A decade of cigarette taxation in Bangladesh: lessons learnt for tobacco control.

Bangladesh has achieved a high share of tax in the price of cigarettes (greater than the 75% benchmark), but has not achieved the expected health benefits from reduction in cigarette consumption. In this paper we explore why cigarette taxation has not succeeded in reducing cigarette smoking in Bangladesh. Using government records over 2006-2017, we link trends in tax-paid cigarette sales to cigarette excise tax structure and changes in cigarette taxes and prices. We analysed data on smoking prevalence from Bangladesh Global Adult Tobacco Surveys to study consumption of different tobacco products in 2009 and 2017. Drawing on annual reports from tobacco manufacturers and other literature, we examine demand- and supply-side factors in the cigarette market. In addition to a growing affordability of cigarettes, three factors appear to have undermined the effectiveness of tax and price increases in reducing cigarette consumption in Bangladesh. First, the multitiered excise tax structure widened the price differential between brands and incentivized downward substitution by smokers from higher-price to lower-price cigarettes. Second, income growth and shifting preferences of smokers for better quality products encouraged upward substitution from hand-rolled local cigarettes (bidi) to machine-made low-price cigarettes. Third, the tobacco industry's market expansion and differential pricing strategy changed the relative price to keep low-price cigarettes inexpensive. A high tax share alone may prove inadequate as a barometer of effective tobacco taxation in lower-middle income countries, particularly where the tobacco tax structure is complex, tobacco products prices are relatively low, and the affordability of tobacco products is increasing.

Le Bangladesh applique un fort pourcentage de taxe sur les prix du tabac (au-delà du référent habituel de 75% du prix de détail) sans pour autant avoir atteint le bénéfice sanitaire attendu de réduction du tabagisme. Cet article se penche sur les raisons pour lesquelles la taxation du tabac n'est pas parvenue à réduire le tabagisme au Bangladesh. En utilisant les données gouvernementales couvrant la période comprise en 2006 et 2017, nous avons relié les tendances de vente des produits du tabac taxés avec la structure des droits d'accise sur le tabac et avec l'évolution des prix et des taxes sur le tabac. Nous avons analysé les données relatives à la prévalence du tabagisme à partir des enquêtes sur le tabagisme des adultes (GATS) réalisées en 2009 et 2017 au Bangladesh afin d'étudier la consommation des différents produits du tabac. À partir des rapports annuels des fabricants de tabac et d'autres ressources, nous avons examiné l'évolution du marché du tabac, côté demande et côté offre. Outre le fait que les cigarettes sont devenues plus abordables au fil du temps, trois facteurs semblent avoir sapé l'efficacité de l'augmentation des prix et des taxes dans l'objectif de réduction de la consommation de tabac au Bangladesh. Premièrement, la structure multi-niveau des droits d'accise sur le tabac a eu pour effet d'augmenter le différentiel de prix entre les marques, ce qui a poussé les consommateurs à opter pour des cigarettes moins chères. Deuxièmement, l'augmentation des revenus et le changement de préférence des consommateurs en faveur de produits de meilleure qualité ont fait que les consommateurs ont délaissé le tabac à rouler local (« bidi ¼) pour se tourner vers les cigarettes industrielles les moins chères. Troisièmement, du fait de l'expansion de ses marchés et de sa stratégie de différenciation des prix, l'industrie du tabac a fait évoluer les prix relatifs afin que les cigarettes les moins chères restent abordables. Un fort pourcentage de taxation peut s'avérer inapproprié, à lui seul, en tant que baromètre de l'efficacité des mesures de taxation du tabac dans les pays à revenu faible ou intermédiaire, notamment lorsque la structure de taxation du tabac est complexe, que les prix des produits du tabac sont relativement bas et qu'ils deviennent plus abordables au fil du temps.

Bangladesh ha alcanzado una elevada cuota de impuestos en el precio de los cigarrillos (superior al 75 % de referencia), pero no ha logrado los beneficios para la salud esperados de la reducción del consumo de cigarrillos. En este artículo exploramos por qué los impuestos sobre los cigarrillos no han logrado reducir el consumo de cigarrillos en Bangladesh. Utilizando los registros del gobierno entre 2006 y 2017, vinculamos las tendencias de las ventas de cigarrillos pagados con la estructura de los impuestos al consumo de cigarrillos y los cambios en los impuestos y precios de los cigarrillos. Se analizaron los datos sobre la prevalencia del tabaquismo de la Encuesta Mundial del Tabaco en Adultos de Bangladesh para estudiar el consumo de diferentes productos de tabaco en 2009 y 2017. Basándonos en los informes anuales de los fabricantes de tabaco y otras publicaciones, examinamos los factores de la demanda y la oferta en el mercado de cigarrillos. Además de la creciente asequibilidad de los cigarrillos, tres factores parecen haber socavado la eficacia de los aumentos de impuestos y precios en la reducción del consumo de cigarrillos en Bangladesh. En primer lugar, la estructura del impuesto especial de varios niveles amplió la diferencia de precios entre las marcas e incentivó la sustitución a la baja por parte de los fumadores, que pasaron de los cigarrillos de precio más alto a los de precio más bajo. En segundo lugar, el crecimiento de los ingresos y el cambio de las preferencias de los fumadores por productos de mejor calidad fomentaron la sustitución de los cigarrillos locales enrollados a mano (bidi) por cigarrillos de bajo precio hechos a máquina. Tercero, la expansión del mercado de la industria tabacalera y la estrategia de precios diferenciales cambiaron el precio relativo para mantener los cigarrillos de bajo precio baratos. Una elevada cuota de impuestos por sí sola puede resultar inadecuada como barómetro de los impuestos efectivos sobre el tabaco en los países de ingresos medios-bajos, en particular cuando la estructura de los impuestos sobre el tabaco es compleja, los precios de los productos del tabaco son relativamente bajos y la asequibilidad de los productos del tabaco está aumentando.

Correlates of exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) at home among non-smoking adults in Bangladesh: findings from the ITC Bangladesh survey.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) is a serious global public health problem. Understanding the correlates of SHS exposure could guide the development of evidence based SHS exposure reduction interventions. The purpose of this study is to describe the pattern of and factors associated with SHS exposure among non-smoking adults in Bangladesh. METHODS: Data come from adult non-smokers who participated in the second wave (2010) of the International Tobacco Control Policy (ITC) Evaluation Bangladesh Survey conducted in all six administrative divisions of Bangladesh. A structured questionnaire gathered information on participants' demographic characteristics, pattern of SHS exposure, SHS knowledge, and attitudes towards tobacco control. Exposure to SHS at home was defined as non-smokers who lived with at least one smoker in their household and who reported having no home smoking ban. The data were analyzed using chi-square tests and logistic regression procedures. RESULTS: The SHS exposure rate at home among the participants (N=2813) was 43%. Several sociodemographic and attitudinal factors were associated with SHS exposure. Logistic regression analyses identified eight predictors of SHS exposure: being female (OR=2.35), being aged 15-24 (OR=2.17), being recruited from Dhaka slums (OR=5.19) or non-tribal/non-border areas outside Dhaka (OR=2.19) or tribal/border area (OR=4.36), having lower education (1-8 years: OR=2.45; illiterate: OR=3.00, having higher monthly household income (5000 to <10,000 Taka: OR=2.34; 10,000 Taka or more: OR=2.28), having a father who smoked in the past or currently smokes (OR=2.09), having lower concern about the harms of tobacco on children (unconcerned OR=3.99; moderate concern OR=2.26), and not knowing the fact that SHS causes lung cancer in non-smokers (OR=2.04). CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of non-smoking Bangladeshi adults are exposed to SHS at home. The findings suggest the need for comprehensive tobacco control measures that would improve public understanding about health hazards of SHS exposure at home and encourage educational initiatives to promote smoke-free homes. Interventions should deliver targeted messages to reach those in the low socioeconomic status group.

Support for and potential impacts of key Smokefree 2025 strategies among Maori who smoke.

AIM: The recently passed Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products (Smoked Tobacco) Amendment Act has the potential to profoundly reduce smoking prevalence and related health inequities experienced among Maori. This study examined support for, and potential impacts of, key measures included within the legislation. METHOD: Data came from Wave 1 (2017-2019) of the Te Ara Auahi Kore longitudinal study, which was conducted in partnership with five primary health organisations serving Maori communities. Participants were 701 Maori who smoked. Analysis included both descriptive analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: More Maori participants supported than did not support the Smokefree 2025 (SF2025) goal of reducing smoking prevalence to below 5%, and the key associated measures. Support was greatest for mandating very low nicotine cigarettes (VLNCs). Participants also believed VLNCs would prompt high rates of quitting. Participants who had made more quit attempts or reported less control over their life were more likely to support VLNCs. CONCLUSION: There was support for the SF2025 goal and for key measures that could achieve it. In particular, VLNCs may have significant potential to reduce smoking prevalence among Maori. As part of developing and implementing these measures it will be important to engage with Maori who smoke and their communities.

Smokers' support for the ban on sale of slim cigarettes in six European countries: findings from the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys.

Background: Efforts to regulate tobacco products and reduce consumption in the European Union (EU) include the European Tobacco Products Directive (TPD), which went into force in May 2016. Despite the initial discussion to include a ban on sale of slim cigarettes, it was excluded in the final TPD. The main goal of this study was to examine support for a ban on slim cigarettes among smokers in six European Countries. Methods: Data from the 2018 (Wave 2) International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project 6 European Country (ITC 6E) EUREST-PLUS project survey, a cross sectional study of adult smokers (n=5592) from Germany, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Spain, was analysed. Descriptive statistics were used to estimate support for a ban on slim cigarettes by sociodemographic characteristics and smoking behaviors. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with support for a ban on slim cigarettes and perceptions of harm. Results: Support for a ban on slims varied across countries, with highest support in Romania (33.8%), and lowest in Greece (18.0%). Female smokers (OR=0.78; 95%CI=0.67-0.91, daily smokers (OR=0.68; 95%CI=0.47-0.97), menthol smokers (OR=0.55; 95%CI=0.36-0.86), and smokers who did not have plans to quit within next six months (OR=0.45; 95%CI=0.36-0.56) had significantly lower odds of supporting a ban on slim cigarettes. Overall, 21% of smokers perceived slim cigarettes as less harmful than regular cigarettes. Conclusions: Support for a ban of slim cigarettes was relatively low among smokers, while misperceptions that slim cigarettes are less harmful is high, particularly among countries where slim cigarette use is more prevalent. Findings support a ban on slim cigarettes to reduce misperceptions around slim cigarettes being less harmful.

[Degree of exposure to secondhand smoking and related knowledge, attitude among adults in urban China].

OBJECTIVE: To identify the levels of exposure to second-hand smoking (SHS) among Chinese adults living in the urban areas and their knowledge on the risks of SHS, to support for the Smoke-free policy. METHODS: Data from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) and the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation China Survey (ITC China Survey) was analyzed and SAS was used to calculate the rates and 95%CI. RESULTS: In the two surveys, less than 40% of the respondents reported that their workplaces had completely stopped smoking. Participants who reported that they had seen people smoking at various public places with different rates, also they could reflect the levels to SHS exposure. Restaurants were the venue with the heaviest overall exposure (83.4%-95.6%), followed by the workplace (53.3%-84.0%). Exposure was low in health facilities, schools and public transport venues. In the GATS survey, 60.6% smokers and 68.5% non-smokers believed that SHS could cause lung cancer, but only one-third of the participants believed that SHS could cause heart diseases in adults. Participants in the ITC China survey reported a comparatively higher level of awareness on the harm of SHS, but only 58.2% smokers believed that SHS could cause heart diseases in adults. Overall, data from the ITC China survey showed that participants' support for a comprehensive smoke-free policy in schools, health-related facilities, government buildings and in taxi were high (over 70% ). However, the proportion of participants supporting comprehensive smoking-free policy at workplaces (50.9%-60.9%) was relatively low. CONCLUSION: The proportion of indoor workplaces with complete smoking ban was low in urban areas but levels to SHS exposure were high. People's awareness of harms related to SHS and their attitude on setting up a comprehensive smoke-free workplace need to be improved.