Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 43(2): 152-156, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36706284

RESUMEN

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: There has long been a clinical belief that bupropion exacerbates anxiety. The purpose of the current retrospective study is to compare anxiety severity over time in those prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus bupropion. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Archival data (N = 8457) from patients receiving psychiatric care from a national tele-mental health company were used. Propensity matching was used to create SSRI and bupropion groups using 17 covariates. These samples were then compared using repeated measures analysis of variance on Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 7 scores at start of treatment, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. FINDINGS/RESULTS: The SSRI and bupropion groups were significantly different across a number of variables. In the entire sample, the bupropion group had significantly greater anxiety levels. However, for propensity-matched comparisons, there were no significant interactions between group and time (ie, groups did not differ and improved comparably over time). IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Using propensity matching, there were no differences in anxiety outcome between those prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor versus bupropion across 12 weeks of treatment.


Asunto(s)
Bupropión , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Humanos , Bupropión/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina , Ansiedad
2.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 43(1): 46-54, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36584249

RESUMEN

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Early response after 2 to 4 weeks of antidepressant therapy has been shown to predict remission by 8 to 12 weeks. Most of the work to date on early response has been done using data from randomized controlled trials. METHODS/PROCEDURES: This naturalistic study uses archival data from a national tele-mental health company. The positive and negative predictive values as well as sensitivity and specificity were calculated using different drops in baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 scores at various periods. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between early responders versus those lacking early response. Binary logistic regression analyses determined if early response was predictive of remission, response, and greater than minimal improvement at 14 weeks. For those who do not show early improvement, treatments were investigated using binary logistic regression to see if changes predicted later outcomes. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Positive predictive values for all endpoints improved with the strength of early response but did not improve much with the time allowed for that response to occur. In contrast, negative predictive values increased substantially with time. Using a definition of 30% drop in Patient Health Questionnaire 9 score at week 4, 56.5% of patients were early responders. Early responders were ~3.2 times more likely to achieve remission than those lacking early response. Of nonresponders by week 4, those prescribed atypical antipsychotics (+SSRI) had significantly reduced odds of response at week 14, whereas those prescribed a norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitor had increased odds. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Early response may be associated with better outcomes at 14 weeks. In those with lack of response by week 4, patients prescribed a norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitor may achieve superior outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Humanos , Adulto , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
3.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 90: 1-5, 2024 May 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865833

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study provides three prevalence-based metrics of potential harm, the fatal toxicity index (FTI), serious morbidity index (SMI) and healthcare utilization index (HUI) for fourteen of the most prescribed antidepressants in the US. METHOD: For the years 2013-2020, adverse events for single drug exposures were obtained from the National Poison Data System. Prescription estimates were taken from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Medical Expenditure Survey. 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a Poisson distribution. Chi-square testing was used where significance was not clear. RESULTS: SSRIs and SNRIs had the lowest overall indices (FTI 0.02-0.26). Bupropion's FTI (0.27-0.43) was not statistically significantly different from that of imipramine (FTI 0-1.3, p = .62) or nortriptyline (FTI 0.25-0.78, p = .22), though its SMI and HUI were significantly greater. There was a statistically significant difference in all indices between TCAs (p < .0047). The difference between the FTI of all SSRIs did not remain significant after correction (p = .045). CONCLUSION: SSRIs and SNRIs are safer than alternative agents on all measures. Bupropion exposure was as likely to cause mortality, and more likely to cause morbidity or require treatment in a healthcare facility, than TCAs nortriptyline and imipramine.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA