Transcriptomics of receptive endometrium in women with sonographic features of adenomyosis.

BACKGROUND: Women with uterine adenomyosis seeking assisted reproduction have been associated with compromised endometrial receptivity to embryo implantation. To understand the mechanisms involved in this process, we aimed to compare endometrial transcriptome profiles during the window of implantation (WOI) between women with and without adenomyosis. METHODS: We obtained endometrial biopsies LH-timed to the WOI from women with sonographic features of adenomyosis (n=10) and controls (n=10). Isolated RNA samples were subjected to RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) by the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform and endometrial receptivity classification with a molecular tool for menstrual cycle phase dating (beREADY®, CCHT). The program language R and Bioconductor packages were applied to analyse RNA-seq data in the setting of the result of accurate endometrial dating. To suggest robust candidate pathways, the identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with the adenomyosis group in the receptive phase were further integrated with 151, 173 and 42 extracted genes from published studies that were related to endometrial receptivity in healthy uterus, endometriosis and adenomyosis, respectively. Enrichment analyses were performed using Cytoscape ClueGO and CluePedia apps. RESULTS: Out of 20 endometrial samples, 2 were dated to the early receptive phase, 13 to the receptive phase and 5 to the late receptive phase. Comparison of the transcriptomics data from all 20 samples provided 909 DEGs (p<0.05; nonsignificant after adjusted p value) in the adenomyosis group but only 4 enriched pathways (Bonferroni p value < 0.05). The analysis of 13 samples only dated to the receptive phase provided suggestive 382 DEGs (p<0.05; nonsignificant after adjusted p value) in the adenomyosis group, leading to 33 enriched pathways (Bonferroni p value < 0.05). These included pathways were already associated with endometrial biology, such as "Expression of interferon (IFN)-induced genes" and "Response to IFN-alpha". Data integration revealed pathways indicating a unique effect of adenomyosis on endometrial molecular organization (e.g., "Expression of IFN-induced genes") and its interference with endometrial receptivity establishment (e.g., "Extracellular matrix organization" and "Tumour necrosis factor production"). CONCLUSIONS: Accurate endometrial dating and RNA-seq analysis resulted in the identification of altered response to IFN signalling as the most promising candidate of impaired uterine receptivity in adenomyosis.

Molecular signature of eutopic endometrium in endometriosis based on the multi-omics integrative synthesis.

PURPOSE: To synthesise data from genome-wide studies reporting molecular signature of eutopic endometrium through the phases of the menstrual cycle in endometriosis. METHODS: Extraction of data from publications reporting genetic signatures characterising endometrium associated with endometriosis. The nomenclature of extracted differentially expressed transcripts and proteins was adopted according to the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC). Loci were further sorted according to the different phases of the menstrual cycle, i.e. menstrual (M), proliferative (P), secretory (S), early-secretory (ES), mid-secretory (MS), late-secretory (LS), and not specified (N/S) if the endometrial dating was not available. Enrichment analysis was performed using the DAVID bioinformatics tool. RESULTS: Altered molecular changes were reported by 21 studies, including 13 performed at the transcriptomic, 6 at proteomic, and 2 at epigenomic level. Extracted data resulted in a catalogue of total 670 genetic causes with available 591 official gene symbols, i.e. M = 3, P = 188, S = 81, ES = 82, MS = 173, LS = 36, and N/S = 28. Enriched pathways included oestrogen signalling pathway, extracellular matrix organization, and endothelial cell chemotaxis. Our study revealed that knowledge of endometrium biology in endometriosis is fragmented due to heterogeneity of published data. However, 15 genes reported as dysregulated by at least two studies within the same phase and 33 significantly enriched GO-BP terms/KEGG pathways associated with different phases of the menstrual cycle were identified. CONCLUSIONS: A multi-omics insight into molecular patterns underlying endometriosis could contribute towards identification of endometrial pathological mechanisms that impact fertility capacities of women with endometriosis.

Determining the Molecular Background of Endometrial Receptivity in Adenomyosis.

BACKGROUND: Adenomyosis is a gynaecological condition with limited evidence of negative impact to endometrial receptivity. It is commonly associated with endometriosis, which has been shown to alter endometrial expression patterns. Therefore, the candidate genes identified in endometriosis could serve as a source to study endometrial function in adenomyosis. METHODS: Transcripts/proteins associated with endometrial receptivity in women with adenomyosis or endometriosis and healthy women were obtained from publications and their nomenclature was adopted according to the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC). Retrieved genes were analysed for enriched pathways using Cytoscape/Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) and Reactome tools to prioritise candidates for endometrial receptivity. These were used for validation on women with (n = 9) and without (n = 13) adenomyosis. RESULTS: Functional enrichment analysis of 173, 42 and 151 genes associated with endometriosis, adenomyosis and healthy women, respectively, revealed signalling by interleukins and interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signalling pathways, from which annotated LIF, JUNB, IL6, FOS, IL10 and SOCS3 were prioritised. Selected genes showed downregulated expression levels in adenomyosis compared to the control group, but without statistical significance. CONCLUSION: This is the first integrative study providing putative candidate genes and pathways characterising endometrial receptivity in women with adenomyosis in comparison to healthy women and women with endometriosis.