Identification and Characterization of Avoidable Hospital Admissions in Patients With Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: More than 50% of patients with lung cancer are admitted to the hospital while receiving treatment, which is a burden to patients and the healthcare system. This study characterizes the risk factors and outcomes of patients with lung cancer who were admitted to the hospital. METHODS: A multidisciplinary oncology care team conducted a retrospective medical record review of patients with lung cancer admitted in 2018. Demographics, disease and admission characteristics, and end-of-life care utilization were recorded. Following a multidisciplinary consensus review process, admissions were determined to be either "avoidable" or "unavoidable." Generalized estimating equation logistic regression models assessed risks and outcomes associated with avoidable admissions. RESULTS: In all, 319 admissions for 188 patients with a median age of 66 years (IQR, 59-74 years) were included. Cancer-related symptoms accounted for 65% of hospitalizations. Common causes of unavoidable hospitalizations were unexpected disease progression causing symptoms, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation, and infection. Of the 47 hospitalizations identified as avoidable (15%), the median overall survival was 1.6 months compared with 9.7 months (hazard ratio, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.34-3.19; P<.001) for unavoidable hospitalizations. Significant reasons for avoidable admissions included cancer-related pain (P=.02), hypervolemia (P=.03), patient desire to initiate hospice services (P=.01), and errors in medication reconciliation or distribution (P<.001). Errors in medication management caused 26% of the avoidable hospitalizations. Of admissions in patients receiving immunotherapy (n=102) or targeted therapy (n=44), 9% were due to adverse effects of treatment. Patients receiving immunotherapy and targeted therapy were at similar risk of avoidable hospitalizations compared with patients not receiving treatment (P=.3 and P=.1, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found that 15% of hospitalizations among patients with lung cancer were potentially avoidable. Uncontrolled symptoms, delayed implementation of end-of-life care, and errors in medication reconciliation were associated with avoidable inpatient admissions. Symptom management tools, palliative care integration, and medication reconciliations may mitigate hospitalization risk.

Management of Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Metastatic Potential of Small Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (ANETs) are rare neoplasms usually discovered incidentally during appendectomy. ANETs < 2 cm were thought to have no metastatic potential, and this dogma has driven management. Our aim is to evaluate the metastatic potential of ANETs < 2 cm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed in a series of patients with ANETs who presented to our tertiary referral center from 1998 to 2019. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 114 patients were included. Median follow-up was 3.3 years (range, 21 days-15 years). At last follow-up, 34 (30%) patients had positive regional lymph nodes and 20 (18%) patients had metastatic disease. Of the 20 patients with metastatic disease, 11 (55%) had primary ANETs < 2 cm. Patient age > 40 years at diagnosis and ANETs with serosal invasion, lymphovascular invasion, intermediate tumor grade, or positive lymph nodes were features significantly more likely to present with metastatic disease. We found no difference in the rate of lymph node positivity, metastatic disease, or overall survival when patients were stratified by tumor size or type of resection (appendectomy vs. right hemicolectomy). On multivariate analysis, patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis had worse overall survival (HR = 24.4, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, tumor size was not a significant risk factor for metastatic disease or worse outcome as many patients with ANETs < 2 cm developed metastatic disease. Appendectomy alone was sufficient surgical management for most ANETs. Patients with risk factors for metastatic disease, regardless of primary ANET size, should be evaluated thoroughly and counseled for further management and surveillance.

Can an amino acid mixture alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms in neuroendocrine tumor patients?

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumors, although relatively rare in incidence, are now the second most prevalent gastrointestinal neoplasm owing to indolent disease biology. A small but significant sub-group of neuroendocrine tumor patients suffer from diarrhea. This is usually secondary to carcinoid syndrome but can also be a result of short gut syndrome, bile acid excess or iatrogenic etiologies. Recently, an amino acid based oral rehydration solution (enterade® Advanced Oncology Formula) was found to have anti-diarrheal properties in preclinical models. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all NET patients treated with enterade® AO was performed after IRB approval. RESULTS: Ninety-eight NET patients who had received enterade® AO at our clinic from May 2017 through June 2019 were included. Patients (N = 49 of 98) with follow up data on bowel movements (BMs) were included for final analysis. Eighty-four percent of patients (41/49) had fewer BMs after taking enterade® AO and 66% (27/41) reported more than 50% reduction in BM frequency. The mean number of daily BMs was 6.6 (range, 3-20) at baseline before initiation of therapy, while the mean number of BMs at 1 week time point post enterade® AO was 2.9 (range, 0-11). CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective observations are encouraging and support prospective validation with appropriate controls in NET patients. This is first published report of the potential anti-diarrheal activity of enterade® AO in NET patients.

Current Treatment Options in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

Poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEPNECs) are a rare neoplasm with a bleak prognosis. Currently there are little prospective data available for optimal treatment. This review discusses the current available regimens and the future direction for the treatment of GEPNECs. Treatment plans for GEPNECs are often adapted from those devised for small cell lung cancer; however, differences in these malignancies exist, and GEPNECs require their own treatment paradigms. As such, current first-line treatment for GEPNECs is platinum-based chemotherapy with etoposide. Studies show that response rate and overall survival remain comparable between cisplatin and carboplatin versus etoposide and irinotecan; however, prognosis remains poor, and more efficacious therapy is needed to treat this malignancy. Additional first-line and second-line treatment options beyond platinum-based chemotherapy have also been investigated and may offer further treatment options, but again with suboptimal outcomes. Recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in low- and intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumors may open the door for further research in its usefulness in GEPNECs. Additionally, the availability of checkpoint inhibitors lends promise to the treatment of GEPNECs. This review highlights the lack of large, prospective studies that focus on the treatment of GEPNECs. There is a need for randomized control trials to elucidate optimal treatment regimens specific to this malignancy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: There are limited data available for the treatment of poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEPNECs) because of the rarity of this malignancy. Much of the treatment regimens used in practice today come from research in small cell lung cancer. Given the poor prognosis of GEPNECs, it is necessary to have treatment paradigms specific to this malignancy. The aim of this literature review is to summarize the available first- and second-line GEPNEC therapy, outline future treatments, and highlight the vast gap in the literature.

Management of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the lung are divided into 4 major types: small cell lung cancer (SCLC), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), atypical carcinoid (AC) or typical carcinoid (TC). Each classification has distinctly different treatment paradigms, making an accurate initial diagnosis essential. The inconsistent clinical presentation of this disease, however, makes this difficult. The objective of this manuscript is to detail the diagnosis and management of the well differentiated pulmonary carcinoid (PC) tumors. A multidisciplinary approach to work up and treatment should be utilized for each patient. A multimodal radiological work-up is used for diagnosis, with contrast enhanced CT predominantly utilized and functional imaging techniques. A definitive diagnosis is based on tissue findings. Surgical management remains the mainstay of therapy and can be curative. In those with advanced disease, medical treatments consist of somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy, targeted therapy, chemotherapy or peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. SSAs are the standard of care in those with metastatic NETs, using either Octreotide long acting repeatable (LAR) or lanreotide as reasonable options, despite a scarcity of prospective data in PCs. Targeted therapies consist of everolimus which is approved for use in PCs, with various studies showing mixed results with other targeted agents. Additionally, radionuclide therapy may be used and has been shown to increase survival and to reduce symptoms in some studies. Prospective trials are needed to determine other strategies that may be beneficial in PCs as well as sequencing of therapy. Successful diagnosis and optimal treatment relies on a multidisciplinary approach in patients with lung NETs. Clinical trials should be used in appropriate patients.

The Role of Capecitabine/Temozolomide in Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are commonly treated with multimodality therapy. The combination of capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) has been suggested as a treatment option for patients with metastatic NETs. We present our experience with CAPTEM. METHODS: Data on NET patients who were placed on CAPTEM and received at least one cycle were obtained from a Velos eResearch database. Response rate was calculated by RECIST 1.1. Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier survival method. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (17 male and 12 female) were included. Median age at CAPTEM initiation was 58 years (range: 26-77). Primary tumors included 9 small bowel (31%), 15 pancreas (52%), 3 lung (10%), and 2 rectum (7%). Median number of CAPTEM cycles was 8 (range: 1-55). Partial response occurred in 5 patients (5 of 29, 17%); 14 patients (14 of 29, 48%) had stable disease, and 10 patients (10 of 29, 34%) had progressive disease. A total of 3 (20%) and 5 (33%) pancreatic NETs experienced partial response and stable disease, respectively. A total of 2 (14%) and 9 (64%) nonpancreatic NETs experienced partial response and stable disease, respectively. Partial response was noted in 1 patient (13%) and stable disease in 5 patients (63%) with Ki-67 values of less than 2%. In patients with Ki-67 values of 2%-20%, partial response was noted in 3 (19%) and stable disease in 8 (50%). Partial response and stable disease were noted in 1 patient each (20%) with Ki-67 values greater than 20%. Median PFS was 12 months. Adverse reactions caused dose reductions in 24% of patients. CONCLUSION: Although adverse reactions were experienced, most patients tolerated this regimen. CAPTEM should be considered as a reasonable treatment option for metastatic NET patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The role of chemotherapy in neuroendocrine tumors has evolved in recent years. The results of this study suggest that the combination of capecitabine and temozolomide provides an adequate treatment option and may prolong survival in patients with a wide variety of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Although prospective data are needed, this research adds to the abundance of retrospective experience with this combination that appears to show that capecitabine and temozolomide could potentially be an option for patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors who have progressed on standard treatment.

Diffuse Idiopathic Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Cell Hyperplasia (DIPNECH) and the Role of Somatostatin analogs: A Case Series.

OBJECTIVES: DIPNECH is a rare pre-neoplastic condition that often presents with a variety of non-specific pulmonary symptoms and sometimes seen in conjunction with pulmonary carcinoid tumors. There are very limited data on use of somatostatin analogs in patients with DIPNECH. We review the long-term outcomes of somatostatin analog therapy with regard to symptom control in patients with DIPNECH. MATERIALS/METHODS: Retrospective study out of our extensive registry of over 2000 neuroendocrine tumors identifies 184 pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. Out of this, there were five histopathologically confirmed cases of DIPNECH. Appropriate institutional review board permission was taken for this analysis. RESULTS: All 5 patients were females, with a mean age at diagnosis was 65.5 years. Follow-up period includes 1-5 years. Cough was the presenting complaint in all five patients described as mostly dry, except for one patient who had productive early morning cough. Other symptoms seen in one of our patients included wheezing, flushing, and fluctuating blood pressure. No one reported weight loss, hemoptysis, and shortness of breath. One of our patients had a benign thyroid nodule and two patients had previous history of breast cancer. All five of our patients were histopathologically diagnosed by lung biopsy. 4 out of 5 patients were started on a somatostatin analog. All four patients reported drastic improvement in cough. One patient reported mild abdominal discomfort and diarrhea as side effects but remained on treatment. CONCLUSIONS: From our single institution review of neuroendocrine pulmonary tumor cases, we found only five cases of DIPNECH, which reaffirms rare nature of the pathology. It primarily affects females over 60 years with dry cough as the most common presenting symptom. Most of our patients responded to treatment with a somatostatin analog and had significant improvement in their presenting symptoms. Somatostatin analogs were well tolerated resulting in significant resolution of presenting symptoms in most of our patients. Further research is needed; however, a trial of somatostatin analogs should be considered in the treatment of patients with DIPNECH with responders being treated long term.

Size and histologic characteristics of lymph node material retrieved from tissue discarded after routine pathologic examination of lung cancer resection specimens.

Redissection of discarded lung resection specimens after routine pathology examination reveals missed lymph node metastasis. We sought to determine if size can be used to grossly select lymph nodes for microscopic examination. This is a prospective cohort study of lymph nodes retrieved from discarded lung resection specimens. The association between size and histologic characteristics of retrieved material was compared by the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. We retrieved 1094 grossly 'lymph node-like" tissue from 112 remnant lung resection specimens, of which 345 (32%) proved not to be lymph nodes and 71 (9%) of 749 lymph nodes had metastasis. Metastasis was present in discarded nodes in 26 (23%) of 112 patients. The non-lymph node tissue was significantly smaller than lymph nodes (P < .0001); lymph nodes with metastases were significantly larger than those without metastases (P < .0001). However, there was significant size overlap between the 3 types of grossly lymph node-like tissue. Thirty-two percent of nodes with metastasis were less than 1 cm; 15% of patients had at least 1 lymph node less than 1 cm with metastasis. The size difference between lymph nodes with and without metastasis is clinically unhelpful because of broad overlap. Size is insufficiently discriminatory and cannot be relied on to select materials for histologic examination. A third of grossly retrieved material was non-lymph node tissue. This probably occurs during routine pathologic examination and likely contributes to the low N1 lymph node count.

Current and emerging strategies for the management of advanced/metastatic lung neuroendocrine tumors.

Pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors represent a spectrum of disease ranging from typical carcinoid tumors to small cell lung cancers. The incidence of low-grade pulmonary NETs has been increasing, leading to improved awareness and the need for more treatment options for this rare cancer. Somatostatin analogs continue to be the backbone of therapy and may be followed or accompanied by targeted therapy, chemotherapy, and immune therapy. The recent addition of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) to the treatment armamentarium of NETs has led to the development of targeted alpha therapy to overcome PRRT resistance and minimize off-target adverse effects. Herein, we aim to highlight current treatment options for patients with advanced low grade pulmonary NETs along with emerging therapies, sequencing of therapies, upcoming clinical trials, and the importance of a multidisciplinary team to improve patient outcomes.

A rare case report of a primary lung cancer comprising adenocarcinoma and atypical carcinoid tumor, with the carcinoid component harboring EML4-ALK rearrangement.

Background: The occurrence of pulmonary adenocarcinoma coexisting with atypical carcinoid tumors is a rare phenomenon. The presence of EML4-ALK fusion in an atypical carcinoid component of a histologically mixed tumor is even more uncommon. Due to their infrequency, the origin and pathogenesis of these mixed tumors remain largely unknown. The advances of therapy development in such patients are still limited and there is no standard treatment. We present a case of collision tumor in the lung consisting of atypical carcinoid and adenocarcinoma to better understand the clinical characteristics of this disease. Case Description: We report an extremely rare case of EML4-ALK rearrangement in a pulmonary atypical carcinoid tumor that coexisting with adenocarcinoma. A 58-year-old woman, who was asymptomatic, underwent pulmonary lobectomy due to the detection of a gradually enlarging solitary pulmonary nodule in the right upper lung. Histological examination of the resected tumor revealed the presence of both atypical carcinoid (approximately 80%) and adenocarcinoma (approximately 20%) components. Metastases by the carcinoid component were observed in mediastinal lymph nodes (station 2R and 4R) and in the primary tumor. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement was detected in both the primary and metastatic lesions of the carcinoid tumor. Four cycles of chemotherapy with etoposide and carboplatin were dispensed after surgery. Conclusions: This is the first reported case of coexisting pulmonary adenocarcinoma and atypical carcinoid tumor with an ALK fusion only detected in the carcinoid component. The presence of ALK rearrangement in pulmonary carcinoid tumor is very uncommon, and there is currently no standard treatment for advanced stages. Therefore, comprehensive molecular testing, including ALK rearrangement analysis, should be recommended for mixed tumors exhibiting features of atypical carcinoid. ALK inhibitors could represent a potential treatment strategy for selected patients.

Alterations in mast cell frequency and relationship to angiogenesis in the rat mammary gland during windows of physiologic tissue remodeling.

BACKGROUND: The mammary epithelium undergoes proliferation and regression accompanied by remodeling of the fibrocellular and vascular stroma. Mast cells are abundant in these compartments and have been implicated in remodeling during wound healing and cancer progression. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that mast cell abundance correlates with physiologic mammary tissue remodeling during estrous cycling, lactogenesis (pregnancy and lactation) and involution. RESULTS: Mast cell and capillary frequency were quantified in the stroma surrounding ducts and lobules from mammary glands of rats. During estrous cycling, periductal mast cell numbers were unchanged, but lobule-associated mast cells significantly increased in the regressive phase of diestrus II. During lactogenesis, lobular stroma mast cells peaked early in pregnancy, at D2, followed by a significant decrease throughout lactation. Involution was associated with a rapid return in mast cell numbers, similar to diestrus II. Lobular vascularization peaked during the state of metestrus, when limited secretory differentiation occurs. Lobular angiogenesis peaked at D7 of pregnancy, regressed, and then returned to high levels during lactation and early involution, when secretory differentiation is high. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest mast cells are predominantly associated with regressive lobular remodeling during cycling and involution, whereas angiogenesis is predominantly associated with secretory differentiation.

Comparison of clinicopathological features and survival analysis between esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on the SEER database, alongside nomogram analysis for esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Background: Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (ENEC) is a rare subtype of esophageal cancer (EC). It presents distinctive clinical and pathological features in comparison to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). To better elucidate the disparities between the two and establish a prognostic prediction model for ENEC, we conducted this study. Methods: Data of ENEC and ESCC patients (1975 to 2016) were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Patients with a confirmed pathological diagnosis of ENEC and ESCC were enrolled in the study. The Chi-square test was employed to compare categorical variables, and the median survival time was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier curve. Training and validation groups were randomly assigned at a ratio of 7:3. Factors with a significance level of <0.05 in the multifactor regression model as well as age were integrated into the nomogram model. Concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and decision curve analyses (DCA) were generated for model validation. Results: This study encompassed a total of 737 ENEC patients and 29,420 ESCC. Compared to ESCC, ENEC patients had higher probability of liver metastasis (13.8% vs. 1.9%, P<0.001), poor differentiation (68.0% vs. 37.1%, P<0.001), and late SEER stage (52.8% vs. 26.9%, P<0.001). Patients who received either surgery, radiotherapy (RT), or chemotherapy had a significantly longer disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) (all P<0.001). After propensity score matching (PSM), ENEC patients were associated with shorter DSS (7.0 months vs. not reached, P<0.0001) and OS (7.0 vs. 12.0 months, P<0.0001) compared to ESCC. Race, SEER stage, surgery, RT, and chemotherapy were identified as predictors of DSS and were incorporated into the nomogram model together with age. The validation of the model using C-index (0.751 and 0.706, respectively) and calibration curves reflected the better discrimination power of the model. In addition, DCA supported the favorable potential clinical effect of the predictive model. Lastly, a risk classification based on the nomogram also verified the reliability of the model. Conclusions: ENEC and ESCC exhibit distinct clinicopathological features. Patients with ENEC experience significantly poorer survival outcomes compared to those with ESCC. Surgical intervention, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy significantly improve OS and DSS for ENEC patients. The nomogram prediction model, constructed based on age, race, stage, and treatment regimen, demonstrates accurate and effective predictive capabilities for prognostic factors in ENEC patients.

Efficacy and toxicity of anti-vascular endothelial growth receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with neuroendocrine tumours - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: Although anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RTKIs) have been tested in patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) over the last two decades, no study to date has benchmarked efficacy and toxicity of these drugs in this patient population. METHODS: All phase II and phase III studies of anti-VEGF RTKIs in patients with NETs, published between January 1, 2000 andJuly 31, 2021, across major trial databases, were searched in August 2021 for relevant studies. The primary objectives of the meta-analysis were to compare objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with pancreatic NETs (pNETs) and extra-pancreatic NETs (epNETs), and the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of adverse events between patients receiving anti-VEGF RTKIs and control. RESULTS: 1611 patients were available for the meta-analysis; 1194 received anti-VEGF RTKIs. ORR in pNETs was 18% (95% confidence interval (CI) 13-25%), while ORR in epNETs was 8% (95% CI 5-12%); test for differences between pNETs and epNETs (x12 = 8.38, p < .01). Median PFS in pNETs was 13.9 months (95% CI 11.43-16.38 months), while median PFS in epNETs was 12.71 months (95% CI 9.37-16.05 months); test for differences between pNETs and epNETs (x12 = .35, p = .55). With regards to common grade 3/4 adverse events , patients who received anti-VEGF RTKIs were more likely to experience hypertension (IRR 3.04, 95% CI 1.63-5.65) and proteinuria (IRR 5.79, 95% CI 1.09-30.74) in comparison to those who received control. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-VEGF RTKIs demonstrate anti-tumour effect in both pNETs and epNETs, supporting their development in both populations. These agents also appear to be safe in patients with NETs.

Treatment Sequencing Strategies in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Review.

Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) incidence has grown. The treatment landscape for advanced NETs is rapidly evolving, but there are limited head-to-head data to guide treatment sequencing decisions. We assessed the available clinical data to aid practicing clinicians in their routine clinical decision-making. Clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy benefits for new therapies in advanced NETs. Emerging long-term data from these trials have enabled clinicians to make more accurate risk-benefit assessments, particularly for patients receiving multiple lines of therapy. However, clinical data specifically regarding treatment sequencing are limited. In lieu of definitive data, treatment sequencing should be based on disease-related factors (e.g., site of tumor origin, volume of disease) and patient-related characteristics (e.g., comorbidities, patient preferences). Clinical decision-making in advanced NETs remains highly individualized and complex; important evidence gaps regarding treatment sequencing remain. Given this, advanced NET management should be a joint effort of multidisciplinary teams at referring and high-volume centers. Additional clinical trial and real-world evidence are needed to meet the challenge of understanding how to sequence available NET therapies. Until these trials are conducted, the best practices provided in this review may serve as a guide for clinicians making treatment sequencing decisions based on the available data.

Sleeve resection after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: We aimed to characterize the outcomes of sleeve resection after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including perioperative and oncologic outcomes, and to identify any impact of operative approach on resultant findings. Methods: We identified patients with NSCLC who underwent sleeve resection after ≥2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy between May 2019 and April 2021 and retrospectively reviewed clinical records. Perioperative data were collected and compared between video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) (n=8) and thoracotomy (n=15) groups. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores were compared between tumors with and without major pathological response (MPR). Results: Twenty-three patients met inclusion criteria, with clinical stages as follows: IB, 2 (8.7%); IIIA, 14 (60.9%); and IIIB, 7 (30.4%). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were recorded in 17 patients (73.9%), including anemia and neutropenia, with no patients exhibiting serious TRAE. Radiological evaluation revealed 5 (21.7%) patients with complete response (CR), 14 (60.9%) with partial response (PR), and 4 (17.4%) with stable disease (SD). Complete resection was accomplished for all patients. One VATS procedure was converted to thoracotomy due to extensive pleural adhesions. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss (87.5±51.8 vs. 193.9±145.3 mL), operative time (198.8±79.7 vs. 225.5±55.0 min), number of lymph node examined (16.9±6.6 vs. 18.2±6.5), and hospital stay (5.5±2.8 vs. 9.2±11.2 days) between the VATS and thoracotomy groups (all P>0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients, and 1 patient died of bronchopleural fistula (BPF) in the thoracotomy group. Complete pathological response (CPR) and MPR were achieved in seven (30.4%) and 13 (56.5%) patients, respectively. Both preoperative histopathology (P=0.024) and radiological response (P=0.002) were significantly associated with MPR. In postoperative specimens with MPR, the IHC scores of cluster of differentiation (CD)4, CD8, and CD20 were modestly higher, while programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1), lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG3) and T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) were lower compared with non-MPR specimens, albeit insignificantly. Conclusions: Sleeve resection after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was feasible in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. Perioperative outcomes were comparable between the VATS and thoracotomy groups.

A multidisciplinary approach to the work up and management of pulmonary carcinoid tumors and DIPNECH: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Low and intermediate grade neuroendocrine tumors of the lung are uncommon malignancies representing 2% of all lung cancers. These are termed typical and atypical pulmonary carcinoid tumors. These can arise in the setting of diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH). The presentation, workup, management and outcomes of patients with these tumors can overlap with more common lung cancers but differ in that many of these patients have a prolonged clinical course. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the literature and provide evidence and expert-based algorithms for work up and treatment of pulmonary carcinoids and DIPNECH. Methods: A search of PubMed and Web of Science databases ending April 15, 2022, with the following keywords "lung carcinoid", "DIPNECH", "lung neuroendocrine," and "bronchopulmonary carcinoid". Key Content and Findings: Pulmonary carcinoid tumors benefit from a multidisciplinary approach. Pre-treatment imaging with contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and DOTATATE positron emission tomography is required. Surgical resection is the gold standard for curative intent, and possibly including sublobar resections. Patients can recur or develop new primaries thus emphasizing the importance of surveillance; national guidelines recommend at least a 10-year follow up. A growing body of literature support the use of endobronchial therapy, with long responses documented. Systemic therapy consists of everolimus, somatostatin analogs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and chemotherapy. Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine tumor cell hyperplasia is rare, but series suggest somatostatin analogs may confer clinical benefit. Conclusions: Pulmonary carcinoid tumors and DIPNECH are rare. Despite lack of regulatory approvals for advanced disease, multiple options are available but should be sequenced according to the clinical status and disease biology. Each patient should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting and clinical trials should be considered if available.

External Validation of a Clinical Score for Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors Under Consideration for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy.

Importance: Despite the benefit of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD NETs), no clinical metric to anticipate benefit from the therapy for individual patients has been previously defined. Objective: To assess whether the prognostic ability of the clinical score (CS) could be validated in an external cohort of patients with WD NETs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study's analysis included patients with WD NETs who were under consideration for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with lutetium-177 (177Lu)-dotatate between March 1, 2016, and March 17, 2020. The original cohort included patients from Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center. The validation cohort included patients from Ochsner Medical Center, Markey Cancer Center, and Rush Medical Center. Patients with paragangliomas, pheochromocytomas and neuroblastomas were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed from June to November 2021. Exposures: PRRT with 177Lu-dotatate or alternate therapies such as everolimus, sunitinib, or capecitabine plus temozolomide. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) and was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method; a Cox proportional-hazards model adjusting for primary tumor site, tumor grade, and number of PRRT doses administered was used to analyze association between CS and outcomes. Results: A total of 126 patients (median age [IQR] age: 63.6 [52.9-70.7] years; 64 male individuals) were included in the validation cohort, and the combined cohort (validation and original cohorts combined) had a total of 248 patients (median [IQR] patient age: 63.3 [53.3-70.3] years; 126 male individuals). In the validation cohort, on multivariable analysis, for each 2-point increase in CS, PFS decreased significantly (hazard ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.64-4.16). After finding an association of the CS with PFS in the validation cohort, the original and validation cohorts were combined into the cohort for this analysis. On multivariable analysis, for each 2-point increase in CS, PFS decreased significantly (hazard ratio, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.89-3.36). Conclusions and Relevance: Increases in CS were associated with worsening PFS in the validation cohort, validating findings from the original cohort. These findings suggest that the CS, to our knowledge, represents the first clinical metric to estimate anticipated benefit from PRRT for patients with WD NETs and may be a clinical tool for patients being considered for PRRT.

Adjuvant therapy for lung neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent a minority of lung cancers and vary from slower growing pulmonary carcinoid (PC) tumors to aggressive small cell lung cancer (SCLC). While SCLC can account for up to 15% of lung cancer, PCs are uncommon and represent about 2% of lung cancers. Surgical resection is the standard of care for early-stage PCs and should also be considered in early stage large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and SCLC. Adjuvant treatment is generally accepted for aggressive LCNEC and SCLC, however, less well established for PCs. Guidelines admit a lack of trials to support a high-level recommendation for adjuvant therapy. This manuscript will discuss the role for adjuvant therapy in NENs and review the available literature.