Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 64
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Psychol Health Med ; 28(6): 1441-1449, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36331176

RESUMEN

During the COVID-19 pandemic, undergraduate medical students (UMS) exposed to isolation, social distancing and complete or partial face-to-face educational activities interruption may present increased stress, depression and anxiety. This study was undertaken to evaluate if, during isolation, UMS involved in online group activities as investigators of a research project (volunteer group) would present better mental health than their colleagues, not involved in that research (control group). A Web-based survey, via the Google Forms platform, including details on demographic data, life habits, previous health conditions, worries with the COVID-19 pandemic, sleep pattern modifications and depression, anxiety and mental stress, using the DASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale) was implemented from 20 July to 31 August 2020. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS version 20.0. A p-value <0.05 was significant. A total of 684 UMS were included, 228 as a volunteer group and 456 as a control group. Mean age was 23.15 (3.16) years. The groups were paired for age, gender, ethnicity, life habits and previous health conditions. Older age, male gender, participation in the research project, unchanged sleep pattern during the pandemic, lack of fear from getting the COVID-19 and lack of previous health conditions were associated with lower DASS21 scores (better mental health). Participating as investigators of a research project foreseeing frequent interaction with patients, colleagues and professors (other investigators) lead to better mental health during the COVID-19 quarantine in Brazil.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Pandemias , Brasil/epidemiología , Salud Mental , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología
2.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 40(7): 1258-1266, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34251312

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of COVID-19 and its main outcomes in rheumatic disease (RD) patients on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) compared to household cohabitants (HC). METHODS: This is a 24-week nationwide prospective multi-centre cohort with a control group without RD and not using HCQ. All participants were monitored through scheduled phone interviews performed by health professionals. Details regarding COVID-19 symptoms, and epidemiological, clinical, and demographic data were recorded on a specific web-based platform. COVID-19 was defined according to the Brazilian Ministry of Health criteria and classified as mild, moderate or severe. RESULTS: A total of 9,585 participants, 5,164 (53.9%) RD patients on HCQ and 4,421 (46.1%) HC were enrolled from March 29th, 2020 to September 30th, 2020, according to the eligibility criteria. COVID-19 confirmed cases were higher in RD patients than in cohabitants [728 (14.1%) vs. 427 (9.7%), p<0.001] in a 24-week follow-up. However, there was no significant difference regarding outcomes related to moderate/ severe COVID-19 (7.1% and 7.3%, respectively, p=0.896). After multiple adjustments, risk factors associated with hospitalisation were age over 65 (HR=4.5; 95%CI 1.35-15.04, p=0.014) and cardiopathy (HR=2.57; 95%CI 1.12-5.91, p=0.026). The final survival analysis demonstrated the probability of dying in 180 days after a COVID-19 diagnosis was significantly higher in patients over 65 years (HR=20.8; 95%CI 4.5-96.1) and with 2 or more comorbidities (HR=10.8; 95%CI 1.1-107.9 and HR=24.8; 95%CI 2.5-249.3, p=0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although RD patients have had a higher COVID-19 incidence than individuals from the same epidemiological background, the COVID-19 severity was related to traditional risk factors, particularly multiple comorbidities and age, and not to underlying RD and HCQ.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Enfermedades Reumáticas , COVID-19/epidemiología , Prueba de COVID-19 , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 2022 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35699528

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has brought additional burden to patients living with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs), especially at the beginning of 2020, for which information for this population is lacking. METHODS: COnVIDa is a cross-sectional study on patients with IMRD from all regions of Brazil who were invited to answer a specific and customized Web questionnaire about how they were facing the COVID-19 pandemic, especially focusing on health care access, use of medications, and patient-reported outcomes related to IMRD activity. The questionnaire was applied from June 1 to 30, 2020. RESULTS: In total, 1722 of 2576 patients who answered the Web questionnaire were included in the final analysis. Participants were most frequently women, 56% were between 31 and 50 years old, and most (55%) has private health insurance. The most commonly reported IMRD was rheumatoid arthritis (39%), followed by systemic lupus erythematosus (28%). During the study period, 30.7% did not have access to rheumatology consultations, and 17.6% stopped chronic medications. Telemedicine was reported in 44.8% of patients. CONCLUSION: COnVIDa demonstrated a negative impact on health care access and treatment maintenance of patients living with IMRD during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it also presented an uptake of telemedicine strategies. Data presented in this study may assist future coping policies.

4.
Rheumatol Int ; 33(2): 507-9, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22065073

RESUMEN

The plantar fascia is a multilayered band of fibrous tissue that support and maintain the longitudinal arch of the foot. We report a 34-old obese woman with heel pain for the past 3 years. On physical examination, she presented painful plantar fascia throughout extension of the foot. In addition, a soft painful, mobile nodule was also palpated in the medial aspect of her left heel. An US examination of her left foot showed an increased thickness of her plantar fascia with reduced echogenity, the presence of an effusion and a positive power Doppler signal. Positive US Doppler signal may be helpful in evaluating patients with plantar fasciitis and is suggestive of the presence of active microcirculation.


Asunto(s)
Fascitis Plantar/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Adulto , Fascitis Plantar/terapia , Femenino , Humanos
5.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 10(4): e24617, 2021 04 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33735094

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in social isolation, which has a potential negative impact on the educational routines (eg, the suspension of face-to-face appointments) and mental health of medical students. The Mario Pinotti II (MPII) study is a 24-week observational study that conducted scheduled telephone calls every 2 weeks to verify the occurrence of COVID-19 in patients with rheumatic diseases on chronic hydroxychloroquine therapy (from March 29, 2020, to September 30, 2020). The effects of voluntarily participating in a research project (ie, one that involves interactions via telephone contact with patients, professors, rheumatologists, and colleagues) on the daily lives and mental health of medical students requires evaluation. OBJECTIVE: As medical students are professionals in training and have a high level of responsibility in terms of handling the emotional and physical aspects of several diseases, this study aims to evaluate the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and participation in the MPII study on the educational routines and mental health of medical students. METHODS: A web-based survey was carried out to perform a cross-sectional comparative assessment of medical students who participated in the MPII study and their colleagues who were not involved in the MPII study. Participants from both groups were matched based on sex, age, and medical school. The web questionnaire was developed by a panel composed of graduate medical students, rheumatologists, medical school professors, and a psychology professor. The questionnaire included details on demographic and life habits data and evaluated participants' impressions of the MPII study and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their educational routines and medical training. In addition, depression, anxiety, and stress were evaluated using the Brazilian version of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS)-21, and currently, the DASS-21 scores are grouped as those that indicate a low, moderate, or high risk of mental distress. This project was approved by the Federal University of São Paulo Ethics Committee (CAAE: 34034620.0.0000.5505). RESULTS: Data were collected from both medical student groups from July 20 to August 31, 2020. Data extraction was completed in September 2020. The data analysis is ongoing. We expect the results to be published in the first semester of 2021. CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide insight into the effects of participating in a research project on depression, anxiety, and stress, which will be determined by applying the DASS-21 to a large sample of Brazilian undergraduate medical students. We will also evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical students' educational routines and medical training. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/24617.

6.
Adv Rheumatol ; 61(1): 60, 2021 10 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34620246

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of information on the role of chronic use of hydroxychloroquine during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. Our aim was to compare the occurrence of COVID-19 between rheumatic disease patients on hydroxychloroquine with individuals from the same household not taking the drug during the first 8 weeks of community viral transmission in Brazil. METHODS: This baseline cross-sectional analysis is part of a 24-week observational multi-center study involving 22 Brazilian academic outpatient centers. All information regarding COVID-19 symptoms, epidemiological, clinical, and demographic data were recorded on a specific web-based platform using telephone calls from physicians and medical students. COVID-19 was defined according to the Brazilian Ministry of Health (BMH) criteria. Mann-Whitney, Chi-square and Exact Fisher tests were used for statistical analysis and two binary Final Logistic Regression Model by Wald test were developed using a backward-stepwise method for the presence of COVID-19. RESULTS: From March 29th to May 17st, 2020, a total of 10,443 participants were enrolled, including 5166 (53.9%) rheumatic disease patients, of whom 82.5% had systemic erythematosus lupus, 7.8% rheumatoid arthritis, 3.7% Sjögren's syndrome and 0.8% systemic sclerosis. In total, 1822 (19.1%) participants reported flu symptoms within the 30 days prior to enrollment, of which 3.1% fulfilled the BMH criteria, but with no significant difference between rheumatic disease patients (4.03%) and controls (3.25%). After adjustments for multiple confounders, the main risk factor significantly associated with a COVID-19 diagnosis was lung disease (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.03-2.58); and for rheumatic disease patients were diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.19-6.63) and glucocorticoids above 10 mg/ day (OR 2.05; 95% CI 1.31-3.19). In addition, a recent influenza vaccination had a protective effect (OR 0.674; 95% CI 0.46-0.98). CONCLUSION: Patients with rheumatic disease on hydroxychloroquine presented a similar occurrence of COVID-19 to household cohabitants, suggesting a lack of any protective role against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Trial registration Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC; RBR - 9KTWX6).


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Brasil/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Salud de la Familia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerodermia Sistémica/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Sjögren/tratamiento farmacológico , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Adulto Joven
7.
Adv Rheumatol ; 61(1): 70, 2021 11 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34819172

RESUMEN

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic and autoimmune systemic inflammatory disease that can cause irreversible joint deformities, with increased morbidity and mortality and a significant impact on the quality of life of the affected individual. The main objective of RA treatment is to achieve sustained clinical remission or low disease activity. However, up to 40% of patients do not respond to available treatments, including bDMARDs. New therapeutic targets for RA are emerging, such as Janus kinases (JAKs). These are essential for intracellular signaling (via JAK-STAT) in response to many cytokines involved in RA immunopathogenesis. JAK inhibitors (JAKi) have established themselves as a highly effective treatment, gaining increasing space in the therapeutic arsenal for the treatment of RA. The current recommendations aim to present a review of the main aspects related to the efficacy and safety of JAKis in RA patients, and to update the recommendations and treatment algorithm proposed by the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology in 2017.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Reumatología , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Citocinas , Humanos , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida
8.
RMD Open ; 7(1)2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33510041

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate risk factors associated with unfavourable outcomes: emergency care, hospitalisation, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), mechanical ventilation and death in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) and COVID-19. METHODS: Analysis of the first 8 weeks of observational multicentre prospective cohort study (ReumaCoV Brasil register). Patients with IMRD and COVID-19 according to the Ministry of Health criteria were classified as eligible for the study. RESULTS: 334 participants were enrolled, a majority of them women, with a median age of 45 years; systemic lupus erythematosus (32.9%) was the most frequent IMRD. Emergency care was required in 160 patients, 33.0% were hospitalised, 15.0% were admitted to the ICU and 10.5% underwent mechanical ventilation; 28 patients (8.4%) died. In the multivariate adjustment model for emergency care, diabetes (prevalence ratio, PR 1.38; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.73; p=0.004), kidney disease (PR 1.36; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.77; p=0.020), oral glucocorticoids (GC) (PR 1.49; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.85; p<0.001) and pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (PR 1.38; 95% CI 1.14 to 1.67; p=0.001) remained significant; for hospitalisation, age >50 years (PR 1.89; 95% CI 1.26 to 2.85; p=0.002), no use of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) (PR 2.51;95% CI 1.16 to 5.45; p=0.004) and methylprednisolone pulse therapy (PR 2.50; 95% CI 1.59 to 3.92; p<0.001); for ICU admission, oral GC (PR 2.24; 95% CI 1.36 to 3.71; p<0.001) and pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (PR 1.65; 95% CI 1.00 to 2.68; p<0.043); the two variables associated with death were pulse therapy with methylprednisolone or cyclophosphamide (PR 2.86; 95% CI 1.59 to 5.14; p<0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Age >50 years and immunosuppression with GC and cyclophosphamide were associated with unfavourable outcomes of COVID-19. Treatment with TNFi may have been protective, perhaps leading to the COVID-19 inflammatory process.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/mortalidad , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Enfermedades Reumáticas/complicaciones , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/inmunología
9.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 9(12): e24357, 2020 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33156812

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD) are at increased risk of infections, including significant morbidity and high mortality. Considering the potential for unfavorable outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with IMRD, several questions were raised regarding the impact of COVID-19 at the start of the pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This paper presents the protocol of a study that aims to prospectively evaluate patients with IMRD and a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis (using criteria provided by the Brazilian Ministry of Health). METHODS: The study comprised a prospective, observational cohort (patients with IMRD and COVID-19) and a comparison group (patients with only IMRD), with a follow-up time of 6 months to evaluate differences in health outcomes. The primary outcomes will be changes in IMRD disease activity after SARS-CoV-2 infection at 4 time points: (1) at baseline, (2) within 4-6 weeks after infection, (3) at 3 months after the second assessment (±15 days), and (4) at 6 months (±15 days). The secondary outcomes will be the progression rate to moderate or severe forms of COVID-19, need for intensive care unit admission and mechanical ventilation, death, and therapeutic changes related to IMRD. Two outcomes-pulmonary and thromboembolic events in patients with both IMRD and SARS-CoV-2 infection-are of particular interest and will be monitored with close attention (clinical, laboratory, and function tests as well as imaging). RESULTS: Recruitment opened in May 2020, with 1300 participants recruited from 43 sites as of November 2020. Patient recruitment will conclude by the end of December 2020, with follow-up occurring until April 2021. Data analysis is scheduled to start after all inclusion data have been collected, with an aim to publish a peer-reviewed paper in December 2020. CONCLUSIONS: We believe this study will provide clinically relevant data on the general impact of COVID-19 on patients with IMRD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials RBR-33YTQC; http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-33ytqc/. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/24357.

10.
Adv Rheumatol ; 60(1): 9, 2020 01 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31964420

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: EpiFibro (Brazilian Epidemiological Study of Fibromyalgia) was created to study patients with fibromyalgia (FM). Patients were included since 2011 according to the classification criteria for FM of the American College of Rheumatology of 1990 (ACR1990). OBJECTIVE: To analyze the therapeutic measures prescribed by Brazilian physicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study of a multicenter cohort. The therapeutic measures were described using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: We analyzed 456 patients who had complete data in the registry. The mean age was 54.0 ± 11.9 years; 448 were women (98.2%). Almost all patients (98.4%) used medications, 62.7% received health education, and less than half reported practicing physical exercise; these modalities were often used in combination. Most patients who practiced exercises practiced aerobic exercise only, and a significant portion of patients combined it with flexibility exercises. The most commonly used medication was amitriptyline, followed by cyclobenzaprine, and a minority used medication specifically approved for FM, such as duloxetine and pregabalin, either alone or in combination. Combinations of two or three medications were observed, with the combination of fluoxetine and amitriptyline being the most frequent (18.8%). CONCLUSION: In this evaluation of the care of patients with FM in Brazil, it was found that the majority of patients are treated with a combination of pharmacological measures. Non-pharmacological methods are underused, with aerobic exercise being the most commonly practiced exercise type. The most commonly prescribed single drug was amitriptyline, and the most commonly prescribed combination was fluoxetine and amitriptyline. Drugs specifically approved for FM are seldom prescribed.


Asunto(s)
Fibromialgia/terapia , Pregabalina/uso terapéutico , Amitriptilina/análogos & derivados , Amitriptilina/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Brasil , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Terapia Combinada/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Quimioterapia Combinada , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina/uso terapéutico , Ejercicio Físico , Femenino , Educación en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ejercicios de Estiramiento Muscular , Sistema de Registros
11.
Adv Rheumatol ; 60(1): 32, 2020 06 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32517786

RESUMEN

Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, also known as antimalarial drugs, are widely used in the treatment of rheumatic diseases and have recently become the focus of attention because of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Rheumatologists have been using antimalarials to manage patients with chronic immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases for decades. It is an appropriate time to review their immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory mechanisms impact on disease activity and survival of systemic lupus erythematosus patient, including antiplatelet effect, metabolic and lipid benefits. We also discuss possible adverse effects, adding a practical and comprehensive approach to monitoring rheumatic patients during treatment with these drugs.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/farmacología , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Cloroquina/farmacología , Hidroxicloroquina/farmacología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/inmunología , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/inmunología , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Femenino , Glucosa/metabolismo , Cardiopatías/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Lípidos/sangre , Lupus Eritematoso Cutáneo/tratamiento farmacológico , Lupus Eritematoso Cutáneo/inmunología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/inmunología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/mortalidad , Masculino , Pandemias , Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos de los fármacos , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Embarazo , Insuficiencia Renal/prevención & control , Enfermedades de la Retina/inducido químicamente , Síndrome de Sjögren/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Sjögren/inmunología
12.
Rev Paul Pediatr ; 37(2): 252-256, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30810692

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To highlight the importance of the new classification criteria for the macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis in order to reduce morbidity and mortality outcome related to this disease. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 12-year-old female patient with diagnosis of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis under immunosuppression therapy for two years developed cough, acute precordial chest pain, tachypnea, tachycardia and hypoxemia for two days. Chest tomography showed bilateral laminar pleural effusion with bibasilar consolidation. The electrocardiogram was consistent with acute pericarditis and the echocardiogram showed no abnormalities. Laboratory exams revealed anemia, leukocytosis and increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate, as well as C-reactive protein rate and serum biomarkers indicative of myocardial injury. Systemic infection and/or active systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis were considered. She was treated with antibiotics and glucocorticoids. However, 10 days later she developed active systemic disease (fever, evanescent rash and myopericarditis with signs of heart failure) associated with macrophage activation syndrome, according to the 2016 Classification Criteria for Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. She was treated for five days with pulse therapy, using glucocorticoids, immunoglobulin and cyclosporine A, with improvement of all clinical signs and laboratory tests. COMMENTS: Myopericarditis with signs of heart failure associated with MAS is a rare clinical presentation of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Macrophage activation syndrome occurs mainly during periods of active systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and may be triggered by infection. Knowledge about this syndrome is crucial to reduce morbidity and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Juvenil , Dolor en el Pecho , Ciclosporina/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Leucocitosis , Síndrome de Activación Macrofágica , Artritis Juvenil/complicaciones , Artritis Juvenil/diagnóstico , Artritis Juvenil/inmunología , Artritis Juvenil/fisiopatología , Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Niño , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Leucocitosis/diagnóstico , Leucocitosis/etiología , Síndrome de Activación Macrofágica/sangre , Síndrome de Activación Macrofágica/etiología , Síndrome de Activación Macrofágica/fisiopatología , Síndrome de Activación Macrofágica/terapia , Quimioterapia por Pulso/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Acta Reumatol Port ; 43(1): 61-65, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29602165

RESUMEN

IIntroduction: Sjögren's syndrome in childhood is a rare autoimmune disease and mostly under-diagnosed. The aim of this study is to highlight the importance of ultrasonographic assessment of the salivary glands in children with recurrent parotitis and positive autoantibodies. Two cases of ultrasonographic patterns typical of Sjögren's syndrome have been described below. Case 1: Female, 7 years old, reporting for 2 years recurrent parotitis, xerophthalmia, xerostomia, polyarthralgia and fever. Immunological tests were positive for antinuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor, anti-SSA/Ro and anti-SSB/La. Salivary glands ultrasound was consistent with Grade 4 by the B-mode method and the spectral Doppler with presence of intense Power Doppler signal and decreased vessels internal resistance, supporting the diagnosis of juvenile Sjögren's syndrome. Case 2: Female, 10 years old, reporting recurrent parotitis for 1 year and polyarthritis for 10 days. The supplementary tests revealed positive antibodies for Sjögren's syndrome. Salivary glands Ultrasound and Spectral Doppler were consistent with chronic and active inflammatory process of the salivary glands in the juvenile Sjögren's syndrome. DISCUSSION: Salivary glands ultrasound can be a useful exam in the diagnosis of juvenile Sjögren's syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Parotiditis/diagnóstico por imagen , Parotiditis/etiología , Glándulas Salivales/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Sjögren/complicaciones , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Ultrasonografía
14.
Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed ; 57 Suppl 2: 467-476, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28800969

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To establish guidelines based on scientific evidence for the diagnosis of fibromyalgia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Evidence collection was performed based on 9 questions regarding the diagnosis of fibromyalgia, structured using the Patient, Intervention or Indicator, Comparison and Outcome (P.I.C.O.), with searches in the main, primary databases of scientific information. After defining the potential studies to support the recommendations, they were graded according to evidence and degree of recommendation.


Asunto(s)
Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Brasil , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Reumatología , Sociedades Médicas
15.
Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed ; 57(2): 129-133, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28343617

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: EpiFibro (Brazilian Epidemiological Study of Fibromyalgia) was created to study Fibromyalgia patients. Patients were included since 2011 according to the 1990 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Fibromyalgia (ACR1990). OBJECTIVES: To determine how many patients still fulfill the ACR1990 and the ACR2010 criteria in 2014; to determine the correlation between the impact of FM and to describe data on the follow-up evaluation. METHODS: This is a cross sectional study in a multicenter cohort of patients. The data was collected between 2013 and 2015. Physician included patients that fulfilled the ACR1990 criteria on the date of entry. The follow-up data were considered only for patients with at least two evaluations. A minimally significant change was considered to be a 30% variation of parameters scores. RESULTS: 810 patients' data were analyzed. Patients presented a mean age of 51.8±11.5 years old. There were 786 female. Most patients met both criteria. There was a greater fulfilling of the ACR2010. There was a moderate correlation between Polysymptomatic Distress Scale and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Three hundred fourteen patients with more than one assessment were found, but 88 patients were excluded. Thus, 226 patients with one follow-up monitoring parameter were considered (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire: 222; Polysymptomatic Distress Scale: 199; both: 195). The mean follow-up time was 9.1±7.5 months (1-44). Most patients became stable. CONCLUSION: InEpiFibro, most patients fulfill simultaneously the ACR1990 and ACR2010. A larger number of patients fulfill the ACR2010 at the time of the evaluation. There was a moderate correlation between the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale and the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Most patients remained stable over time.


Asunto(s)
Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Sistema de Registros/normas , Reumatología/normas , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Fibromialgia/clasificación , Fibromialgia/fisiopatología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
16.
Rev Bras Reumatol ; 2016 Feb 17.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26952873

RESUMEN

Livedoid vasculopathy is a chronic and painful skin disease that progresses to ulceration. Due to its uncertain pathogenesis, there is no single effective treatment for this condition, and current therapeutic options are based on isolated case reports, or on case series. We report a case of a female patient with livedoid vasculopathy, which achieved excellent healing of lower limb ulcers after using an anti-TNF agent.

17.
Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed ; 56(1): 75-8, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27267337

RESUMEN

Paracoccidioidomycosis is a fungal infection endemic to South America. The infection is usually asymptomatic and mostly affects the upper and lower respiratory tracts with clinical-radiological dissociation. Joint involvement is rare with no specific pattern or radiological injury. We report a case of paracoccidioidomycosis in which the patient's initial symptoms were hoarseness and arthritis. After an ultrasound examination, we performed the differential diagnosis of other noninfectious arthropathies and analysis of the material collected, which revealed infection with the fungus Paracoccidioides brasiliensis.


Asunto(s)
Músculo Esquelético/diagnóstico por imagen , Paracoccidioides/aislamiento & purificación , Paracoccidioidomicosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , América del Sur
18.
Adv Rheumatol ; 61: 60, 2021. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1345107

RESUMEN

Abstract Background: There is a lack of information on the role of chronic use of hydroxychloroquine during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. Our aim was to compare the occurrence of COVID-19 between rheumatic disease patients on hydroxychloroquine with individuals from the same household not taking the drug during the first 8 weeks of community viral transmission in Brazil. Methods: This baseline cross-sectional analysis is part of a 24-week observational multi-center study involving 22 Brazilian academic outpatient centers. All information regarding COVID-19 symptoms, epidemiological, clinical, and demographic data were recorded on a specific web-based platform using telephone calls from physicians and medical students. COVID-19 was defined according to the Brazilian Ministry of Health (BMH) criteria. Mann-Whitney, Chi-square and Exact Fisher tests were used for statistical analysis and two binary Final Logistic Regression Model by Wald test were developed using a backward-stepwise method for the presence of COVID-19. Results: From March 29th to May 17st, 2020, a total of 10,443 participants were enrolled, including 5166 (53.9%) rheumatic disease patients, of whom 82.5% had systemic erythematosus lupus, 7.8% rheumatoid arthritis, 3.7% Sjögren's syndrome and 0.8% systemic sclerosis. In total, 1822 (19.1%) participants reported flu symptoms within the 30 days prior to enrollment, of which 3.1% fulfilled the BMH criteria, but with no significant difference between rheumatic disease patients (4.03%) and controls (3.25%). After adjustments for multiple confounders, the main risk factor significantly associated with a COVID-19 diagnosis was lung disease (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.03-2.58); and for rheumatic disease patients were diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.19-6.63) and glucocorticoids above 10 mg/ day (OR 2.05; 95% CI 1.31-3.19). In addition, a recent influenza vaccination had a protective effect (OR 0.674; 95% CI 0.46-0.98). Conclusion: Patients with rheumatic disease on hydroxychloroquine presented a similar occurrence of COVID-19 to household cohabitants, suggesting a lack of any protective role against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Trial registration Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC; RBR - 9KTWX6).

19.
Clin Rheumatol ; 34(8): 1455-62, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25085275

RESUMEN

We compared the analgesic efficacy and safety of glucosamine sulfate (GS) and chondroitin sulfate (CS) capsules or sachet preparations with glucosamine hydrochloride (GH) and CS capsules in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. 1,120 subjects with radiographic knee OA (Kellgren/Lawrence 2-3) were randomized (1:1:1) at 16 centers to receive GS 500 mg/CS 400 mg three times daily capsules (GI) or once daily sachet (GII) or GH 500 mg/CS 400 mg three times daily (GIII) for a 16-week trial. Primary outcome, intention-to-treat (ITT) was change from baseline of patient reported pain intensity (0-100 mm visual analogue scale) in the affected knee and variation of Lequesne's index (LI). Monthly secondary outcomes were changes from baseline in patient reported pain and LI, patient and physician global assessments of disease activity, acetaminophen consumption, and adherence. ITT population comprised 302, 301, and 306 patients in GI, GII, and GIII. Pain significantly decreased (GI = -30.9 ± 1.5; GII = -28.7 ± 1.5; GIII = -29.7 ± 1.5 mm) in all groups (P < 0.001) as well as LI (GI = -3.8 ± 0.2; GII = -3.7 ± 0.2; GIII = -3.9 ± 0.2; P < 0.001). All secondary outcomes improved (P < 0.005) for all groups. Patients that did not complete the study were 77 (44.8 %) for lack of adherence, 16 (9.3 %) consent withdrawal, 11 (6.4 %) adverse events, eight (4.7 %) lost to follow-up, and 17 (9.9 %) for other causes. Non-inferiority analysis found no differences among groups. This is a large study showing that GS/CS and GH/CS provide clinically meaningful and sustained analgesia in knee OA regardless of dose fractionation and capsule or sachet formulations.


Asunto(s)
Sulfatos de Condroitina/uso terapéutico , Glucosamina/uso terapéutico , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Sulfatos de Condroitina/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Glucosamina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor , Dimensión del Dolor , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Adv Rheumatol ; 60: 32, 2020. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1130792

RESUMEN

Abstract Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, also known as antimalarial drugs, are widely used in the treatment of rheumatic diseases and have recently become the focus of attention because of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Rheumatologists have been using antimalarials to manage patients with chronic immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases for decades. It is an appropriate time to review their immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory mechanisms impact on disease activity and survival of systemic lupus erythematosus patient, including antiplatelet effect, metabolic and lipid benefits. We also discuss possible adverse effects, adding a practical and comprehensive approach to monitoring rheumatic patients during treatment with these drugs.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Cloroquina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Cloroquina/farmacología , Hidroxicloroquina/farmacología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA