we recommend that (1) patients with total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) in place who develop postoperative cellulitis be evaluated thoroughly to rule out periprosthetic joint infection of the ankle, and that (2) isolated cellulitis may be treated with antibiotics, elevation, and close monitoring. Aspiration can be considered in certain cases, with the potential risk of introducing deep space infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Consensus. DELEGATE VOTE: Agree: 92%, Disagree: 0%, Abstain: 8% (Super Majority, Strong Consensus).

What Is the Definition of Acute and Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) of Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA)?

RECOMMENDATION: There is a paucity of data for defining acute or chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) in the literature. Any discussion of PJI after ankle replacement is entirely reliant on the literature surrounding knee and hip arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Consensus. DELEGATE VOTE: Agree: 100%, Disagree: 0%, Abstain: 0% (Unanimous, Strongest Consensus).

When does intraoperative 3D-imaging play a role in transpedicular C2 screw placement?

INTRODUCTION: The stabilization of an atlantoaxial (C1-C2) instability is demanding due to a complex atlantoaxial anatomy with proximity to the spinal cord, a variable run of the vertebral artery (VA) and narrow C2 pedicles. We perfomed the Goel & Harms fusion in combination with an intraoperative 3D imaging to ensure correct screw placement in the C2 pedicle. We hypothesized, that narrow C2 pedicles lead to a higher malposition rate of screws by perforation of the pedicle wall. The purpose of this study was to describe a certain pedicle size, under which the perforation rate rises. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, all patients (n=30) were operated in the Goel & Harms technique. The isthmus height and pedicle diameter of C2 were measured. The achieved screw position in C2 was evaluated according to Gertzbein & Robbin classification (GRGr). RESULTS: A statistically significant correlation was found between the pedicles size (isthmus height/pedicle diameter) and the achieved GRGr for the right (p=0.002/p=0.03) and left side (p=0.018/p=0.008). The ROC analysis yielded a Cut Off value for the pedicle size to distinguish between an intact or perforated pedicle wall (GRGr 1 or ≥2). The Cut-Off value was identified for the isthmus height (right 6.1mm, left 5.4mm) and for the pedicle diameter (6.6mm both sides). CONCLUSION: The hypothesis, that narrow pedicles lead to a higher perforation rate of the pedicle wall, can be accepted. Pedicles of <6.6mm turned out to be a risk factor for a perforation of the pedicle wall (GRGr 2 or higher). Intraoperative 3D imaging is a feasible tool to confirm optimal screw position, which becomes even more important in cases with thin pedicles. The rising risk of VA injury in these cases support the additional use of navigation.