Emerging drugs for the treatment of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Introduction: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematologic disorder with heterogenous prognosis, but with no curative therapies with exception of allogeneic transplant. Therapeutic options for patients with CMML are limited, and although hypomethylating agents such as azacitidine and decitabine are the standard of care, only 40% of patients achieve a response, and most responses are transient. Over the last 5 years, significant advances have been made in the understanding of the clonal landscape of CMML, some of the mechanisms associated to resistance to HMA, and other key biological processes involved in disease pathogenesis. Areas covered: The current article reviews the most relevant emerging therapies currently undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of previously untreated or relapsed CMML. Expert opinion: The presence of recurrent somatic mutations in CMML represents therapeutic opportunities to utilize specific small molecule inhibitors such as IDH, FLT3, MEK/ERK, PLK1, or splicing inhibitors and modulators. In addition, other novel agents such as immune therapies, BCL2 or MCL1 inhibitors and other monoclonal antibodies could lead to therapeutic advances. Identifying specific patient populations likely to benefit from some of these interventions, and development of optimal combinations will remain the challenge when determining their role in therapy.

Hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax compared with intensive induction chemotherapy regimens in molecularly defined secondary AML.

Molecularly defined secondary acute myeloid leukemia is associated with a prior myeloid neoplasm and confers a worse prognosis. We compared outcomes of molecularly defined secondary AML patients (n = 395) treated with daunorubicin and cytarabine (7 + 3, n = 167), liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (CPX-351, n = 66) or hypomethylating agents (HMA) + venetoclax (VEN) (n = 162). Median overall survival (OS) was comparable between treatment groups among patients aged >60 years. In a multivariable model HMA + VEN vs. 7 + 3 was associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-0.98, p = 0.041]), whereas CPX-351 vs. 7 + 3 was not (HR 0.79 [CI 95% 0.50-1.25, p = 0.31]). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, BCOR and IDH mutations were associated with improved OS; older age, prior myeloid disease, NRAS/KRAS mutations, EZH2 mutation, and monosomal karyotype were associated with worse OS. When analyzed in each treatment separately, the IDH co-mutations benefit was seen with 7 + 3 and the detrimental effect of NRAS/KRAS co-mutations with HMA + VEN and CPX-351. In pairwise comparisons adjusted for age, HMA + VEN was associated with improved OS vs. 7 + 3 in patients with SF3B1 mutation and improved OS vs. CPX-351 in those with RNA splicing factor mutations. In molecularly defined secondary AML treatment with HMA + VEN might be preferred but could further be guided by co-mutations.

Intensive induction chemotherapy vs hypomethylating agents in combination with venetoclax in NPM1-mutant AML.

ABSTRACT: Although intensive induction chemotherapy (IC) remains the standard of care for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), hypomethylating agents + venetoclax (HMA/VEN) can lead to durable remission among older patients with nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutations. Whether IC or HMA/VEN is superior in patients aged ≥60 years with NPM1-mutant AML is unknown. We performed an international, multicenter retrospective cohort study of 221 patients (147 IC and 74 HMA/VEN) with previously untreated NPM1-mutant AML. Composite complete remission (cCR) (defined as CR + CR with incomplete count recovery) rate was similar for IC and HMA/VEN (cCR, 85% vs 74%; P = .067). Although overall survival (OS) was favorable with IC in unselected patients compared with HMA/VEN (24-month OS, 59% [95% confidence interval (CI), 52-69%] vs 38% [95% CI, 27-55%]; P = .013), it was not statistically different among patients aged 60-75 years (60% [95% CI, 52-70%] vs 44% [95% CI, 29-66%]; P = .069) and patients who received an allogeneic stem cell transplant (70% [95% CI, 58-85%] vs 66% [95% CI, 44-100%]; P = .56). Subgroup analyses suggested that patients with normal cytogenetics (24-month OS, 65% [95% CI, 56-74%] with IC vs 40% [95% CI, 26-60%] with HMA/VEN; P = .009) and without FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations might benefit from IC compared with HMA/VEN (24-month OS, 68% [95% CI, 59-79%] vs 43% [95% CI, 29-63%]; P = .008). In multivariable analysis, OS was not statistically different between patients treated with IC and HMA/VEN (hazard ratio for death with HMA/VEN vs IC, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.40-1.27; P = .25).

Value of measurable residual disease monitoring in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia in the era of frontline 'chemotherapy-free' therapy.

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is characterized by the chromosomal translocation t(15;17) and the resulting gene PML-RARA, used for measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring. Despite highly effective therapy for APL, MRD monitoring practices are not fully established. We aimed to assess the value of MRD monitoring by RT-qPCR in patients with APL treated with ATRA and arsenic trioxide +/- GO. We reviewed 223 patients with APL treated with this regimen. RT-qPCR for PML-RARA was measured every 3 months, and at 12, 18, and 24 months after therapy. Seven patients relapsed. Time to relapse was 7.9-12.4 months in 6 patients, and one patient relapsed after 79.5 months. These data show that MRD monitoring may be important for the detection of relapse in patients treated with this regimen within one year after completing therapy, however, since late molecular relapse is rare, our data suggest a low value of MRD monitoring beyond that first year.

The pharmacological management of hairy cell leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a B-cell lymphoid malignancy that accounts for approximately 2% of all leukemias. Treatment with purine nucleoside analogs (PNA) results in a high response rate and remains the standard of care. Long term follow-up shows that most patients relapse and require retreatment. Newer combination strategies and agents have emerged to try to reduce the relapse rate and to address cases of PNA refractoriness. AREAS COVERED: The authors reviewed the literature on the pharmacological management of HCL, including recent studies that led to new agents being incorporated into practice. EXPERT OPINION: Combination of cladribine plus rituximab produces a high rate of measurable residual disease-negative complete remission. In our center, newly diagnosed patients are offered cladribine followed by 8 weekly doses of rituximab in an ongoing phase II trial. Patients in first relapse are also offered this combination if they were initially treated with a single-agent PNA, or if the remission duration was ≥5 years after first-line cladribine plus rituximab. Patients who relapse within 5 years are offered therapy with a novel agent that may include the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib, alone or in combination with rituximab, dabrafenib in combination with trametinib, the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib, or moxetumomab pasudotox.

Validation of a Hematopoietic Cell Transplant-Composite Risk (HCT-CR) Model for Post-Transplant Survival Prediction in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.

PURPOSE: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) outcomes depend on disease and patient characteristics. We previously developed a novel prognostic model, hematopoietic cell transplant composite-risk (HCT-CR) by incorporating the refined disease risk index (DRI-R) and hematopoietic cell transplant-comorbidity/age index (HCT-CI/Age) to predict post-transplant survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Here we aimed to validate and prove the generalizability of the HCT-CR model in an independent cohort of patients with hematologic malignancies receiving AHCT. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Data of consecutive adult patients receiving AHCT for various hematologic malignancies were analyzed. Patients were stratified into four HCT-CR risk groups. The discrimination, calibration performance, and clinical net benefit of the HCT-CR model were tested. RESULTS: The HCT-CR model stratified patients into four risk groups with significantly different overall survival (OS). Three-year OS was 67.4%, 50%, 37.5%, and 29.9% for low, intermediate, high, and very high-risk group, respectively (P < 0.001). The HCT-CR model had better discrimination on OS prediction when compared with the DRI-R and HCT-CI/Age (C-index was 0.69 vs. 0.59 and 0.56, respectively, P < 0.001). The decision curve analysis showed that HCT-CR model provided better clinical utility for patient selection for post-transplant clinical trial than the "treat all" or "treat none" strategy and the use of the DRI-R and HCT-CI/Age model separately. CONCLUSIONS: The HCT-CR can be effectively used to predict post-transplant survival in patients with various hematologic malignancies. This composite model can identify patients who will benefit the most from transplantation and helps physicians in making decisions regarding post-transplant therapy to improve outcomes.