Patient Falls in Seclusion Rooms in Psychiatric Inpatient Care: A Sociotechnical Probabilistic Risk Modeling Study.

BACKGROUND: Patient falls are a major adverse event in psychiatric inpatient care. PURPOSE: To model the risk for patient falls in seclusion rooms in psychiatric inpatient care. METHODS: Sociotechnical probabilistic risk assessment (ST-PRA) was used to model the risk for falls. Data sources were the research team, literature review, and exploration groups of psychiatric nurses. Data were analyzed with fault tree analysis. RESULTS: The risk for a patient fall in a seclusion room was 1.8%. Critical paths included diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder, the mechanism of falls, failure to assess and prevent falls, and psychological or physical reason. The most significant individual risk factor for falls was diagnosis of schizophrenia. CONCLUSIONS: Falls that occur in seclusion events are associated with physical and psychological risk factors. Therefore, risk assessment methods and fall prevention interventions considering patient behavioral disturbance and physiological risk factors in seclusion are warranted.

False-Positive Atypical Endocervical Cells in Conventional Pap Smears: Cyto-Histological Correlation and Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Endocervical glandular atypia is relatively rarely diagnosed by Pap smears. A significant proportion of follow-up histological samples show no premalignant or malignant lesions. The observed cytomorphological findings in premalignant glandular lesions overlap with histologically proven reactive lesions. METHODS: A total of 45 conventional Pap smears diagnosed as atypical endocervical cells, not otherwise specified (AEC, NOS) with human papillomavirus (HPV) status available were blindly evaluated in a search for 38 cytomorphological features representing background, architectural, cellular, and nuclear features. Of the cases, 30 represented histologically proven benign changes, and 15 represented histologically proven adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or endocervical adenocarcinoma (EAC) cases. The benign biopsies were re-evaluated, and the associations of the cytomorphological features or combinations of them with specific histological features and entities were statistically examined. RESULTS: The most frequent histological findings in the benign group were squamous metaplasia, inflammation, tubal metaplasia, and microglandular hyperplasia. The statistical analysis revealed cytological features associated with squamous metaplastic changes, inflammation, and microglandular hyperplasia. Unfortunately, no cytomorphological feature was sufficiently specific to confidently leave the lesion without follow-up and histological correlation. Degeneration and nuclear crowding were the most salient features that distinguished the instances of glandular atypia with benign follow-up histology from those with histologically proven AIS or EAC (26.7 vs. 60.0%, p = 0.030, and 50.0 vs. 86.7%, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Additional methods besides cytomorphology are required to reliably distinguish smears with AEC, NOS harbouring only benign histological changes from those exhibiting endocervical glandular malignancy.

Atypical urothelial cells classified according to the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: A 2-year experience with histological correlation from a Finnish tertiary care center-low rate and high risk of malignancy.

BACKGROUND: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) was issued to shift the focus of urine cytology to high-grade lesions to increase the diagnostic accuracy of urine cytology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the power of TPS in the atypical urothelial cells (AUC) category with histological correlation and follow-up. METHODS: The data cohort consisted of 3741 voided urine samples collected during a 2-year period between January 2017 and December 2018. All samples were prospectively classified using TPS. This study focuses on the subset of 205 samples (5.5%) classified as AUC. All cytological and histological follow-up data were analyzed until 2019, and the time between each sampling was documented. RESULTS: Of the 205 AUC cases, cytohistological correlation was possible in 97 (47.3%) cases. Of these, 36 (12.7%) were benign in histology, 27 (13.2%) were low-grade urothelial carcinomas, and 34 (16.6%) were high-grade urothelial carcinomas. Overall, the risk of malignancy was 29.8% for all cases in the AUC category, and 62.9% in the histologically confirmed cases. The risk of high-grade malignancy was 16.6% in all the AUC category samples and 35.1% in the histological follow-up group. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of 5.5% AUC cases is considered good and within the limits proposed by TPS. TPS is widely accepted by cytotechnologists, cytopathologists, and clinicians; it improves communication and patient management.

Endocervical Cytology: Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability in Conventional Pap Smears.

INTRODUCTION: Although the cytological diagnostic criteria for cervical squamous and glandular lesions are established by the Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology, the reproducibility of the diagnosis of these lesions has been shown to be variable in previous studies. At best, occasional good kappa (κ) values were reached both inter- and intra-observerly. Generally, consensus on high-grade lesions has been better compared to milder changes. METHODS: Altogether, 167 conventional Pap smears from 50 patients with histologically confirmed endocervical adenocarcinomas (EAC) and adenocarcinomas in situ (AIS) and from 28 patients with histologically proven high-grade intraepithelial lesions were analyzed by four cytopathologists. Twenty of the smears were later re-evaluated by the same cytopathologists. κ-values between cytopathologists in the categories of squamous versus glandular, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM), atypical, and preneoplastic/neoplastic were calculated. The diagnostic Pap smears of EAC and AIS with best and worst consensus between observers were then morphologically analyzed. RESULTS: The reproducibility ranged from poor to substantial. The overall κ-values between the four cytopathologists were 0.412, 0.314, 0.272, and 0.082, respectively, in the categories of preneoplastic/neoplastic, squamous versus glandular, NILM, and atypical. Overall intra-observer κ-values were correspondingly 0.491, 0.616, 0.345, and 0.241. In the diagnostic smears of AIS and EAC, the nuclear size >2 times the normal and nuclear pleomorphism were the commonest features associated with good diagnostic consensus and the lack of nuclear enlargement and degenerative changes were associated with poor consensus. CONCLUSIONS: The reproducibility of preneoplasia/neoplasia diagnoses was better than that of atypia and NILM both in the inter- and intra-observer part in this study. In the smears from AIS and EAC patients, general neoplasia-associated features were more common in samples with good agreement by the four cytopathologists of the neoplastic nature and the endocervical origin of the lesion.

The role of Pap smear in the diagnostics of endocervical adenocarcinoma.

In the high-income countries, the amount of cervical adenocarcinomas is on the rise. The pap smear sampling has a low sensitivity and a low specificity for endocervical malignancies, and there are only a few cytomorphological features, that are specifically associated with glandular atypia. In this study, 298 pap smears of 60 patients with endocervical adenocarcinoma or adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and 30 patients with high-grade intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) in histology were reviewed. The pap smear type (screening/clinical), the HPV status and the time from sampling to the histological confirmation of diagnosis were recorded for each case. Despite that no cytomorphological features could be associated with adenocarcinoma statistically, 70% of the pap smears were initially correctly diagnosed as an endocervical glandular lesion. Palisading cell borders, nuclear pleomorphism and the lack of single atypical cells present simultaneously were found to be associated with adenocarcinoma and AIS with the corresponding ORs of 5.89 (95% CI 1.96-17.70), 3.71 (95% CI 1.14-12.02) and 10.76 (95% CI 1.20-59.50). This combination of features was seen in smears taken up to 5 years before the histological diagnosis. Of all our screening samples, 10.9% were HPV-positive. There were no HPV-negative samples among patients with adenocarcinoma.

Detection and Outcome of Endocervical Atypia in Cytology in Primary HPV Screening Programme.

Most endocervical adenocarcinomas (EAC) are associated with high-risk HPV (hrHPV) infection, with HPV genotypes 16, 18 and 45 accounting for >90% of the cases. Among endocervical glandular lesions, screening with hrHPV test has previously shown to predict the outcome better than cytology, although around one-fifth of the EAC remain negative both in hrHPV testing and cytology. The study consists of two consecutive HPV-primary screening rounds, conducted in 2012-2015 and 2017-2020. Of the 87 women aged 35 to 60 years of age diagnosed with Atypical endocervical cells, NOS or Atypical endocervical cells, favor neoplastic cytology during the first screening round, 63 (72.4%) were hrHPV positive and 24 (27.6%) were hrHPV negative. Among hrHPV positive patients, three EAC, two adenocarcinomas in situ (AIS), one AIS + high-grade intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and 13 HSIL were found. Of the histologically verified lesions, 68.4% (13/19) were purely of squamous origin. All the EAC and AIS were HPV16 or HPV 18 positive. No high-grade histological lesions were found among the hrHPV negative patients with cytological glandular atypia. A later database search revealed one HPV-negative, gastric-type mucinous EAC that was missed by the HPV primary screening.