RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nursing experts regularly visited the community to deliver safety education on the prevention of unintentional injuries in children to the parents of children aged 0-6 years and to pregnant women in a maternity school. This was undertaken to explore the effects of the measure on preventing unintentional injuries in children in Chizhou, China. METHODS: Using the convenience sampling method, the guardians(it means mother in this study)of children were investigated. The nursing experts visited communities in which the number of nursing experts is declining. Data on unintentional injuries in children in the previous year were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: After the nursing experts delivered safety education to the community, the scores of the questionnaire on unintentional injury prevention knowledge completed by children's guardians increased significantly (p < 0.01). Among the children whose guardians completed the questionnaire, there were 157 cases of unintentional injury in 2020 and 103 cases in 2021 (p < 0.05). The types of unintentional injuries included scratches, falls, sharp object injuries, swallowing of foreign bodies, burns and traffic accidents; there was no statistical difference (p > 0.05). However, there were significant differences in terms of gender ratio and location (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In conjunction with the maternity school for pregnant women and the vaccination programme, nursing experts delivered safety education regarding unintentional injuries in children; this may have promoted safety and protection awareness in the children's guardians and reduced unintentional injuries.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Accidentales , Quemaduras , Heridas y Lesiones , Embarazo , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidentes de Tránsito , Participación de la Comunidad , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/etiología , Heridas y Lesiones/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Chiglitazar (CHI) is a potent and selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor potentially for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). An open-label, randomized, 3-period crossover and self-controlled study was conducted to investigate drug-drug interaction potential between CHI and metformin hydrochloride (MET). Eligible subjects received a single oral dose of CHI (48 mg), MET (1000 mg), or a combination in each period, followed by serial blood sampling collected for up to 48 hours postdose, and safety was assessed throughout the trial. The area under the plasma concentration-time curves from time 0 to 48 hours (AUC0-48 h ) of CHI was similar following administration alone or with MET (AUC0-48h , 12 540 ng·h/mL [9811-15 269 ng·h/mL] vs 12 130 ng·h/mL [9304-14 956 ng·h/mL]; 90% confidence interval [CI] of its geometric mean ratio [GMR], 89.7%-103.8%), whereas the maximum concentration (Cmax ) of CHI was reduced during coadministration, as its 90%CI of the GMR was slightly outside the acceptance range for bioequivalence (Cmax , 1620 ng/mL [1418-1822 ng/mL] vs 1420 ng/mL [1049-1791 ng/mL], 90%CI GMR, 77.%-94.1%). However, it was not considered clinically meaningful. The MET exposures remained consistent in the absence or presence of CHI (AUC0-48 h , 12 570 ng·h/mL [10681-14 459 ng·h/mL] vs 13 190 [10973-15 407 ng·h/mL); 90%CI of GMR: 99.1%-110.5%; Cmax , 1790 ng/mL [1448-2132 ng/mL] vs 1820 ng/mL [1510-2130 ng/mL]; 90%CI of GMR, 94.2%-110.9%). No moderate to severe adverse events were reported. Our study indicated no clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between CHI and MET and demonstrated good tolerance in subjects. These results support future application of CHI in combination with MET for treatment of T2DM.