Gender-Based Salary Inequities Among Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine Physicians in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether gender inequities exist for pediatric physiatrists and, if affirmative, what factors account for this difference. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Online REDCap survey administered via e-mail. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric physiatrists practicing in the United States in 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Respondents reported on their gender, training, practice type and location, leadership positions, years in practice and years at their current location, salary, research, and clinical productivity. RESULTS: Of the 307 surveys sent, 235 individuals responded, yielding a response rate of 76.5%. Pediatric physiatrists who identified as women were more likely to work part-time but were demographically similar to their colleagues who identified as men. The odds of having no leadership role were higher for women (odds ratio=2.17; P=.02) than men. Pediatric physiatrists who identified as men made on average (in US dollars ± SD) 244,798±52,906 annually compared with those who identified as women 224,497±60,756. The average annual difference in full-time salary was $20,311 in favor of those who identified as men (95% confidence interval, $3135-$37,486). The set of predictors in the multivariable model explained about 40% of the total variability in annual full-time salary (R2=0.389; adjusted R2=0.339; F15,197=7.734; P<.001). Gender was not a significant predictor in the model, but model prediction of the salaries of pediatric physiatrists who identified as men was better than model prediction of the salaries of those who identified as women. CONCLUSIONS: Despite representing a majority of the field, pediatric physiatrists who identified as women were paid less than their counterparts who identified as men. The traditional predictors associated with the salaries of men were not enough to explain salary variation among those who identified as women, thereby providing evidence of the importance of intangible and unmeasured aspects of a women's career, such as bias and institutional culture.

Benefits of Methylphenidate for Long-Term Attention Problems After Traumatic Brain Injury in Childhood: A Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Titration, Crossover Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the benefits and optimal dose of long-acting methylphenidate for management of long-term attention problems after childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Phase 2, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, dose-titration, crossover clinical trial. SETTING: Outpatient, clinical research. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six children aged 6 to 17 years who were at least 6 months post-TBI and met criteria for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) at the time of enrollment. OUTCOME MEASURES: Vanderbilt Rating Scale of attention problems, Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale, and vital signs. RESULTS: Among the 26 participants randomized, 20 completed the trial. The mean ages at injury and enrollment were 6.3 and 11.5 years, respectively. Eight participants had a severe TBI. On an optimal dose of medication, greater reductions were found on the Vanderbilt Parent Rating Scale for the medicated condition than for placebo (P = .022, effect size = 0.59). The mean optimal dose of methylphenidate was 40.5 mg (1.00 mg/kg/day). Preinjury ADHD diagnosis status was not associated with a differential medication response. Methylphenidate was associated with weight loss (∼1 kg), increased systolic blood pressure (∼3- to 6-point increase), and mild reported changes in appetite. CONCLUSION: Findings support use of long-acting methylphenidate for management of long-term attention problems after pediatric TBI. Larger trials are warranted of stimulant medications, including comparative effectiveness and combination medication and nonmedication interventions.

Pediatric intramedullary spinal cord tumor outcomes using the WeeFIM scale.

PURPOSE: The Functional Independence Measure for children (WeeFIM) is a user-friendly functional outcomes tool that has been validated across other traditional functional scales. Historically, the significant neurologic and functional deficits of intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs) have been monitored by coarse or overbearing functional outcomes tools that make it difficult to measure the slow improvement/decline seen in these patients. This study is the first to report WeeFIM outcomes on a series of IMSCTs with emphasis on an aggressive surgical strategy. METHODS: A retrospective review from 2005 to 2014 was performed for nine patients who underwent resective surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors with intraoperative ultrasound and neurophysiologic monitoring. WeeFIM scales were assessed at admission and discharge to evaluate changes in severity of disability and need for assistance. RESULTS: At the time of this submission, 7/9 patients are alive. The mean WeeFIM improvement was 27 points (8-50 points) with a mean WeeFIM efficiency of 2.0 points/day. CONCLUSIONS: The WeeFIM scale is an appropriate and useful scale for measuring postoperative improvements in patients with IMSCTs undergoing aggressive resective surgery. Attention to intraoperative spinal cord monitoring and prevention of spinal column instability may prevent morbidity related to surgery, and functional outcomes do not appear to be compromised by an aggressive surgical approach.

Meeting the Growing Need for Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine Physicians.

Disability in childhood is on the rise. In light of the national shortage of pediatric rehabilitation medicine physicians to provide care for the growing population of children with disabilities, the field of pediatric rehabilitation medicine should consider allowing pediatric trainees into pediatric rehabilitation medicine fellowships. There are concerns about how best to train these fellows. This commentary discusses the issues and concludes that training opportunities should be developed to allow pediatricians to become pediatric rehabilitation medicine physicians.

Current practice focus trends in physical medicine and rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) is a diverse specialty, growing and evolving over a variety of subspecialty and practice focus areas. Accurate data regarding practice patterns of physiatrists are essential for updating requirements in training and certification, particularly as the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education begins its process to update of the PM&R core residency training requirements. This study analyzes practice trends for nearly 98% of physiatrists in active practice, the largest study to date. OBJECTIVE: To update current demographics of physicians specializing in PM&R, including current areas of practice focus, to analyze the alignment of practice focus with subspecialty certification, and to determine the extent that electromyography is a component of current physiatric practice. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of deidentified responses from American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (ABPMR) board-certified PM&R physicians (diplomates) on annual enrollment in the ABPMR Continuing Certification program. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 9543 ABPMR diplomates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics - age, gender, years in practice, practice setting(s) and area(s). Practice focus, subspecialty certifications. RESULTS: The majority of practicing physiatrists are men (62%) although the percentage of women in the field is growing (38%). Nearly 80% of physiatrists report more than one practice focus area, with pain medicine and sports medicine/musculoskeletal practices most commonly reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the growth trends in PM&R in pain and sports medicine but also highlights the substantial number of physiatrists focusing their practices in areas related to neurorehabilitation and medical rehabilitation. The large majority of physiatrists incorporate multiple focus areas into their practices. Electromyography is a focus for a declining percentage of practicing physiatrists.

Functional Impairment in Pediatric Cancer Survivorship.

Care for pediatric cancer survivors must include scheduled, thorough evaluations of potential chronic and late effects resulting from multidimensional cancer treatments. Assessment of functional independence with activities and participation is critical in assuring that survivors can optimally access their environments and pursue educational, occupational, and leisure activities appropriate to their interests and capabilities. Owing to their expertise in both rehabilitation and habilitation, pediatric physiatrists are of great benefit in the care of survivors of pediatric cancer.

First year impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric physiatrists.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the work and compensation of pediatric physiatrists during the first year of the pandemic. METHODS: Pediatric physiatrists were surveyed in the spring of 2021 about how the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic impacted their practices as a part of a larger survey examining pediatric rehabilitation medicine practices. The COVID-19 specific questions covered three topic areas: 1) personal experiences with COVID-19; 2) occupational workflow changes due to COVID-19, including telehealth; and 3) employment consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Thirteen of 259 pediatric physiatrists reported having a COVID-19 infection, of whom none required hospitalization. Nearly all (96.5%) of pediatric physiatrists reported using telehealth during the pandemic compared to 14% prior to the pandemic. They reported numerous changes to their clinical operations, and 50% reported not having adequate personal protective equipment available for themselves or their staff all of the time. Fifteen pediatric physiatrists (5.9%) reported being furloughed, and three reported job loss during the first year of the pandemic. CONCLUSION: While only a small percentage of pediatric physiatrists contracted COVID-19 during the first year of the pandemic, nearly all experienced workflow changes.

Assessing the Field of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine's Interest in Expanding Fellowship Training to Pediatricians.

BACKGROUND: Training opportunities to pursue a career in pediatric rehabilitation medicine (PRM) have evolved over the last 40 years, with the most recent change being the development and accreditation of PRM fellowships and subspecialty certification in PRM. Currently the American Board of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (ABPMR) requires all candidates for PRM subspecialty certification to have completed a physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) residency. The small number of certified PRM physicians has prompted debate within the field about permitting pediatricians to enter PRM fellowships without having to complete a PM&R residency. OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of interest within the field of PRM in creating a pathway to PRM for pediatricians. DESIGN: Survey of pediatric physiatrists in the United States in 2017. SETTING: National. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric physiatrists. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Favorability toward pediatricians becoming certified in PRM. RESULTS: Most respondents (62%) were in favor of pediatricians having the opportunity to pursue training in PRM, with an increase in support (70%) after being introduced to workforce issues in PRM. Training time for pediatricians was the largest concern identified by respondents who were not in favor (80%), with additional themes identified including dilution of the essence of the field and operationalization issues. CONCLUSIONS: With a small number of practicing pediatric physiatrists, the growing number of children with disabilities, and the limited access to our services, most pediatric physiatrists are in agreement that it is time to consider the opportunity to expand the PRM workforce by creating a fellowship pathway to subspecialty board certification in PRM after pediatric residency.

The State of the Field: Results from the 2014 and 2017 Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine Practice Surveys.

BACKGROUND: Childhood disability is on the rise and there is a national shortage of pediatric physiatrists in the United States. The 2009 Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine Practice Survey identified concerns regarding inadequate geographic dispersion of providers, salary inequities, and limited academic competitiveness and external funding for research. OBJECTIVE: To describe the current state of the field of pediatric rehabilitation medicine. DESIGN: Survey of pediatric physiatrists in the United States in 2014 and 2017. SETTING: National. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric physiatrists INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Characteristics; clinical activities, responsibilities, and comfort; academic activities; and salaries and productivity. RESULTS: In both 2014 and 2017, the majority of pediatric physiatrists who responded were women (~63%) and worked at an academic teaching hospital (~68%). Pediatric physiatrists most commonly held the title of assistant professor and were overrepresented in the Midwest. Overall, 55.8% of providers felt that access was adequate in their area whereas only 3.7% felt access was adequate across the country. In 2017, 52.5% of pediatric physiatrists participated in research or other scholarly activities with 44.2% reporting having published original research at some point in their careers. The inflation adjusted mean salary in 2014 ($227 360) was not statistically different than in 2017 ($232 634, P = .422). In both years, full professors reported the highest academic full-time salaries. Individuals having at least one leadership title also reported significantly higher average full-time salaries than individuals with no titles. CONCLUSIONS: Although gains have been made in terms of academic competitiveness and engagement in research in pediatric physiatry, there are areas of ongoing concern including large geographic practice variations with associated access to care problems, challenges with recruiting physicians to the field, and salary malalignment within the field of PM&R.

The Impact of Spatial Distribution of Pain on Long-Term Trajectories for Chronic Pain Outcomes After Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence for the effectiveness of intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) for pediatric chronic pain is growing; however, little research has considered factors that contribute to differences in patients' treatment response. The present study utilized multilevel modeling to examine trajectory of change over time in functional disability from clinic assessment to 6-month follow-up in pediatric patients participating in IIPT, considering spatial distribution of pain, coping efficacy, and pain intensity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants included 110 pediatric patients (Mage=14.65, SD=2.37; localized pain, 27.3%; widespread pain, 72.7%) consecutively admitted into IIPT. Patients completed self-report measures of functional disability, pain intensity, and coping efficacy at pretreatment assessment, admission, weekly during IIPT, discharge, and several follow-ups. RESULTS: Analysis identified a model with 3 three-way interactions, including time, time squared, pain intensity, coping efficacy, and pain distribution, on functional disability. The spatial distribution of pain had the greatest impact on treatment trajectory in patients with widespread pain, high pain intensity, and poor coping efficacy; these patients demonstrated greater functional disability compared with patients with localized pain. In addition, patients with widespread pain and poor coping efficacy had the most functional disability across all levels of pain intensity. Patients with localized pain and poor coping efficacy demonstrated initial treatment gains, but evidenced an increase in functional disability at follow-up. DISCUSSION: Overall, spatial distribution of pain, coping efficacy, and pain intensity played an important role in patients' response to treatment. Better understanding of these variables could improve treatment response, particularly for the most severely disabled chronic pain patients.

Performance of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine Candidates on the Subspecialty Board Certification Examination from 2003 to 2015.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric rehabilitation medicine (PRM) physicians enter the field via several pathways. It is unknown whether different training pathways impact performance on the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (ABPMR) PRM Examination and Maintenance of Certification (MOC) Examination. OBJECTIVES: To describe the examination performance of candidates on the ABPMR PRM Examination according to their type of training (physiatrists with a clinical PRM focus, accredited or unaccredited fellowship training, separate pediatric and physical medicine and rehabilitation residencies, or combined pediatrics/physical medicine and rehabilitation residencies) and to compare candidates' performance on the PRM Examination with their initial ABPMR certification and MOC Examinations. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation office. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 250 candidates taking the PRM subspecialty certification examination from 2003 to 2015. METHODS: Scaled scores on the PRM Examination were compared to the examinees' initial certification scores as well as their admissibility criteria. Pass rates and scaled scores also were compared for those taking their initial PRM certification versus MOC. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Board pass rates and mean scaled scores for initial PRM Examination and MOC. RESULTS: The 250 physiatrists who took the subspecialty PRM Examination had an overall first-time pass rate of 89%. There was no significant difference between first-time PRM pass rates or mean scaled scores for individuals who completed an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited fellowship versus those who did not. First time PRM pass rates were greatest among those who were also certified by the American Board of Pediatrics (100%). Performance on Parts I and II of the initial ABPMR Certification Examination significantly predicted PRM Examination scores. There was no difference in mean scaled scores for initial PRM certification versus taking the PRM Examination for MOC. CONCLUSIONS: Several pathways to admissibility to the PRM Examination afforded similar opportunity for diplomates to gain the knowledge necessary to pass the PRM Examination. Once certified, physicians taking the PRM Examination for MOC have a high success rate of passing again in years 7-10 of their certification cycle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Pediatric brain tumor rehabilitation.

Children with brain tumors experience significant functional deficits related to the primary disease process and also as a consequence of its treatment. As in adults, childhood brain tumors represent a heterogeneous group of tumors, which vary in pathologic characteristics, tumor biology, response to therapy, anatomic location, and age at diagnosis. With the advances in diagnostic strategies, neurosurgical techniques and therapeutic trials over the last 30 years, a greater proportion of these children are surviving into adulthood. Accompanying this survival, knowledge and intervention regarding long-term effects and the consequences of functional deficits on independent living is necessary. Involvement of a pediatric physiatrist throughout the course of disease, from diagnosis through survivorship, assists in optimizing functional independence and quality of life for children with brain tumors.

Common medical comorbidities associated with cerebral palsy.

The medical issues associated with the diagnosis of cerebral palsy (CP) can have significant interplay with the neuromuscular issues that most physiatrists manage in the clinical setting. Identification and appropriate management of these common comorbidities by the primary care and subspecialist physicians can have significant impact on the quality of life of the patient and family. Some of these issues are prevalent across all gross motor function classification system (GMFCS) levels of severity, whereas others more commonly complicate the care of those children with the more severe GMFCS levels IV and V. Performance of a complete review of systems to address the potentially complex medical comorbidities and subsequent application of appropriate screening tools can assist in achieving optimal outcomes in children with CP and their families.