Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
BJOG ; 116(3): 381-9, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19187370

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of 100 mg and 200 mg of mifepristone and 24- and 48-hour intervals to administration of 800 microg vaginal misoprostol for termination of early pregnancy. DESIGN: Placebo-controlled, randomized, equivalence trial, stratified by centre. SETTING: 13 departments of obstetrics and gynecology in nine countries. POPULATION: 2,181 women with 63 days or less gestation requesting medical abortion. METHODS: Two-sided 95% CI for the risk differences of failure to complete abortion were calculated and compared with 5% equivalence margin between two doses of mifepristone and two intervals to misoprostol administration. Proportions of women with adverse effects were compared between the regimens using standard testes for proportions. OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of complete abortion without surgical intervention and adverse effects associated with the regimens. RESULTS: Efficacy outcome was analysed for 2,126 women (97.5%) excluding 55 lost to follow up. Both mifepristone doses were found to be similar in efficacy. The rate of complete abortion was 92.0% for women assigned 100 mg of mifepristone and 93.2% for women assigned 200 mg of mifepristone (difference 1.2%, 95% CI: -1.0 to 3.5). Equivalence was also evident for the two intervals of administration: the rate of complete abortion was 93.5% for 24-hour interval and 91.7% for the 48-hour interval (difference -1.8%, 95% CI: -4.0 to 0.5). Interaction between doses and interval to misoprostol administration was not significant (P = 0.92). Adverse effects related to treatments did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both the 100 and 200 mg doses of mifepristone and the 24- and 48-hour intervals have a similar efficacy to achieve complete abortion in early pregnancy when mifepristone is followed by 800 micrograms of vaginally administered misoprostol.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Abortivos Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Abortivos no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Abortivos Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Mifepristona/efectos adversos , Misoprostol/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Comprimidos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento
2.
Contraception ; 34(3): 223-35, 1986 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2947777

RESUMEN

Two dosages of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), 100 mg and 150 mg given every 90 days, were compared in two groups of women with regard to effectiveness, reported complaints and reasons for discontinuation. A total of 1216 women were recruited into a seven-centre, multinational, randomized clinical trial. Follow-up was for a period of one year and resulted in a total of 5507 woman-months of experience of 100 mg DMPA and 5429 woman-months of experience of the 150 mg dose. The study showed little difference in efficacy and side effects between the two treatment groups. Two pregnancies occurred in women receiving 100 mg DMPA giving a Pearl Index of 0.44 per 100 woman-years. None occurred in the 150 mg group. There was no difference in the overall continuation rates between the two groups at one year, being 59.3% in the 100 mg group and 58.8% in the 150 mg group. Except for discontinuation of method use for amenorrhea, the rates of all medical and non-medical reasons given for discontinuation were comparable between the two treatment groups. Women's perception of lack of bleeding was reported as amenorrhea and resulted in discontinuation rates at 12 months for amenorrhea of 7.2% for women receiving 100 mg of DMPA and 12.5% for those receiving the 150 mg dose. Three centres, Alexandria, Karachi and Szeged, made the major contributions to this difference.


Asunto(s)
Medroxiprogesterona/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Amenorrea/inducido químicamente , Presión Sanguínea , Peso Corporal , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Anticonceptivos Femeninos , Femenino , Humanos , Medroxiprogesterona/administración & dosificación , Medroxiprogesterona/efectos adversos , Medroxiprogesterona/uso terapéutico , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona , Embarazo , Distribución Aleatoria
3.
Contraception ; 35(6): 591-610, 1987 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2959448

RESUMEN

A multicentered phase III clinical trial was conducted in seven countries to compare two dosages of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), 100mg and 150mg, given every 90 days. Contraceptive efficacy and side-effects of both regimens were reported previously. Their effect on vaginal bleeding patterns is the object of this paper. A total of 1216 women were randomly assigned to a dose group and 1156 of them provided a menstrual diary. The comparison of the bleeding patterns is made using a 90-day reference period approach and following the guidelines published by WHO. In addition, the longest bleeding/spotting episode and the longest bleeding/spotting-free interval are calculated over the entire diary length. The only difference found between the two dose groups is a higher incidence of amenorrhea with the 150mg regimen. Overall, there is a high degree of consistency between the reasons given by individual women for discontinuing the contraceptive method and their vaginal bleeding pattern during the 90 days preceding discontinuation. However the data revealed large between-centre differences, both in the incidence of specific patterns, and in the identification by women of bleeding problems as reasons for discontinuation. This last point suggests that the life-table analysis underestimates the true incidence of menstrual irregularities. Comments on the reference period analysis method are made.


Asunto(s)
Medroxiprogesterona/análogos & derivados , Trastornos de la Menstruación/inducido químicamente , Amenorrea/inducido químicamente , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Medroxiprogesterona/administración & dosificación , Medroxiprogesterona/efectos adversos , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona , Cooperación del Paciente , Hemorragia Uterina/inducido químicamente
4.
Contraception ; 36(3): 275-86, 1987 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3119286

RESUMEN

The contraceptive efficacy and side effects of postcoital levonorgestrel used repeatedly during the peri-ovulatory period of one cycle was examined in 259 women. All subjects were of proven fertility in their present union and had ovulatory cycles as assessed from pre-treatment BBT charts. The mean number of coital acts during the treatment cycle was 7.5 (SD:2.6) and the mean number of 0.75 mg levonorgestrel tablets taken during the peri-ovulatory period was 4.0 (SD:1.2). Two pregnancies, both considered to be method failures, occurred, giving a failure rate of 0.8% per treated cycle. Although the overall effect of levonorgestrel on menstrual cycle length was small and insignificant, menstrual cycle disturbances were not uncommon. Intermenstrual bleeding or spotting occurred in 8.5% of the treated cycles and 12.5% of the cycles were less than 20 or more than 35 days. Other side effects, mainly nausea, headache and dizziness, were reported by about 20% of the subjects but the apparent incidence of these complaints varied markedly between the nine participating centres from 0% to just over 50%. The data suggest that repeated postcoital use of levonorgestrel is probably not a viable approach to fertility regulation for the majority of women who have regular intercourse and wish to limit the number of their pregnancies.


Asunto(s)
Anticonceptivos Hormonales Poscoito/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos Poscoito/administración & dosificación , Norgestrel/administración & dosificación , Ovulación/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Anticonceptivos Hormonales Poscoito/efectos adversos , Evaluación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Levonorgestrel , Ciclo Menstrual/efectos de los fármacos , Norgestrel/efectos adversos , Embarazo
5.
Contraception ; 25(3): 243-52, 1982 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6804162

RESUMEN

A randomized double-blind study of two combined oral contraceptives and two progestogen-only oral contraceptives was conducted using the same protocol at WHO Collaborating Centres for Clinical Research in Human Reproduction in Bombay and Ljubljana of the 518 women admitted to the trial, 123 received mestranol 50 micrograms + norethisterone 1mg (MES 50 + NET 1); 137 received ethinyl estradiol 30 micrograms + levonorgestrel 150 micrograms (EE 30 + LNG 150); 130 received norethisterone 350 micrograms/NET 350); and 128 received levonorgestrel 30 micrograms (LNG 30). At one year, between 52.6 and 61.0 percent of those recruited had discontinued oral contraceptive use for all reasons, and by two years, between 70.5 and 76.5 percent had discontinued the treatment. These rates did not differ between the four treatment groups. However, discontinuation rates for all medical reasons at one and two years, and at two years pregnancy rates and discontinuation rates for bleeding disturbances, were significantly lower in the EE/LNG preparation. The groups receiving the MES/NET, LNG and NET had similar pregnancy rates, discontinuation rates for all medical reasons and all bleeding disturbances. There were two ectopic pregnancies among the 22 pregnancies in the progestogen-only groups. Discontinuation because of headache, dizziness and other central nervous system symptoms were significantly more common in those receiving MES/NET compared to EE/LNG. In contrast, discontinuation for gastro-intestinal disturbances were significantly higher in the EE/LNG combined preparation. Bleeding disturbances in the first few cycles tended to be higher in NET than in the LNG group. The data suggest that greater consideration be given to the benefits and risks of including progestogen-only oral contraceptives in the family planning programmes of some countries.


Asunto(s)
Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados , Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales , Anticonceptivos Orales , Adolescente , Adulto , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Anticonceptivos Orales/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Etinilestradiol/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Levonorgestrel , Menstruación/efectos de los fármacos , Mestranol/administración & dosificación , Noretindrona/administración & dosificación , Norgestrel , Embarazo , Distribución Aleatoria
6.
Acta Reprod Turc ; 8(3-4): 37-42, 1987.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12316487

RESUMEN

PIP: Researchers used the double blind randomization method to place 254 women 18-35 years into 3 groups to study the effects of various dosages of hormones at the same ratio (1 part ethinyl estradiol [EE]: 5 parts levonorgestrel [LNG]) on high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and total cholesterol levels. Group OC (oral contraceptive) I included 82 women who took 50ug EE and 250ug LNG, while Group OC II included an additional 82 women who took 30ug EE and 150ug LNG. The 3rd group consisted of 90 women who had an IUD inserted. Clinicians measured all the women's HDL levels before beginning contraception and 3 and 12 months after using contraception. None of the women experienced a serious complication due to the OCs or IUD and no one became pregnant during the study. The mean HDL levels in OC I and OC II groups fell significantly (p.0005) after 3 months, yet they remained within the normal range (.8-2.4 mmol/l). These levels also declined significantly (p.025) after 12 months for the 2 OC groups, albeit less than they fell after 3 months. This verifies others research which indicate any OC related complications generally occur in the 1st months of OC use. No differences in changes occurred between the OC I and OC II groups. Further, the average HDL levels for women in the IUD group did not differ significantly. HDL levels did differ significantly after 3 and 12 months, however, between the OC I and IUD groups. Since the levels of HDL between the OC I and OC II groups did not differ significantly, there is no advantage to a reduced dosage of estrogen and progestogen.^ieng


Asunto(s)
Arteriosclerosis , Colesterol , Anticonceptivos Femeninos , Anticonceptivos Orales , Método Doble Ciego , Etinilestradiol , Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Levonorgestrel , Progesterona , Arteriopatías Oclusivas , Biología , Anticoncepción , Anticonceptivos , Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales , Países Desarrollados , Enfermedad , Sistema Endocrino , Europa (Continente) , Servicios de Planificación Familiar , Hormonas , Lípidos , Fisiología , Progestinas , Investigación , Enfermedades Vasculares , Yugoslavia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA