Piperacillin/tazobactam Susceptibility Test Interpretive Criteria for Enterobacterales: Recommendations from the United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.

The in vitro susceptibility testing interpretive criteria (STIC) for TZP against Enterobacterales were recently updated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). The United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (USCAST) also recently reviewed TZP STIC for Enterobacterales and arrived at different STIC for Enterobacterales and herein we explain our recommendations and rationale behind them. Based on our review of the available data, USCAST does not recommend TZP STIC for certain Enterobacterales species that have a moderate to high likelihood of clinically significant AmpC production (E. cloacae, C. freundii, and K. aerogenes only) or for third-generation cephalosporin-non-susceptible (3GC-NS) Enterobacterales. USCAST recommends a TZP susceptibility breakpoint of ≤ 16/4 mg/L for third-generation cephalosporin-susceptible (3GC-S) Enterobacterales but only endorses the use of extended infusion TZP regimens for patients with infections due to these pathogens.

The growing threat of NDM-producing E. coli with penicillin-binding protein 3 mutations in the United States - is there a potential role for durlobactam?

We report identification of 5 patients with infections caused by NDM-5-producing E. coli harboring PBP3 mutations that showed reduced susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam and cefiderocol. Durlobactam, a novel diazabicyclooctane ß-lactamase inhibitor, demonstrated minimum inhibitory concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 2 µg/mL supporting future investigations into a potential role in clinical management.

Rates of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam among patients treated for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia or pneumonia.

Among consecutive patients with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia or pneumonia we found those treated with ceftazidime-avibactam were more likely to develop resistance (defined as ≥4-fold increased MIC) than those treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam (40% vs. 10%; P=0.002). Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance was associated with new mutations in ampC and efflux regulatory pathways.

Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment analysis of IV fosfomycin for the treatment of MDR Gram-negative bacterial infections.

BACKGROUND: IV fosfomycin is used against MDR Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) but has dose-limiting side effects, especially in patients with impaired kidney function. OBJECTIVES: To determine the optimal dosage of IV fosfomycin for patients with varying degrees of kidney function. METHODS: Adult patients receiving IV fosfomycin for treatment of GNB were eligible. Five serial blood samples were collected after at least three doses of fosfomycin; plasma was assayed by LC-MS/MS and modelled by population pharmacokinetic analysis. The PTA for AUC24/MIC of 98.9 for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 40.8 for Pseudomonas aeruginosa were computed by Monte Carlo simulations. Cumulative fractions of response (CFR) were analysed for each pathogen using EUCAST MIC distributions. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients were included. Creatinine clearance (CLCR) and gender significantly influenced fosfomycin clearance. The kidney function-adjusted dosing regimens are proposed by using the lowest dose that can achieve ≥90% PTA for AUC24/MIC of 98.9 at an MIC of ≤32 mg/L (EUCAST v.13 susceptibility breakpoint for Enterobacterales). For patients with normal kidney function (CLCR 91-120 mL/min), a dosage of 15 g/day is suggested. This regimen achieved 97.1% CFR against E. coli, whereas CFR was 72.9% for K. pneumoniae and 76.7% for P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: A fosfomycin dosage of 15 g/day with adjustment according to kidney function provided high PTA and CFR when treating E. coli. This dosage is lower than that used in current practice and may improve tolerability. Higher dosages may be needed for P. aeruginosa; however, safety data are limited.

A comparison of strategies for identifying patients at risk for carbapenem-resistant or extended ß-lactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

OBJECTIVES: To assess risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR) and extended-ß-lactam-resistant P. aeruginosa (EBR) infection/colonization, and to develop and compare tools for predicting isolation of CR and EBR from clinical cultures. METHODS: This retrospective study analysed hospitalized patients with positive P. aeruginosa cultures between 2015 and 2021. Two case-control analyses were performed to identify risk factors and develop scoring tools for distinguishing patients with CR versus carbapenem-susceptible (CS) P. aeruginosa and EBR versus CS P. aeruginosa. The performance of institutionally derived scores, externally derived scores and the presence/absence of key risk factors to predict CR and EBR were then compared. RESULTS: A total of 2379 patients were included. Of these, 8.3% had a positive culture for CR, 5.0% for EBR and 86.7% for CS P. aeruginosa. There was substantial overlap in risk factors for CR and EBR. Institutional risk scores demonstrated modestly higher area under the ROC curve values than external scores for predicting CR (0.67 versus 0.58) and EBR (0.76 versus 0.70). Assessing the presence/absence of ≥1 of the two strongest predictors (prior carbapenem use or CR isolation within 90 days) was slightly inferior to scoring tools for predicting CR, and comparable for predicting EBR. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians concerned about CR in P. aeruginosa should consider the likelihood of EBR when making treatment decisions. A simple approach of assessing recent history of CR isolation or carbapenem usage performed similarly to more complex scoring tools and offers a more pragmatic way of identifying patients who require coverage for resistant P. aeruginosa.

Less Is More? Antibiotic Treatment Duration in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.

Recommended antimicrobial treatment durations for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa have evolved over the past few decades. In this Viewpoint, we provide a narrative review of landmark trials investigating antimicrobial treatment durations for VAP caused by P. aeruginosa, and appraise iterations of expert consensus guidelines based on these data. We highlight strengths and weaknesses of existing data on this topic and provide recommendations for future avenues of study.

State of the Management of Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Organisms.

In the past decade, the prevalence of multidrug-resistant gram-negative (MDR-GN) bacterial infections has increased significantly, leading to higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Treating these infections poses numerous challenges, particularly when selecting appropriate empiric therapy for critically ill patients for whom the margin for error is low. Fortunately, the availability of new therapies has improved the treatment landscape, offering safer and more effective options. However, there remains a need to establish and implement optimal clinical and therapeutic approaches for managing these infections. Here, we review strategies for identifying patients at risk for MDR-GN infections, propose a framework for the choice of empiric and definitive treatment, and explore effective multidisciplinary approaches to managing patients in the hospital while ensuring a safe transition to outpatient settings.

Case Commentary: When Voldemort Meets Sauron: Treatment Considerations for Emerging Dual-Carbapenemase-Producing Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Infections caused by extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa are difficult to treat due to limited effective treatment options. In this issue, a patient with a corneal infection caused by a Verona integron-encoded metallo-ß-lactamase (VIM)- and Guiana extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (GES)-coproducing P. aeruginosa strain associated with the recent artificial tears-related outbreak in the United States is described. This resistance genotype/phenotype further compromises therapeutic options, and this report provides insights into diagnostic and treatment approaches for clinicians dealing with infections due to this highly resistant P. aeruginosa.

Burden of illness in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections in US hospitals between 2014 and 2019.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant (CR) Acinetobacter baumannii is a concerning pathogen in the USA and worldwide. METHODS: To assess the comparative burden of CR vs carbapenem-susceptible (CS) A. baumannii, this retrospective cohort study analyzed data from adult patients in 250 US hospitals from the Premier HealthCare Database (2014-2019). The outcomes analyzed included hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, discharge status, in-hospital mortality, readmission rates and hospital charges. Logistic regression was used for univariate and multivariable assessment of the independent relationship between relevant covariates, with a focus on CR status, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: 2047 Patients with CR and 3476 patients with CS A. baumannii infections were included. CR A. baumannii was more commonly isolated in respiratory tract infections (CR 40.7% and CS 27.0%, P < 0.01), whereas CS A. baumannii was more frequently associated with bloodstream infections (CS 16.7% and CR 8.6%, P < 0.01). Patients with CR A. baumannii infections had higher in-hospital (CR 16.4% vs CS 10.0%; P < 0.01) and 30-day (CR 32.2% vs CS 21.6%; P < 0.01) mortality compared to those with CS infections. After adjusting for age, sex, admission source, infection site, comorbidities, and treatment with in vitro active antibiotics within 72 h, carbapenem resistance was independently associated with increased mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.42 [95% confidence interval 1.15; 1.75], P < 0.01). CR infections were also associated with increases in hospital length of stay (CR 11 days vs CS 9 days; P < 0.01), rate of intensive care unit utilization (CR 62.3% vs CS 45.1%; P < 0.01), rate of readmission with A. baumannii infections (CR 17.8% vs CS 4.0%; P < 0.01) and hospital charges. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the burden of illness is significantly greater for patients with CR A. baumannii infections and are at higher risk of mortality compared with CS infections in US hospitals.

Antibiotic Overuse After Hospital Discharge: A Multi-hospital Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are commonly prescribed to patients as they leave the hospital. We aimed to create a comprehensive metric to characterize antibiotic overuse after discharge among hospitalized patients treated for pneumonia or urinary tract infection (UTI), and to determine whether overuse varied across hospitals and conditions. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients treated for pneumonia or UTI in 46 hospitals between 1 July 2017-30 July 2019, we quantified the proportion of patients discharged with antibiotic overuse, defined as unnecessary antibiotic use, excess antibiotic duration, or suboptimal fluoroquinolone use. Using linear regression, we assessed hospital-level associations between antibiotic overuse after discharge in patients treated for pneumonia versus a UTI. RESULTS: Of 21 825 patients treated for infection (12 445 with pneumonia; 9380 with a UTI), nearly half (49.1%) had antibiotic overuse after discharge (56.9% with pneumonia; 38.7% with a UTI). For pneumonia, 63.1% of overuse days after discharge were due to excess duration; for UTIs, 43.9% were due to treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria. The percentage of patients discharged with antibiotic overuse varied 5-fold among hospitals (from 15.9% [95% confidence interval, 8.7%-24.6%] to 80.6% [95% confidence interval, 69.4%-88.1%]) and was strongly correlated between conditions (regression coefficient = 0.85; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic overuse after discharge was common and varied widely between hospitals. Antibiotic overuse after discharge was associated between conditions, suggesting that the prescribing culture, physician behavior, or organizational processes contribute to overprescribing at discharge. Multifaceted efforts focusing on all 3 types of overuse and multiple conditions should be considered to improve antibiotic prescribing at discharge.

Tocilizumab for Treatment of Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can manifest in rapid decompensation and respiratory failure with elevated inflammatory markers, consistent with cytokine release syndrome for which IL-6 blockade is an approved treatment. METHODS: We assessed effectiveness and safety of IL-6 blockade with tocilizumab in a single-center cohort of patients with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. The primary endpoint was survival probability postintubation; secondary analyses included an ordinal illness severity scale integrating superinfections. Outcomes in patients who received tocilizumab compared with tocilizumab-untreated controls were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression with propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: 154 patients were included, of whom 78 received tocilizumab and 76 did not. Median follow-up was 47 days (range, 28-67). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, although tocilizumab-treated patients were younger (mean: 55 vs 60 years), less likely to have chronic pulmonary disease (10% vs 28%), and had lower D-dimer values at time of intubation (median: 2.4 vs 6.5 mg/dL). In IPTW-adjusted models, tocilizumab was associated with a 45% reduction in hazard of death (HR, .55; 95% CI, .33-.90) and improved status on the ordinal outcome scale [OR per 1-level increase, .58; .36-.94). Although tocilizumab was associated with an increased proportion of patients with superinfections (54% vs 26%; P < .001), there was no difference in 28-day case fatality rate among tocilizumab-treated patients with versus without superinfection (22% vs 15%; P = .42). Staphylococcus aureus accounted for ~50% of bacterial pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, tocilizumab was associated with lower mortality despite higher superinfection occurrence.

Clinical Implications of Microbiologic Treatment Failure in the Setting of Clinical Cure of Bacterial Pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Microbiologic cure is a common outcome in pneumonia clinical trials, but its clinical significance is incompletely understood. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients hospitalized with bacterial pneumonia who achieved clinical cure. Rates of recurrent pneumonia and death were compared between patients with persistent growth of the index pathogen at the time of clinical cure (microbiologic failure) and those with pathogen eradication (microbiologic cure). RESULTS: Among 441 patients, 237 experienced microbiologic cure and 204 experienced microbiologic failure. Prevalences of comorbidities, ventilator dependence, and severity of acute illness were similar between groups. Patients with microbiologic failure experienced significantly higher rates of recurrent pneumonia or death following clinical cure than patients with microbiologic cure, controlling for comorbid conditions, severity of acute illness, appropriateness of empiric antibiotics, intensive care unit placement, tracheostomy dependence, and immunocompromised status (90-day multivariable adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.35). This association was observed among patients with pneumonias caused by Staphylococcus aureus (90-day multivariable adjusted OR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.73-7.90). A trend was observed among pneumonias caused by nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli, but not Enterobacteriaceae or other pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: Microbiologic treatment failure was independently associated with recurrent pneumonia or death among patients with bacterial pneumonia following clinical cure. Microbiologic cure merits further study as a metric to guide therapeutic interventions for patients with bacterial pneumonia.

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam vs Polymyxin or Aminoglycoside-based Regimens for the Treatment of Drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

BACKGROUND: Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a novel cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination that often retains activity against resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The comparative safety and efficacy vs polymyxins or aminoglycosides in this setting remains unknown. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter, observational cohort study was performed. Patients who received ceftolozane/tazobactam were compared with those treated with either polymyxin or aminoglycoside-based regimens for infections due to drug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Multivariate logistic regression was performed controlling for factors associated with treatment to assess the independent impact of ceftolozane/tazobactam on clinical cure, acute kidney injury (AKI), and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included (100 in each treatment arm). The cohort represented an ill population with 69% in the intensive care unit, 63% mechanically ventilated, and 42% in severe sepsis or septic shock at infection onset. The most common infection type was ventilator-associated pneumonia (52%); 7% of patients were bacteremic. Combination therapy was more commonly used in polymyxin/aminoglycoside patients than those who received ceftolozane/tazobactam (72% vs 15%, P < .001). After adjusting for differences between groups, receipt of ceftolozane/tazobactam was independently associated with clinical cure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-5.30) and protective against AKI (aOR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.22). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality. The number needed to treat for a clinical cure with ceftolozane/tazobactam was 5, and the number needed to harm with AKI with a polymyxin/aminoglycoside was 4. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the preferential use of ceftolozane/tazobactam over polymyxins or aminoglycosides for drug-resistant P. aeruginosa infections.

Polymyxin Susceptibility Testing and Interpretive Breakpoints: Recommendations from the United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (USCAST).

The polymyxins are important agents for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. The United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoint recommendations for colistin and polymyxin B are that isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Enterobacteriaceae are considered susceptible at MIC values of ≤2 mg/liter. These recommendations are contingent upon dosing and testing strategies that are described in this commentary. Importantly, these recommendations are not applicable to lower respiratory tract infections, for which we recommend no breakpoints. Furthermore, there is no breakpoint recommendation for polymyxin B for lower urinary tract infections.

Analysis of Pooled Phase III Efficacy Data for Delafloxacin in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.

BACKGROUND: Delafloxacin is an oral or intravenous (IV) antibiotic indicated for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), including both gram-positive (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA]) and gram-negative organisms. Chemically distinct from other quinolones, delafloxacin exhibits enhanced potency, particularly against gram-positive pathogens. The integration of efficacy data across the Phase III ABSSSI studies is presented here and allows for additional examination of results across subgroups. METHODS: Results of 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind trials of 1510 adults with ABSSSI were pooled for this analysis. Subjects in the vancomycin arm received 15 mg/kg, plus 1-2 g of aztreonam every 12 hours. Delafloxacin was dosed at 300 mg IV every 12 hours in Study 302; dosing in Study 303 was 300 mg IV every 12 hours for 3 days, with a mandatory, blinded switch to delafloxacin at 450 mg orally every 12 hours. The primary endpoint was objective response (OR), defined as a ≥20% reduction of lesion spread of erythema area at the primary infection site at 48 to 72 hours (±2 hours), in the absence of clinical failure. Investigator-assessed response, based on the resolution of signs and symptoms at follow-up (FU; Day 14 ± 1) and late follow-up (LFU; Day 21- 28), were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat analysis set, the OR was 81.3% in the delafloxacin arm and 80.7% in the comparator arm (mean treatment difference 0.8%, 95% confidence interval -3.2% to 4.7). Results for OR in the defined subgroups showed delafloxacin to be comparable to vancomycin/aztreonam. Investigator-assessed success was similar at FU (84.7% versus 84.1%) and LFU (82.0% versus 81.7%). Delafloxacin was comparable to vancomycin/aztreonam in the eradication of MRSA, at 98.1% versus 98.0%, respectively, at FU. The frequencies of treatment-emergent adverse events between the groups were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, IV/oral delafloxacin fixed-dose monotherapy was non-inferior to IV vancomycin/aztreonam combination therapy and was well tolerated in each Phase III study, as well as in the pooled analysis, regardless of endpoint or analysis population.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Meropenem/Vaborbactam, or Both? Clinical and Formulary Considerations.

Ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam are changing the management of invasive infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), leading to higher rates of clinical cure, decreased mortality, and decreased rates of acute kidney injury compared with colistin-based regimens. However, these 2 agents are not interchangeable with regard to management of CRE infections, and clinicians need to be aware of their differences. This review focuses on differences in the in vitro activity of these agents as a function of mechanism of carbapenem resistance, the clinical data supporting their superiority over colistin-based therapy, and the differences between agents with regard to propensity for selection of resistance. Furthermore, considerations and recommendations for hospital formularies and antibiotic stewardship programs regarding positioning of these agents are discussed.

The Hypothetical Impact of Accelerate Pheno on Time to Effective Therapy and Time to Definitive Therapy for Bloodstream Infections Due to Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli.

Strategies are needed to improve time to optimal therapy in patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) due to resistant Gram-negative (GN) pathogens. Accelerate Pheno (ACC) can provide antimicrobial susceptibility results within 7 h of a positive culture and may more rapidly optimize therapy. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the hypothetical impact of ACC on time to effective therapy (TTET) and time to definitive therapy (TTDT) among patients with BSI due to resistant GN pathogens. ACC was performed on resistant GN BSI isolates, and results were not available to clinicians in real time. A potential benefit of having ACC on TTET or TTDT was determined if modifications to antimicrobial regimens could have been made sooner with ACC. Comparisons on the impact of ACC in the presence or absence of testing by the Verigene Gram-negative blood culture test (Verigene GN-BC) were performed. Sixty-one patients with resistant GN BSI were evaluated. The median actual TTET and TTDT in the cohort were 25.9 h (interquartile range [IQR], 18.5, 42.1) and 47.6 h (IQR, 24.9, 79.6), respectively. Almost half of the patients had potential improvement in TTET and/or TTDT with ACC. In patients who would have had a benefit the median potential decreases in TTET and TTDT were 16.6 h (IQR, 5.5 to 30.6) and 29.8 h (IQR, 13.6 to 43), respectively. The largest potential improvements were seen in patients for whom Verigene results were not available. In conclusion, among patients with resistant GN BSI in a setting where other rapid diagnostic technologies are utilized, ACC results could have further improved TTET and TTDT.

The hypothetical impact of Accelerate Pheno™ system on time to effective therapy and time to definitive therapy in an institution with an established antimicrobial stewardship programme currently utilizing rapid genotypic organism/resistance marker identification.

Background: Rapid organism identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) can optimize antimicrobial therapy in patients with bacteraemia. The Accelerate Pheno™ system (ACC) can provide identification and AST results within 7 h of a positive culture. Objectives: To assess the hypothetical impact of ACC on time to effective therapy (TTET), time to definitive therapy (TTDT) and antimicrobial usage at the Detroit Medical Center (DMC). Methods: Patients with positive blood cultures from 29 March to 24 June 2016 were included. ACC was performed in parallel with normal laboratory procedures, but results were not made available to the clinicians. The potential benefit of having ACC results was determined if clinicians modified therapy based on actual AST results. Potential changes in TTET, TTDT and antibiotic usage were calculated. Results: One hundred and sixty-seven patients were included. The median TTET was 2.4 h (IQR 0.5, 15.1). Had ACC results been available, TTET could have been improved in four patients (2.4%), by a median decrease of 18.9 h (IQR 11.3, 20.4). The median TTDT was 41.4 h (IQR 21.7, 73.3) and ACC results could have improved TTDT among 51 patients (30.5%), by a median decrease of 25.4 h (IQR 18.7, 37.5). ACC implementation could have led to decreases in usage of cefepime (16% reduction), aminoglycosides (23%), piperacillin/tazobactam (8%) and vancomycin (4%). Conclusions: ACC results could potentially improve time to de-escalation and reduce use of antimicrobials. The impact of ACC on TTET was small, likely related to the availability of other rapid diagnostic tests at DMC.

Toxicity in Patients.

Polymyxin toxicity remains a significant concern that limits the clinical utility of this class of antibacterials for patient care. The most notable adverse event is the dose- and treatment-limiting nephrotoxicity that occurs in roughly 30-60% of patients receiving a systemic polymyxin. This chapter focuses on this adverse event with a detailed assessment of the incidence of, and risk factors for, polymyxin-associated nephrotoxicity. In particular, the text focuses on the impact of dose, serum concentrations, and polymyxin selection on nephrotoxicity. Additionally, less common, but clinically important adverse events are discussed.