Adjuvant bisphosphonates in early breast cancer: consensus guidance for clinical practice from a European Panel.

Bisphosphonates have been studied in randomised trials in early breast cancer to investigate their ability to prevent cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) and reduce the risk of disease recurrence and metastasis. Treatment benefits have been reported but bisphosphonates do not currently have regulatory approval for either of these potential indications. This consensus paper provides a review of the evidence and offers guidance to breast cancer clinicians on the use of bisphosphonates in early breast cancer. Using the nominal group methodology for consensus, a systematic review of the literature was augmented by a workshop held in October 2014 for breast cancer and bone specialists to present and debate the available pre-clinical and clinical evidence for the use of adjuvant bisphosphonates. This was followed by a questionnaire to all members of the writing committee to identify areas of consensus. The panel recommended that bisphosphonates should be considered as part of routine clinical practice for the prevention of CTIBL in all patients with a T score of <-2.0 or ≥2 clinical risk factors for fracture. Compelling evidence from a meta-analysis of trial data of >18,000 patients supports clinically significant benefits of bisphosphonates on the development of bone metastases and breast cancer mortality in post-menopausal women or those receiving ovarian suppression therapy. Therefore, the panel recommends that bisphosphonates (either intravenous zoledronic acid or oral clodronate) are considered as part of the adjuvant breast cancer treatment in this population and the potential benefits and risks discussed with relevant patients.

Oral clodronate and reduction in loss of bone mineral density in women with operable primary breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Women with primary breast cancer who receive systemic therapy may experience ovarian failure or early menopause, leading to a loss of bone mineral density (BMD). Loss of BMD may be reduced by use of bisphosphonates, compounds that inhibit the action of osteoclasts (cells that absorb or remove bone tissue). We have conducted a double-blind, randomized, two-center trial to evaluate BMD in women with primary breast cancer who were given the bisphosphonate clodronate (1600 mg/day orally) or placebo for 2 years. METHODS: From August 31, 1990, through March 31, 1996, more than 300 eligible patients had been accrued, randomly assigned to study treatment, given the appropriate primary surgical care and systemic (chemotherapy and/or tamoxifen) therapy, and had completed follow-up for at least 1 year. BMD in the lumbar spine and in the hip, including the trochanteric area, was measured by use of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the beginning of treatment and after 1 and 2 years of treatment. Changes in BMD were calculated as percent changes from the initial readings. Treatment effects for clodronate versus placebo (i.e., mean percent changes in BMD with clodronate minus mean percent changes in BMD with placebo) at 1 and 2 years for individual sites were calculated. RESULTS: After 1 year, the treatment effects for clodronate versus placebo in the lumbar spine, the total hip, and the trochanter, respectively, were as follows: +2.38% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.36-3.41), +0.74% (95% CI = -0.13 - 1.60), and +1.29% (95% CI = 0.24-2.34). After 2 years, the corresponding treatment effects were +1.72% (95% CI = 0.12-3.34), +1.85% (95% CI = 0.51-3.20), and +2.30% (95% CI = 0.66-3.94), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Oral clodronate appears to reduce the loss of BMD in patients who receive treatment for primary breast cancer.

Aminoglutethimide in the treatment of advanced postmenopausal breast cancer.

A group of 213 unselected postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer were treated with aminoglutethimide, 250 mg 4 times a day, and hydrocortisone, 20 mg 2 times a day. Follow-up is 10 months to 4 years from the start of treatment. In 190 assessable patients, there were 6 complete responses (CR), 47 partial responses (PR), 25 stable disease (SD), and 3 mixed responses. Overall objective response rate was 28% and with SD was 41%. Median duration of objective response was 14 months. Objective response by site was: soft tissue, 31%; nodes, 27%; bone 23: liver, 22%; and lung, 16%. A further 32% of patients with bone deposits had SD, and 19 of 60 patients with progressive disease had pain relief. Years after menopause, age and tumor-free interval did not affect response rates. Thirty-eight % of patients responding to previous endocrine therapy responded to aminoglutethimide compared with 19% of patients who had progressed on previous endocrine therapy. A group of 213 patients were assessable for toxicity. Main side effects were drowsiness (33%), rash (23%), and nausea (15%). Eleven patients stopped treatment because of toxicity. Median survival from start of treatment was 28 months for PR-CR and for SD and 10 months for progressive disease (p less than 0.001). Median survival from first metastasis was 43 months for PR-CR, 40 months for SD (not significantly different), and 22 months for progressive disease (p less than 0.001). Aminoglutethimide is an effective endocrine therapy in advanced postmenopausal breast cancer, particularly for bone deposits. Disease stabilization is associated with symptomatic and survival benefit similar to CR-PR.

Clinical trial of multiple endocrine therapy for metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer with tamoxifen-aminoglutethimide-danazol compared to tamoxifen used alone.

Multiple-endocrine therapy with combinations of various types of treatment has not been evaluated properly in spite of the success of individual types of hormone treatment. This paper reports the early results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing tamoxifen (10 mg 2 times/day)-amino-glutethimide (250 mg 3 times/day)-danazol (100 mg 3 times/day)-hydrocortisone (20 mg 2 times/day) (TAD) with tamoxifen (10 mg 2 times/day). Analysis of the first 107 assessable patients indicates objective response (criteria of the International Union Against Cancer) in 33% of patients receiving tamoxifen versus 50% of patients receiving TAD. Duration of response to TAD is identical to duration of response to tamoxifen alone. TAD is well tolerated, and toxicity, although greater than or tamoxifen, is acceptable.

Immunocytochemical assay for estrogen receptor: relationship to outcome of therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer.

We have used an immunoperoxidase technique utilizing a monoclonal antibody to the estradiol receptor to identify immunoreactive estradiol receptor in breast carcinomas and have examined the relationship between the immunoreactive estradiol receptor and response to therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer. Fifty-six patients were found to be assessable for response to endocrine therapy. Twenty-two showed an objective response to some form of endocrine manipulation, and all these had positively stained carcinomas. None of the 17 patients with negatively stained carcinomas responded to endocrine therapy. We conclude that the monoclonal antibody to estradiol receptor can help identify breast cancer patients who may respond to endocrine therapy.

Use of the aromatase inhibitor 4-hydroxyandrostenedione in postmenopausal breast cancer: optimization of therapeutic dose and route.

4-Hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA) is a potent inhibitor of estrogen production by aromatase and causes suppression of plasma estradiol levels and disease regression in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Groups of patients were given p.o. or parenteral 4-OHA, and plasma estradiol and 4-OHA levels were measured to enable the delineation of the minimal effective dose and optimal therapeutic regimen. A single injection of 500 mg i.m. suppressed estradiol levels to a mean 36.3 +/- 3.3% (SE) (n = 14) of base line after 4 to 7 days and maintained this suppression in six of seven patients for greater than 14 days. The half-life of 4-OHA was approximately 8 days, and when the level had fallen to less than 3 ng/ml, estradiol levels began to rise. Similar suppression was achieved by a single i.m. injection of 125 mg of 4-OHA and by 500 mg of 4-OHA p.o. daily after 1 wk, but escape from suppression was more rapid.

Treatment of advanced postmenopausal breast cancer with an aromatase inhibitor, 4-hydroxyandrostenedione: phase II report.

4-Hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA), a potent new aromatase inhibitor, was given i.m. (500-1000 mg) to 58 patients with advanced postmenopausal breast cancer. Of 52 assessable patients 14 responded (27%), in 10 (19%) the disease stabilized, and in 28 (54%) the disease progressed. Sterile abscesses occurred at the injection site in 6 patients and painful lumps were found in a further 3 patients. Two patients developed allergic-type reactions and 4 developed lethargy, suspected to be treatment induced. Plasma estradiol levels were suppressed from a mean of 7.2 +/- 0.8 (SE) pg/ml before treatment to 2.6 +/- 0.2, 2.7 +/- 0.2, and 2.8 +/- 0.3 pg/ml after 1, 2, and greater than 4 months, respectively, of treatment and remained suppressed in patients whose disease relapsed. No significant fall in estrone levels was seen. Similarly, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, sex hormone binding globulin, and gonadotrophin levels were unaltered after 6 months of treatment. Plasma 4-OHA levels were measured in a radioimmunoassay for androstenedione after chromatographic separation of 4-OHA from androstenedione. Drug concentrations ranged from 0.7 to 23.2 (7.8 +/- 1.1) ng/ml after 2 months on treatment. 4-OHA is an effective drug in the management of postmenopausal patients with breast cancer and does not produce notable systemic side effects.

In vitro and in vivo effects of a monoclonal antibody-toxin conjugate for use in autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with breast cancer.

We have devised a method utilizing a monoclonal antibody-toxin conjugate (LICR-LON-Fib75/abrin A-chain) for ridding bone marrow of infiltrating breast cancer cells to rescue patients with autologous bone marrow following high dose therapy. Initially we examined the activity of this conjugate in vitro. Five of seven human breast cancer cell lines were killed following exposure at 10(-8) M for 2 h; this concentration only reduced bone marrow colony formation to 83% (range, 50-100%) of control bone marrow. We then examined the pattern of bone marrow recovery after high dose melphalan (200 mg/m2) in patients with advanced breast cancer who were in remission following combination chemotherapy. To do this we compared the time of recovery of the blood count in three patients who received treated marrow and seven who received untreated marrow. Mean time to recovery of the peripheral white count (greater than 1.5 X 10(9)/liter) was 16.7 days (treated) and 18.3 days (untreated), respectively. Mean time to recovery of peripheral platelet count (greater than 50 X 10(9)/liter) was 23.7 days (treated) and 18.9 days (untreated), respectively. Patients continued in remission for 1-greater than 14 mo after high dose melphalan, and remission duration was similar in patients who received treated (6.2 mo) and untreated (7.3 mo) bone marrow. These findings indicate that treatment of bone marrow with LICR-LON-Fib75/abrin A-chain conjugate does not significantly impair bone marrow recovery, and it is, therefore, possible to rescue breast cancer patients with bone marrow that has been cleansed of infiltrating cancer cells. This may have an application in patients with poor-risk primary breast cancer who have micrometastases and who may benefit from intensive therapy, but it has minimal application in patients with more advanced disease.

Adjuvant aminoglutethimide therapy for postmenopausal patients with primary breast cancer.

Three hundred and twenty-two postmenopausal patients with primary breast cancer and ipsilateral axillary node involvement were randomized to receive aminoglutethimide and hydrocortisone or placebo for 2 years in a double blind randomized trial between April 1980 and March 1985. Two hundred and eighty-six patients were eligible for the study of whom 145 received active drug and 141 received placebo. At the present time significantly fewer patients have relapsed or died without previous relapse in the treatment arm (P = 0.002); 43 of 145 (30%) patients receiving aminoglutethimide have relapsed or died compared with 63 of 141 (40%) of those receiving placebo. Local recurrence is also significantly reduced (P = 0.002) since only 6 patients receiving active treatment developed local recurrence compared to 21 receiving placebo. Side effects were severe enough to necessitate complete withdrawal or reduction of therapy in 27 of 145 (19%) in the treatment arm of the study compared with 21 of 141 (15%) in the placebo arm. A single treatment-related death occurred, due to agranulocytosis. Aminoglutethimide and hydrocortisone therefore delay relapse after surgery for primary breast cancer in postmenopausal women. It is too early to assess any effect on overall survival.

Presurgical determination of estrogen receptor status using immunocytochemically stained fine needle aspirate smears in patients with breast cancer.

We have developed an immunocytochemical staining procedure (ERICA) using a monoclonal antibody to the estrogen receptor (ER) to determine ER status from samples obtained by fine needle aspiration of primary and recurrent breast cancer tissue (cyto-ERICA). ER status was assessable on 214 of 246 smeared aspirates from breast cancer patients. In 143 (66.8%) assessable smears positive nuclear staining was observed but was completely absent in 71 (33.2%) cases. In 107 cases we were able to compare results with those obtained with the quantifiable dextrancoated charcoal (DCC) radioligand binding technique using surgically excised material. We observed qualitative agreement in 53 of 62 (85.5%) of primary specimens and 16 of 16 (100%) recurrent samples compared to the subsequent DCC result on the same sample. Aspirates obtained from new secondary deposits were also assessed and in 16 of 19 (84.2%) cases results agreed with that established previously by DCC on the primary breast tumor. In a further 6 of 10 (60%) cases the cyto-ERICA result obtained from recurrent samples qualitatively agreed with that determined by DCC on a previous recurrent lesion. A comparison of staining of aspirates was also made against frozen tissue sections stained with the monoclonal antibody (tissue-ERICA). Where comparison was made of primary tumor specimens agreement was observed in 40 of 45 (88.9%) of cases while specimens from secondary lesions agreed qualitatively in 14 of 17 (82.3%) of cases. In a small number of samples where tissue-ERICA was performed on an earlier lesion to that aspirated for cyto-ERICA an agreement of 4 of 5 (80%) was observed. This technique shows good sensitivity in demonstrating ER in aspirate specimens, should therefore permit us to determine ER status before surgery for primary breast cancer, and may also mean that surgery for recurrent disease to determine receptor status is no longer necessary.

Adjuvant aminoglutethimide therapy for postmenopausal patients with primary breast cancer: progress report.

A group of 122 postmenopausal patients with histologically proven node-positive primary breast cancer have been randomized to receive aminoglutethimide-hydrocortisone or placebo aminoglutethimide-placebo hydrocortisone for 2 years. Median follow-up is 17 months. In general, treatment was well tolerated, but 15 patients required a reduction in the dose of aminoglutethimide, and of these four patients were unable to continue therapy due to side effects. Primary staging, incidence of extensive node involvement, and estrogen receptor were similar in the treatment and control arms. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHA-S) and estrone were measured in a subgroup of patients, and significant suppression of DHA-S levels throughout the duration of the treatment period as seen in patients receiving the active drug. No significant suppression of either DHA-S or estrone levels was seen in the controls. Patients were monitored for metastases by serial liver function tests, carcinoembryonic antigen, and chest X-rays, and of 26 relapsing patients only three patients were not detected by this screen. We conclude that adjuvant aminoglutethimide is moderately well tolerated. It is capable of suppressing DHA-S throughout 2 years of treatment. A further 280 patients will be entered into the study to assess the survival benefit for those taking aminoglutethimide-hydrocortisone.

Chemoprevention options for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer predisposition gene mutation carriers are at markedly increased risk of breast and other cancers. The consideration of chemopreventative options will depend on the cancer site and age-specific penetrance curve. Most chemoprevention studies to date have investigated the role of endocrine intervention in women at increased risk of breast cancer, and study results are conflicting. At the present time, there is uncertainty regarding whether endocrine intervention, particularly with tamoxifen, is as effective in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers as in other women who are at increased risk of breast cancer because of hormonal factors or genes with moderately conferred cancer risks. Furthermore, if chemoprevention were needed for at least 10 years to produce an effect, new chemoprevention agents will need to be developed for women in their 30s, as the breast cancer risk curves are steepest between 40 and 50 years of age. Consideration is now being given to types of chemoprevention in this younger age group. There is also an increased risk of other cancers (in particular ovarian cancer and, in men, prostate cancer), and considerations regarding chemoprevention will have to encompass cancer at these sites.

Effect of tamoxifen on bone mineral density measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in healthy premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

PURPOSE: Tamoxifen is an effective treatment for metastatic and primary breast cancer and is now being evaluated as a chemoprevention agent in healthy women. Any long-term effects on estrogen-sensitive tissues such as bone may have important therapeutic implications. METHODS: We measured bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine and hip using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in premenopausal and postmenopausal healthy women who participated in our placebo-controlled tamoxifen chemoprevention of breast cancer trial. RESULTS: BMD data are now available from 179 women for this analysis. In premenopausal women, BMD decreased progressively in the lumbar spine (P < .001) and in the hip (P < .05) for women on tamoxifen, but not those on placebo. The mean annual loss in lumbar BMD per year over the 3-year study period in tamoxifen-treated compliant women who remained premenopausal throughout the study period was 1.44% (1.88% calculated on an intent-to-treat basis) compared with a small gain of 0.24% per annum for women on placebo (P < .001). Tamoxifen had the opposite effect in postmenopausal women. The mean annual increase in BMD for women on tamoxifen was 1.17% in the spine (P < .005) and 1.71% in the hip (P < .001) compared with a noninsignificant loss for women on placebo. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that tamoxifen treatment is associated with a significant loss of BMD in premenopausal women, whereas it prevents bone loss in postmenopausal women. These adverse and beneficial effects of tamoxifen should be considered in the assessment of the therapeutic benefits for both the adjuvant treatment and the chemoprevention of breast cancer.

Double-blind controlled trial of oral clodronate in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Osteolytic metastases often give rise to hypercalcemia, fracture, and bone pain, and occur commonly in patients with recurrent breast cancer. We assessed the bisphosphonate, clodronate, which has proven to be a useful treatment for hypercalcemia and may be a potent inhibitor of tumor-induced osteolysis, for its effect on reducing the osseous complications of metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 173 patients with bone metastases due to breast cancer in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral clodronate 1,600 mg/d (85 patients) compared with an identical placebo (88 patients). RESULTS: The patients in each wing were comparable in their clinical, radiologic, and biochemical characteristics at trial entry. In patients who received clodronate, there was a significant reduction compared with placebo in the total number of hypercalcemic episodes (28 v 52; P < .01), in the number of terminal hypercalcemic episodes (seven v 17; P < .05), in the incidence of vertebral fractures (84 v 124 per 100 patient-years; P < .025), and in the rate of vertebral deformity (168 v 252 per 100 patient-years; P < .001). The combined rate of all morbid skeletal events was significantly reduced (218.6 v 304.8 per 100 patient-years; P < .001). Trends were seen in favor of clodronate for nonvertebral fracture rates and radiotherapy requirements for bone pain (particularly spinal pain). No significant survival differences and no significant differences in side effects were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that oral clodronate has a beneficial effect on the skeletal morbidity associated with breast cancer and should be considered as antiosteolytic therapy in affected patients. It deserves further investigation as an adjuvant therapy in operable breast cancer and in patients with nonosseous recurrence who are at high risk for bone metastases.

Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: psychosocial impact on women participating in two randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychosocial implications of tamoxifen versus placebo in women who are at increased risk of breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 488 women in the psychosocial study were recruited from participants in two placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, controlled trials that investigated the efficacy of tamoxifen in the prevention of breast cancer in women who are at high familial risk. During a 5-year period, repeated assessments were made of anxiety, psychological distress, and sexual functioning using standardized questionnaires before treatment at baseline and at 6-month intervals during the trial. RESULTS: Questionnaire completion over 5 years was good, with 71.1% of women returning at least 8 of 10 follow-up assessments. Although scores from individuals showed considerable fluctuation and variation over time, changes in anxiety, mood, and sexual functioning were not associated with treatment group. The number of symptoms reported at 48 months via a self-report checklist were not associated with treatment group, but vasomotor symptoms were more frequent among tamoxifen-treated women. Symptoms of low energy, breast sensitivity, and visual blurring were reported most frequently in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: In general, these results are comparable to those from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project psychosocial study despite differences in study populations, methodology, and instruments. The long-term use of tamoxifen and other selective estrogen response modulators as preventive agents in high-risk groups has been questioned, but we found no evidence of treatment-related side effects that affect women's psychosocial and sexual functioning.

Immunocytochemical assay for estrogen receptor in patients with breast cancer: relationship to a biochemical assay and to outcome of therapy.

We developed an immunoperoxidase technique using a monoclonal antibody to the estradiol receptor (ER) to identify immunoreactive ER (iER) in breast carcinomas and compared this with the conventional dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) steroid binding assay. We also examined the relationship between the iER and response to therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer. We found iER-positive cells in 60 of 90 carcinomas (66.7%); this correlated with the DCC assay (r = 0.76; P less than .001). Of these, 56 patients were found to be assessable for response to endocrine therapy. Twenty-two showed an objective response to some form of endocrine manipulation, and all these had positively stained carcinomas. By deriving a staining intensity index (SII) we observed that 21 of 22 responders (95%) had an SII of greater than or equal to 0.5, whereas only 8 of 34 nonresponders (24%) had an SII of greater than or equal to 0.5. This difference is highly significant (P less than .001). None of the 17 patients with negatively stained carcinomas responded to endocrine therapy. We conclude that the monoclonal antibody to ER can help identify breast cancer patients who may respond to endocrine therapy.

Randomized trial of chemoendocrine therapy started before or after surgery for treatment of primary breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate in a randomized clinical trial systemic chemoendocrine therapy used as primary (neo-adjuvant) treatment before surgery in women with primary operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged less than 70 years with clinically palpable, primary operable breast cancer diagnostically confirmed by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and suitable for treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and tamoxifen were considered eligible. Patients randomized to neoadjuvant treatment received four cycles of chemo-therapy for 3 months before surgery followed by another four cycles after surgery, and were compared with patients randomized to adjuvant therapy who received eight cycles of chemotherapy over 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Of 212 patients who were randomized to receive either adjuvant (n = 107) or neoadjuvant (n = 105) chemoendocrine therapy, 200 are now assessable for response. The two groups are comparable for age, menopausal status, disease stage, and surgical requirements. The overall clinical response rate was 85%, with a complete histologic response rate of 10%. There was a significant reduction in the requirement for mastectomy in patients who received neoadjuvant treatment (13%) as compared with those who received adjuvant therapy (28%) (P < .005). Symptomatic and hematologic acute toxicity was low and similar for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. The median follow-up period for patients in this trial is 28 months, during which time four patients have relapsed locally and 20, including one of the local relapses, have developed metastatic disease, 19 of whom have died. The follow-up period is too brief to evaluate relapse rate or survival duration. CONCLUSION: This trial confirms previous reports of a high rate of response to neoadjuvant therapy, but is the first to include small primary cancers and to show, in the context of a randomized trial, a reduction in the requirement for mastectomy. Until disease-free and overall survival data are available from the larger National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)-18 trial, such neoadjuvant treatment cannot be recommended outside of a clinical trial.

Adjuvant aminoglutethimide for postmenopausal patients with primary breast cancer: analysis at 8 years.

PURPOSE: The study purpose was to evaluate aminoglutethimide (AG) as adjuvant therapy in patients with primary node-positive breast cancer in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multicenter trial, 354 postmenopausal women with early breast cancer and histologically confirmed positive axillary lymph nodes were randomized after surgery to received aminoplac. Patients were prescribed either AG 250 mg four times per day and hydrocortisone 20 mg twice per day or placebos of identical appearance for 2 years. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 8.1 years, there has been no overall benefit for AG in terms of either event-free survival or overall survival (OS). However, the results are consistent with interim analyses with a significantly improved event-free survival for patients who received AG for up to 4 years, although this benefit subsequently disappears. Similarly, there is an improved OS for patients who received AG for up to 4 years, but this also subsequently disappears. There was a marginal advantage for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive patients who received AG (n = 74; P = .054). There was no difference in the sites of relapse. There was a significant increase in toxicity for patients who received AG. CONCLUSION: The lack of survival benefit with long-term follow-up for AG may indicate that aromatase inhibitors have less of an impact on early breast cancer than tamoxifen and may imply different biologic mechanisms of action.

Biologic markers as predictors of clinical outcome from systemic therapy for primary operable breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine whether pretreatment clinical features and molecular markers, together with changes in these factors, can predict treatment response and survival in patients with primary operable breast cancer who receive neoadjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Mitoxantrone, methotrexate (with or without mitomycin), and tamoxifen chemoendocrine therapy was administered to 158 patients before surgery. Clinical response was assessed after four cycles of treatment. Fine-needle aspiration cytology for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), c-erbB-2, p53, bcl-2, Ki67, S-phase fraction (SPF), and ploidy were performed pretreatment and repeated on day 10 or day 21 after the first cycle of treatment. RESULTS: Good clinical response (GCR, defined as complete response or minimal residual disease) was achieved in 31% of patients (49 of 158). Tumor size, nodal disease, response, ER, PgR, c-erbB-2, p53, bcl-2, Ki67, SPF, and ploidy were analyzed as predictors of survival. By univariate analysis, node-positive disease (P =.05), lack of ER (P <.05) and PgR (P <.05), and failure to attain GCR (P =.008) were associated with a significantly increased risk of relapse. A significantly increased risk of death was associated with node-positive disease (P =.02), lack of ER expression (P =.04), and failure to attain GCR. By multivariate analysis, GCR was an independent predictor for survival (P =.05). ER expression (P =.03), absence of c-erbB-2 (P =.03), and a decrease in Ki67 on day 10 or day 21 of the first cycle (P <.05) significantly predicted for subsequent GCR. CONCLUSION: Molecular markers may be used to predict the likelihood of achieving GCR, which seems to be a valid surrogate marker for survival.

Prediction of clinical outcome from primary tamoxifen by expression of biologic markers in breast cancer patients.

The aim of this study was to evaluate pretreatment clinical features and biological markers together with changes in these factors as predictors of response and relapse in patients receiving tamoxifen for primary breast cancer. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the primary breast cancer was performed before tamoxifen treatment in 54 patients and repeated after therapy on day 14, day 60, or on both days in a subset of 35 patients. These samples were evaluated for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), Ki67, S-phase fraction and ploidy. The overall response to tamoxifen was 57% (31 of 54 patients). Pretreatment ER and PgR significantly predicted for response by univariate analysis (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.003, respectively). By multivariate analysis, ER expression was the only independent predictor of response, and it was associated with 27 times the likelihood of response (95% confidence interval, 6-136). Increase in PgR and decrease in Ki67 on day 14 significantly predicted for response to tamoxifen (P < 0.03 and P < 0.04, respectively). Lack of ER, clinical node-positive disease, and failure to decrease Ki67 on day 14 were significantly associated with increased risk of relapse (P < 0.05). By multivariate analysis, ER expression was the only independent predictor of relapse (P < 0.005). Pretreatment and early changes in molecular marker expression may assist in the prediction of response and clinical outcome in primary breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen.