Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Transplant ; 36(1): e14502, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34634150

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Caregiver support is considered necessary after heart transplant (HT) and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) for patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). Few studies have demonstrated how caregivers differ by gender and race, and whether that impacts therapy eligibility. METHODS: We examined caregiver relationships among 674 patients (32% women, 55% Black) evaluated at Emory University from 2011 to 2017. Therapy readiness was assessed using the Stanford Integrated Assessment for Transplant (SIPAT). Evaluation outcome according to caregiver relationship was compared using χ2 analysis. Multivariable logistic regression determined the association between caregiver and eligibility according to gender and race. RESULTS: Women and Black patients were less likely to have spouses as their support person (P < .001). Women were less likely to be considered eligible for advanced therapies (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] .64, 95% confidence interval [CI] .46-.89; P = .008), with Black women having lower eligibility than White women (aOR .28, 95% CI .11-.72; P = .008). Social support and SIPAT scores did not significantly influence eligibility by gender or race. CONCLUSION: Lack of caregiver support is considered a relative contraindication to advanced therapies. Type of caregiver in our cohort varied according to race and gender but did not explain differences in eligibility for advanced therapies.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón , Corazón Auxiliar , Cuidadores , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 34(6): 825-31, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25682551

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Contemporary epidemiology of chronic graft failure (GF) after heart transplantation (HT) is not well described. Moreover, differences in the epidemiology of GF based on race/ethnicity remain poorly understood, despite clear evidence of inferior survival of ethnic minorities after HT. METHODS: The incidence of GF and the population-attributable risk (PAR) of independent risk factors for GF were assessed in 15,255 patients (76% men; mean age 52 ± 12 years) who underwent primary HT from 2004 to 2012. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 4.7 years (interquartile range, 2.3-7.1 years), GF developed in 2,926 patients (19.2%), corresponding to an incidence rate of 39.8/1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 38.4-41.3). Blacks were more likely to develop GF than Hispanics or whites, with incidence rates of 55.1, 42.2, and 36.5/1,000 person-years, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, black race was associated with a higher risk of GF (hazard ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.6; p < 0.001). Blacks and Hispanics were more likely to have risk factors for GF, including low education, public insurance, allosensitization, higher human leukocyte antigen mismatch, non-adherence, and history of rejection requiring hospitalization (all p < 0.001). Rejection requiring hospitalization carried the highest population-attributable risk in all groups, with the highest fraction in blacks (25.8%) compared with whites (18.6%) and Hispanics (15.6%). Socioeconomic and donor risk factors conferred relatively less risk of GF. CONCLUSIONS: Black HT recipients have the highest risk of GF, with immunologic factors conferring the greatest proportion of that risk. Racial differences in risk factors for GF after HT require further study.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/etnología , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Trasplante de Corazón , Grupos Raciales , Adulto , Población Negra , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etnología , Hispánicos o Latinos , Histocompatibilidad/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Población Blanca
3.
Congest Heart Fail ; 15(1): 24-30, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19187404

RESUMEN

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in congestive heart failure (HF) and indicates a worse prognosis. AF increases HF symptoms and increases in prevalence with increasing New York Heart Association class. AF also interferes with the ideal management of HF. Across all HF etiologies, AF may be a marker of disease severity. Yet, controversies exist regarding whether strategies to restore and maintain sinus rhythm can improve outcomes in HF. It is also unclear what the optimal strategy is to suppress the ventricular response to AF in patients with HF. As HF incidence and prevalence continue to rise, the authors sought to reinvestigate current literature that relates AF to HF and examine the impact of therapy on HF and/or AF. The authors performed a literature review using a MEDLINE search from 1966 to the present and included existing literature based on their strength of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Biomarcadores , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Incidencia , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA