Assessment of the safe and efficacious dose of the selective progesterone receptor modulator vilaprisan for the treatment of patients with uterine fibroids by exposure-response modelling and simulation.

AIMS: We report population pharmacokinetic (popPK) and exposure-response (E-R) analyses for efficacy (induced amenorrhoea [IA]) and safety (unbound oestradiol [E2] concentrations) of the selective progesterone receptor modulator vilaprisan. Results were used to inform the dose for the Phase 3 programme in patients with uterine fibroids. METHODS: A popPK model was developed using data from Phase 1 and 2 studies (including ASTEROID 1 and 2). The relationship between vilaprisan exposure (steady-state AUC) and IA after oral administration of 0.5, 1, 2 or 4 mg/day over 3 months was analysed in ASTEROID 1 using logistic regression and qualified in ASTEROID 2 by comparing simulated and observed probability for IA after 2 mg/day. The exposure-E2 relationship was analysed visually. RESULTS: Vilaprisan clearance was 22.7% lower in obese vs non-obese patients. The E-R relationship for IA in ASTEROID 1 was steep and consistent with ASTEROID 2, with a maximum probability (Pmax ) of 59% (95% CI: 49-68%). The exposure at which 50% of Pmax is obtained was 36.9 µg*h/L (95% CI: 27.7-48.7 µg*h/L). Simulations showed that 36% of the patients will be below 90% of Pmax for IA after 1 mg/day compared to 2% after 2 mg/day. E2 levels tended to decrease with increasing exposure. While E2 levels remained largely within the physiologic follicular phase range, the clinical relevance of this decrease will be evaluated in long-term studies. CONCLUSIONS: A 2 mg/day dose was selected for Phase 3 as E-R analyses show this dose results in a close to maximum probability for IA, without any safety concerns noted.

Population pharmacokinetics of regorafenib in solid tumours: Exposure in clinical practice considering enterohepatic circulation and food intake.

AIM: Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor with clinical efficacy in a range of advanced solid tumours. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed to evaluate the variability of the PK of regorafenib and its pharmacologically active metabolites M-2 and M-5 in solid tumours. METHODS: The model was initially developed using densely sampled phase 1 data and information on food intake to incorporate enterohepatic circulation (EHC) that was identified to considerably contribute to the PK of regorafenib. This was then applied to sparsely sampled data from four phase 3 studies in patients with advanced solid tumours. The need for exact food intake data to estimate individual drug exposure was evaluated. RESULTS: By incorporating EHC, the model adequately described the PK profiles of regorafenib, M-2 and M-5 after single and multiple doses in patients from phase 1 studies. Individual exposure in phase 3 studies was adequately described based on assumptions on the time and frequency of food intake, although exact food intake data are recommended to improve the estimation. Covariate analysis identified sex and body mass index (BMI) as impacting exposure to regorafenib, and sex as strongly impacting exposure to M-2 and M-5 (also influenced by the BMI effect on parent regorafenib in the joint model developed); however, these factors accounted for a small portion of the overall variability in exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The adequate description of regorafenib PK after multiple dosing requires the incorporation of EHC. Neither single nor combined covariates predicted exposures that would warrant a priori regorafenib dose adjustment.

CYP3A4-mediated effects of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of vilaprisan and its UGT1A1-mediated effects on bilirubin glucuronidation in humans.

AIMS: The primary aim of the present study was to quantify the effects of rifampicin, a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inducer, on the pharmacokinetics of the new selective progesterone receptor modulator, vilaprisan. In addition, the effects of rifampicin on the glucuronidation of bilirubin, an endogenous UDP-glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A1 (UGT1A1) substrate, were explored. METHODS: This was an open-label, two-period study in 12 healthy postmenopausal women. Subjects received a single oral dose of vilaprisan 4 mg in each period. In period 2, administration of vilaprisan was preceded and followed by rifampicin 600 mg day-1 . A subtherapeutic dose of midazolam (1 mg) was coadministered with vilaprisan to monitor CYP3A4 induction. Details of the administration and sampling schedule were optimized by means of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. Plasma concentrations of vilaprisan, midazolam, and 1'- hydroxy-midazolam were measured and rifampicin-associated changes in the glucuronidation of bilirubin were determined. RESULTS: As predicted by our model, the coadministration of rifampicin was associated with a substantial decrease in exposure to vilaprisan and midazolam - indicated by the following point estimates (90% confidence intervals) for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration ratio with or without rifampicin: 0.040 (0.0325, 0.0505) for vilaprisan and 0.144 (0.117, 0.178) for midazolam. Further, it was associated with an increase in bilirubin glucuronidation, indicating that UGT1A1 was induced. CONCLUSIONS: The exposure to vilaprisan was reduced by 96%. Such a reduction is likely to render the drug therapeutically ineffective. Therefore, it is recommended that the use of strong CYP3A4 inducers is avoided when taking vilaprisan.

Characterization and Prediction of Cardiovascular Effects of Fingolimod and Siponimod Using a Systems Pharmacology Modeling Approach.

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor agonists are associated with cardiovascular effects in humans. This study aims to develop a systems pharmacology model to identify the site of action (i.e., primary hemodynamic response variable) of S1P receptor agonists, and to predict, in a quantitative manner, the cardiovascular effects of novel S1P receptor agonists in vivo. The cardiovascular effects of once-daily fingolimod (0, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg) and siponimod (3 and 15 mg/kg) were continuously recorded in spontaneously hypertensive rats and Wistar-Kyoto rats. The results were analyzed using a recently developed systems cardiovascular pharmacology model, i.e. the CVS model; total peripheral resistance and heart rate were identified as the site of action for fingolimod. Next, the CVS model was interfaced with an S1P agonist pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model. This combined model adequately predicted, in a quantitative manner, the cardiovascular effects of siponimod using in vitro binding assays. In conclusion, the combined CVS and S1P agonist PKPD model adequately describes the hemodynamic effects of S1P receptor agonists in rats and constitutes a basis for the prediction, in a strictly quantitative manner, of the cardiovascular effects of novel S1P receptor agonists.

Exploring genetic and non-genetic risk factors for delayed graft function, acute and subclinical rejection in renal transplant recipients.

AIMS: This study aimed at identifying pharmacological factors such as pharmacogenetics and drug exposure as new predictive biomarkers for delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR) and/or subclinical rejection (SCR). METHODS: Adult renal transplant recipients (n = 361) on cyclosporine-based immunosuppression were followed for the first 6 months after transplantation. The incidence of DGF and AR were documented as well as the prevalence of SCR at 6 months in surveillance biopsies. Demographic, transplant-related factors, pharmacological and pharmacogenetic factors (ABCB1, CYP3A5, CYP3A4, CYP2C8, NR1I2, PPP3CA and PPP3CB) were analysed in a combined approach in relation to the occurrence of DGF, AR and prevalence of SCR at month 6 using a proportional odds model and time to event model. RESULTS: Fourteen per cent of the patients experienced at least one clinical rejection episode and only DGF showed a significant effect on the time to AR. The incidence of DGF correlated with a deceased donor kidney transplant (27% vs. 0.6% of living donors). Pharmacogenetic factors were not associated with risk for DGF, AR or SCR. A deceased donor kidney and acute rejection history were the most important determinants for SCR, resulting in a 52% risk of SCR at 6 months (vs. 11% average). In a sub-analysis of the patients with AR, those treated with rejection treatment including ATG, significantly less frequent SCR was found in the 6-month biopsy (13% vs. 50%). CONCLUSIONS: Transplant-related factors remain the most important determinants of DGF, AR and SCR. Furthermore, rejection treatment with depleting antibodies effectively prevented SCR in 6-month surveillance biopsies.

Modeling and Simulation of In Vivo Drug Effects.

The concept of a pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) assessment of drug development candidates is well established in pharmaceutical research and development, and PK/PD modeling is common practice in all pharmaceutical companies. A recent analysis (Morgan et al., Drug Discov Today 17(9-10):419-424, 2012) revealed however that insufficient certainty in the integrity of the causal chain of fundamental pharmacological steps from drug dosing through systemic exposure, target tissue exposure, and engagement of molecular target to pharmacological response is still the major driver of failure in phase II of clinical drug development. Despite the rise of molecular biomarkers, ethical, scientific, and practical constraints very often still prevent a direct assessment of each necessary step ultimately leading to an intended drug effect or an unintended adverse reaction. Yet, incomplete investigation of the causality of drug responses is a major risk for translational assessments and the prediction of drug responses in different species or other populations. Mechanism-based modeling and simulation (M&S) offers a means to investigate complex physiological and pharmacological processes and to complement experimental data for non-accessible steps in the pharmacological causal chain. With the help of two examples, it is illustrated, what level of physiological detail, state-of-the-art models can represent, how predictive these models are and how mechanism-based approaches can be combined with empirical correlation-based concepts.

Translational pharmacokinetic modeling of fingolimod (FTY720) as a paradigm compound subject to sphingosine kinase-mediated phosphorylation.

A complicating factor in the translational pharmacology of sphingosine 1-phosphate agonists is that they exert their pharmacological effect through their respective phosphate metabolites, which are formed by the enzyme sphingosine kinase (S1PHK). In this investigation, we present a semimechanistic pharmacokinetic model for the interconversion of S1PHK substrates and their respective phosphates in rats and humans with the aim of investigating whether characterization of the rate of phosphorylation in blood platelets constitutes a basis for interspecies scaling using fingolimod as a model compound. Data on the time course of fingolimod and fingolimod-phosphate (fingolimod-P) blood concentrations after intravenous and oral administration of fingolimod and/or fingolimod-P in rats and after oral administration of fingolimod in doses of 0.5, 1.25, and 5 mg once daily in healthy volunteers were analyzed in conjunction with data on the ex vivo interconversion and blood-plasma distribution in rat and human blood, respectively. Integrating the data from the ex vivo and in vivo studies enabled simulation of fingolimod and fingolimod-P concentrations in plasma rather than blood, which are more relevant for characterizing drug effects. Large interspecies differences in the rate of phosphorylation between rats and humans were quantified. In human, phosphorylation of fingolimod in the platelets was four times slower compared with rat, whereas the dephosphorylation rates were comparable in both species. This partly explained the 10-12-fold overprediction of fingolimod-P exposure in human when applying a dose-by-factor approach on the developed rat model. Additionally, differences in presystemic phosphorylation should also be taken into account.

Discovery of AZD3839, a potent and selective BACE1 inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of Alzheimer disease.

ß-Site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme1 (BACE1) is one of the key enzymes involved in the processing of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and formation of amyloid ß peptide (Aß) species. Because cerebral deposition of Aß species might be critical for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease, BACE1 has emerged as a key target for the treatment of this disease. Here, we report the discovery and comprehensive preclinical characterization of AZD3839, a potent and selective inhibitor of human BACE1. AZD3839 was identified using fragment-based screening and structure-based design. In a concentration-dependent manner, AZD3839 inhibited BACE1 activity in a biochemical fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) assay, Aß and sAPPß release from modified and wild-type human SH-SY5Y cells and mouse N2A cells as well as from mouse and guinea pig primary cortical neurons. Selectivity against BACE2 and cathepsin D was 14 and >1000-fold, respectively. AZD3839 exhibited dose- and time-dependent lowering of plasma, brain, and cerebrospinal fluid Aß levels in mouse, guinea pig, and non-human primate. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses of mouse and guinea pig data showed a good correlation between the potency of AZD3839 in primary cortical neurons and in vivo brain effects. These results suggest that AZD3839 effectively reduces the levels of Aß in brain, CSF, and plasma in several preclinical species. It might, therefore, have disease-modifying potential in the treatment of Alzheimer disease and related dementias. Based on the overall pharmacological profile and its drug like properties, AZD3839 has been progressed into Phase 1 clinical trials in man.

Regorafenib plus Vincristine and Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients with Recurrent/Refractory Solid Tumors: An Innovative Therapy for Children with Cancer Study.

PURPOSE: This phase Ib study defined the safety, MTD, and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of regorafenib combined with vincristine and irinotecan (VI). Secondary objectives were evaluation of antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of regorafenib and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged 6 months to <18 years with relapsed/refractory solid malignancies [≥50% with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS)] received regorafenib (starting dose 72 mg/m2/day) concomitantly or sequentially with vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and irinotecan 50 mg/m2 on days 1-5 (21-day cycle). Adverse events (AE) and tumor response were assessed. PK (regorafenib and irinotecan) were evaluated using a population PK model. RESULTS: We enrolled 21 patients [median age, 10 years; 12, RMS; 5, Ewing sarcoma (EWS)]. The MTD/RP2D of regorafenib in the sequential schedule was 82 mg/m2. The concomitant dosing schedule was discontinued because of dose-limiting toxicities in 2 of 2 patients treated. Most common grade 3/4 (>30% of patients) AEs were neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia. The overall response rate was 48% and disease control rate [complete response (CR)/partial response/stable disease/non-CR/non-progressive disease] was 86%. Median progression-free survival was 7.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.9-14.8] and median overall survival was 8.7 months (95% CI, 5.5-16.3). When combined with VI, regorafenib PK was similar to single-agent PK in children and adults (treated with regorafenib 160 mg/day). CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib can be combined sequentially with standard dose VI in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors with appropriate dose modifications. Clinical activity was observed in patients with RMS and EWS (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02085148).

Regorafenib plus nivolumab in patients with mismatch repair-proficient/microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer: a single-arm, open-label, multicentre phase 2 study.

Background: Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibodies plus multikinase inhibitors have shown encouraging activity in several tumour types, including colorectal cancer. This study assessed regorafenib plus nivolumab in patients with microsatellite stable/mismatch repair-proficient metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: This single-arm, open-label, multicentre phase 2 study enrolled adults from 13 sites in the USA with previously treated advanced microsatellite stable/mismatch repair-proficient metastatic colorectal cancer. Eligible patients had known extended RAS and BRAF status, progression or intolerance to no more than two (for extended RAS mutant) or three (for extended RAS wild type) lines of systemic chemotherapy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Regorafenib 80 mg/day was administered orally for 3 weeks on/1 week off (increased to 120 mg/day if 80 mg/day was well tolerated) with intravenous nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks. Primary endpoint was objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included safety, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Exploratory endpoints included biomarkers associated with antitumour activity. Patients who received at least one dose of study intervention were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. Tumour assessments were carried out every 8 weeks for the first year, and every 12 weeks thereafter until progressive disease/end of the study, and objective response rate was analysed after all patients had met the criteria for primary completion of five post-baseline scans and either 10-months' follow-up or drop out. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04126733. Findings: Between 14 October 2019 and 14 January 2020, 94 patients were enrolled, 70 received treatment. Five patients had a partial response, yielding an objective response rate of 7% (95% CI 2.4-15.9; p = 0.27). All responders had no liver metastases at baseline. Median overall survival (data immature) and progression-free survival were 11.9 months (95% CI 7.0-not evaluable) and 1.8 months (95% CI 1.8-2.4), respectively. Most patients (97%, 68/70) experienced a treatment-related adverse event; 51% were grade 1 or 2, 40% were grade 3, 3% were grade 4, and 3% were grade 5. The most common (≥20%) events were fatigue (26/70), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (19/70), maculopapular rash (17/70), increased blood bilirubin (14/70), and decreased appetite (14/70). Higher baseline expression of tumour biomarkers of immune sensitivity correlated with antitumour activity. Interpretation: Further studies are warranted to identify subgroups of patients with clinical characteristics or biomarkers that would benefit most from treatment with regorafenib plus nivolumab. Funding: Bayer/Bristol Myers Squibb.

Mechanism-based PK-PD model for the prolactin biological system response following an acute dopamine inhibition challenge: quantitative extrapolation to humans.

The aim of this investigation was to develop a mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model for the biological system prolactin response following a dopamine inhibition challenge using remoxipride as a paradigm compound. After assessment of baseline variation in prolactin concentrations, the prolactin response of remoxipride was measured following (1) single intravenous doses of 4, 8 and 16 mg/kg and (2) following double dosing of 3.8 mg/kg with different time intervals. The mechanistic PK-PD model consisted of: (i) a PK model for remoxipride concentrations in brain extracellular fluid; (ii) a pool model incorporating prolactin synthesis, storage in lactotrophs, release into- and elimination from plasma; (iii) a positive feedback component interconnecting prolactin plasma concentrations and prolactin synthesis; and (iv) a dopamine antagonism component interconnecting remoxipride brain extracellular fluid concentrations and stimulation of prolactin release. The most important findings were that the free brain concentration drives the prolactin release into plasma and that the positive feedback on prolactin synthesis in the lactotrophs, in contrast to the negative feedback in the previous models on the PK-PD correlation of remoxipride. An external validation was performed using a dataset obtained in rats following intranasal administration of 4, 8, or 16 mg/kg remoxipride. Following simulation of human remoxipride brain extracellular fluid concentrations, pharmacodynamic extrapolation from rat to humans was performed, using allometric scaling in combination with independent information on the values of biological system specific parameters as prior knowledge. The PK-PD model successfully predicted the system prolactin response in humans, indicating that positive feedback on prolactin synthesis and allometric scaling thereof could be a new feature in describing complex homeostatic mechanisms.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulator Vilaprisan: A Comprehensive Overview.

Vilaprisan is a highly potent selective progesterone receptor modulator in development for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids and endometriosis. Its pharmacokinetics are characterized by rapid absorption, almost complete bioavailability, and dose-proportional exposure. The intrinsic factors of age, bodyweight, and race have no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vilaprisan and do not warrant a dose adjustment. Similarly, vilaprisan can be used in patients with mild or moderate renal or hepatic impairment without dose adjustment, but its use is not recommended in patients with severe organ impairment. Vilaprisan has no perpetrator potential on cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes or transporters and therefore restrictions in the concomitant use of their substrates are not required. Nonetheless, because it is a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate itself, concomitant use of vilaprisan with strong CYP3A inhibitors or inducers is not recommended. However, there is no risk for QTc prolongation when vilaprisan and a strong CYP3A inhibitor are administered concomitantly, as indicated by a vilaprisan concentration-QTc response analysis across all studies with triplicate electrocardiogram measurements. Furthermore, due to its mode of action, vilaprisan is also not recommended to be used together with progestin-containing oral contraceptives. Vilaprisan shows a steep exposure-response relationship for inducing amenorrhea in patients with uterine fibroids experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding. Based on simulations, a dose of 2 mg/day is expected to induce a maximum bleeding reduction and was thus selected for phase III.

Systemic and direct nose-to-brain transport pharmacokinetic model for remoxipride after intravenous and intranasal administration.

Intranasal (IN) administration could be an attractive mode of delivery for drugs targeting the central nervous system, potentially providing a high bioavailability because of avoidance of a hepatic first-pass effect and rapid onset of action. However, controversy remains whether a direct transport route from the nasal cavity into the brain exists. Pharmacokinetic modeling is proposed to identify the existence of direct nose-to-brain transport in a quantitative manner. The selective dopamine-D2 receptor antagonist remoxipride was administered at different dosages, in freely moving rats, by the IN and intravenous (IV) route. Plasma and brain extracellular fluid (ECF) concentration-time profiles were obtained and simultaneously analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Brain ECF/plasma area under the curve ratios were 0.28 and 0.19 after IN and IV administration, respectively. A multicompartment pharmacokinetic model with two absorption compartments (nose-to-systemic and nose-to-brain) was found to best describe the observed pharmacokinetic data. Absorption was described in terms of bioavailability and rate. Total bioavailability after IN administration was 89%, of which 75% was attributed to direct nose-to brain transport. Direct nose-to-brain absorption rate was slow, explaining prolonged brain ECF exposure after IN compared with IV administration. These studies explicitly provide separation and quantitation of systemic and direct nose-to-brain transport after IN administration of remoxipride in the rat. Describing remoxipride pharmacokinetics at the target site (brain ECF) in a semiphysiology-based manner would allow for better prediction of pharmacodynamic effects.

NT-proBNP Qualifies as a Surrogate for Clinical End Points in Heart Failure.

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a well-established biomarker in heart failure (HF) but controversially discussed as a potential surrogate marker in HF trials. We analyzed the NT-proBNP/mortality relationship in real-world data (RWD) of 108,330 HF patients from the IBM Watson Health Explorys database and compared it with the NT-proBNP / clinical event end-point relationship in 20 clinical HF studies. With a hierarchical statistical model, we quantified the functional relationship and interstudy variability. To independently qualify the model, we predicted outcome hazard ratios in five phase III HF studies solely based on NT-proBNP measured early in the respective study. In RWD and clinical studies, the relationship between NT-proBNP and clinical outcome is well described by an Emax model. The NT-proBNP independent baseline risk (R0 , RWD/studies median (interstudy interquartile range): 5.5%/3.0% (1.7-4.9%)) is very low compared with the potential NT-proBNP-associated maximum risk (Rmax : 55.2%/79.4% (61.5-89.0%)). The NT-proBNP concentration associated with the half-maximal risk is comparable in RWD and across clinical studies (EC50 : 3,880/2,414 pg/mL (1,460-4,355 pg/mL)). Model-based predictions of phase III outcomes, relying on short-term NT-proBNP data only, match final trial results with comparable confidence intervals. Our analysis qualifies NT-proBNP as a surrogate for clinical outcome in HF trials. NT-proBNP levels after short treatment durations of less than 10 weeks quantitatively predict hazard ratios with confidence levels comparable to final trial readout. Early NT-proBNP measurement can therefore enable shorter and smaller but still reliable HF trials.

Phase 1 dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study of regorafenib in paediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid malignancies.

BACKGROUND: This phase 1 study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and antitumour activity of regorafenib in paediatric patients with solid tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (aged 6 months to <18 years) with recurrent/refractory solid tumours received oral regorafenib once daily for 3 weeks on/1 week off. The starting dose (60 mg/m2) was derived from an adult physiology-based PK model and scaled to children; dose escalation was followed by safety expansion of the MTD cohort. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Regorafenib PK was evaluated using a population PK model. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (median age 13 years) received regorafenib (four cohorts: 60-93 mg/m2). Five of 23 evaluable patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, Grade 3 maculopapular rash, pyrexia, hypertension, and exfoliative dermatitis [each n = 1]). The MTD was defined as 82 mg/m2. The most common Grade ≥3 drug-related TEAE was thrombocytopenia (10%). The incidence and severity of hypertension, diarrhoea, fatigue, hypothyroidism, and hand-foot skin reaction were lower than reported in adults. Regorafenib exposure increased with dose, with substantial overlap because of moderate-to-high interpatient variability. One patient with rhabdomyosarcoma experienced an unconfirmed partial response; 15 patients had stable disease, five for >16 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended phase 2 dose of single-agent regorafenib in paediatric patients with solid malignancies is 82 mg/m2. Regorafenib demonstrated acceptable tolerability and preliminary antitumour activity, supporting further investigation in paediatric patients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT02085148.

Explaining variability in ciclosporin exposure in adult kidney transplant recipients.

PURPOSE: Optimal ciclosporin A (CsA) exposure in kidney transplant recipients is difficult to attain because of variability in CsA pharmacokinetics. A better understanding of the variability in CsA exposure could be a good means of individualizing therapy. Specifically, genetic variability in genes involved in CsA metabolism could explain exposure differences. Therefore, this study is aimed at identifying a relationship between genetic polymorphisms and the variability in CsA exposure, while accounting for non-genetic sources of variability. METHODS: De novo kidney transplant patients (n = 33) were treated with CsA for 1 year and extensive blood sampling was performed on multiple occasions throughout the year. The effects of the non-genetic covariates hematocrit, serum albumin concentration, cholesterol, demographics (i.e., body weight), CsA dose interval, prednisolone dose and genetic polymorphisms in genes encoding ABCB1, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and PXR on CsA pharmacokinetics were studied using non-linear mixed effect modeling. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of CsA were described by a two-compartment disposition model with delayed absorption. Body weight was identified as the most important covariate and explained 35% of the random inter-individual variability in CsA clearance. Moreover, concurrent prednisolone use at a dosage of 20 mg/day or higher was associated with a 22% higher clearance of CsA, hence lower CsA exposure. In contrast, no considerable genotype effects (i.e., greater than 30-50%) on CsA clearance were found for the selected genes. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that the selected genetic markers explain variability in CsA exposure insufficiently to be of clinical relevance. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring is still required to optimize CsA exposure after administration of individualized doses based on body weight and, as this study suggests, co-administration of prednisolone.

Population Pharmacokinetic and Exposure-Response Analysis of Finerenone: Insights Based on Phase IIb Data and Simulations to Support Dose Selection for Pivotal Trials in Type 2 Diabetes with Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: Finerenone (BAY 94-8862) is a potent non-steroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist being developed for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. METHODS: We present the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PD) analysis for efficacy and safety markers based on data from two clinical phase IIb studies: ARTS-DN (NCT01874431) and ARTS-DN Japan (NCT01968668). RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of finerenone were adequately characterized, with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and body weight as influencing covariates. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve in Japanese patients did not differ from that in the global population, and the investigated pharmacokinetics were dose- and time-linear. In addition, the pharmacokinetic model provided robust individual exposure estimates to study exposure-response. The concentration-effect relationship over time for the efficacy marker urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR) was well-characterized by a maximum effect model indicating saturation at high exposures. For the safety markers, a log-linear model and a power model were identified for serum potassium concentration and eGFR, respectively, indicating attenuation of effect gains at high exposures. There was no apparent ethnic effect on the investigated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships. The model-predicted times to reach the full (99%) steady-state drug effect on UACR, serum potassium, and eGFR were 138, 20, and 85 days, respectively, while the pharmacokinetic half-life was 2-3 h and steady state was achieved after 2 days, indicating timescale separation. CONCLUSION: Our dose-exposure-response modeling and simulation indicates effects were largely saturated at finerenone 20 mg and doses of both 10 and 20 mg once daily appear safe and efficacious at reducing albuminuria.

Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling in translational drug research.

The use of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling in translational drug research is a promising approach that provides better understanding of drug efficacy and safety. It is applied to predict efficacy and safety in humans using in vitro bioassay and/or in vivo animal data. Current research in PK-PD modeling focuses on the development of mechanism-based models with improved extrapolation and prediction properties. A key element in mechanism-based PK-PD modeling is the explicit distinction between parameters for describing (i) drug-specific properties and (ii) biological system-specific properties. Mechanism-based PK-PD models contain specific expressions for the characterization of processes on the causal path between drug exposure and drug response. The different terms represent: target-site distribution, target binding and activation and transduction. Ultimately, mechanism-based PK-PD models will also characterize the interaction of the drug effect with disease processes and disease progression. In this review, the principles of mechanism-based PK-PD modeling are described and illustrated by recent applications.

Changes in GABAA receptor properties in amygdala kindled animals: in vivo studies using [11C]flumazenil and positron emission tomography.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present investigation was to quantify alterations in GABA(A) receptor density in vivo in rats subjected to amygdala kindling. METHODS: The GABA(A) receptor density was quantified by conducting a [(11)C]flumazenil (FMZ) positron emission tomography (PET) study according to the full saturation method, in which each animal received a single injection of FMZ to fully saturate the GABA(A) receptors. Subsequently, the concentration-time curves of FMZ in blood [using high-pressure liquid chromatography with UV detector (HPLC-UV) or high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS)] and brain (with PET-scanning) were analyzed by population modeling using a pharmacokinetic model, containing expressions to describe the time course of FMZ in blood and brain. RESULTS: The GABA(A) receptor density (B(max)) in kindled rats was decreased by 36% compared with controls. This is consistent with a reduction of 28% in electroencephalography (EEG) effect of midazolam in the same animal model, suggesting that a reduced number of GABA(A) receptors underlies the decreased efficacy of midazolam. Furthermore, receptor affinity (K(D)) was not changed, but the total volume of distribution in the brain (V(Br)), is increased to 178% of control after kindling, which might indicate an alteration in the transport of FMZ across the blood-brain barrier. CONCLUSIONS: Both the GABA(A) receptor density (B(max)), and possibly also the blood-brain barrier transport of FMZ (V(Br)) are altered after kindling. Furthermore, this study indicates the feasibility of conducting PET studies for quantifying moderate changes in GABA(A) receptor density in a rat model of epilepsy in vivo.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex.

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex selectively binds steroidal neuromuscular blocking drugs, leading to reversal of neuromuscular blockade. The authors developed a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for reversal of neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex, assuming that reversal results from a decrease of free drug in plasma and/or neuromuscular junction. The model was applied for predicting the interaction between sugammadex and rocuronium or vecuronium. METHODS: Noninstantaneous equilibrium of rocuronium-sugammadex complex formation was assumed in the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic interaction model. The pharmacokinetic parameters for the complex and sugammadex alone were assumed to be identical. After development of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for rocuronium alone, the interaction model was optimized using rocuronium and sugammadex concentration data after administration of 0.1-8 mg/kg sugammadex 3 min after administration of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. Subsequently, the predicted reversal of neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex was compared with data after administration of up to 8 mg/kg sugammadex at reappearance of second twitch of the train-of-four; or 3, 5, or 15 min after administration of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. Finally, the model was applied to predict reversal of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. RESULTS: Using the in vitro dissociation constants for the binding of rocuronium and vecuronium to sugammadex, the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic interaction model adequately predicted the increase in total rocuronium and vecuronium plasma concentrations and the time-course of reversal of neuromuscular blockade. CONCLUSIONS: Model-based evaluation supports the hypothesis that reversal of rocuronium- and vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex results from a decrease in the free rocuronium and vecuronium concentration in plasma and neuromuscular junction. The model is useful for prediction of reversal of rocuronium and vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex.