Atrial Fibrillation Risk Assessment after Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 20% of strokes are embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS). Undetected atrial fibrillation (AF) remains an important cause. Yet, oral anticoagulation in unselected ESUS patients failed in secondary stroke prevention. Guidance on effective AF detection is lacking. Here, we introduce a novel, non-invasive AF risk assessment after ESUS. METHODS: Catch-Up ESUS is an investigator-initiated, observational cohort study conducted between 2018 and 2019 at the Munich University Hospital. Besides clinical characteristics, patients received ≥72 h digital electrocardiogram recordings to generate the rhythm irregularity burden. Uni- and multivariable regression models predicted the primary endpoint of incident AF, ascertained by standardized follow-up including implantable cardiac monitors. Predictors included the novel rhythm irregularity burden constructed from digital electrocardiogram recordings. We independently validated our model in ESUS patients from the University Hospital Tübingen, Germany. RESULTS: A total of 297 ESUS patients were followed for 15.6 ± 7.6 months. Incident AF (46 patients, 15.4%) occurred after a median of 105 days (25th to 75th percentile 31-33 days). Secondary outcomes were recurrent stroke in 7.7% and death in 6.1%. Multivariable-adjusted analyses identified the rhythm irregularity burden as the strongest AF-predictor (hazard ratio 3.12, 95% confidence interval 1.62-5.80, p < 0001) while accounting for the known risk factors age, CHA2 DS2 -VASc-Score, and NT-proBNP. Independent validation confirmed the rhythm irregularity burden as the most significant AF-predictor (hazard ratio 2.20, 95% confidence interval 1.45-3.33, p < 0001). INTERPRETATION: The novel, non-invasive, electrocardiogram-based rhythm irregularity burden may help adjudicating AF risk after ESUS, and subsequently guide AF-detection after ESUS. Clinical trials need to clarify if high-AF risk patients benefit from tailored secondary stroke prevention. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:479-488.

Early Administration of Desmopressin and Platelet Transfusion for Reducing Hematoma Expansion in Patients With Acute Antiplatelet Therapy Associated Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the hemostatic efficacy of combined desmopressin (1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin) and platelet transfusion in reducing hematoma expansion in acute, spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage under antiplatelet treatment. DESIGN: Single-center, nonrandomized study, performed between 2006 and 2014. SETTING: Tertiary University Hospital of Tuebingen, Germany. PATIENTS: Adult patients with intracerebral hemorrhage under antiplatelet treatment and follow-up CT at 24 ± 12 hours were included. Exclusion criteria included other intracerebral hemorrhage causes, anticoagulation, coagulopathy, or immediate surgery after baseline-CT. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with IV 1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (0.4 µg/kg) + platelet transfusion (2 U) within 60 minutes of intracerebral hemorrhage under antiplatelet treatment diagnosis on brain imaging. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcome was relative hematoma expansion from baseline to follow-up CT. Secondary outcomes included secondary intraventricular hemorrhage or hydrocephalus upon follow-up CT, thromboembolic events before discharge, and the 3-month functional outcome (assessed by modified Rankin Scale). One-hundred forty patients were included, 72 treated versus 68 controls. Times of symptom-onset-to-baseline-CT (hr) (median [interquartile range]: 3 [4] vs 5 [5]; p = 0.468) and follow-up CT (26 [18] vs 19 [12]; p = 0.352) were similar between groups. No between-group differences of total intracerebral hematoma expansion (%) (median [interquartile range]: 8.5 [12.4] vs 9.1 [16.5]; p = 0.825), intraparenchymal (10.7 [23.1] vs 9.2 [20.7]; p = 0.900), and intraventricular hematoma expansion (14.5 [63.2] vs 6.1 [40.4]; p = 0.304) were noted. Among patients with hematoma expansion greater than or equal to 33% compared with baseline, 16 (52%) received treatment versus 15 (48%) controls. The occurrence of hematoma expansion greater than or equal to 33% was similar between groups (p = 0.981). Rates of secondary intraventricular hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, and thromboembolic events were similar between groups. Treatment with 1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin + platelet transfusion was not associated with the 3-month functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 1.570; 95% CI, 0.721-3.419; p = 0.309). CONCLUSIONS: In line with the randomized Platelet Transfusion Versus Standard Care After Acute Stroke Due to Spontaneous Cerebral Hemorrhage Associated With Antiplatelet Therapy trial, our results suggest no hemostatic efficacy of early platelet transfusion in intracerebral hemorrhage under antiplatelet treatment. Contrary to results of preclinical and clinical nonintracerebral hemorrhage studies, adjunct 1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin showed no benefit in limiting hematoma expansion or improving functional outcome.

Apixaban versus Aspirin for Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.

BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban and dabigatran were not superior to aspirin in trials of patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). It is unknown whether apixaban is superior to aspirin in patients with ESUS and known risk factors for cardioembolism. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded-outcome trial of apixaban (5 mg twice daily) compared with aspirin (100 mg once daily) initiated within 28 days after ESUS in patients with at least one predictive factor for atrial fibrillation or a patent foramen ovale. Cardiac monitoring was mandatory, and aspirin treatment was switched to apixaban in case of atrial fibrillation detection. The primary outcome was any new ischemic lesion on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 352 patients were randomly assigned to receive apixaban (178 patients) or aspirin (174 patients) at a median of 8 days after ESUS. At 12-month follow-up, MRI follow-up was available in 325 participants (92.3%). New ischemic lesions occurred in 23 of 169 (13.6%) participants in the apixaban group and in 25 of 156 (16.0%) participants in the aspirin group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.42 to 1.48; P=0.57). Major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in five and seven participants, respectively (1-year cumulative incidences, 2.9 and 4.2; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 2.16). Serious adverse event rates were 43.9 per 100 person-years in those given apixaban and 45.7 per 100 person-years in those given aspirin. The Apixaban for the Treatment of Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source trial was terminated after a prespecified interim analysis as a result of futility. CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban treatment was not superior to cardiac monitoring-guided aspirin in preventing new ischemic lesions in an enriched ESUS population. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Medtronic Europe; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02427126.)

Early REperfusion therapy with intravenous alteplase for recovery of VISION in acute central retinal artery occlusion (REVISION): Study protocol of a phase III trial.

RATIONALE: Meta-analyses of case series of non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) indicate beneficial effects of intravenous thrombolysis when initiated early after symptom onset. Randomized data are lacking to address this question. AIMS: The REperfusion therapy with intravenous alteplase for recovery of VISION in acute central retinal artery occlusion (REVISION) investigates intravenous alteplase within 4.5 h of monocular vision loss due to acute CRAO. METHODS: This study is the randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter adaptive phase III trial. STUDY OUTCOMES: Primary outcome is functional recovery to normal or mildly impaired vision in the affected eye defined as best-corrected visual acuity of the Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution of 0.5 or less at 30 days (intention-to-treat analysis). Secondary efficacy outcomes include modified Rankin Score at 90 days and quality of life. Safety outcomes include symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, major bleeding (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition) and mortality. Exploratory analyses of optical coherence tomography/angiography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers will be conducted. SAMPLE SIZE: Using an adaptive design with interim analysis at 120 patients, up to 422 participants (211 per arm) would be needed for 80% power (one-sided alpha = 0.025) to detect a difference of 15%, assuming functional recovery rates of 10% in the placebo arm and 25% in the alteplase arm. DISCUSSION: By enrolling patients within 4.5 h of CRAO onset, REVISION uses insights from meta-analyses of CRAO case series and randomized thrombolysis trials in acute ischemic stroke. Increased rates of early reperfusion and good neurological outcomes in stroke may translate to CRAO with its similar pathophysiology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04965038; EU Trial Number: 2023-507388-21-00.

Endovascular therapy of isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion stroke with and without general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The optimal anesthetic strategy for endovascular therapy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke is still under debate. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery (PCA) occlusion stroke undergoing EVT by anesthesia modality with conscious sedation (non-GA) versus general anesthesia (GA). METHODS: Patients from the Posterior CerebraL Artery Occlusion (PLATO) study were analyzed with regard to anesthetic strategy. GA was compared with non-GA using multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of weighting treatment (IPTW) methods. The primary endpoint was the 90-day distribution of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary outcomes included functional independence or return to Rankin at day 90, and successful reperfusion, defined as expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) 2b to 3. Safety endpoints were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality. RESULTS: Among 376 patients with isolated PCA occlusion stroke treated with EVT, 183 (49%) had GA. The treatment groups were comparable, although the GA group contained more patients with severe stroke and lower posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (pc-ASPECTS). On IPTW analysis, there was no difference between groups with regard to ordinal mRS shift analysis (common OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.51, P=0.67) or functional independence (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.39, P=0.49). There were greater odds for successful reperfusion with GA (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.47, P=0.01). Safety outcomes were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with isolated PCA occlusion undergoing EVT, patients treated with GA had higher reperfusion rates compared with non-GA. Both GA and non-GA strategies were safe and functional outcomes were similar.

Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis of Posterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Posterior cerebral artery occlusion (PCAo) can cause long-term disability, yet randomized controlled trials to guide optimal reperfusion strategy are lacking. We compared the outcomes of PCAo patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) with or without intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) to patients treated with IVT alone. METHODS: From the multicenter retrospective Posterior cerebraL ArTery Occlusion (PLATO) registry, we included patients with isolated PCAo treated with reperfusion therapy within 24 hours of onset between January 2015 and August 2022. The primary outcome was the distribution of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months. Other outcomes comprised 3-month excellent (mRS 0-1) and independent outcome (mRS 0-2), early neurological improvement (ENI), mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). The treatments were compared using inverse probability weighted regression adjustment. RESULTS: Among 724 patients, 400 received EVT+/-IVT and 324 IVT alone (median age 74 years, 57.7% men). The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission was 7, and the occluded segment was P1 (43.9%), P2 (48.3%), P3-P4 (6.1%), bilateral (1.0%), or fetal posterior cerebral artery (0.7%). Compared to IVT alone, EVT+/-IVT was not associated with improved functional outcome (adjusted common odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-1.43). EVT increased the odds for ENI (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.12), sICH (aOR 2.87, 95% CI 1.23-6.72), and mortality (aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.07-2.95). CONCLUSION: Despite higher odds for early improvement, EVT+/-IVT did not affect functional outcome compared to IVT alone after PCAo. This may be driven by the increased risk of sICH and mortality after EVT.

Recurrent Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM) after COVID-19-vaccination and after subsequent COVID-19-infection: A case report (part II).

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is an autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system (CNS), which is commonly associated to previous viral infection or immunization. Cases of ADEM with a potential relationship to both severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and vaccination have been reported. We recently published a rare case of a 65-year-old patient who suffered from a corticosteroid- and immunoglobulin-refractory multiple autoimmune syndrome including ADEM following Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 vaccination, and whose symptoms largely resolved after repeated plasma exchange (PE). Four months later, the patient was diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant infection after experiencing mild upper respiratory tract symptoms. Few days later, the patient developed severe tetraparesis with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing multiple new inflammatory contrast-enhancing lesions in the left middle cerebellar peduncle, cervical spinal cord, and ventral conus medullaris. Repeated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analyses indicated blood-brain barrier damage (increased albumin ratio) without signs of SARS-CoV-2 invasion (mild pleocytosis, no intrathecal antibody production). SARS-CoV-2 specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) were detected in serum and to a much lower degree in CSF with close correlation between both concentrations over time, reflecting antibody dynamics of vaccine- and infection-induced immune response, and blood-brain barrier patency. Daily PE therapy was initiated. Given the patient's lack of improvement after seven PE, treatment with rituximab was considered. After a first dose, however, the patient suffered epididymo-orchitis leading to sepsis, and declined rituximab continuation. At 3-months follow-up, clinical symptoms had dramatically improved. The patient regained walking ability without assistance. This case of recurrent ADEM after COVID-19-vaccination and after subsequent COVID-19-infection strongly supports the hypotheses of neuroimmunological complications in these conditions being promoted by a systemic immune response and mediated by molecular mimicry of, both, viral and vaccine SARS-CoV-2 antigens and CNS self-antigens.

Multiple Autoimmune Syndromes Including Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis, Myasthenia Gravis, and Thyroiditis Following Messenger Ribonucleic Acid-Based COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Report.

The global pandemic has resulted from the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To control the spread of the pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been developed. Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-based COVID-19 vaccines have been the most widely used. We present the case of a 65-year-old patient, who was diagnosed with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, ocular myasthenia gravis, and autoimmune thyroiditis, following his third mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. On admission, the patient showed mild left-sided hemiparesis, contralateral dissociated sensory loss, dizziness, and right-sided deafness. Brain MRI revealed multiple acute inflammatory contrast-enhancing periventricular and brainstem lesions with involvement of vestibulo-cerebellar tract and cochlear nuclei. Despite steroid pulse and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, clinical symptoms and MRI lesions worsened, and additional signs of ocular myasthenia gravis and elevated but asymptomatic thyroid antibodies developed. After repeated plasma exchange, all clinical symptoms resolved. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first case report of multiple autoimmune syndromes triggered by COVID-19 vaccination. The rare occurrence of such treatable autoimmune complications should not question the importance of vaccination programs during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Closure or medical therapy of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke: prospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Results of randomized controlled trials (RCT) do not provide definite guidance for secondary prevention after ischemic stroke (IS)/transient ischemic attack (TIA) attributed to patent foramen ovale (PFO). No recommendations can be made for patients > 60 years. We aimed to compare interventional and medical PFO-management in cryptogenic IS/TIA patients, including patients > 60 years. METHODS: Prospective case series including consecutive cryptogenic IS/TIA patients with PFO at Tuebingen university stroke unit, Germany. 'PFO-closure' was recommended in patients ≤70 years when featuring high-risk PFO (i.e., with atrial septal aneurysm, spontaneous, or high-grade right-to-left shunt during Valsalva). Primary (recurrent IS/intracranial hemorrhage) and secondary endpoints (e.g., disability) were assessed during ≥1-year follow-up; planned subgroup analyses of patients ≤60/> 60 years. RESULTS: Among 236 patients with median age of 58 (range 18-88) years, 38.6% were females and median presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 1 (IQR 0-4). Mean follow-up was 2.8 ± 1.3 years. No intracranial hemorrhage was observed. Recurrent IS rate after 'PFO-closure' was 2.9% (95%CI 0-6.8%) and 7% (4-16.4) in high-risk PFO patients ≤60 (n = 103) and > 60 years (n = 43), respectively, versus 4% (0-11.5) during 'medical therapy alone' MTA (n = 28). 42 low-risk PFO patients treated with MTA experienced no recurrent IS/TIA. CONCLUSIONS: In our real-world study, IS recurrence rate in 'PFO-closure' high-risk PFO patients ≤60 years was comparable to that observed in recent RCT. High-risk PFO patients > 60 years who underwent PFO-closure had similar IS recurrence rates than those who received MTA. MTA seems the appropriate treatment for low-risk PFO. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT04352790 , registered on: April 20, 2020 - retrospectively registered.

Comparison of Risk Factors, Safety, and Efficacy Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Posterior vs. Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion.

Background and Purpose: It is believed that stroke occurring due to posterior circulation large vessel occlusion (PCLVO) and that occurring due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ACLVO) differ in terms of their pathophysiology and the outcome of their acute management in relation to endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Limited sample size and few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with respect to PCLVO make the safety and efficacy of MT, which has been confirmed in ACLVO, difficult to assess in the posterior circulation. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis to study to which extent MT in PCLVO differs from ACLVO. Materials and Methods: We searched the databases PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE for studies published between 2010 and January 2021, with information on risk factors, safety, and efficacy outcomes of MT in PCLVO vs. ACLVO and conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis; we compared baseline characteristics, reperfusion treatment profiles [including rates of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and onset-to-IVT and onset-to-groin puncture times], recanalization success [Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction scale (TICI) 2b/3], symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and favorable functional outcome [modified Rankin Score (mRS) 0-2] and mortality at 90 days. Results: Sixteen studies with MT PCLVO (1,172 patients) and ACLVO (7,726 patients) were obtained from the search. The pooled estimates showed higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (SMD 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.48) in the PCLVO group. PCLVO patients received less often IVT (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.79). Onset-to-IVT time (SMD 0.86, 95% CI 0.45-1.26) and onset-to-groin puncture time (SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.33-0.85) were longer in the PCLVO group. The likelihood of obtaining successful recanalization and favorable functional outcome at 90 days was comparable between the two groups. PCLVO was, however, associated with less sICH (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.37-0.85) but higher mortality (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.46-2.53). Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates that MT in PCLVO may be comparably efficient in obtaining successful recanalization and 90 day favorable functional outcome just as in ACLVO. Less sICH in MT-treated PCLVO patients might be the result of the lower IVT rate in this group. Higher baseline NIHSS and longer onset-to-IVT and onset-to-groin puncture times may have contributed to a higher 90 day mortality in PCLVO patients.

Thrombolysis in Stroke With Unknown Onset Based on Non-Contrast Computerized Tomography (TRUST CT).

Background Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in wake-up stroke (WUS) or stroke with unknown onset (SUO) has been recently proven to be safe and effective using advanced neuroimaging (magnetic resonance imaging or computerized tomography-perfusion) for patient selection. However, in most of the thrombolyzing centers advanced neuroimaging is not instantly available. We hypothesize that pragmatic non-contrast computed tomography-based IVT in WUS/SUO may be feasible and safe. Methods and Results TRUST-CT (Thrombolysis in Stroke With Unknown Onset Based on Non-Contrast Computerized Tomography) is an international multicenter registry-based study. WUS/SUO patients undergoing non-contrast computed tomography-based IVT with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale ≥4 and initial Alberta Stroke Program Early Computerized Tomography score ≥7 were included and compared with propensity score matched non-thrombolyzed WUS/SUO controls. Primary end point was the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage; secondary end points included 24-hour National Institute of Health Stroke Scale improvement of ≥4 and modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. One hundred and seventeen WUS/SUO patients treated with non-contrast computed tomography-based IVT were included. As compared with 112 controls, the median admission National Institute of Health Stroke Scale was 10 and the median Alberta Stroke Program Early Computerized Tomography score was 10 in both groups. Four (3.4%) IVT patients and one control patient (0.9%) suffered symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio 7.9, 95% CI 0.65-96, P=0.1). A decrease of ≥4 National Institute of Health Stroke Scale points was observed in 67 (57.3%) of IVT patients as compared with 25 (22.3%) in controls (adjusted odds ratio 5.8, CI 3.0-11.2, P<0.001). A months, 39 (33.3%) IVT patients reached a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 versus 23 (20.5%) controls (adjusted odds ratio 1.94, CI 1.0-3.76, P=0.05). Conclusions Non-contrast computed tomography-based thrombolysis in WUS/SUO seems feasible and safe and may be effective. Randomized prospective comparisons are warranted. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT03634748.