Smoke-free legislation and hospitalizations for acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested a reduction in the total number of hospital admissions for acute coronary syndrome after the enactment of legislation banning smoking in public places. However, it is unknown whether the reduction in admissions involved nonsmokers, smokers, or both. METHODS: Since the end of March 2006, smoking has been prohibited by law in all enclosed public places throughout Scotland. We collected information prospectively on smoking status and exposure to secondhand smoke based on questionnaires and biochemical findings from all patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome to nine Scottish hospitals during the 10-month period preceding the passage of the legislation and during the same period the next year. These hospitals accounted for 64% of admissions for acute coronary syndrome in Scotland, which has a population of 5.1 million. RESULTS: Overall, the number of admissions for acute coronary syndrome decreased from 3235 to 2684--a 17% reduction (95% confidence interval, 16 to 18)--as compared with a 4% reduction in England (which has no such legislation) during the same period and a mean annual decrease of 3% (maximum decrease, 9%) in Scotland during the decade preceding the study. The reduction in the number of admissions was not due to an increase in the number of deaths of patients with acute coronary syndrome who were not admitted to the hospital; this latter number decreased by 6%. There was a 14% reduction in the number of admissions for acute coronary syndrome among smokers, a 19% reduction among former smokers, and a 21% reduction among persons who had never smoked. Persons who had never smoked reported a decrease in the weekly duration of exposure to secondhand smoke (P<0.001 by the chi-square test for trend) that was confirmed by a decrease in their geometric mean concentration of serum cotinine from 0.68 to 0.56 ng per milliliter (P<0.001 by the t-test). CONCLUSIONS: The number of admissions for acute coronary syndrome decreased after the implementation of smoke-free legislation. A total of 67% of the decrease involved nonsmokers. However, fewer admissions among smokers also contributed to the overall reduction.

Low serum cortisol predicts early death after acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether low serum cortisol concentrations are associated with adverse prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Low serum cortisol concentrations have been associated with adverse prognosis in critical illness of diverse etiology. DESIGN: Nested case-control study. SETTING: Prospective cohort study of consecutive patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction to nine Scottish hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 100 patients who survived 30 days (controls) and 100 patients who died within 30 days (cases). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Admission cortisol concentrations were lower in patients who died than those who survived (median, 1189 nmol/L vs. 1355 nmol/L; p < .001). A cortisol concentration in the bottom quartile (<1136 nmol/L) was a strong predictor of death within 30 days and remained so after adjustment for age and cardiac troponin concentration (adjusted odds ratio, 8.78; 95% confidence interval, 3.09-24.96; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who mount a lesser cortisol stress response to acute myocardial infarction have a poorer early prognosis.

Spironolactone has antiarrhythmic activity in ischaemic cardiac patients without cardiac failure.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether endogenous aldosterone can cause either arrhythmias (and some of their underlying mechanisms) or endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) but without heart failure. BACKGROUND: Aldosterone blockade has been shown to reduce the incidence of sudden death in patients with heart failure. This could be caused by a reduction in arrhythmias or in coronary events. Whether either effect also occurs in other cardiac patients without heart failure is currently unknown. METHOD: We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study on 98 patients with CAD but without heart failure on standard therapy, comparing 12.5-50 mg/day spironolactone (3 months) with placebo. Endothelial function was assessed by bilateral forearm venous occlusion plethysmography. Ventricular extrasystoles, procollagen III N-terminal peptide (PIIINP) and QT interval length were used to represent arrhythmias and their determinants. RESULTS: Spironolactone produced a highly significant 75% reduction in ventricular extrasystoles (median 192, range 48-744) on placebo compared with spironolactone (median 48, range 19.2-288, P < 0.003). Spironolactone also decreased the QT interval from a mean of 440 +/- 28 to a mean of 425 +/- 25 (P < 0.001) and a collagen marker (PIIINP) from a mean of 3.6 +/- 0.9 to a mean of 3.0 +/- 0.8 (P < 0.001), but did not significantly change endothelial dysfunction or heart rate variability. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that despite conventional therapy, endogenous aldosterone can be an arrhythmogenic influence in patients with CAD, but without heart failure. The possible mechanisms are that aldosterone promotes myocardial fibrosis and lengthens the QTc interval as well as decreasing potassium in CAD patients without heart failure.

A critical re-appraisal of different ways of selecting ambulatory patients with suspected heart failure for echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: ECG and BNP have been assessed as screening tests for LVSD and heart failure. However, echocardiography also provides information about valvular disease and LVH. We assessed how good these screening tests are in identifying whether the subsequent echocardiogram will have any significant abnormality. AIMS: To re-appraise the ECG and BNP as screening tests for echocardiography since there are important practical deficiencies in our current knowledge in this area. METHODS: General practitioners referred suspected heart failure patients for clinical assessment, echocardiography, electrocardiography, and BNP measurement. The accuracy of each screening test and combinations of screening tests were calculated for LVSD, heart failure, valvular disease, and LVH. RESULTS: The sensitivities of the ECG for LVSD, heart failure, LVH and valvular disease were 97%, 95%, 76%, and 69%, respectively. The corresponding figures for BNP were 86%, 82%, 59%, and 48%, respectively. When patients with atrial fibrillation and murmurs were excluded, the values for ECG were 94%, 87%, 53%, and 55%, while for BNP they were 83%, 73%, 50%, and 32%. CONCLUSIONS: ECG interpretation and BNP are adequate screening tests to detect LVSD or heart failure but fail to screen for other echocardiographic abnormalities, like valvular disease and LVH. This remains the case even if patients with atrial fibrillation or heart murmurs are excluded on the basis that they require echocardiography anyway.

The cardiovascular risk factor, left ventricular hypertrophy, is highly prevalent in stable, treated angina pectoris.

BACKGROUND: In coronary artery disease (CAD), a potentially reversible factor leading to cardiac death is left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). However, LVH will only have a large impact overall in CAD if it is highly prevalent. Therefore we aimed to assess the prevalence of LVH in patients with stable, treated angina and its relationship with blood pressure (BP). METHODS: Three hundred twenty-two consecutive patients with angiographically confirmed coronary artery disease were recruited. Echocardiographic LV mass was performed and correlated with both office and 24-h ambulatory BP. RESULTS: Of the 267 patients with LV mass measurements, 195 (73%) had LVH. The mean 24-h ambulatory BP reading was systolic 125 +/- 12 mm Hg and diastolic 68 +/- 8 mm Hg in the LVH group. Of the LVH patients 62% had a nonhypertensive 24-h BP reading. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, factors independently related to LVH were history of hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 1.848, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.051-3.248), body mass index (OR 1.085, 95% CI 1.011-1.165), and age (OR 1.039, 95% CI 1.004-1.076). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that echo LVH is very common in patients with stable, treated angina and the majority of these patients had a nonhypertensive BP at the time of study. Studies are now required to determine whether identifying and vigorously treating LVH in CAD would reduce the risk of premature death in these patients.

Screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction using GP-reported ECGs.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic echocardiography has poor access for patients with suspected heart failure. Pre-echocardiography screening with electrocardiograms (ECGs) is recommended as a means of targeting this scarce resource. There are data to support this policy when ECGs are interpreted by cardiologists but not by GPs. AIM: To assess the value of GP-reported ECGs as a pre-echocardiography screening test for left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional study of GPs' ECG reporting skills. SETTING: General practice, NHS in Scotland. METHOD: A randomly selected, stratified sample of 123 Scottish GPs reviewed 180 ECGs (100 abnormal, 50 normal and 30 duplicate) from 150 patients with suspected heart failure. Forty-one patients had LVSD on echocardiography. GPs were required to categorise ECGs as normal or abnormal. RESULTS: Mean sensitivity was 0.94 (95% CI = 0.92 to 0.95). Mean specificity 0.58 (95% CI = 0.56 to 0.60). Mean positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.47 (95% CI = 0.46 to 0.48). Mean negative predictive value (NPV) was 0.96 (95% CI = 0.95 to 0.97). Mean likelihood ratio was 2.39 (95% CI = 2.28 to 2.50). Seventy of 123 (57%) GPs achieved sensitivity of 0.9 and specificity of 0.5 for the detection of LVSD. CONCLUSION: Most Scottish GPs have the skills to perform pre-echocardiography screening ECGs in patients with suspected LVSD. However, differences in ECG reporting performance between individual GPs will result in widely varying referral rates for echocardiography and differences in the detection rate of LVSD. The implications of these findings need to be considered when heart failure diagnostic services are being developed.

Aldosterone blockade over and above ACE-inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease but without heart failure.

Recent evidence points to a role for the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and its complications, including acute angina pectoris. Two large trials in heart failure have clearly demonstrated that blocking aldosterone improves mortality and that this benefit occurs over and above standard therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. The question that naturally arises from these landmark studies is whether aldosterone blockade would produce the same benefits in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) but no heart failure. There are three reasons to believe this might be the case. Firstly, angiotensin II (Ang II) and aldosterone produce similar biological effects and Ang II withdrawal has been shown to benefit patients with angina; aldosterone blockade may therefore follow in the footsteps of ACE inhibitors, as it did in heart failure, and produce benefits in vascular patients without heart failure. Secondly, one of the main mechanisms which is thought to be responsible for the benefit of aldosterone blockade in the Randomised ALdactone Evaluation Study (RALES) and Eplerenone Post-AMI Heart Failure Survival Study (EPHESUS), is that it improves endothelial/vascular function and endothelial/vascular dysfunction is the fundamental abnormality in angina pectoris. Finally, aldosterone blockade has been shown to reduce atherosclerosis in animal studies of atherosclerosis without heart failure, which are analogous to CAD patients.

Infective endocarditis presenting with Parinaud's dorsal midbrain syndrome.

We present a case of vertical gaze palsy in a 13-year-old girl caused by underlying infective endocarditis, secondary to an infected navel piercing. This case illustrates that infective endocarditis does not always present with classic signs.

Peripheral blood pressure measurement is as good as applanation tonometry at predicting ascending aortic blood pressure.

BACKGROUND: The Sphygmocor system purports to be able to assess ascending aortic blood pressure using a transfer function. It has been shown to be accurate when data obtained invasively are used, but has not been tested prospectively using data obtained non-invasively. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of this equipment when measurements are obtained non-invasively, as would normally be the case in the clinic setting. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was observational. Ascending aortic pressure measurements were taken simultaneously with radial artery pressure wave recordings for estimation of ascending aortic blood pressure, in 28 patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization. RESULTS: The transfer function in the Sphygmocor system significantly underestimated invasively measured systolic blood pressure [mean -7.23 +/- 10.07 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.3 to -11.14 mmHg, P = 0.001] and significantly overestimated invasively measured diastolic blood pressure (mean 12.20 +/- 7.14 mmHg; 95% CI 9.43 to 14.97 mmHg, P <0.001). Oscillometrically measured brachial systolic blood pressure was not significantly different from that measured invasively in the ascending aorta (mean 3.36 +/- 10.47 mmHg; 95% CI -0.69 to 7.43 mmHg, P = 0.1), but oscillometric measurement of brachial diastolic blood pressure gave a significant overestimation of that measured invasively (mean 11.70 +/- 7.18 mmHg; 95% CI 8.91 to 14.49 mmHg, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS The transfer function in the Sphygmocor system is no better at estimating ascending aortic blood pressure than are standard peripheral blood pressure measurements. It may be necessary to derive a new transfer system that is based on data that are acquired entirely non-invasively.

How much echo left ventricular hypertrophy would be missed in diabetics by applying the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction electrocardiogram criteria to select patients for angiotensin receptor blockade?

OBJECTIVE: The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction (LIFE) study demonstrated a clear mortality benefit in treating hypertensive patients with electrocardiogram (ECG) evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) with losartan rather than atenolol. Previous studies have also shown that identifying and treating echo LVH is associated with prognostic benefits in hypertensive subjects, and is independent of the presence of ECG LVH. We sought to determine how many cases of echo LVH would be missed by applying the ECG criteria for LVH used in the LIFE study. DESIGN: A prospective study of 219 patients with type 2 diabetes recruited from the hospital diabetic clinic. METHODS: Fifteen ECG criteria were assessed on each subject and compared with the presence or absence of LVH on echocardiography. RESULTS: All the proposed ECG criteria are poor at identifying echo LVH in people with diabetes. CONCLUSION: Using ECG LVH to select patients for angiotensin receptor blockade would lead to many diabetics with echo LVH missing out on the benefits of treatment. This assumes that the benefits seen in the LIFE study would also occur if the LIFE strategy were extended to echo LVH patients as well as to ECG LVH patients.

Relation of QT interval dispersion to the number of different cardiac abnormalities in diabetes mellitus.

Three studies have clearly shown that a prolonged QT dispersion (QTD) is the best predictor of cardiac death in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). This was originally believed to be because QTD identified electrical inhomogeneity, but recent data suggests that this is unlikely. The alternative possibility is that QTD is a convenient identifier of hidden but lethal cardiac abnormalities. We explored whether the latter possibility is true by examining exactly what spectrum of cardiac abnormalities, if any, are over-represented in diabetics with a prolonged QTD. Two hundred nineteen patients with type 2 DM who had been first diagnosed with DM 3 to 6 years previously underwent intensive cardiac examinations. Patients with prolonged QTD had a significantly increased incidence of myocardial ischemia and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, and to a lesser extent, autonomic dysfunction. The main independent determinant of a prolonged QTD was ischemia, as seen on both ambulatory ST-segment monitoring (p <0.001) and Duke score on treadmill testing (p <0.001). It was also observed that QTD increased progressively as the number of different cardiac abnormalities increased (p <0.001). These studies suggest that QTD is a useful, general prescreening test to select diabetics for more detailed cardiac examinations (especially for ischemia and LV hypertrophy), and that if cardiac examinations were targeted by way of QTD screening, then a high incidence of hidden but treatable cardiac abnormalities could be found.

Is glutamine beneficial in ischemic heart disease?

OBJECTIVE: Glutamine enhances recovery from acute normothermic ischemia in isolated rat heart by a dose-dependent effect (Khogali et al. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1998;30:819). We compared the cardioprotective effects of equimolar concentrations of glutamine, glutamate, and aspartate in isolated rat heart. We also explored the potential cardioprotective effects of glutamine in patients with chronic stable angina. METHODS: The isolated perfused working rat heart was subjected to ischemia, followed by reperfusion with or without an amino acid (2.5 mM). Patients with chronic stable angina received a single oral dose of glutamine (80 mg/kg) or placebo in a double-blind, random fashion 40 min before a standard Bruce exercise test. RESULTS: Postischemic reperfusion of isolated rat heart with glutamine (but not with glutamate or aspartate) resulted in full recovery of cardiac output. Only glutamine prevented the decrease in the myocardial ratio between adenosine triphosphate to adenosine diphosphate and significantly enhanced the myocardial ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione. A single oral dose of glutamine given to patients with chronic stable angina significantly increased plasma glutamine concentration from 419 to 649 microM and delayed time to onset of more than 1.0 mm of ST segment depression on the ECG by 38 s. CONCLUSION: Glutamine may be cardioprotective in patients with coronary heart disease.

Reducing patient delay with symptoms of acute coronary syndrome: a research protocol for a systematic review of previous interventions to investigate which behaviour change techniques are associated with effective interventions.

INTRODUCTION: Delay to presentation with symptoms of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is common meaning many fail to achieve optimal benefit from treatments. Interventions have had variable success in reducing delay. Evidence suggests inclusion of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) may improve effectiveness of interventions but this has not yet been systematically evaluated. Data from other time-critical conditions may be relevant. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review will be undertaken to identify which BCTs are associated with effective interventions to reduce patient delay (or prompt rapid help-seeking) among people with time-critical conditions (eg, chest pain, ACS, lumps, stroke, cancer and meningitis). A systematic search of a wide range of databases (including Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo) and grey literature will be undertaken to identify all relevant intervention studies (randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and cohort studies). Two independent reviewers will screen abstracts to identify relevant studies, apply inclusion criteria to full papers, assess methodological quality and extract data. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in patient decision time BCTs reported in each of the included studies will be categorised and presented according to the latest reliable taxonomy. Results of included studies will be synthesised, exploring relationships between inclusion of each BCT and effectiveness of the overall intervention. Where possible, means and SDs for differences in delay time will be calculated and combined within meta-analyses to derive a standardised mean difference and 95% CI. Analysis of (1) all time-critical and (2) ACS-only interventions will be undertaken. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical issues are anticipated. Results will be submitted for publication in a relevant peer-reviewed journal.

Renin-angiotensin system blockers are associated with reduced mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients paced for complete atrioventricular block.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular apical pacing can cause dyssynchronous activation of the ventricles, increase sympathetic activation, cause abnormalities in myocardial perfusion, worsen cardiac output and endothelial function, and may be associated with adverse cardiovascular effects. The use of rennin-angiotensin system blockers (RASBs) may be beneficial in counteracting these potentially harmful effects of right ventricular pacing. OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of RASB use on the outcome in patients with right ventricular pacemakers implanted for complete atrioventricular (AV) block. METHODS: Patients implanted with right ventricular pacemakers for complete AV block between 1994 and 2009 were identified from the Tayside Pacing Registry. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess differences in all-cause mortality and congestive heart failure hospitalizations for those receiving RASB during follow-up, adjusted for confounding variables. We also performed 2 sensitivity analyses--a propensity score-matched analysis and time-dependent analyses--to minimize bias. RESULTS: Eight hundred twenty patients (57% men; median age 73 years; range 22-103 years) received pacemakers for complete AV block between 1994 and 2008 (54% dual-chamber pacemaker and 46% ventricular demand pacemaker). Two hundred seventy-eight (34%) patients had received RASBs. Mean follow-up was 4.9 ± 4.6 years, with 540 (65%) deaths. RASB use was independently associated with significantly reduced mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.67; 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.94; P = .017) and reduced heart failure hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio 0.42; 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.92; P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that RASBs may confer outcome benefits in patients with right ventricular pacemakers implanted for complete AV block.

Pulmonary hypertension predicts all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure: a retrospective cohort study.

AIMS: The presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and symptomatic heart failure is an ominous sign. There are insufficient data regarding the risk conferred by increasing severity of PH in patients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a record linkage study in Tayside, Scotland (population ∼400,000) utilizing the Tayside echocardiogram database (>50,000 echocardiograms) maintained by the Health Informatics Centre (HIC). Data sets from the HIC include mortality data, cardiovascular medications, and other healthcare activities linked anonymously by the community health index (CHI) number. Patients were included in the analysis if they had LVSD, had a valid right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) measurement, and had a loop diuretic prescription (provided not more than 1 year prior to echocardiogram). A Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine the effects of RVSP on all-cause mortality. A total of 1612 patients [mean age, 75.2 ± 10.9 (SD) years; 57.4% male] met the entry criteria. Mean RVSP for the cohort was 44.9 ± 13.1 mmHg and mean follow-up was 2.8 ± 2.5 years. For each 5 mmHg stepwise increase in RVSP, after adjustment for confounding factors including the degree of LVSD and the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was 1.06 (1.03-1.08, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary hypertension predicted all-cause mortality in a heterogeneous group of patients with heart failure. Each 5 mmHg rise in RVSP was associated with a 6% increased risk of death.

Role of multidetector computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of patients attending the rapid access chest pain clinic, The Scottish computed tomography of the heart (SCOT-HEART) trial: study protocol for randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Rapid access chest pain clinics have facilitated the early diagnosis and treatment of patients with coronary heart disease and angina. Despite this important service provision, coronary heart disease continues to be under-diagnosed and many patients are left untreated and at risk. Recent advances in imaging technology have now led to the widespread use of noninvasive computed tomography, which can be used to measure coronary artery calcium scores and perform coronary angiography in one examination. However, this technology has not been robustly evaluated in its application to the clinic. METHODS/DESIGN: The SCOT-HEART study is an open parallel group prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial of 4,138 patients attending the rapid access chest pain clinic for evaluation of suspected cardiac chest pain. Following clinical consultation, participants will be approached and randomized 1:1 to receive standard care or standard care plus ≥64-multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography and coronary calcium score. Randomization will be conducted using a web-based system to ensure allocation concealment and will incorporate minimization. The primary endpoint of the study will be the proportion of patients diagnosed with angina pectoris secondary to coronary heart disease at 6 weeks. Secondary endpoints will include the assessment of subsequent symptoms, diagnosis, investigation and treatment. In addition, long-term health outcomes, safety endpoints, such as radiation dose, and health economic endpoints will be assessed. Assuming a clinic rate of 27.0% for the diagnosis of angina pectoris due to coronary heart disease, we will need to recruit 2,069 patients per group to detect an absolute increase of 4.0% in the rate of diagnosis at 80% power and a two-sided P value of 0.05. The SCOT-HEART study is currently recruiting participants and expects to report in 2014. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to look at the implementation of computed tomography in the patient care pathway that is outcome focused. This study will have major implications for the management of patients with cardiovascular disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01149590.

The impact of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade on heart failure outcomes and mortality in patients identified to have aortic regurgitation: a large population cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of renin-angiotensin system blockade on outcomes in patients with aortic regurgitation (AR). BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have the potential to reduce afterload, blunt left ventricular wall stress, and limit left ventricular dilation and hypertrophy. However, long-term studies have yielded inconsistent results, and very few have assessed clinical outcomes. METHODS: The Health Informatics Centre dispensed prescription and morbidity and mortality database for the population of Tayside, Scotland, was linked through a unique patient identifier to the Tayside echocardiography database. Patients diagnosed with at least moderate AR from 1993 to 2008 were identified. Cox regression analysis was used to assess differences in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV) and AR events (heart failure hospitalizations, heart failure deaths, or aortic valve replacement) between those treated with and without ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). RESULTS: A total of 2,266 subjects with AR (median age 74 years; interquartile range: 64 to 81 years) were studied, with a mean follow-up period of 4.4 ± 3.7 years. Seven hundred and five patients (31%) received ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy. There were 582 all-cause deaths (25.7%). Patients treated with ACE inhibitors or ARBs had significantly lower all-cause mortality and fewer CV and AR events, with adjusted hazard ratios of 0.56 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64 to 0.89; p < 0.01) for all-cause mortality, 0.77 (95% CI: 0.67 to 0.89; p < 0.01) for CV events, and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.87; p < 0.01) for AR events. CONCLUSIONS: This large retrospective study shows that the prescription of ACE inhibitors or ARBs in patients with moderate to severe AR was associated with significantly reduced all-cause mortality and CV and AR events. These data need to be confirmed by a prospective randomized controlled outcome trial.

Impact of renin-angiotensin system blockade therapy on outcome in aortic stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of renin-angiotensin system blockade therapy on outcomes in aortic stenosis (AS). BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are perceived to be relatively contraindicated in AS. However, inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system may be beneficial in AS through their cardioprotective and beneficial effects on left ventricular remodeling. METHODS: The Health Informatics dispensed prescribing, morbidity, and mortality database for the population of Tayside, Scotland, was linked through a unique patient identifier to the Tayside echocardiography database (>110,000 scans). Patients with a diagnosis of AS from 1993 to 2008 were identified. Cox regression model (adjusted for confounding variables) and propensity score analysis were used to assess the impact of ACEIs or ARBs on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV) events (CV death or hospitalizations). RESULTS: A total of 2,117 patients with AS (mean age 73 ± 12 years, 46% men) were identified and 699 (33%) were on ACEI or ARB therapy. Over a mean follow-up of 4.2 years, there were 1,087 (51%) all-cause deaths and 1,018 (48%) CV events. Those treated with ACEIs or ARBs had a significantly lower all-cause mortality with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.62 to 0.92, p < 0.0001) and fewer CV events with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.65 to 0.92, p < 0.0001). The outcome benefits of ACEIs/ARBs were further supported by propensity score analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This large observational study suggests that ACEI/ARB therapy is associated with an improved survival and a lower risk of CV events in patients with AS.

Validity of self-reported smoking status: Comparison of patients admitted to hospital with acute coronary syndrome and the general population.

Many studies rely on self-reported smoking status. We hypothesized that patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), a smoking-related condition, would be more prone to misclassify themselves as ex-smokers, because of pressure to quit. We compared patients admitted with ACS with a general population survey conducted in the same country at a similar time. We determined whether ACS patients who classified themselves as ex-smokers (n = 635) were more likely to have cotinine levels suggestive of smoking deception than self-reported ex-smokers in the general population (n = 289). On univariate analysis, the percentage of smoking deceivers was similar among ACS patients and the general population (11% vs. 12%, p = .530). Following adjustment for age, sex and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, ACS patients were significantly more likely to misclassify themselves (adjusted OR = 14.06, 95% CI 2.13-93.01, p = .006). There was an interaction with age whereby the probability of misclassification fell significantly with increasing age in the ACS group (adjusted OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97, p<.001), but not in the general population. Overall, smoking deception was more common among ACS patients than the general population. Studies comparing patients with cardiovascular disease and healthy individuals risk introducing bias if they rely solely on self-reported smoking status. Biochemical confirmation should be undertaken in such studies.

The prevention of progression of arterial disease and diabetes (POPADAD) trial: factorial randomised placebo controlled trial of aspirin and antioxidants in patients with diabetes and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether aspirin and antioxidant therapy, combined or alone, are more effective than placebo in reducing the development of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised, double blind, 2x2 factorial, placebo controlled trial. SETTING: 16 hospital centres in Scotland, supported by 188 primary care groups. PARTICIPANTS: 1276 adults aged 40 or more with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and an ankle brachial pressure index of 0.99 or less but no symptomatic cardiovascular disease. INTERVENTIONS: Daily, 100 mg aspirin tablet plus antioxidant capsule (n=320), aspirin tablet plus placebo capsule (n=318), placebo tablet plus antioxidant capsule (n=320), or placebo tablet plus placebo capsule (n=318). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two hierarchical composite primary end points of death from coronary heart disease or stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, or amputation above the ankle for critical limb ischaemia; and death from coronary heart disease or stroke. RESULTS: No evidence was found of any interaction between aspirin and antioxidant. Overall, 116 of 638 primary events occurred in the aspirin groups compared with 117 of 638 in the no aspirin groups (18.2% v 18.3%): hazard ratio 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.26). Forty three deaths from coronary heart disease or stroke occurred in the aspirin groups compared with 35 in the no aspirin groups (6.7% v 5.5%): 1.23 (0.79 to 1.93). Among the antioxidant groups 117 of 640 (18.3%) primary events occurred compared with 116 of 636 (18.2%) in the no antioxidant groups (1.03, 0.79 to 1.33). Forty two (6.6%) deaths from coronary heart disease or stroke occurred in the antioxidant groups compared with 36 (5.7%) in the no antioxidant groups (1.21, 0.78 to 1.89). CONCLUSION: This trial does not provide evidence to support the use of aspirin or antioxidants in primary prevention of cardiovascular events and mortality in the population with diabetes studied. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN53295293.