Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book ; 44(3): e432462, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38768421

RESUMEN

Melanoma has long been a difficult malignancy to treat with low response rates to standard chemotherapies. In recent years, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated promising results, paving the way for the use of the rapidly developing novel immune targeting therapies. In this review, we look beyond immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments and summarize several emerging treatment strategies for melanoma, including neoantigen vaccines, conventional antibody drug-conjugates, and bispecific T-cell engager therapies.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Melanoma , Humanos , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico
2.
J Immunother Cancer ; 12(7)2024 Jul 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39032941

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist for management strategies targeting immunotherapy-related enteritis (irEnteritis). Systemic corticosteroids are commonly used but often are limited by adverse events. Enteric corticosteroids such as budesonide offer an attractive alternative; however, the ileocolonic release of enteric-coated budesonide has limited utility for diffuse enteritis. Open-capsule budesonide (OCB) is a novel therapeutic approach that offers drug delivery throughout the small bowel. We report outcomes in patients treated with OCB for confirmed or suspected irEnteritis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort included all individuals treated with OCB for irEnteritis at Memorial Sloan Kettering from July 2018 to August 2023. Primary outcomes included clinical response, clinical remission, and corticosteroid-free remission following OCB. Secondary outcomes were OCB-related adverse events and efficacy by gastrointestinal toxicity location. RESULTS: 19 patients (53% female) with irEnteritis were treated with OCB. All patients presented with diarrhea; 15 (79%) reported anorexia with median 6 kg weight loss. 17 patients (89%) underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsies revealing enteritis in all; 8 (42%) had concomitant colitis. 15 (79%) patients were treated previously with systemic corticosteroids: 8 (53%) were corticosteroid-dependent while 7 (47%) demonstrated non-response. 18 patients (95%) achieved clinical response, 15 (79%) attained clinical remission, and 11 (58%) had corticosteroid-free remission. Response to OCB was rapid with improvement noted after a median 4 days. 14 (74%) patients restored their pre-irEnteritis weight by OCB cessation. One mild, self-resolving adverse event was reported. CONCLUSIONS: OCB is a safe and effective therapy for irEnteritis. OCB avoids systemic immunosuppression and successfully achieves clinical response and remission even in patients previously nonresponsive to systemic corticosteroids. Future studies are needed to optimize indications and duration.


Asunto(s)
Budesonida , Enteritis , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Humanos , Femenino , Budesonida/uso terapéutico , Budesonida/farmacología , Enteritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/farmacología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Adulto
3.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1340979, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38348030

RESUMEN

Introduction: There is debate on which are the best surrogate endpoint and metric to capture treatment effect on overall survival (OS) in RCTs testing immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: We systematically searched for RCTs testing ICIs in patients with advanced solid tumors. Inclusion criteria were: RCTs i) assessing PD-(L)1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors either as monotherapy or in combination with another ICI, and/or targeted therapy, and/or chemotherapy, in patients with advanced solid tumors; ii) randomizing at least 100 patients. We performed a meta-analysis of RCTs to compare the surrogacy value of PFS and modified-PFS (mPFS) for OS in RCTs testing ICIs, when the treatment effect is measured by the hazard ratio (HR) for OS, and by the HR and the ratio of restricted mean survival time (rRMST) for PFS and mPFS. Results: 61 RCTs (67 treatment comparisons and 36,034 patients) were included in the analysis. In comparisons testing ICI plus chemotherapy, HRPFS and HRmPFS both had a strong surrogacy value (R2 = 0.74 and R2 = 0.81, respectively). In comparisons testing ICI as monotherapy, HRPFS was the best surrogate, although having a moderate correlation (R2 = 0.58). In comparisons testing ICI plus other treatment(s), the associations were very weak for all the surrogate endpoints and treatment effect measures, with R2 ranging from 0.01 to 0.22. Conclusion: In RCTs testing ICIs, the value of potential surrogates for HROS was strongly affected by the type of treatment(s) tested. The evidence available supports HRPFS as the best surrogate, and disproves the use of alternative endpoints, such as the mPFS, or treatment effect measures, such as the RMST.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Neoplasias , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Biomarcadores , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38960393

RESUMEN

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of melanoma with a dismal prognosis. We present the case of a young man with stage IV BRAF V600E mutant melanoma with lung, lymph node, and brain metastases initially treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab, who subsequently developed LMD. Upon change to BRAF/MEK targeted therapy with nivolumab, a durable complete response was achieved and remains ongoing, off treatment, 7 years from diagnosis. Management of symptomatic LMD remains a critical unmet clinical challenge, with limited clinical trial data. This exceptional case is instructive, as the first published case of the use of the triplet, and the first durable response with therapy discontinuation, in melanoma LMD. The triple-drug regimen may be considered a viable option in fit patients. This case highlights the potential for long-term disease control and the critical and urgent need to develop clinical trials inclusive of patients with LMD to define the best treatment strategies.

5.
Res Sq ; 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38883779

RESUMEN

While CD40 agonism is an attractive approach for activating antigen-presenting cells and initiating antitumor responses, previous attempts have encountered limited clinical efficacy coupled with toxicity. We previously demonstrated that interactions between the antibody Fc domain and the inhibitory receptor FcγRIIB are critical for enhanced antitumor activity. Here, we present the results of a phase 1 study on intratumoral administration of an anti-CD40 agonistic antibody (2141-V11) Fc-engineered to enhance FcγRIIB binding. Primary endpoints included safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives included preliminary clinical activity and correlative studies from biospecimens. 2141-V11 was well-tolerated without dose-limiting toxicities and MTD was not reached. In ten evaluable patients with metastatic cancer, the overall response rate was 20%, with complete responses in two patients (melanoma and breast carcinoma) and stable disease in six patients. 2141-V11 induced tumor regression in injected and non-injected lesions, with increased leukocyte infiltration and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) formation in post-treatment biopsies. In a humanized mouse model for CD40 and FcγRs, 2141-V11 induced TLS formation in mice bearing orthotopic breast carcinoma, correlating with local and abscopal antitumor effects, systemic immune activation, and immune memory. These findings support the safety and efficacy of 2141-V11, warranting phase 2 studies and suggesting a unique mechanism of action for this Fc-enhanced immunotherapy (NCT04059588).

6.
Clin Cancer Res ; 30(16): 3407-3415, 2024 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767650

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Adaptively Dosed ImmunoTherapy Trial (ADAPT-IT;NCT03122522) investigated adaptive ipilimumab discontinuation in melanoma based on early radiographic assessment. Initial findings indicated similar effectiveness compared with conventional nivolumab-ipilimumab (nivo-ipi). Exploratory biomarker analyses and final clinical results are now reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable melanoma received two doses of nivo-ipi. Radiographic assessment at Week 6 informed continuation of ipilimumab before nivolumab maintenance. The primary endpoint was overall response rate at Week 12. Plasma was assayed for circulating tumor DNA and 10 cytokines using a multiplex immunoassay. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed with an 11-color panel. RESULTS: Among the treated patients, expansion of proliferating T-cell populations was observed in responders and nonresponders. Baseline IL6 levels were low in patients achieving an objective radiographic response (median 1.30 vs. 2.86 pg/mL; P = 0.025). High baseline IL6 levels were associated with short progression-free survival [PFS; HR = 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.52; P = 0.041]. At Week 6, patients with response had lower average tumor variant allele fractions than nonresponders (median 0.000 vs. 0.019; P = 0.014). Greater increases in average variant allele fractions from baseline to Week 6 correlated with short PFS (HR = 1.11, 95% CI, 1.01-1.21; P = 0.023). Week 12 overall response rate was 47% (95% CI, 35%-59%) with a median follow-up of 34 months among survivors. Median PFS was 21 months (95% CI, 10-not reached); 76% of responses (95% CI, 64%-91%) persisted at 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptively dosed nivo-ipi responses are durable and resemble historical data for conventional nivo-ipi. Baseline IL6 and circulating tumor DNA changes during treatment warrant further study as biomarkers of nivo-ipi response.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Citocinas , Ipilimumab , Melanoma , Nivolumab , Humanos , Nivolumab/administración & dosificación , Ipilimumab/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/patología , Melanoma/mortalidad , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Citocinas/metabolismo , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos T/metabolismo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores de Tumor , ADN de Neoplasias , ADN Tumoral Circulante
7.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.) ; 63(9): 814-823, set. 2017. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-896397

RESUMEN

Summary Following decades of relative ostracism, advances in the treatment of melanoma have brought a new reality for patients, physicians and researchers. While antibodies targeting molecules involved in the modulation of the interaction between melanoma and immune cells changed the meaning of the term "cancer immunotherapy," a better characterization of the molecular aberrations involved in melanoma carcinogenesis prompted the development of inhibitors of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway (MAPK) that also led to significant improvements both in response rates and survival. As a result, new drugs have been approved for clinical use in the United States and Europe, including the immune-checkpoint blockers ipilmumab, pembrolizumab and nivolumab, the oncolytic herpesvirus talimogene laherparepvec, and the targeted-agents vemurafenib, dabrafenib, cobimetinib and trametinib. In this article, we review the results of studies that brought new approaches to the bedside and discuss how these developments are being incorporated into the care of patients in Brazil.


Resumo Após décadas de ostracismo, os recentes avanços no tratamento do melanoma trouxeram uma nova realidade para pacientes, médicos e pesquisadores. Enquanto anticorpos monoclonais voltados a moléculas envolvidas na modulação da interação entre células do melanoma e do sistema imune consolidaram o uso da "imunoterapia", um melhor conhecimento acerca das aberrações genômicas envolvidas na carcinogênese do melanoma viabilizaram o desenvolvimento de inibidores da via mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway (MAPK), o que também resultou em ganhos significativos em taxas de resposta e sobrevida. Consequentemente, novas modalidades de tratamento foram aprovadas para uso clínico nos Estados Unidos e na Europa, incluindo os bloqueadores de correceptores imunes ipilimumabe, nivolumabe e pembrolizumabe, o herpesvírus oncolítico talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), e os agentes-alvo vemurafenibe, dabrafenibe, cobimetinibe e trametinibe. Nesse artigo, revisamos os resultados que trouxeram novas alternativas para a prática clínica e discutimos a incorporação desses avanços ao cuidado de pacientes no Brasil.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/antagonistas & inhibidores , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA