A population pharmacokinetics model of balovaptan to support dose selection in adult and pediatric populations.

Balovaptan is a brain-penetrating vasopressin receptor 1a antagonist previously investigated for the core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of balovaptan was developed, initially to assist clinical dosing for adult and pediatric ASD studies and subsequently for new clinical indications including malignant cerebral edema (MCE) and post-traumatic stress disorder. The final model incorporates one-compartment disposition and describes time- and dose-dependent non-linear PK through empirical drug binding and a gut extraction component with turnover. An age effect on clearance observed in children was modeled by an asymptotic function that predicts adult-equivalent exposures at 40% of the adult dose for children aged 2-4 years, 70% for 5-9 years, and at the full adult dose for ≥ 10 years. The model was adapted for intravenous (IV) balovaptan dosing and combined with in vitro and ex vivo pharmacodynamic data to simulate brain receptor occupancy as a guide for dosing in a phase II trial of MCE prophylaxis after acute ischemic stroke. A sequence of three stepped-dose daily infusions of 50, 25 and 15 mg over 30 or 60 min was predicted to achieve a target occupancy of ≥ 80% in ≥ 95% of patients over a 3-day period. This model predicts both oral and IV balovaptan exposure across a wide age range and will be a valuable tool to analyze and predict its PK in new indications and target populations, including pediatric patients.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Nifurtimox in Adult and Pediatric Patients With Chagas Disease.

Nifurtimox (LAMPIT) has been used for decades for the treatment of Chagas disease, a chronic and potentially life-threatening disease caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. The pharmacokinetic (PK) information on nifurtimox in humans derived from controlled clinical studies is very limited. The objective was to investigate and compare the population PK of nifurtimox in adult and pediatric patients with Chagas disease to confirm the clinical dosing regimen in children, which was based on allometric approaches using the concept that a dose-equivalent exposure would reach equivalent antiparasitic efficacy as in adults. The resulting adult model adequately described the PK in adults. Significant predictors of the availability in PK were food intake, tablet formulation (fast- vs slow-dissolution tablet), study, and body weight. As the resulting adult model could not adequately predict the sparse sampled pediatric patient data, these data were analyzed separately to derive exposure estimates for comparison with adult exposure. In the population PK model for pediatric patients, significant covariates were body weight and age. As compared to adults, children aged >2 years were estimated to have 50.6% higher apparent clearance. No hints of dose nonlinearity were observed in a dose range of 30 to 240 mg single dose in adults and 15 to 300 mg 3 times daily (8-20 mg/kg) in children. Altogether, this study retroactively showed that the current mg/kg dosing regimen in children reached similar exposure as in adults receiving an 8 mg/kg total daily dose.

HATT: a phase IV, single-arm, open-label study of sorafenib in Taiwanese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib significantly improves survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This phase IV study assessed sorafenib efficacy/safety in Taiwanese patients with advanced HCC and Child-Pugh A status. METHODS: All patients received 400 mg sorafenib BID. Safety, efficacy, sorafenib pharmacokinetics, and Child-Pugh progression were evaluated. A hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) prevention substudy assessed HFSR incidence and grade/severity and time to HFSR in 29 and 34 patients randomized to corticosteroid and noncorticosteroid ointments, respectively, and in 88 nonrandomized patients. RESULTS: The 151 patients included 120 (80%) male patients and 81 (54%) with stage IV disease. Mean sorafenib dose was 626 mg/day, and median treatment duration was 4.2 months. Median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and time to progression (TTP) were 8.6, 2.7, and 3.8 months, respectively. Disease control and response rates (partial responses only) were 48 and 6.6%, respectively. Median TTP from Child-Pugh A to B/C was 88 days. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 89.4% of patients; none were new or unexpected. The most frequent grade ≥3 drug-related, treatment-emergent AEs were HFSR (13.2%), diarrhea (11.9%), and hypertension (6.6%). Corticosteroid ointment tended to reduce the severity and incidence of all HFSR-associated parameters. Pharmacokinetic exposure was unaltered by Child-Pugh progression. The final pharmacokinetic model predicted 13.1 and 33.8% reductions in sorafenib exposure over 6 and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend of longer OS and TTP in Taiwanese patients with advanced HCC compared with patients with advanced HCC in the Asia-Pacific trial. Sorafenib exposure did not correlate with liver function. Reduced pharmacokinetic exposure over time was unrelated to reduced or interrupted dosing.

A Model-Based Meta-analysis to Compare Efficacy and Tolerability of Tramadol and Tapentadol for the Treatment of Chronic Non-Malignant Pain.

INTRODUCTION: Pain is a major symptom in many medical conditions which can be relieved thanks to analgesics. The goal of this work was to present an indirect comparison of efficacy and tolerability profiles of two analgesics, tramadol and tapentadol, in patients with chronic non-malignant pain. METHODS: In the absence of a head-to-head comparison between these two opioid drugs, model-based meta-analyses were used to characterize the pain intensity time dynamics and evaluate the proportions of most frequent adverse events (constipation, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and somnolence) and drop-outs (due to adverse event, as well as due to lack of efficacy) in each treatment group. Using these models, the investigational treatments were compared on the basis of Monte Carlo simulation outcomes. RESULTS: Data were extracted from 45 Phase II and Phase III studies representing a total of 81 treatment arms, i.e., approximately 13,000 patients. The pain intensity model shows, that after having adjusted for differences in baseline pain intensity and placebo effects, tramadol 300 mg once daily (qd) was slightly more effective in reducing pain than tapentadol 100-250 mg twice daily (bid), with a 46% change from baseline for the former versus 36% for the latter. From a tolerability standpoint, both drugs showed, as expected, increased risks of adverse events compared to placebo. Yet, tapentadol was associated with slightly lower risks of constipation, and nausea than tramadol. CONCLUSION: Overall, the analysis showed that the benefit-risk profiles of tramadol 300 mg qd and tapentadol 100-250 mg bid were approximately even. The amount of data to characterize dose-response relationships was sufficient only in the tramadol group; public access to tapentadol efficacy and tolerability readouts across a wide dose range in chronic non-malignant pain would allow a comparison of therapeutic indices, a straight quantitation of the benefit-risk ratio. Knowing that their side-effects have been identified as potential hindrance to prescription, a broad and open access to clinical trial data in this indication is encouraged in order to facilitate the evaluation of the opiate analgesics clinical utility.