Sodium depletion and secondary hyperaldosteronism in outpatients with an ileostomy: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with an ileostomy may experience postoperative electrolyte derangement and dehydration but are presumed to stabilise thereafter. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of sodium depletion in stable outpatients with an ileostomy and applied established methods to estimate their fluid status. METHODS: We invited 178 patients with an ileostomy through a region-wide Quality-of-Life-survey to undergo outpatient evaluation of their sodium and fluid status. The patients delivered urine and blood samples, had bioelectrical impedance analysis performed and answered a questionnaire regarding dietary habits. RESULTS: Out of 178 invitees, 49 patients with an ileostomy were included; 22 patients (45%, 95% CI, 31-59%) had unmeasurably low urinary sodium excretion (<20 mmol/L), indicative of chronic sodium depletion, and 26% (95% CI, 16-41%) had plasma aldosterone levels above the reference value. Patients with unmeasurably low urinary sodium excretion had low estimated glomerular filtration rates (median 76, IQR 63-89, mL/min/1.73m2) and low venous blood plasma CO2 (median 24, IQR 21-26, mmol/L), indicative of chronic renal impairment and metabolic acidosis. Bioelectrical impedance analysis, plasma osmolality, creatinine and sodium values were not informative in determining sodium status in this population. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of patients with an ileostomy may be chronically sodium depleted, indicated by absent urinary sodium excretion, secondary hyperaldosteronism and chronic renal impairment, despite normal standard biochemical tests. Sodium depletion may adversely affect longstanding renal function. Future studies should investigate methods to estimate and monitor fluid status and aim to develop treatments to improve sodium depletion and dehydration in patients with an ileostomy.IMPACT AND PRACTICE RELEVANCE STATEMENTSodium depletion in otherwise healthy persons with an ileostomy was identified in a few publications from the 1980s. The magnitude of the problem has not been demonstrated before. The present study quantifies the degree of sodium depletion and secondary hyperaldosteronism in this group, and the results may help guide clinicians to optimise treatment. Sodium depletion is easily assessed with a urine sample, and sequelae may possibly be avoided if sodium depletion is detected early and treated. This could ultimately help increase the quality of life in patients with an ileostomy.

Osmolality in oral supplements drives ileostomy output: Defining the Goldilocks zone.

BACKGROUND: Patients with an ileostomy often have impaired quality of life, sodium depletion, secondary hyperaldosteronism, and other organ-specific pathologies. The osmolality of oral supplements influences ileostomy output and increases sodium loss. We hypothesized the existence of an osmolality range in which fluid absorption and secondary natriuresis are optimal. METHODS: This was a single-center, quasi-randomized crossover intervention study, including patients with an ileostomy and no home parenteral support. After an 8-h fasting period, each patient ingested 500 mL of 3-18 different oral supplements and a standardized meal during the various intervention periods, followed by a 6-h collection of ileostomy and urine outputs. The primary outcome was 6-h ileostomy output. RESULTS: A total of 14 ileostomy patients with a median age of 65 years (interquartile range 38-70 years) were included. The association between osmolalities (range 5-1352 mOsm/kg) and ileostomy output forecasted an S-curve. A linear association between osmolality of oral supplements (range 290-600 mOsm/kg) and ileostomy output was identified and assessed with a mixed-effects model. Ileostomy output increased by 57 g/6 h (95% confidence interval (CI) 21-94) when the oral supplement osmolality increased by 100 mOsm/kg (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Osmolality in oral supplements correlated with ileostomy output. Our results indicate that patients with an ileostomy may benefit from increased ingestion of oral supplements with osmolalities between 100 and 290 mOsm/kg. We define this range as the Goldilocks zone, equivalent to optimal fluid and electrolyte absorption.

Bioelectrical impedance analysis as a clinical marker of health status in adult patients with benign gastrointestinal disease: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Body composition reflects nutritional status, disease status and progression, and treatment responses. Mounting evidence supports the use of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) as a non-invasive tool to assess body composition. Patients with benign gastrointestinal (GI) disease experience disease-related alterations in their body composition, and bioimpedance outcomes in patients with benign GI diseases have not previously been summarized. We aimed to evaluate BIA as a clinical body composition marker for benign GI diseases and describe its association with physical health status. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL from inception to October 2023 (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021265866). Of 971 screened studies, 26 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising a total of 2398 adult patients with benign GI disease. The main outcome was raw impedance data. RESULTS: The most frequently reported BIA outcome was phase angle (PhA) (reported in 18 of 26 studies), followed by fat-free-mass (FFM) (reported in 13 of 26 studies). The consensus view of the included studies illustrates that BIA can be a useful tool for evaluating body composition in patients with benign GI diseases, and low PhA and FFM were associated with increased nutritional risk, abnormal physical characteristics, and increased mortality risk. CONCLUSION: To fully utilize BIA as a clinical marker of health in patients with benign GI disease, standardized protocols specific to this population are needed and prospective studies testing cut-offs and ranges, accuracy, and other raw BIA parameters for classifying disease status.