Posterior Vitreous Detachment and the Posterior Hyaloid Membrane.

PURPOSE: Despite posterior vitreous detachment being a common ocular event affecting most individuals in an aging population, there is little consensus regarding its precise anatomic definition. We investigated the morphologic appearance and molecular composition of the posterior hyaloid membrane to determine whether the structure clinically observed enveloping the posterior vitreous surface after posterior vitreous detachment is a true basement membrane and to postulate its origin. Understanding the relationship between the vitreous (in both its attached and detached state) and the internal limiting membrane of the retina is essential to understanding the cause of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and vitreoretinal interface disorders, as well as potential future prophylactic and treatment strategies. DESIGN: Clinicohistologic correlation study. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six human donor globes. METHODS: Vitreous bodies identified to have posterior vitreous detachment were examined with phase-contrast microscopy and confocal microscopy after immunohistochemically staining for collagen IV basement membrane markers, in addition to extracellular proteins that characterize the vitreoretinal junction (fibronectin, laminin) and vitreous gel (opticin) markers. The posterior retina similarly was stained to evaluate the internal limiting membrane. Findings were correlated to the clinical appearance of the posterior hyaloid membrane observed during slit-lamp biomicroscopy after posterior vitreous detachment and compared with previously published studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morphologic appearance and molecular composition of the posterior hyaloid membrane. RESULTS: Phase-contrast microscopy consistently identified a creased and distinct glassy membranous sheet enveloping the posterior vitreous surface, correlating closely with the posterior hyaloid membrane observed during slit-lamp biomicroscopy in patients with posterior vitreous detachment. Immunofluorescent confocal micrographs demonstrated the enveloping membranous structure identified on phase-contrast microscopy to show positive stain results for type IV collagen. Immunofluorescence of the residual intact internal limiting membrane on the retinal surface also showed positive stain results for type IV collagen. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide immunohistochemical evidence that the posterior hyaloid membrane is a true basement membrane enveloping the posterior hyaloid surface. Because this membranous structure is observed only after posterior vitreous detachment, the results of this study indicate that it forms part of the internal limiting membrane when the vitreous is in its attached state.

Deep Intronic Sequence Variants in COL2A1 Affect the Alternative Splicing Efficiency of Exon 2, and May Confer a Risk for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.

COL2A1 mutations causing haploinsufficiency of type II collagen cause type 1 Stickler syndrome that has a high risk of retinal detachment and failure of the vitreous to develop normally. Exon 2 of COL2A1 is alternatively spliced, expressed in the eye but not in mature cartilage and encodes a region that binds growth factors TGFß1 and BMP-2. We investigated how both an apparently de novo variant and a polymorphism in intron 2 altered the efficiency of COL2A1 exon 2 splicing and how the latter may act as a predisposing risk factor for the occurrence of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD)-associated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in the general population. Using amplification of illegitimate transcripts and allele-specific minigenes expressed in cultured cells, we demonstrate variability in exon 2 inclusion not only between different control individuals, but also between different COL2A1 alleles. We identify transacting factors that bind to allele-specific RNA sequences, and investigate the effect of knockdown and overexpression of these factors on exon 2 splicing efficiency. Finally, using a specific cohort of patients with PVD-associated RRD and a control population, we demonstrate a significant difference in the frequency of the COL2A1 intronic variant rs1635532 between the two groups.

Prevention of retinal detachment in Stickler syndrome: the Cambridge prophylactic cryotherapy protocol.

PURPOSE: The Stickler syndromes are the most common causes of inherited and childhood retinal detachment; however, no consensus exists regarding the effectiveness of prophylactic intervention. We evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the Cambridge prophylactic cryotherapy protocol, a standardized retinal prophylactic treatment developed to prevent retinal detachment arising from giant retinal tears in type 1 Stickler syndrome. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred eighty seven patients with type 1 Stickler syndrome. METHODS: Time to retinal detachment was compared between patients who received bilateral prophylaxis and untreated controls, with and without individual patient matching. Patients receiving unilateral prophylaxis (after fellow eye retinal detachment) were similarly compared with an appropriate control subgroup. Individual patient matching ensured equal age and follow-up between groups and that an appropriate control (who had not suffered a retinal detachment before the age at which their individually matched treatment patient underwent prophylactic treatment) was selected. Matching was blinded to outcome events. Individual patient matching protocols purposely weighted bias against the effectiveness of treatment. All treatment side effects are reported. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to retinal detachment and side effects occurring after prophylactic treatment. RESULTS: The bilateral control group (n = 194) had a 7.4-fold increased risk of retinal detachment compared to the bilateral prophylaxis group (n = 229) (hazard ratio [HR], 7.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.53-12.08; P<0.001); the matched bilateral control group (n = 165) had a 5.0-fold increased risk compared to the matched bilateral prophylaxis group (n = 165) (HR, 4.97; 95% CI, 2.82-8.78; P<0.001). The unilateral control group (n = 104) had a 10.3-fold increased risk of retinal detachment compared to the unilateral prophylaxis group (n = 64) (HR, 10.29; 95% CI, 4.96-21.36; P<0.001); the matched unilateral control group (n = 39) had a 8.4-fold increased risk compared to the matched unilateral prophylaxis group (n = 39) (HR, 8.36; 95% CI, 3.24-21.57; P<0.001). No significant long-term side effects occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest global cohort of type 1 Stickler syndrome patients published, all analyses indicate that the Cambridge prophylactic cryotherapy protocol is safe and markedly reduces the risk of retinal detachment.

Alternative splicing modifies the effect of mutations in COL11A1 and results in recessive type 2 Stickler syndrome with profound hearing loss.

BACKGROUND: Stickler syndromes types 1, 2 and 3 are usually dominant disorders caused by mutations in the genes COL2A1, COL11A1 and COL11A2 that encode the fibrillar collagens types II and XI present in cartilage and vitreous. Rare recessive forms of Stickler syndrome exist that are due to mutations in genes encoding type IX collagen (COL9A1 type 4 Stickler syndrome and COL9A2 type 5 Stickler syndrome). Recently, recessive mutations in the COL11A1 gene have been demonstrated to result in fibrochondrogenesis, a much more severe skeletal dysplasia, which is often lethal. Here we demonstrate that some mutations in COL11A1 are recessive, modified by alternative splicing and result in type 2 Stickler syndrome rather than fibrochondrogenesis. METHODS: Patients referred to the national Stickler syndrome diagnostic service for England, UK were assessed clinically and subsequently sequenced for mutations in COL11A1. Additional in silico and functional studies to assess the effect of sequence variants on pre-mRNA processing and collagen structure were performed. RESULTS: In three different families, heterozygous COL11A1 biallelic null, null/missense or silent/missense mutations, were found. They resulted in a recessive form of type 2 Stickler syndrome characterised by particularly profound hearing loss and are clinically distinct from the recessive types 4 and 5 variants of Stickler syndrome. One mutant allele in each family is capable of synthesising a normal α1(XI) procollagen molecule, via variable pre-mRNA processing. CONCLUSION: This new variant has important implications for molecular diagnosis and counselling families with type 2 Stickler syndrome.

Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-Like Structures in Stickler Syndrome.

PURPOSE: To report a previously undescribed finding of peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) in Stickler syndrome. DESIGN: Noncomparative case series. SUBJECTS: Twenty-two eyes with anomalous optic disc from 11 Stickler syndrome patients were identified and imaged. METHODS: Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures were graded using enhanced-depth imaging OCT (EDI-OCT) according to the consensus recommendations of the Optic Disc Drusen Studies Consortium. All EDI-OCT scans were obtained using the Heidelberg Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering) with a dense horizontal raster (15 × 10°, 97 sections) centered on the optic nerve head and graded by 2 independent assessors. In case of disagreement, the image was graded by a third assessor. The presence of any coexisting optic disc drusen was also assessed using EDI-OCT and autofluorescence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The presence of PHOMS, clinical characteristics and genetic mutations. RESULTS: A pilot sample of 22 eyes with phenotypic optic disc abnormalities from 11 Stickler syndrome patients were identified and imaged. Eight patients were female and 3 were male. The mean age was 31 years (13-58 years). Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures were present in 91% (n = 20) of imaged eyes. Seventy percent (n = 14) were type 1 Stickler syndrome and 30% (n = 6) were type 2 Stickler syndrome. All eyes were myopic and the degree of myopia did not seem to affect whether or not PHOMS was present in this cohort. One eye with PHOMS had retinal detachment, and 77.3% (n = 17) of eyes had undergone 360o prophylactic retinopexy. Thirty-two percent (n = 7) of eyes with PHOMS were present in patients with coexisting hearing loss and 22.7% (n = 5) had orofacial manifestation of Stickler syndrome in the form of a cleft palate. Seventy-seven percent (n = 15) of eyes with PHOMS were present in patients who reported joint laxity or symptoms of arthritis. No coexisting optic disc drusen were identified and raised intracranial pressure was also excluded after neurological investigation. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that PHOMS are a novel finding in Stickler syndrome patients and should be considered when evaluating the optic nerves of these patients. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Retinal detachment risk in the fellow eyes of patients presenting with retinal tears in more than two quadrants.

Literature discussing fellow eye risk in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment secondary to posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) is limited, particularly in subgroups where this risk may be greater than the general population. In this retrospective consecutive case series with 107 study patients, the risk of retinal tears in fellow eyes of patients with horseshoe tears in three or more quadrants of their presenting eye, secondary to PVD, was 81%. The fellow eye risk is high in this subgroup of patients, and it is important to inform them to seek prompt attention when symptoms of PVD develop in their fellow eye.

Retinal detachment and prophylaxis in type 1 Stickler syndrome.

PURPOSE: To report the prevalence of retinal detachment (RD) and results of prophylaxis against detachment from a giant retinal tear in a large cohort of patients with type 1 Stickler syndrome. DESIGN: Retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred four type 1 Stickler syndrome patients. METHOD: Pedigrees and individuals with type 1 Stickler syndrome were identified from the vitreous research clinic and divided into 3 groups. Group 1 consisted of patients who received no prophylaxis (control group). Group 2 consisted of patients who had bilateral 360 degrees prophylactic cryotherapy (study group). Group 3 consisted of patients referred with unilateral RD for surgical repair and who underwent prophylaxis in the fellow eye (mixed group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Retinal status after prophylaxis, with failure of prophylaxis being defined as the development of RD or retinal tears needing further retinopexy. RESULTS: Of 111 patients who had no prophylactic retinopexy (group 1; mean age, 49 years), 73% (81/111) suffered RD and 48% (53/111) were bilateral. Of 62 patients who had bilateral prophylactic cryotherapy (group 2; mean age, 21 years), 8% (5/62) suffered failure of prophylaxis. There were no cases of bilateral detachments. The mean follow-up period was 11.5 years. In 31 patients who had unilateral prophylactic cryotherapy to the fellow eye (group 3; mean age, 36 years), failure occurred in 10% (3/31) of cases with a mean follow-up of 15.5 years. The prevalence of failure of prophylaxis in treated patients was significantly less than prevalence of RD in untreated patients (chi2(1) = 119.2, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic cryotherapy substantially reduces the risk of RD in type 1 Stickler syndrome and, in this series, eliminated the risk of bilateral detachments.

Missense and silent mutations in COL2A1 result in Stickler syndrome but via different molecular mechanisms.

Stickler syndrome due to mutations in COL2A1 is usually the result of premature termination codons and nonsense mediated decay resulting in haploinsufficiency of type II collagen. Here we present two missense mutations and one apparently silent mutation that each result in Stickler syndrome, but via different molecular mechanisms. One alters the translation initiating ATG codon. The second mutation is a unique glycine substitution in the minor collagen helix of the procollagen. To our knowledge a glycine substitution has not previously been reported in this region of fibrillar procollagens. The third mutation appears to be a silent change altering a GGC codon to GGT both for glycine, but use of a splicing reporter assay demonstrates that it results in missplicing and a shift in the reading frame.

Clinical characterisation and molecular analysis of Wagner syndrome.

AIM: To detail the clinical findings in a British family with molecularly characterised Wagner syndrome. BACKGROUND: Only in the last year has the specific genetic defect in Wagner syndrome been identified, and the background literature of the molecular genetics is outlined. Clinical and laboratory findings in a second case of Wagner syndrome are included to highlight difficulties that can be encountered when identifying pathogenic mutations for disorders arising in complex genes. METHODS: Mutation screening was performed using PCR and RT-PCR. RESULTS: A heterozygous mutation was found converting the donor splice site of exon 8 of the chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan 2 (CSPG2). This is the same mutation that has been reported in the original Wagner pedigree. The main clinical features of Wagner syndrome are vitreous syneresis, thickening and incomplete separation of the posterior hyaloid membrane, chorioretinal changes accompanied by subnormal electroretinographic responses, an ectopic fovea and early-onset cataract. A clinical feature present in this family, but previously undescribed, is anterior uveitis without formation of synechiae. Wagner syndrome has a progressive course, resulting in loss of vision even in the absence of retinal detachment. CONCLUSION: On a background of considerable confusion regarding the distinction between Wagner syndrome and predominantly ocular Stickler syndrome, it is now apparent the that two conditions are both clinically and genetically distinct. This report summarises the clinical findings in Wagner syndrome and extends the phenotypic characteristics.