Are accessory spleen screening and resection in refractory immune cytopenia an effective strategy or a waste of resources?

Splenectomy remains an effective treatment for refractory immune cytopenia (RIC), which encompasses immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). Accessory spleens (AS) have been described without identifying specific risk factors. We retrospectively analyzed patients with RIC after splenectomy who underwent splenic scintigraphy (SS) at our institution. Seventy-one patients were included. Sixty-two patients had ITP, five had AIHA, and four had Evans syndrome. Seventy-five percent (n = 53) were women. Eleven patients (15.5%) had an AS detected by SS. A complete response (CR) to first-line steroids (odds ratio (OR) 5.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37-24.14, p = 0.017) and the absence of Howell-Jolly bodies (HJB) in peripheral blood smear (PBS) (OR 11.37, 95% CI 2.70-47.85, p = 0.001) were found to be risk factors. Patients with both elements had a higher rate of AS (83.3%) when compared to those with one or no factors (p < 0.001). Eight patients (73%) underwent an accessory splenectomy: seven (87.5%) achieved a CR, and none had perioperative complications. The presence of HJB in PBS changed from 25 to 87.5% after accessory splenectomy. We recommend the search for an AS via SS in patients with RIC due to ITP, who had a CR to corticosteroids and the absence of HJB in PBS. Accessory splenectomy is a safe and effective procedure.

Splenectomy outcomes in patients with autoimmune cytopenias and persistent antiphospholipid antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Splenectomy is a therapy for patients with treatment-refractory autoimmune cytopenias. Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) can be identified in 25%-85% of these patients. In this study, we sought to identify whether the presence of aPL was associated with worse outcomes in autoimmune cytopenia's patients who had undergone splenectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent splenectomy from 2000 to 2018. We describe clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with autoimmune cytopenia's diagnosis with positive determinations of aPL. Additionally, we performed a case-control sub-analysis 1:1 of the cases with autoimmune cytopenia's matched control patients with negative aPL determination. RESULTS: A splenectomy was performed in 707 patients, of which we included 34 for the analysis. The median age at the time of splenectomy was 37 years (range 19-61), 53% corresponded to immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and 47% to autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). Compared with controls (n = 34), patients had more treatment lines in addition to steroids (p = .02). There were no differences in complete response rate, 65% in cases and 80% in controls (p = .17). However, there was numerically a higher incidence of early infections (21% of cases vs. 3% controls, p = .05). During the entire follow-up, 15% of aPL patients compared with 9% of control patients had a thrombotic event (p = .70). DISCUSSION: Splenectomy for treatment-refractory autoimmune cytopenia's patients with persistent aPL is an effective treatment despite some safety concerns related to early infections. These results suggest that the presence of aPL should not impact the decision to undergo splenectomy.

Are delays in diagnosis and treatment of acute leukemia in a middle-income country associated with poor outcomes? A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Acute leukemias (ALs) are aggressive diseases that lead to death without medical attention. We evaluated the association between delays in diagnosis and poor outcomes in AL by evaluating the symptom onset to treatment intervals in adults with newly diagnosed AL and their effect on an early death (ED). METHODS: We assessed adults diagnosed with AL between 2015 and 2020 and evaluated baseline characteristics, the patient interval (PI), diagnostic interval (DI), treatment interval (TI) and the total time interval (TTI) to determine ED-associated factors. MAIN RESULTS: We assessed 102 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), 57 with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) and 29 with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Median interval days were PI 14, DI 10, TI 4 and TTI 31.5. The TI and TTI intervals were lower in APL than in ALL and AML; TI 1 vs. 4 and 3 (p = 0.001) and TTI 21 vs. 31 and 35 (p = 0.016). The 30-day and 60-day EDs were 13.8% and 20.7%, mainly infections. ECOG > 2 (OR = 15.0) and PI < 7 days (OR = 4.06) were associated with 30-day ED; AML (OR = 2.69), high-risk (OR = 3.34), albumin < 3.5 g/dl (OR = 5) and platelets < 20 × 103/uL (OR = 2.71) with a 60-day ED. CONCLUSION: None of the interval-delays were associated with an ED. Intervals seemed to be longer in patients without an ED, except for the TI, probably because of "the waiting time paradox." Aggressive manifestations of disease may lead to shorter diagnostic intervals, but increased mortality.

A modified CALGB 10403 in adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Central America.

Mexico and Central America have a high incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adolescents and young adults. Historically, this patient group has been treated using adult-based regimens, which entails a high rate of treatment-related mortality and a poor overall survival (OS). The use of the CALGB 10403, a pediatric-inspired regimen, has been proven effective in this patient subgroup. Nonetheless, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) may present limited access to standard care treatments implemented elsewhere, warranting the need for further research to improve outcomes among vulnerable populations. In this study, we present the outcomes in terms of safety and effectiveness of using a modified CALGB 10403 regimen to reflect drug and resource availability in LMICs. Modifications included the use of Escherichia coli asparaginase,6-mercaptopurine instead of thioguanine and the use of rituximab among patients with CD20+. A total of 95 patients with a median age of 23 (range, 14-49) years treated with this modified scheme were prospectively assessed at 5 centers in Mexico and 1 in Guatemala. Among these, 87.8% achieved a complete response after induction. During follow-up, 28.3% of patients relapsed. Two-year OS rate was 72.1%. Factors associated with worse OS included hyperleukocytosis (hazard ratio [HR], 4.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.81-10.10) and postinduction minimal residual disease (HR, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.75-12.44). Most patients presented hepatotoxicity (51.6% and 53.7% during induction and consolidation, respectively), and the treatment-related mortality was 9.5%. Overall, results highlight that implementing a modified CALGB 10403 regimen in Central America is feasible, and it is associated with improvements in clinical outcomes and a manageable safety profile.

Comparison of Two Pediatric-Inspired Regimens to Hyper-CVAD in Hispanic Adolescents and Young Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric-inspired regimens (PIR) in adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia have led to better long-term outcomes. In Latin America, the adolescent and young adult population has an increasing incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia with poor outcomes (5-year OS of approximately 20%) with traditional regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of adolescent and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with PIR in two reference centers in Mexico City between March 2016 and June 2019, in which the primary endpoint was OS, compared to a historic cohort of patients treated with hyper-CVAD treated between February 2009 and June 2015. RESULTS: We compared 73 patients treated with PIR (46 and 27 received modified versions of the ALL-BFM 90 and CALGB C10403 regimens, respectively) and 173 patients treated with hyper-CVAD. Patients treated with PIR experienced higher 4-week complete response rates (79.5% vs. 64.2%; P = .02) and lower relapse rates (44.1% vs. 60.0%; P = .04). OS was significantly higher with PIR than with hyper-CVAD (24 months: 41.5% vs. 28.1%; P = .012). The benefit on OS for PIR was only significant for CALGB (24-month OS: 61.1% vs. 28.0%; P = .01) but not for BFM. In the multivariate analysis, hyperleukocytosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-3.22; P = .02), autologous stem-cell transplantation (HR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.86; P = .02), and 4-week complete response (HR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26-0.70; P < .01) were independent prognostic factors. For the group of patients older than 20 years, only CALGB had an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.97; P = .04). CONCLUSION: In terms of 4-week complete response, relapse rates, and OS, PIR provides benefits to Hispanic patients.

Treating Acute Leukemia During the COVID-19 Pandemic in an Environment With Limited Resources: A Multicenter Experience in Four Latin American Countries.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic is a colossal challenge for global health; nonetheless, specific subgroups face considerably higher risks for infection and mortality. Among patients with malignant diseases, those with hematologic neoplasms are at a higher risk for poor outcomes. The objective of this study was to register treatment modifications associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and their short-term consequences in Latin America. METHODS: Multicenter, prospective, observational, cohort study including patients older than 14 years from 14 centers in four countries (Mexico, Peru, Guatemala, and Panama) who had a confirmed diagnosis of acute leukemia, and who were undergoing active treatment since the first COVID-19 case in each country until the cutoff on July 15, 2020. RESULTS: We recruited 635 patients. Treatment modifications because of the COVID-19 pandemic were reported in 40.8% of cases. The main reason for such modifications was logistic issues (55.0%) and the most frequent modification was chemotherapy delay (42.0%). A total of 13.1% patients developed COVID-19 disease, with a mortality of 37.7%. Several factors were identified as independently associated with mortality, including a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (odds ratio 2.38 [95% CI, 1.47 to 3.84]; P < .001), while the use of telemedicine was identified as a protective factor (odds ratio 0.36 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.82]; P = .014). CONCLUSION: These results highlight the collateral damage of COVID-19 in oncology patients.