Sigmoid dose accumulation and reporting for multifractionated brachytherapy for cervical cancer: Methodological development of sigmoid points through virtual endoscopic method.

PURPOSE: The sigmoid is an important organ at risk for gynecological brachytherapy (BT). However, the reliability of localization of high-dose regions during multi-fractionated treatment is limited. This work reports the methodological development of sigmoid points to summate multi-fractionated doses. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Ten paired MRI data sets of ring-based intracavitary brachytherapy were obtained. Simulating a virtual endoscope, a reference line was created along the central axis of the anorectosigmoid for each implant. A trendline was generated, and linear dose was determined. Three-dimensional (3D) coordinates of high-dose regions were identified, and overlap was determined. In the next step, 3D coordinates of high-dose sigmoid points were localized in reference to cervical os and re-verified for location in reference to sigmoid lumen and corroboration with 2cc doses. With minor modifications, sigmoid points were proposed. RESULTS: In 6 of 10 patients, high-dose regions co-localized in subsequent fractions of BT. Three high-dose regions were identified along the sigmoid length and proposed as sigmoid points in reference to cervical os. (S1'= 0.5 cm right, 1.5 cm posterior, and 2.4 cm cranial; S2' = 0.3 cm anterior and 4.5 cm cranial; S3' = 2.7 cm left, 3 cm anterior, and 3.6 cm cranial to the cervical os). S1' and S2' were located in the sigmoid in 70% and 60% of data sets. The mean difference between D2cc and S1'/S2' was 0.30 Gy and 1.06 Gy respectively. S3' had limited corroboration to sigmoid lumen or 2 cc doses. The points S1' and S2' were further modified (minor) for applicability and proposed as sigmoid points 1 and 2 (SP1 0.5 right,1.5 posterior and 2.5 cm cranial to cervical os and SP2 (0.5 cm anterior and 4.5 cm cranial to cervical os)). CONCLUSION: SP1 and SP 2 are proposed as a surrogate for 2 cc sigmoid doses and may provide a method of reliable inter-fraction dose summation. This pilot work requires further validation.

Patterns of Relapse After Adjuvant Chemoradiation for Cervical Cancer in a Phase 3 Clinical Trial (PARCER): An Evaluation of Updated NRG Oncology/RTOG Target Delineation Guidelines.

PURPOSE: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) under NRG Oncology recently published updated contouring guidelines for intensity modulated radiation therapy in postoperative treatment for endometrial and cervical cancer. The present study was designed to evaluate the implications of newly published guidelines. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We recruited 300 patients in a phase 3 randomized controlled trial of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy for cervical cancer (NCT01279135) to understand patterns of relapse. For those patients with pelvic relapse, we imported radiation therapy structure sets, treatment plans, and diagnostic images at relapse on the treatment planning system. We performed rigid registration with treatment planning images that contained the delineated planning target volume and radiation dose information. We delineated gross tumor volume at time of relapse on the diagnostic scans and superimposed it on the radiation therapy treatment scans. We categorized the site of pelvic relapse as "within field of old RTOG/[Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation in Cervical Cancer (PARCER)] target delineation guidelines" or "within field of new NRG/RTOG guidelines," or both, and compared proportions of recurrences contained within the 2 guidelines. We consider a P value of <.05 statistically significant. Additionally, we generated intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment plans based on the new guidelines for a limited set of patients to see if these new guidelines increased the organ at risk doses. RESULTS: Most common form of relapse was distant metastasis (15%). Pelvic relapse rate in our study was 8%. Overall, 9 out of 19 relapses were encompassed in the contouring guidelines of the old RTOG/ Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation in Cervical Cancer (PARCER) trial, and 12 out of 19 were encompassed within the new RTOG 2021 contouring guidelines. This corresponded to a further 1% reduction in local relapses (P = .007). Dose to rectum was marginally increased with the new contouring, with no difference in other organs at risk. Salvage treatment was offered in 25 out of 60 patients who relapsed. Patients who received local treatment after relapse had a mean survival after relapse of 27.2 months compared with 8 months among those who received supportive care alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the use of newly published NRG/RTOG contouring guidelines in patients with cervical cancer who have undergone hysterectomy. Further data are needed to ascertain if anterior extension of the clinical target volume is needed as in the Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation in Cervical Cancer trial.