Trial of dextromethorphan/quinidine to treat levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Nondopaminergic pathways represent potential targets to treat levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD). This pilot-study (NCT01767129) examined the safety/efficacy of the sigma-1 receptor-agonist and glutamatergic/monoaminergic modulator, dextromethorphan plus quinidine (to inhibit rapid dextromethorphan metabolism), for treating levodopa-induced dyskinesia. METHODS: PD patients were randomized to dextromethorphan/quinidine (45 mg/10 mg twice daily)/placebo in two 2-week double-blind, crossover treatment periods, with intervening 2-week washout. After 14 days, a 2-hour intravenous levodopa-infusion was administered. Patient examinations were videotaped before infusion ("off" state) and every 30 minutes during and afterwards until patients returned to "off." The primary endpoint was dyskinesia-severity during infusion measured by Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale part 3 area-under-curve scores (blinded expert rated). Additional endpoints included other dyskinesia/motor assessments, global measures of clinical-change, and adverse-events. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients were randomized and completed the study (efficacy-evaluable population). Dyskinesia-severity was nonsignificantly lower with dextromethorphan/quinidine than placebo during infusion (area-under-curve 966.5 vs 1048.8; P = .191 [efficacy-evaluable patients]), and significantly lower in a post-hoc sensitivity analysis of the per-protocol-population (efficacy-evaluable patients with ≥ 80% study-drug-compliance, n = 12) when measured from infusion start to 4-hours post-infusion completion (area-under-curve 1585.0 vs 1911.3; P = .024). Mean peak dyskinesia decreased significantly from infusion-start to return to "off" (13.3 vs 14.9; P = .018 [efficacy-evaluable patients]). A total of 9 patients rated dyskinesia "much/very much improved" on dextromethorphan/quinidine versus 1-patient on placebo. Dextromethorphan/quinidine did not worsen PD-motor scores, was generally well tolerated, and was associated with more frequent adverse events. CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence of clinical benefit with dextromethorphan/quinidine for treating levodopa-induced dyskinesia in PD. Larger studies with a longer treatment duration need to corroborate these early findings. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Efficacy and safety of dextromethorphan/quinidine at two dosage levels for diabetic neuropathic pain: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate dextromethorphan coadministered with quinidine as treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. DESIGN: In a 13-week, phase 3, randomized controlled trial, 379 adults with daily symmetric diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) leg pain for ≥3 months received double-blind placebo, dextromethorphan/quinidine (DMQ) 45/30 mg, or DMQ 30/30 mg, administered once daily for 7 days and twice daily thereafter. Efficacy measures included four pain rating scales applied daily using patient diaries, and another two applied at five clinic visits. RESULTS: On all six scales, DMQ 45/30 mg was significantly superior to placebo, including the primary efficacy analysis, which utilized mixed-effects modeling to test all scores on an 11-point numerical Pain Rating Scale (P < 0.0001). Sensitivity analyses gave consistent results. Efficacy vs placebo was also seen for diary ratings of present pain intensity, and pain interference with sleep and with activities (all P < 0.0001). Among clinic visit assessments, DMQ 45/30 mg demonstrated greater leg pain relief (P = 0.0002) and greater reduction of leg pain intensity (P = 0.0286) vs placebo. The efficacy of DMQ 30/30 mg was numerically less than for 45/30 mg but for most outcomes remained significantly greater vs placebo. Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate and of expected types. Discontinuation for adverse events in the DMQ groups was at least twice as common as placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Throughout a 13-week trial, DMQ was effective, with an acceptable safety profile, for treatment of DPN pain. Other fixed-dose combinations of DMQ should be studied to improve overall tolerability while maintaining significant efficacy.

Dextromethorphan and quinidine in adult patients with uncontrolled painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a 29-day, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study.

BACKGROUND: Pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) has a substantial negative impact on patients' quality of life. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerability of capsules containing dextromethorphan (DM) and quinidine (Q) in patients with painful DPN. A secondary objective was to perform a preliminary assessment of the efficacy of DM/Q in this patient population. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study. Eligible patients were aged between 18 and 80 years, had a confirmed diagnosis of diabetes with acceptable glycemic control, had been receiving established diabetic therapy for at least 3 months, and had a clinical diagnosis of distal symmetric sensory neuropathy with daily DPN-associated pain for the previous 3 months. On study entry, patient-rated diabetic pain had to be moderate or greater. Patients who met the inclusion criteria underwent a 2-week washout period during which all analgesics were discontinued, followed by 29 days of treatment with capsules containing DM 30 mg and Q 30 mg (DM30/Q30), beginning with 1 capsule/d and escalating at approximately 1-week intervals, as tolerated, to a maximum dose of 4 capsules/d (DM120/Q120). Tolerability was assessed based on adverse events and changes in clinical and laboratory parameters and nerve conduction velocity. Preliminary efficacy assessments included changes from baseline in scores on the pain intensity rating scale (PIRS), pain relief rating scale (PRRS), peripheral neuropathy quality-of-life instrument, and patients' diary assessments of sleep, present pain intensity, pain, and activity. RESULTS: The study included 36 men and women (mean age, 58 years; mean body mass index, 32.8 kg/m(2)). Of the 33 subjects who completed the study, 23 (69.7%) did so at the highest permitted dose (DM120/Q120). The most commonly reported adverse events (occurring in > or =5% of subjects) were nausea (27.8%), dizziness (25.0%), and headache (25.0%). Three patients experienced 5 serious adverse events, only 1 of which was considered possibly related to study drug. The most commonly occurring laboratory abnormalities (involving glycosylated hemoglobin, serum glucose, triglycerides, and cholesterol) were considered typical of a population with diabetes. Improvements from baseline in scores on the PIRS, PRRS, and other exploratory efficacy measures were noted (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this open-label study indicated that the combination of DMIQ (dose range, DM30/Q30-DM120/Q120) was well tolerated in patients with pain associated with DPN. Based on the preliminary efficacy results, a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial is warranted to assess the tolerability and efficacy of this combination in patients with DPN.

Pharmacology of dextromethorphan: Relevance to dextromethorphan/quinidine (Nuedexta®) clinical use.

Dextromethorphan (DM) has been used for more than 50years as an over-the-counter antitussive. Studies have revealed a complex pharmacology of DM with mechanisms beyond blockade of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and inhibition of glutamate excitotoxicity, likely contributing to its pharmacological activity and clinical potential. DM is rapidly metabolized to dextrorphan, which has hampered the exploration of DM therapy separate from its metabolites. Coadministration of DM with a low dose of quinidine inhibits DM metabolism, yields greater bioavailability and enables more specific testing of the therapeutic properties of DM apart from its metabolites. The development of the drug combination DM hydrobromide and quinidine sulfate (DM/Q), with subsequent approval by the US Food and Drug Administration for pseudobulbar affect, led to renewed interest in understanding DM pharmacology. This review summarizes the interactions of DM with brain receptors and transporters and also considers its metabolic and pharmacokinetic properties. To assess the potential clinical relevance of these interactions, we provide an analysis comparing DM activity from in vitro functional assays with the estimated free drug DM concentrations in the brain following oral DM/Q administration. The findings suggest that DM/Q likely inhibits serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake and also blocks NMDA receptors with rapid kinetics. Use of DM/Q may also antagonize nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, particularly those composed of α3ß4 subunits, and cause agonist activity at sigma-1 receptors.

Pharmacokinetics of dextromethorphan after single or multiple dosing in combination with quinidine in extensive and poor metabolizers.

Dextromethorphan (DM) pharmacological properties predict that the widely used cough suppressant could be used to treat several neuronal disorders, but it is rapidly metabolized after oral dosing. To find out whether quinidine (Q), a CYP2D6 inhibitor, could elevate and prolong DM plasma profiles, 2 multiple-dose studies identified the lowest oral dose of Q that could be used in a fixed combination with 3 doses of DM. A multiple-dose study in healthy subjects with an extensive or a poor enzyme metabolizer phenotype evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of a selected fixed-dose combination (AVP-923). Study 1 randomized 46 healthy subjects, who were extensive CYP2D6 metabolizers, to receive 0, 2.5, 10, 25, 50, or 75 mg Q twice daily in combination with 30 mg DM for 7 days. Plasma and urine samples were collected after the first and last doses for the assay of DM, dextrorphan (DX), and Q. Study 2 randomized 65 healthy extensive CYP2D6 metabolizers to 8 groups given twice-daily 45- or 60-mg DM doses combined with 0, 30, 45, or 60 mg Q for 7 days. The effects of increasing Q were not different with doses greater than 25 mg, whereas lower doses showed a dose-related increase in plasma DM concentrations. Urinary ratios of DM/DX showed a Q dose- and time-related increase in the number of subjects converted to the poor metabolizer phenotype that reached 100% on day 3 of dosing with 25 mg Q. Results from both studies indicated that 25 to 30 mg Q is adequate to maximally suppress O-demethylation of DM. Study 3 evaluated 7 extensive metabolizers and 2 poor metabolizers given an oral capsule every 12 hours containing 30 mg Q combined with 30 mg DM. DM plasma AUC values increased in both groups of subjects during the 8-day study. The mean urinary metabolic ratio (DM/DX) increased at least 27-fold in extensive metabolizers by day 8. There was no effect of Q on urinary metabolic ratios in poor metabolizers. Safety evaluations, including electrocardiograms, indicated that the combination was well tolerated, with no difference between extensive and poor metabolizer phenotypes.

An open-label multicenter study to assess the safety of dextromethorphan/quinidine in patients with pseudobulbar affect associated with a range of underlying neurological conditions.

BACKGROUND: Pseudobulbar affect (PBA) is associated with neurological disorders or injury affecting the brain, and characterized by frequent, uncontrollable episodes of crying and/or laughing that are exaggerated or unrelated to the patient's emotional state. Clinical trials establishing dextromethorphan and quinidine (DM/Q) as PBA treatment were conducted in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or multiple sclerosis (MS). This trial evaluated DM/Q safety in patients with PBA secondary to any neurological condition affecting the brain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of DM/Q during long-term administration to patients with PBA associated with multiple neurological conditions. METHODS: Fifty-two-week open-label study of DM/Q 30/30 mg twice daily. Safety measures included adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, electrocardiograms (ECGs), vital signs, and physical examinations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: #NCT00056524. RESULTS: A total of 553 PBA patients with >30 different neurological conditions enrolled; 296 (53.5%) completed. The most frequently reported treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were nausea (11.8%), dizziness (10.5%), headache (9.9%), somnolence (7.2%), fatigue (7.1%), diarrhea (6.5%), and dry mouth (5.1%). TRAEs were mostly mild/moderate, generally transient, and consistent with previous controlled trials. Serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in 126 patients (22.8%), including 47 deaths, mostly due to ALS progression and respiratory failure. No SAEs were deemed related to DM/Q treatment by investigators. ECG results suggested no clinically meaningful effect of DM/Q on myocardial repolarization. Differences in AEs across neurological disease groups appeared consistent with the known morbidity of the primary neurological conditions. Study interpretation is limited by the small size of some disease groups, the lack of a specific efficacy measure and the use of a DM/Q dose higher than the eventually approved dose. CONCLUSIONS: DM/Q was generally well tolerated over this 52 week trial in patients with PBA associated with a wide range of neurological conditions.

Randomized open-label drug-drug interaction trial of dextromethorphan/quinidine and paroxetine in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The novel combination of dextromethorphan (DM) and quinidine (Q) [DMQ] has been extensively studied in well controlled clinical trials as treatment for pseudobulbar affect (PBA), and is the first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for this indication. The approved dosage of DMQ is DM 20 mg and Q 10 mg twice daily. DM is metabolized via cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6); Q is a CYP2D6 inhibitor used to increase DM plasma concentrations. Paroxetine is both a substrate and inhibitor of CYP2D6. This trial evaluated the effect of DMQ at a dose of DM 30 mg and Q 30 mg twice daily on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of paroxetine 20 mg daily and the effects of paroxetine on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of DMQ in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, parallel-group, 20-day trial. Drug plasma concentrations were analysed following monotherapy and concomitant (DMQ + paroxetine) therapy. Participants were 27 healthy adults who were randomized in a 1 : 1 fashion to one of two groups. Group 1 received paroxetine 20 mg once daily for 12 days to attain steady state, at which point DMQ 30 mg/30 mg twice daily was added for 8 days. Group 2 received DMQ 30 mg/30 mg twice daily for 8 days to attain steady state, at which point paroxetine 20 mg once daily was added for 12 days. The primary endpoints were the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) during concomitant therapy versus monotherapy. Safety and tolerability measures including adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. RESULTS: The 90% CIs of the AUCs were outside of the predefined range [0.80, 1.25] for all analytes, indicating a drug-drug interaction. In group 1 (n = 14), addition of DMQ to paroxetine resulted in a 30% increase in mean plasma exposure of paroxetine (AUC up to 24 hours). In group 2 (n = 13), addition of paroxetine to DMQ resulted in increases in mean plasma exposure (AUC up to 12 hours) of 50% for DM and 40% for Q, and a decrease of 12.3% for dextrorphan, the metabolite of DM. The incidence of AEs was higher with paroxetine monotherapy and combination therapy, compared with DMQ given alone (30.8% with DMQ alone vs 83.3% following addition of paroxetine, and 78.6% with paroxetine alone vs 64.3% following addition of DMQ). Three subjects discontinued due to AEs, and no serious AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: The addition of DMQ 30 mg/30 mg twice daily to paroxetine increased steady-state paroxetine plasma concentrations and addition of paroxetine to DMQ 30 mg/30 mg twice daily increased steady-state plasma concentrations of DM and Q, indicating a potential interaction. Thus, patients should be monitored for AEs and dosage adjustment considered when combining these two agents.

A study of potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between dextromethorphan/quinidine and memantine in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Dextromethorphan/quinidine (DMQ) is the first agent indicated for the treatment of pseudobulbar affect. Dextromethorphan, the active ingredient, is a low-affinity, uncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist. This study evaluated the potential for a drug-drug interaction (DDI) of DMQ with memantine, which is also an NMDA receptor antagonist. METHODS: This open-label, randomized, parallel-group study enrolled healthy adults who were randomized into one of two treatment groups. Group 1 subjects were administered memantine at a starting dose of 5 mg once daily, which was titrated over a 3-week period to a dose of 10 mg twice daily (every 12 hours) and continued for another 11 days to attain steady state; DMQ 30 mg (dextromethorphan 30 mg/quinidine 30 mg) every 12 hours was then added for a further 8 days. Group 2 subjects received DMQ 30 mg every 12 hours for 8 days to attain steady state; memantine was then added, titrated on the same schedule as in group 1, and continued at 10 mg every 12 hours for an additional 11 days. Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was performed to assess the primary endpoints of the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios of the areas under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUCs) for memantine, dextromethorphan, dextrorphan - the dextromethorphan metabolite - and quinidine during concomitant therapy versus monotherapy. Safety/tolerability and pharmacodynamic variables were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 52 subjects were randomized. In both group 1 (n = 23) and group 2 (n = 29), the 90% CIs for the ratios of the AUCs during concomitant therapy versus monotherapy were within the predefined range to indicate similarity (0.8-1.25) for memantine, dextromethorphan and dextrorphan, indicating no pharmacokinetic DDI. The 90% CI for the AUC ratio for quinidine was slightly above the predefined range; however, the mean AUC increased by only 25%. In both groups, incidence of adverse events was similar, and pharmacodynamic variables were either similar or slightly improved with DMQ added to memantine and memantine added to DMQ, compared to monotherapy with either agent. CONCLUSION: Minimal pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions were observed between memantine and DMQ, suggesting they can be coadministered without dose adjustment.

Randomized, controlled trial of dextromethorphan/quinidine for pseudobulbar affect in multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DM/Q (capsules containing dextromethorphan [DM] and quinidine [Q]) compared with placebo, taken twice daily, for the treatment of pseudobulbar affect over a 12-week period in multiple sclerosis patients. METHODS: A total of 150 patients were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess pseudobulbar affect with the validated Center for Neurologic Study-Lability Scale. Each patient also recorded the number of episodes experienced between visits, estimated quality of life and quality of relationships on visual analog scales, and completed a pain rating scale. RESULTS: Patients receiving DM/Q had greater reductions in Center for Neurologic Study-Lability Scale scores than those receiving placebo (p < 0.0001) at all clinic visits (days 15, 29, 57, and 85). All secondary end points also favored DM/Q, including the number of crying or laughing episodes (p

Review of pseudobulbar affect including a novel and potential therapy.

Pseudobulbar affect (PBA) is an affective disinhibition syndrome associated with various neuropathologies, which is characterized by involuntary and inappropriate outbursts of laughter and/or crying. The PBA syndrome can be socially and occupationally disabling, and it is largely unrecognized in clinical settings. Validated instruments to distinguish PBA from other disorders of affective regulation exist and could be used to improve recognition of the disorder. There is no pharmacological therapy with a Food and Drug Administration indication for PBA, although antidepressants and dopaminergic agents have been reported to show varying levels of treatment success. Recent evidence suggests that treatment with a fixed combination of dextromethorphan and the cytochrome P450 2D6 enzyme inhibitor, quinidine, can improve PBA. This review describes the clinical and neuropathological features of PBA, and presents an overview of current and future treatment approaches.

The toxicity of behenyl alcohol. I. Genotoxicity and subchronic toxicity in rats and dogs.

The genotoxic potential of behenyl alcohol, a saturated long-chain (C22:0) fatty alcohol, was examined in the Ames Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay, the gene mutation, and chromosome aberrations assays in Chinese hamster V79 cells, and the micronucleus assay in NMRI mice. Behenyl alcohol did not increase the number of revertants per plate compared to controls in the S. typhimurium assay, with or without metabolic activation. No significant increases in the number of mutant colonies or in structural chromosome aberrations were observed in Chinese hamster V79 cells. In addition, behenyl alcohol did not increase the frequency of bone marrow polychromatic erythrocyte (PCE) micronuclei in mice in vivo. In two subchronic toxicity studies, CD rats and beagle dogs were administered behenyl alcohol by oral gavage for at least 26 weeks at doses of 0, 10, 100, or 1000 mg behenyl alcohol/kg body weight/day for rats and 0, 20, 200, or 2000 mg behenyl alcohol/kg body weight/day for dogs. Adverse effects were not observed following gross and histopathological evaluations of dosed rats. Compound-related effects in dogs were limited to observations of pale feces, indicative of unabsorbed behenyl alcohol, at doses of 2000 mg/kg body weight/day. There were no histopathological changes observed in dogs dosed with behenyl alcohol. The no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) for behenyl alcohol was 1000 mg/kg body weight/day for rats, and 2000 mg/kg body weight/day for dogs, the highest doses used in these studies.

The toxicity of behenyl alcohol. II. Reproduction studies in rats and rabbits.

Behenyl alcohol is a saturated 22-carbon, long-chain aliphatic alcohol, which has potential for use in foods as an oil-structuring and -solidifying agent in fats. Previously completed studies with behenyl alcohol indicated an absence of mutagenic or genotoxic potential. In addition, subchronic toxicity studies in rats and dogs reported no adverse effects following gross and histopathological examinations. Compound-related effects were limited to the observation of pale feces in dogs treated with high doses of behenyl alcohol, and were attributable to unabsorbed behenyl alcohol. The reproductive effects of behenyl alcohol were investigated in a fertility and reproduction study, and an embryonic development study in rats and rabbits, respectively. No evidence of maternal or fetal toxicity was observed in either study. Behenyl alcohol demonstrated no effects on the fertility or reproduction of rats dosed up to 1000 mg/kg body weight. Similarly, behenyl alcohol had no reproductive effects on rabbits treated with doses up to 2000 mg/kg body weight. The observation of pale feces was the only compound-related effect reported, limited to rabbits treated with 2000 mg behenyl alcohol/kg body weight. Based on these findings, there is no evidence to suggest that behenyl alcohol is teratogenic or embryotoxic.

Validation of the CNS emotional lability scale for pseudobulbar affect (pathological laughing and crying) in multiple sclerosis patients.

Pseudobulbar affect (PBA) or pathological laughing and crying (PLC) is a disorder of affect that occurs in about 10% of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. The objective of this study was to validate the CNS Emotional Lability Scale (CNS-LS) in MS patients and to correlate the results with the frequency and intensity of episodes of PLC. Physicians at seven private practice referral centers in the United States made a diagnosis concerning PLC based on patient interviews. Clinical coordinators separately administered the CNS-LS, a self-report measure of PLC with seven questions, to MS patients, including patients known to exhibit PLC, patients thought to be free of PLC, and newly diagnosed patients where PLC status was unknown, and the physician was blinded as to the results. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to define a cut-off best correlating with the physician's diagnosis. Of 90 MS patients selected to complete the survey, 50 were physician diagnosed with PLC; 40 were without PLC, and 15 of these 90 patients were newly diagnosed with MS (<6 months). Scores of 17 or higher corresponded to a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specificity of 0.83 (LR+ = 5.5, LR- = 0.07); 89% of patients were correctly diagnosed. The area under the ROC curve was 0.95. Symptoms were greater in patients diagnosed as PLC than in non-PLC patients as evidenced by mean number of episodes/week, number of days/week with episodes, duration of an episode and total time in an episode. Similar results were observed if patients were classified as PLC or non-PLC according to CNS-LS score > or = 17, suggesting that the CNS-LS is a valid measure for the assessment of PLC in MS patients and could be a useful instrument for clinical and research purposes.