HRAS mutation positive multiple myeloma in the type 2 CALR mutation positive essential thrombocythemia: A case report.

Out of BCR-ABL negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPNPh- ) patients, 3%-14% display a concomitant monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS). In most cases, the diagnosis of plasma cell dyscrasia is either synchronous with that of MPNPh- or occurs later on. We present a 50-year-old patient with type 2 CALR Lys385Asnfs*47 mutation positive essential thrombocythemia (ET) who developed symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) 13 years after the diagnosis of ET during PEG-INF2α treatment. The NGS study performed at the time of the MM diagnosis revealed the HRAS Val14Gly/c.41T〉G mutation and the wild type CALR, JAK2 and MPL gene sequence. In the presented case, the complete molecular remission of ET was achieved after 16 months of PEG-INF2α treatment. The origin of MM cells in MPNPh- patients remains unknown. Published data suggests that type 2 CALRins5 up-regulate the ATF6 chaperone targets in hematopoietic cells and activate the inositol-requiring enzyme 1α-X-box-binding protein 1 pathway of the unfolded protein response (UPR) system to drive malignancy. It cannot be excluded that endoplasmic reticulum stress induced by the increased ATF6 resulted in an abnormal redox homeostasis and proteostasis, which are factors linked to MM. The presented case history and the proposed mechanism of mutant CALR interaction with UPR and/or ATF6 should initiate the discussion about the possible impact of the mutant CALR protein on the function and genomic stability of different types of myeloid cells, including progenitor cells.

Evaluation of the effect of ritlecitinib on the pharmacokinetics of caffeine in healthy participants.

AIMS: This clinical study was conducted to evaluate the impact of ritlecitinib on the pharmacokinetics of caffeine, a cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) substrate. METHODS: In this single-centre, single-arm, open-label, fixed-sequence study, healthy participants received a single 100-mg dose of caffeine on 2 separate occasions: on Day 1 of Period 1 as monotherapy and on Day 8 of Period 2 after oral administration of ritlecitinib 200 mg once daily for 8 days. Serial blood samples were collected and analysed using a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by using a noncompartmental method. Safety was monitored by physical examination, vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory assessments. RESULTS: Twelve participants were enrolled and completed the study. Coadministration of caffeine 100 mg in the presence of steady-state levels of ritlecitinib (200 mg once daily) increased caffeine exposure compared with caffeine given alone. Area under the curve to infinity and maximum concentration of caffeine increased by approximately 165 and 10%, respectively, when coadministered with ritlecitinib. The ratios of the adjusted geometric means (90% confidence interval) for caffeine area under the curve to infinity and maximum concentration were 265.14% (234.12-300.26%) and 109.74% (103.90-15.91%), respectively, when caffeine was coadministered with steady-state ritlecitinib (test) compared with its administration alone (reference). Multiple doses of ritlecitinib when coadministered with a single dose of caffeine were generally safe and well tolerated in healthy participants. CONCLUSION: Ritlecitinib is a moderate inhibitor of CYP1A2 and can increase systemic exposures of CYP1A2 substrates.

Utilization of Rosuvastatin and Endogenous Biomarkers in Evaluating the Impact of Ritlecitinib on BCRP, OATP1B1, and OAT3 Transporter Activity.

PURPOSE: Ritlecitinib, an inhibitor of Janus kinase 3 and tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma family kinases, is in development for inflammatory diseases. This study assessed the impact of ritlecitinib on drug transporters using a probe drug and endogenous biomarkers. METHODS: In vitro transporter-mediated substrate uptake and inhibition by ritlecitinib and its major metabolite were evaluated. Subsequently, a clinical drug interaction study was conducted in 12 healthy adult participants to assess the effect of ritlecitinib on pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin, a substrate of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1), and organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3). Plasma concentrations of coproporphyrin I (CP-I) and pyridoxic acid (PDA) were assessed as endogenous biomarkers for OATP1B1 and OAT1/3 function, respectively. RESULTS: In vitro studies suggested that ritlecitinib can potentially inhibit BCRP, OATP1B1 and OAT1/3 based on regulatory cutoffs. In the subsequent clinical study, coadministration of ritlecitinib decreased rosuvastatin plasma exposure area under the curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) by ~ 13% and maximum concentration (Cmax) by ~ 27% relative to rosuvastatin administered alone. Renal clearance was comparable in the absence and presence of ritlecitinib coadministration. PK parameters of AUCinf and Cmax for CP-I and PDA were also similar regardless of ritlecitinib coadministration. CONCLUSION: Ritlecitinib does not inhibit BCRP, OATP1B1, and OAT3 and is unlikely to cause a clinically relevant interaction through these transporters. Furthermore, our findings add to the body of evidence supporting the utility of CP-I and PDA as endogenous biomarkers for assessment of OATP1B1 and OAT1/3 transporter activity.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetics and safety of talazoparib in patients with advanced cancer and varying degrees of hepatic impairment.

AIM: This phase I study investigated talazoparib pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety in patients with advanced solid tumours and varying degrees of hepatic function. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumours and normal hepatic function or varying degrees of hepatic impairment (mild, moderate or severe, based on National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group classification) received talazoparib 0.5 mg once daily for 22 calendar days. Plasma and urine samples after single and multiple doses were collected and analysed for talazoparib using validated assays. Plasma PK data from all patients were analysed using the population PK method. Plasma and urine PK parameters in PK-evaluable patients were calculated using noncompartmental analysis (NCA). Safety was monitored in all enrolled patients. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled; 37 had ≥1 PK concentration, among which 17 were evaluable for NCA. Population PK analysis (n = 37) indicated no significant impact of hepatic function on apparent clearance (CL/F) of talazoparib. Baseline creatinine clearance was the only significant covariate on CL/F (α = 0.05). NCA of data (n = 17) showed no clear trend for increase in exposure on day 22 with worsening hepatic function. Talazoparib protein binding was comparable in patients with varying hepatic function. Talazoparib was generally well tolerated, and the safety profile observed in this study was consistent with the known safety profile of the drug. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic impairment (mild, moderate or severe) has no impact on the PK of talazoparib. No dose modification is recommended for patients with advanced solid tumours and various degrees of hepatic impairment, and this labelling language has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency.

BCR/ABL1-Like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: From Diagnostic Approaches to Molecularly Targeted Therapy.

BACKGROUND: BCR/ABL1-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia is a newly recognized high-risk subtype of ALL, characterized by the presence of genetic alterations activating kinase and cytokine receptor signaling. This subtype is associated with inferior outcomes, compared to other B-cell precursor ALL. SUMMARY: The recognition of BCR/ABL1-like ALL is challenging due to the complexity of underlying genetic alterations. Rearrangements of CRLF2 are the most frequent alteration in BCR/ABL1-like ALL and can be identified by flow cytometry. The identification of BCR/ABL1-like ALL can be achieved with stepwise algorithms or broad-based testing. The main goal of the diagnostic analysis is to detect the underlying genetic alterations, which are critical for the diagnosis and targeted therapy. KEY MESSAGES: The aim of the manuscript is to review the available data on BCR/ABL1-like ALL characteristics, diagnostic algorithms, and novel, molecularly targeted therapeutic options.

Evaluation of the effect of P-glycoprotein inhibition and induction on talazoparib disposition in patients with advanced solid tumours.

AIMS: In vitro data show that talazoparib is a substrate for P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein transporters. This open-label, 2-arm, drug-drug interaction Phase 1 study in patients with advanced solid tumours assessed the effect of a P-gp inhibitor (itraconazole) and a P-gp inducer (rifampicin) on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of talazoparib. The safety and tolerability of a single dose of talazoparib with and without itraconazole or rifampicin were also assessed. METHODS: Thirty-six patients were enrolled (Arm A [itraconazole], n = 19; Arm B [rifampicin], n = 17). Patients in both arms received 2 single oral doses of talazoparib (0.5 mg, Arm A; 1 mg, Arm B) alone and with multiple daily oral doses of itraconazole (Arm A) or rifampicin (Arm B). RESULTS: Coadministration of itraconazole and talazoparib increased talazoparib area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinity by ~56% and maximum observed plasma concentration by ~40% relative to talazoparib alone. Coadministration of rifampicin and talazoparib increased talazoparib maximum observed plasma concentration by approximately 37% (geometric mean ratio 136.6% [90% confidence interval 103.2-180.9]); area under the curve was not affected relative to talazoparib alone (geometric mean ratio 102.0% [90% confidence interval 94.0-110.7]). Talazoparib had an overall safety profile consistent with that observed in prior studies in which talazoparib was administered as a single dose. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of itraconazole increased talazoparib plasma exposure compared to talazoparib alone. A reduced talazoparib dose is recommended if coadministration of potent P-gp inhibitors cannot be avoided. Similar exposure was observed when talazoparib was administered alone and with rifampicin suggesting that the effect of rifampicin on talazoparib exposure is limited.

Talazoparib has no clinically relevant effect on QTc interval in patients with advanced solid tumors.

The aims of this study were (i) to evaluate the effect of talazoparib (1 mg once daily) on cardiac repolarization in patients with advanced solid tumors by assessing corrected QT interval (QTc) and (ii) to examine the relationship between plasma talazoparib concentration and QTc. In this open-label phase 1 study, patients had continuous 12-lead ECG recordings at baseline followed by time-matched continuous ECG recordings and collection of talazoparib plasma pharmacokinetic samples predose and at 1, 2, 4, and 6 h postdose on treatment days 1 and 22 and before talazoparib administration on day 2. ECG recordings were submitted for independent central review where triplicate 10-s ECGs, extracted up to 15 min before pharmacokinetic samples, were assessed for RR, PR, QRS, and QT intervals and ECG morphology. QT interval was corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's (QTcF) and Bazett's (QTcB) formulae. Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to examine the relationship between QTc and RR interval change from baseline and plasma talazoparib concentration. Thirty-seven patients received talazoparib. Mean change in QTcF from time-matched baseline ranged from -3.5 to 6.9 ms, with the greatest change 1 h postdose on day 22. No clinically relevant changes in PR, QRS, QTcB, QTcF, or RR intervals, heart rate, or ECG morphology were observed. No concentration-dependent effect on heart rate or QTc was observed. No deaths, permanent treatment discontinuations due to adverse events were reported. Talazoparib (1 mg once daily) had no clinically relevant effects on cardiac repolarization.

Successful Management of a Child With Drug-induced Necrotizing Pancreatitis During Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Therapy: A Case Report.

Acute pancreatitis in children acute lymphoblastic leukemia is commonly caused by drugs, for example, L-Asparaginase, pegapargase, steroids. The incidence of this complication is estimated at 6.7% to 18%. Although the majority of drug-induced acute pancreatitis cases are mild, severe cases can rarely occur. This work presents a case of successful management of a child with drug-induced necrotizing pancreatitis during acute lymphoblastic leukemia therapy. This case illustrates that comprehensive care and immediate intensive treatment can rescue patient despite poor prognosis. Administration of octreotide may serve a role in limiting the severity of the disease.

Investigation of the impact of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of dacomitinib.

Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) is a small-molecule inhibitor of the tyrosine kinases human epidermal growth factor receptor-1 (HER1; epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR), HER2, and HER4 currently being developed for the treatment of lung cancer with sensitizing mutations in EGFR or refractory to EGFR-directed treatment. Dacomitinib is largely metabolized by the liver through oxidative and conjugative metabolism; therefore, determination of the impact of varying degrees of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of dacomitinib was warranted to ensure patient safety. In this phase I, open-label, parallel-group study, a single dose of dacomitinib was administered to healthy volunteers and to subjects with mild or moderate liver dysfunction, as determined by Child-Pugh classification. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on the single-dose PK profile of dacomitinib, as well as to assess the safety and tolerability in these subjects. Plasma protein binding and impact of hepatic function on the PK of the active metabolite PF-05199265 was also investigated. Twenty-five male subjects received dacomitinib 30 mg, with 8 subjects in the healthy- and mild-impairment cohorts and 9 subjects in the moderate-impairment cohort. Compared with healthy volunteers, there was no significant change in dacomitinib exposure in subjects with mild or moderate liver dysfunction and no observed alteration in plasma protein binding. No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in any group, and dacomitinib was well tolerated. A dose adjustment does not appear necessary when administering dacomitinib to patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between maraviroc and fosamprenavir-ritonavir: an open-label, fixed-sequence study in healthy subjects.

This open-label, fixed-sequence, phase 1 study evaluated the pharmacokinetic interaction between maraviroc (MVC) and ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir (FPV/r) in healthy subjects. In period 1, subjects received 300 mg of MVC twice daily (BID; cohort 1) or once daily (QD; cohort 2) for 5 days. In period 2, cohort 1 subjects received 700/100 mg of FPV/r BID alone on days 1 to 10 and then FPV/r at 700/100 mg BID plus MVC at 300 mg BID on days 11 to 20; cohort 2 subjects received FPV/r at 1,400/100 mg QD alone on days 1 to 10 and then FPV/r at 1,400/100 mg QD plus MVC at 300 mg QD on days 11 to 20. Pharmacokinetic parameters, assessed on day 5 of period 1 and on days 10 and 20 of period 2, included the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the concentration at end of dosing interval (Cτ), and the area under the curve over dosing interval (AUCτ). Safety and tolerability were also assessed. MVC geometric mean AUCτ, Cmax, and Cτ were increased by 149, 52, and 374%, respectively, after BID dosing with FPV/r, and by 126, 45, and 80%, respectively, after QD dosing. Amprenavir (the active form of the prodrug fosamprenavir) and ritonavir exposures were decreased in the presence of MVC with amprenavir AUCτ, Cmax, and Cτ decreased by 34 to 36% in the presence of FPV/r plus maraviroc BID and by 15 to 30% with FPV/r plus MVC QD both compared to FPV/r alone. The overall all-causality adverse-event (AE) incidence rate was 96.4%; all AEs were of mild or moderate severity. Commonly reported treatment-related AEs (>20% of patients overall) included diarrhea, fatigue, abdominal discomfort, headache, and nausea. No serious AEs or deaths occurred. In summary, maraviroc exposure increased in the presence of FPV/r, whereas MVC coadministration decreased amprenavir and ritonavir exposures. MVC dosed at 300 mg BID with FPV/r is not recommended due to concerns of lower amprenavir exposures; however, no dose adjustment is warranted with MVC at 150 mg BID in combination with FPV/r based on the available clinical data. MVC plus FPV/r was generally well tolerated; no new safety signals were detected.

Tigecycline does not prolong corrected QT intervals in healthy subjects.

We evaluated the effect of tigecycline (50-mg and 200-mg doses) on corrected QT (QTc) intervals and assessed safety and tolerability in a randomized, placebo-controlled, four-period crossover study of 48 (44 male) healthy volunteers aged 22 to 53 years. Fed subjects received tigecycline (50 mg or 200 mg) or placebo in a blinded fashion or an open-label oral dose of moxifloxacin (400 mg) after 1 liter of intravenous fluid. Serial electrocardiograms were recorded before, and for 96 h after, dosing. Blood samples for tigecycline pharmacokinetics were collected after each recording. QTc intervals were corrected using Fridericia's correction (QTcF). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods with potential relationships examined using linear mixed-effects modeling. Adverse events were recorded. The upper limits of the 90% confidence interval for the mean difference between both tigecycline doses and placebo for all time-matched QTcF interval changes from baseline were <5 ms. The tigecycline concentrations initially declined rapidly and then more slowly. In the group given 50 mg of tigecycline, the pharmacokinetic parameters and means were as follows: maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)), 432 ng/ml; area under the concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞), 2,366 ng · h/ml; clearance (CL), 21.1 liters/h; volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)), 610 liters; and terminal half-life (t(1/2)), 22.1 h. Proportional or similar values were found for the group given 200 mg of tigecycline. Linear mixed-effects modeling failed to show an effect on QTcF values by tigecycline concentrations (P = 0.755). Tigecycline does not prolong the QTc interval in healthy subjects. This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01287793.

Comparison of diagnostic and treatment processes among pediatric and adolescents and young adults' populations suffering from acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphomas.

Introduction: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphomas affect both pediatric and adult populations, therefore, they might be treated by pediatric or adult centers.It has been proven that the prognosis among adolescents and young adults (AYA) is poorer than among children, which remains a subject of research. Many factors are suspected to affect the diagnostic and treatment processes in adolescents and young adults, one of them being the organization of the healthcare system.The aimof the studywas to compare the time intervals between different events on disease trajectory in pediatric and AYA groups suffering from ALL and lymphomas. Methods: We collected data on 81 patients diagnosed with ALL (50 children and 31 AYAs) and 100 patients diagnosed with lymphomas (50 children and 50 AYAs). Statistical analysis was performed in order to compare the groups. Results: The results confirmed the hypothesis that the duration of the diagnostic process differs significantly between groups. For patients with ALL, the analyzed time intervals were significantly shorter in the pediatric group than in the AYA group: first contact with a GP - admission to Hematology Department (2 vs. 5 days; pvalue= 0.004), first contact with a GP - treatment (6 vs. 12 days, p-value=0.001), diagnosis - treatment (1 vs. 3 days, p-value=0.003). In the case of patients suffering from lymphomas, the results were similar. The analyzed time intervals were significantly shorter in the pediatric group than in the AYA group: first contact with a GP- diagnosis (21 vs. 40.5 days, p-value<0.0001), first contact with a GP - treatment (27 vs. 65 days, p-value<0.0001). Trend analysis showed that the longer patients had presented symptoms before contacting the primary care physician, the longer they waited for the beginning of treatment both in ALL and lymphomas groups (p-values=0.0129 and 0.0038 respectively). Discussion: As the diagnostic and treatment processes are longer for AYA patients, actions must be undertaken in order to ensure equality and improve the healthcare system in Poland and possibly other countries.

Leveraging Prior Healthy Participant Pharmacokinetic Data to Evaluate the Impact of Renal and Hepatic Impairment on Ritlecitinib Pharmacokinetics.

Ritlecitinib is a selective, covalent, irreversible inhibitor of Janus kinase 3 (JAK3) and the tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (TEC) family kinases. Pharmacokinetics and safety of ritlecitinib in participants with hepatic (Study 1) or renal (Study 2) impairment were to be characterized from two phase I studies. Due to a study pause caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the study 2 healthy participant (HP) cohort was not recruited; however, the demography of the severe renal impairment cohort closely matched the study 1 HP cohort. We present results from each study and two innovative approaches to utilizing available HP data as reference data for study 2: a statistical approach using analysis of variance and an in silico simulation of an HP cohort created using a population pharmacokinetics (POPPK) model derived from several ritlecitinib studies. For study 1, the observed area under the curve for 24-h dosing interval and maximum plasma concentration for HPs and their observed geometric mean ratios (participants with moderate hepatic impairment vs HPs) were within 90% prediction intervals from the POPPK simulation-based approach, thereby validating the latter approach. When applied to study 2, both the statistical and POPPK simulation approaches demonstrated that patients with renal impairment would not require ritlecitinib dose modification. In both phase I studies, ritlecitinib was generally safe and well tolerated. These analyses represent a new methodology for generating reference HP cohorts in special population studies for drugs in development with well-characterized pharmacokinetics in HPs and adequate POPPK models. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04037865 , NCT04016077 , NCT02309827 , NCT02684760 , and NCT02969044 .

Evaluation of the Impact of Ritlecitinib on Organic Cation Transporters Using Sumatriptan and Biomarkers as Probes.

Ritlecitinib, an inhibitor of Janus kinase 3 and hepatocellular carcinoma family kinases, is in development as potential treatment for several inflammatory diseases. In vitro studies presented ritlecitinib as an inhibitor of hepatic organic cation transporter (OCT) 1, renal transporters OCT2 and multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) proteins 1/2K using multiple substrates, and ritlecitinib's major inactive metabolite M2, as an inhibitor of OCT1. A clinical interaction study with an OCT1 drug probe (sumatriptan) and relevant probe biomarkers for OCT/MATE was conducted to assess the effect of ritlecitinib on these transporters in healthy adult participants. The selectivity of sumatriptan for OCT1 was confirmed through a series of in vitro uptake assays. A simple static model was used to help contextualize the observed changes in sumatriptan area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Coadministration of a single 400-mg dose of ritlecitinib increased sumatriptan AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf ) by ≈30% relative to a single 25-mg sumatriptan administration alone. When administered 8 hours after a ritlecitinib dose, sumatriptan AUCinf increased by ≈50% relative to sumatriptan given alone. Consistent with OCT1 inhibition, the AUC from time 0 to 24 hours of isobutyryl-L-carnitine decreased by ≈15% after ritlecitinib. Based on the evaluation of the renal clearance of N1 -methylnicotinamide, ritlecitinib does not exert clinically meaningful inhibition on renal OCT2 or MATE1/2K. This study confirmed that ritlecitinib and M2 are inhibitors of OCT1 but not OCT2 or MATE1/2K in healthy adults.

BCR::ABL1-like acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a single institution experience on identification of potentially therapeutic targetable cases.

BACKGROUND: BCR::ABL1-like acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (BCR::ABL1-like ALL) is characterized by inferior outcomes. Current efforts concentrate on the identification of molecular targets to improve the therapy results. The accessibility to next generation sequencing, a recommended diagnostic method, is limited. We present our experience in the BCR::ABL1-like ALL diagnostics, using a simplified algorithm. RESULTS: Out of 102 B-ALL adult patients admitted to our Department in the years 2008-2022, 71 patients with available genetic material were included. The diagnostic algorithm comprised flow cytometry, fluorescent in-situ hybridization, karyotype analysis and molecular testing with high resolution melt analysis and Sanger Sequencing. We recognized recurring cytogenetic abnormalities in 32 patients. The remaining 39 patients were screened for BCR::ABL1-like features. Among them, we identified 6 patients with BCR::ABL1-like features (15.4%). Notably, we documented CRLF2-rearranged (CRLF2-r) BCR::ABL1-like ALL occurrence in a patient with long-term remission of previously CRLF2-r negative ALL. CONCLUSIONS: An algorithm implementing widely available techniques enables the identification of BCR::ABL1-like ALL cases in settings with limited resources.

Psychosocial Late Effects in Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer Diagnosed with Leukemia, Lymphoma, and Central Nervous System Tumor.

Purpose: The prevalence of psychosocial late effects and quality of life in adolescent and young adult (AYA)-aged survivors of pediatric cancer have been studied. Methods: The study was conducted in AYA survivors who had been diagnosed with leukemia, lymphoma, or brain tumor, had completed treatment at least 1 year before the study, and were 15-39 years old at study enrollment. The control group consisted of healthy volunteers. A questionnaire comprised a demographic form, eight questions concerning mental health and the disease, and survey The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30. Controls received a questionnaire without questions concerning an illness. Results: Most of survivors believed that cancer treatment might have a serious influence on their health. Survivors significantly more frequently declared using drugs: neuroleptics, tranquilizers, and antidepressants than controls. Survivors of leukemia demonstrated significantly more problems in cognitive functioning than lymphoma survivors. Females were significantly more disabled in emotional functioning than males. Young adults more often reported dysfunction in emotional functioning compared to adolescents. Survivors who were assessed ≥10 years since therapy reported significantly more disadvantage in social functioning than those assessed <10 years since treatment completion. Survivors reported significantly more disadvantages in social functioning than controls. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survivors more often suffered cognitive limitations. Irradiated survivors more often attended psychological therapy. Conclusions: Survivors of pediatric cancer are vulnerable to consequences of oncological treatment, making their quality life significantly worse in comparison with healthy controls. They need to be monitored, supported, and educated.

The Effect of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Talazoparib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies suggest that talazoparib is primarily eliminated unchanged via renal excretion. The current study investigated how varying degrees of renal impairment may affect the PK of talazoparib, and evaluated the safety and tolerability of talazoparib, in patients with advanced solid tumors with/without renal impairment. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors and normal renal function or different degrees of renal impairment measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR: mild = 60-89, moderate = 30-59, severe = 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m2) were enrolled in this open-label, non-randomized, phase I study. Talazoparib was administered orally at 0.5 mg/day for 22 days. Primary PK parameters included the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) at steady state (Day 22). Safety and tolerability were also investigated. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. At Day 22, compared with patients with normal renal function (n = 9), patients with mild (n = 9), moderate (n = 8), or severe (n = 8) renal impairment had a 12.2%, 43.0%, and 163.3% increase in talazoparib AUC0-24, and a 11.1%, 31.6%, and 89.3% increase in talazoparib Cmax, respectively. Talazoparib was generally well tolerated, and overall there were no notable differences in the treatment-emergent adverse event profile across renal function groups. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to talazoparib increased with worsening renal impairment. Overall, this study confirms current dosing recommendations in patients with mild and moderate renal impairment (1 mg/day and 0.75 mg/day, respectively) and indicates that a lower starting dose of 0.5 mg/day should be considered for patients with severe renal impairment. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02997163.

Palbociclib (PD-0332991) pharmacokinetics in subjects with impaired renal function.

PURPOSE: This publication describes an evaluation of the impact of different degrees of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of palbociclib after a single 125-mg oral dose. METHODS: Thirty-one subjects were assigned to different renal function groups. Serial blood sampling for pharmacokinetics was performed up to 120 h and 168 h post-palbociclib dose for subjects with normal and impaired renal function, respectively. A separate blood sample was collected at pre-dose and 8 h after dosing to measure plasma protein binding. Plasma palbociclib was measured using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Plasma protein binding samples were processed by equilibrium dialysis and measured by a validated LC-MS/MS method. RESULTS: Plasma palbociclib exposure was higher in subjects with renal impairment than in subjects with normal renal function; however, there were no marked differences in exposure across subjects with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment. Total plasma exposure AUCinf increased by 39%, 42%, and 31% with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively, relative to subjects with normal renal function. Peak exposure Cmax increased by 17%, 12%, and 15% for mild, moderate, and severe impairment, respectively. There was no obvious trend in the mean fu with worsening renal function. The PBPK model adequately described palbociclib exposure observed in subjects with moderate or severe renal impairment from this study. CONCLUSION: Palbociclib was safe and well-tolerated in a small population of subjects with normal and impaired renal function after a single oral 125 mg dose. No dose adjustment is required in patients with renal impairment.

Effect of Renal or Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Intravenous Rivipansel.

Two studies evaluated the effects of renal and hepatic impairment on pharmacokinetics and safety of rivipansel (NCT02813798, NCT02871570). A single intravenous 840-mg rivipansel dose was administered to subjects with renal impairment or normal renal function in study 1005 and subjects with moderate hepatic impairment or normal hepatic function in study 1006. Plasma (both studies) and urine (study 1005) samples were collected for 96 hours postdose. All subjects in studies 1005 (n = 28) and 1006 (n = 16) completed all study procedures. Rivipansel exposure (AUCinf ) was 47%, 124%, and 437% higher and total clearance 30%, 57%, and 82% lower in the mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment groups, respectively, than in the normal renal function group. Overall rivipansel exposure was 20% lower and total clearance 31% higher in the moderate hepatic impairment group than in the normal hepatic function group. Ten treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in studies 1005 and 1006; no event was considered treatment related. As expected, clearance of rivipansel decreased with increasing renal impairment. The difference observed between rivipansel pharmacokinetics in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and subjects with normal hepatic function was not considered clinically significant. Single doses of rivipansel were well tolerated in subjects with either renal or hepatic impairment.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ascending single and multiple doses of lecozotan in healthy young and elderly subjects.

AIMS: To determine the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of oral immediate release (IR) lecozotan in healthy young and elderly subjects. METHODS: Three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential, ascending dose Phase I studies of lecozotan were conducted. In a single-dose study, ascending doses of 2, 5 and 10 mg were administered to cohorts of eight young subjects. In the two ascending 14-day multiple-dose studies, 41 young subjects received 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 5 mg q12h of lecozotan or placebo and 24 elderly received 0.5 mg and 5 mg q12h of lecozotan or placebo. Assessments included safety evaluations, a complete PK profile and PD. RESULTS: Lecozotan was safe and well tolerated at steady state up to 5 mg q12. The maximum tolerated dose after multiple doses was >10 mg (5 mg q12). In the single-dose study, the maximum tolerated dose was 10 mg. Dose-limiting mild-to-moderate adverse events included paraesthesia, dizziness and visual disturbances peaking at t(max) and disappearing concomitantly with plasma concentrations. No clinically relevant changes in vital signs, ECG intervals or routine laboratory tests occurred. Lecozotan did not significantly change cognitive function, EEG or hormone levels. PK was characterized by rapid absorption, dose proportionality, extensive distribution and rapid elimination. The mean CL/F was approximately 35% lower in the elderly. CONCLUSIONS: Lecozotan IR was safe and well tolerated after administration of multiple oral doses up to 5 mg q12h in young and elderly subjects. These results support the development of lecozotan in patients with Alzheimer's disease.