Impact of Detecting Occult Pathologic Nodal Disease During Resection for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) involvement is a poor prognostic factor for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). However, to our knowledge, postresection outcomes of node-negative (cN0/pN0), occult pathologic nodal disease (cN0/pN+), and clinical node-positive disease (cN+) have not been compared to date. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for newly diagnosed, resected MPM with known clinical/pathologic LN information. Three cohorts were compared: cN0/pN0, cN+, and cN0/pN+. Multivariable logistic regression examined predictors of pathologic nodal upstaging. Kaplan-Meier analysis with propensity matching assessed overall survival (OS); multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling examined predictors thereof. RESULTS: Of 1369 patients, 687 (50%) had cN0/pN0, 457 (33%) cN+, and 225 (16%) cN0/pN+ disease. Median follow-up was 29 months. In patients with cN0 disease, factors associated with pathologic nodal upstaging were younger age, greater number of examined LNs, and nonsarcomatoid histology (P < .05 for all). Relative to pN0 cases, occult LN involvement (65% being pN2) was associated with 51% higher hazard of mortality on multivariate analysis (P = .005). Following propensity matching, the OS of cN0/pN+ was similar to cN+ cases (P = .281). On multivariate analysis, the number of involved LNs (continuous variable, P = .013), but not nodal tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) classification or LN ratio (P > .05 for both), was associated with OS. CONCLUSION: Detecting occult nodal disease during resection for cN0 MPM is associated with poorer prognosis, with similar survival as cN+ cases, underscoring the importance of routine preoperative pathologic nodal assessment for potentially resectable MPM. The number of involved LNs (rather than current location-based classification) may provide more robust prognostic stratification for future TNM staging.

Eye-Related Emergency Department Visits and The Opioid Epidemic: a 10-Year Analysis.

PURPOSE: To describe the epidemiology of Emergency Department (ED) visits related to opioid abuse with primary ophthalmic diagnoses in the United States (US). METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study used National ED Sample (NEDS) (2006-2015), a representative sample of all US EDs, to analyze and compare the epidemiology of primary ophthalmic diagnoses in opioid abusers and a control group of non-opioid users. National incidence and descriptive statistics were calculated for demographics and prevalent diagnoses. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare outcomes between primary ophthalmic diagnoses in opioid and non-opioid abusers. RESULTS: An estimated 10,617 visits had a primary ophthalmic diagnosis and an accompanying opioid abuse diagnosis, and the incidence increased from 0.2 in 2006 to 0.6 per 100,000 US population in 2015. Opioid abuse group had more adults (6,747:63.5%) and middle-aged (3,361:31.7%) patients, while in controls adults (7,905,003:40.4%) and children (4,068,534:20.8%) were affected more. Leading etiologies were similar: traumatic and infectious etiologies were most common; however, opioid abuse patients had more severe ophthalmic diagnoses such as orbital fractures (8.4%), orbital cellulitis (7.4%), globe injury (3.4%) and endophthalmitis (3.2%) compared to controls. Patients in the opioid abuse group were also more likely to be admitted (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR], 28.38 [95% CI, 24.50-32.87]). CONCLUSIONS: In the era of opioid crisis, an increase in ED visits with ophthalmic complaints is seen, with increasing direct and indirect costs on the healthcare system. More research is needed to establish causality and devise strategies to lower this burden.