Lentiviral gene therapy corrects platelet phenotype and function in patients with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia is a serious issue for all patients with classical Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) and X-linked thrombocytopenia (XLT) because it causes severe and life-threatening bleeding. Lentiviral gene therapy (GT) for WAS has shown promising results in terms of immune reconstitution. However, despite the reduced severity and frequency of bleeding events, platelet counts remain low in GT-treated patients. OBJECTIVE: We carefully investigated platelet defects in terms of phenotype and function in untreated patients with WAS and assessed the effect of GT treatment on platelet dysfunction. METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of 20 patients with WAS/XLT, 15 of them receiving GT. Platelet phenotype and function were analyzed by using electron microscopy, flow cytometry, and an aggregation assay. Platelet protein composition was assessed before and after GT by means of proteomic profile analysis. RESULTS: We show that platelets from untreated patients with WAS have reduced size, abnormal ultrastructure, and a hyperactivated phenotype at steady state, whereas activation and aggregation responses to agonists are decreased. GT restores platelet size and function early after treatment and reduces the hyperactivated phenotype proportionally to WAS protein expression and length of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the coexistence of morphologic and multiple functional defects in platelets lacking WAS protein and demonstrates that GT normalizes the platelet proteomic profile with consequent restoration of platelet ultrastructure and phenotype, which might explain the observed reduction of bleeding episodes after GT. These results are instrumental also from the perspective of a future clinical trial in patients with XLT only presenting with microthrombocytopenia.

Influence of Different Antithrombotic Regimens on Platelet-Mediated Thrombin Generation in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

We characterized the biologic background of prothrombotic platelet function in the setting of durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) evaluating the role of different antithrombotic regimens. Platelet-mediated thrombin generation was quantified using the Platelet Activity State (PAS) Assay and the Thrombin Generation Test (TGT) in 78 patients implanted with the HeartMate II (n = 10, 13%), the HeartMate 3 (HM3) (n = 30, 38%), or the HVAD (n = 38, 49%) and managed with oral anticoagulation plus aspirin (n = 46, 59%) or anticoagulation alone (n = 32, 41%). Coagulation parameters (platelet count, International Normalized Ratio (INR), activated Partial Thromboplastin Time, Fibrinogen and D-Dimer levels) and hemolysis (lactate dehydrogenase levels [LDH]) were also recorded to comprehensively characterize the hemostatic profile in the two groups. In patients without aspirin, the PAS assay revealed low-intensity increase in platelet prothrombinase activity (1.11-fold, p = 0.03). Similarly the TGT revealed moderate higher platelet reactivity when compared with patients receiving aspirin, consistent with reduction in lag time (0.87-fold, p < 0.001), increase in peak of thrombin generation (1.5-fold, p = 0.002) and thrombin generation rate (2-fold, p = 0.02), but comparable endogenous thrombin potential (p = 0.50). Coagulation parameters and LDH were comparable in the two groups (p > 0.05). Moreover, no differences were noted in platelet prothrombinase activity of patients implanted with the HM3 or HVAD. Our results suggest that, in the setting of durable LVADs, aspirin minimally modulates the biochemical pathway of platelet-mediated thrombin generation. Accordingly, re-evaluation of current antithrombotic management criteria in patients stratified according to bleeding/thromboembolic risk might be safe and beneficial to prevent adverse events.

Which Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device and Aspirin Allergy?

In patients with left ventricular assist device support and aspirin allergy, the choice of effective antiplatelet strategy remains a challenge. We compared the antithrombotic effect of clopidogrel vs ticagrelor in an LVAD patient with aspirin allergy by using a modified protocol of the thrombin generation test, accounting selectively for the platelet contribution on thrombin generation. Our results demonstrate enhanced antithrombotic efficacy offered by ticagrelor. Consistent with experimental results, the patient has passed more than 300 days without thromboembolic complications. This study provides additional mechanistic rationale supporting clinical evidence and opens the perspective to identify individual poor responsiveness to drugs by specifically evaluating drug-mediated platelet function.

Platelet activation is a preoperative risk factor for the development of thromboembolic complications in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.

AIMS: To correlate the dynamics of platelet activation with the development of thromboembolic events in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (cf-LVAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: The platelet activity state (PAS) assay was utilized to evaluate platelet activation in 68 cf-LVAD patients implanted with the HeartMate II (n = 15, 22%), HeartMate 3 (n = 15, 22%), or HeartWare HVAD (n = 38, 56%). PAS was measured preoperatively, early post-implant, and at long-term follow-up (1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-implant). PAS was also measured at the occurrence of adverse events in patients who developed thrombotic complications. Data on patient demographics, medical history, antithrombotic therapy, and coagulation parameters were also analysed. Over a median follow-up of 602 (234-942) days, PAS values did not increase over time in the overall population (P = 0.15). However, PAS measured at event was 15-fold higher in the six patients (9%) who suffered pump thrombosis (n = 2) or ischaemic stroke (n = 4) vs. the rest of the population [6.67% (5.59%-11.98%) vs. 0.45% (0.33%-0.75%); P = 0.012], despite comparable coagulation profile. Pre-implant PAS values were 4.5-fold higher in these patients [1.90% (1.24%-3.17%) vs. 0.42% (0.32%-0.72%); P = 0.006]. Neither preoperative variables nor the type of the pump or the antiplatelet strategy were associated with a higher risk of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombotic events are associated with altered PAS values. Moreover, baseline elevated PAS values in patients who developed thrombotic events suggest patient-specific tendency to post-implant thromboembolic complications. Prospectively, systematic monitoring of PAS might guide the development of refined patient-tailored antithrombotic strategies and the technological improvement of LVAD design.