Randomized Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial of Vibrating Capsule for Chronic Constipation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Despite therapeutic advances, effective treatments for chronic constipation remain an unmet need. The vibrating capsule is a nonpharmacologic, orally ingested, programmable capsule that vibrates intraluminally to induce bowel movements. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of the vibrating capsule in patients with chronic constipation. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients with chronic constipation, who were randomized to receive either a vibrating or placebo capsule, once daily, 5 days a week for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy end points were an increase of 1 or more complete spontaneous bowel movements per week (CSBM1 responder) or 2 or more CSBMs per week (CSBM2) from baseline during at least 6 of the 8 weeks. Safety analyses were performed. RESULTS: Among 904 patients screened, 312 were enrolled. A greater percentage of patients receiving the vibrating capsule achieved both primary efficacy end points compared with placebo (39.3% vs 22.1%, P = .001 for CSBM1; 22.7% vs 11.4% P = .008 for CSBM2). Significantly greater improvements were seen with the vibrating capsule for the secondary end points of straining, stool consistency, and quality-of-life measures compared with placebo. Adverse events were mild, gastrointestinal in nature, and similar between groups, except that a mild vibrating sensation was reported by 11% of patients in the vibrating capsule group, but none withdrew from the trial. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic constipation, the vibrating capsule was superior to placebo in improving bowel symptoms and quality of life. The vibrating capsule was safe and well tolerated. (Clinical trials.gov, Number: NCT03879239).

Benefits of Prokinetics, Gastroparesis Diet, or Neuromodulators Alone or in Combination for Symptoms of Gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Prokinetics have limited effectiveness for treating symptoms of gastroparesis. Thus, alternative or adjunct therapies, such as gastroparesis diets or neuromodulators, are often prescribed. Their therapeutic benefits alone or in combination remain unclear. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients with symptoms of gastroparesis underwent wireless motility capsule gastric emptying time and gastric emptying scintigraphy. Based on test results, changes in therapy were recommended. Changes in Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) and individual symptom scores over 6 months were related to recommendations for prokinetics, gastroparesis diet, or neuromodulators given as solo new therapies or in dual combinations. Multivariate analyses were performed to adjust for gastric emptying and other variables. RESULTS: In the whole group regardless of therapy, GCSI scores decreased by 0.53 points (interquartile range, -1.25 to 0.05; P < .0001) over 6 months. GCSI did not decrease for prokinetics as solo new therapy (P = .95). Conversely, neuromodulators as solo therapy decreased GCSI scores (P = .04) and all individual symptoms except nausea/vomiting (P = .86). Prokinetics combined with gastroparesis diets or neuromodulators improved GCSI scores (P ≤ .04) and most individual symptoms. Adjusting for gastric emptying time on multivariate analyses showed greater GCSI decreases for nondelayed emptying for neuromodulators as solo new therapy (P = .01). Gastric emptying scintigraphy, gender, diabetes, and functional dyspepsia did not influence responses to any treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Initiating prokinetics as solo new therapy had little benefit for patients with symptoms of gastroparesis. Neuromodulators as the only new therapy decreased symptoms other than nausea and vomiting, especially with nondelayed gastric emptying. Adding gastroparesis diets or neuromodulators to prokinetics offered relief, suggesting that combination therapies may be more useful in managing these patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02022826.).

Pantothenate Kinase Activation Restores Brain Coenzyme A in a Mouse Model of Pantothenate Kinase-Associated Neurodegeneration.

Pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration (PKAN) is characterized by a motor disorder with combinations of dystonia, parkinsonism, and spasticity, leading to premature death. PKAN is caused by mutations in the PANK2 gene that result in loss or reduction of PANK2 protein function. PANK2 is one of three kinases that initiate and regulate coenzyme A biosynthesis from vitamin B5, and the ability of BBP-671, an allosteric activator of pantothenate kinases, to enter the brain and elevate coenzyme A was investigated. The metabolic stability, protein binding, and membrane permeability of BBP-671 all suggest that it has the physical properties required to cross the blood-brain barrier. BBP-671 was detected in plasma, liver, cerebrospinal fluid, and brain following oral administration in rodents, demonstrating the ability of BBP-671 to penetrate the brain. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of orally administered BBP-671 evaluated in cannulated rats showed that coenzyme A (CoA) concentrations were elevated in blood, liver, and brain. BBP-671 elevation of whole-blood acetyl-CoA served as a peripheral pharmacodynamic marker and provided a suitable method to assess target engagement. BBP-671 treatment elevated brain coenzyme A concentrations and improved movement and body weight in a PKAN mouse model. Thus, BBP-671 crosses the blood-brain barrier to correct the brain CoA deficiency in a PKAN mouse model, resulting in improved locomotion and survival and providing a preclinical foundation for the development of BBP-671 as a potential treatment of PKAN. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The blood-brain barrier represents a major hurdle for drugs targeting brain metabolism. This work describes the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of BBP-671, a pantothenate kinase activator. BBP-671 crosses the blood-brain barrier to correct the neuron-specific coenzyme A (CoA) deficiency and improve motor function in a mouse model of pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration. The central role of CoA and acetyl-CoA in intermediary metabolism suggests that pantothenate kinase activators may be useful in modifying neurological metabolic disorders.

Comparative profiles of lubiprostone, linaclotide, and elobixibat for chronic constipation: a systematic literature review with meta-analysis and number needed to treat/harm.

OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively evaluate the efficacy, safety, patient symptoms, and quality-of-life (QoL) of lubiprostone, linaclotide, and elobixibat as treatment for chronic constipation (CC). DESIGN: Systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis (MA). Literature searches were conducted on PubMed and Embase using the Ovid platform. METHODS: SLR including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies was conducted to identify the overall efficacy and safety of lubiprostone, linaclotide, and elobixibat. Thereafter, MA was performed using only RCTs. The number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) analyses were additionally conducted. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was efficacy regarding change in spontaneous bowel movements. Secondary outcomes included safety, constipation-related symptoms, and QoL. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria for the SLR: 17 RCTs, 4 observational studies, and 3 single-arm trials. Feasibility assessment for the MA resulted in 14 studies available for safety data analysis, and 8 available for efficacy analysis, respectively. Three drugs showed similar efficacy in the MA and NNT analysis. However, the NNH analysis revealed distinct safety profiles: lubiprostone, linaclotide, and elobixibat were linked to the highest risk of nausea, diarrhea, and abdominal pain, respectively. CONCLUSION: The current study provides an updated overview of the efficacy, safety, patient symptoms, and QoL of the three drugs with different mechanisms of action for CC treatment.The findings could help physicians adopt an individualized approach for treating patients with CC in clinical practice.

Capsules for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders- A Game Changer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Over the last few decades, there have been remarkable strides in endoscopy and radiological imaging that have advanced gastroenterology. However, the management of neurogastroenterological disorders has lagged behind, in part handicapped by the use of catheter-based manometry that is both non-physiological and uncomfortable. The advent of capsule technology has been a game changer for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications. RECENT FINDINGS: Here, we discuss several capsule devices that are available or under investigation. There are three technologies that are FDA approved. Wireless motility capsule measures pH and pressure and provides clinically impactful information regarding gastric, small intestine and colonic transit, without radiation that has been demonstrated to guide management of gastroparesis, dyspepsia and constipation. Wireless ambulatory pH monitoring capsule is currently the gold standard for assessing gastroesophageal acid reflux. In the therapeutics arena, an orally ingested vibrating capsule has been recently FDA approved for the treatment of chronic constipation, supported by a robust phase 3 clinical trial which showed significant improvement in constipation symptoms and quality of life. There are several capsules currently under investigation. Smart capsule bacterial detection system and Capscan® are capsules that can sample fluid in the small or large bowel and provide microbiome analysis for detection of small intestinal bacterial (SIBO) or fungal overgrowth (SIFO). Another investigational gas sensing capsule analyzing hydrogen, CO2, volatile fatty acids and capsule orientation, can measure regional gut transit time and luminal gas concentrations and assess gastroparesis, constipation or SIBO. Therapeutically, other vibrating capsules are in development. Innovations in capsule technology are poised to transform our ability to investigate gut function physiologically, and non-invasively deliver targeted treatment(s), thereby providing both accurate diagnostic information and luminally-directed, safe therapy.

Plecanatide Improves Abdominal Bloating and Bowel Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation.

BACKGROUND: Bloating is a bothersome symptom in irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). AIM: To evaluate plecanatide efficacy in patients with IBS-C stratified by bloating intensity. METHODS: Pooled phase 3 data (2 randomized, controlled IBS-C trials) from adults treated with plecanatide 3 mg or placebo for 12 weeks were analyzed. Patients were stratified post-hoc by baseline bloating severity (11-point scale: mild [≤ 5] and moderate-to-severe [> 5]). Assessments included change from baseline in bloating, abdominal pain, and complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) frequency. Abdominal pain and bloating composite responders were defined as patients with ≥ 30% improvement from baseline in both bloating and abdominal pain at Week 12. RESULTS: At baseline, 1104/1436 patients with IBS-C (76.9%) reported moderate-to-severe bloating. In the moderate-to-severe bloating subgroup, plecanatide significantly reduced bloating severity versus placebo (least-squares mean change [LSMC]: - 1.7 vs - 1.3; P = 0.002), reduced abdominal pain (- 1.7 vs - 1.3; P = 0.006), and increased CSBM frequency (1.4 vs 0.8; P < 0.0001). In the mild bloating subgroup, significant improvements were observed with plecanatide versus placebo for abdominal pain (LSMC: - 1.3 vs - 1.0; P = 0.046) and CSBM frequency (2.0 vs 1.2; P = 0.003) but not bloating (- 0.9 vs - 0.8; P = 0.28). A significantly greater percentage of patients were abdominal pain and bloating composite responders with plecanatide versus placebo (moderate-to-severe bloating: 33.6% vs 26.8% [P = 0.02]; mild bloating: 38.4% vs 27.2% [P = 0.03]). CONCLUSION: Plecanatide treatment improved IBS-C abdominal and bowel symptoms, including in those who present with moderate-to-severe bloating.

Comparison of Insulin Sensitivity in Subclinical and Overt Hypothyroidism.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of thyroid hormone levels with insulin sensitivity in patients with subclinical (SCH) and overt hypothyroidism (OH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present cross-sectional case-control study observed the association of thyroid hormone levels with insulin sensitivity in patients with SCH and OH as compared to their age-matched controls with euthyroidism (ET). Thyroid profile status, fasting blood sugar and triglyceride level, and basic anthropometric measurements were noted. Fasting insulin level (FIL) was analyzed using serum. Body mass index (BMI) and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) were calculated. RESULTS: Insulin levels were found to be significantly increased (p = 0.038) in patients with SCH as well as those with OH when compared with compared with age-matched ET controls. insulin sensitivity index (ISI) was comparable among the subjects of the three groups. CONCLUSION: Subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) and OH had high insulin levels but without statistically significant association between thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels and QUICKI.

Aberrant cytoplasmic localization of ARID1B activates ERK signaling and promotes oncogenesis.

The ARID1B (BAF250b) subunit of the human SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex is a canonical nuclear tumor suppressor. We employed in silico prediction, intracellular fluorescence and cellular fractionation-based subcellular localization analyses to identify the ARID1B nuclear localization signal (NLS). A cytoplasm-restricted ARID1B-NLS mutant was significantly compromised in its canonical transcription activation and tumor suppressive functions, as expected. Surprisingly however, cytoplasmic localization appeared to induce a gain of oncogenic function for ARID1B, as evidenced from several cell line- and mouse xenograft-based assays. Mechanistically, cytoplasm-localized ARID1B could bind c-RAF (RAF1) and PPP1CA causing stimulation of RAF-ERK signaling and ß-catenin (CTNNB1) transcription activity. ARID1B harboring NLS mutations derived from tumor samples also exhibited aberrant cytoplasmic localization and acquired a neo-morphic oncogenic function via activation of RAF-ERK signaling. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry on a tissue microarray revealed significant correlation of ARID1B cytoplasmic localization with increased levels of active forms of ERK1 and ERK2 (also known as MAPK3 and MAPK1) and of ß-catenin, as well as with advanced tumor stage and lymph node positivity in human primary pancreatic tumor tissues. ARID1B therefore promotes oncogenesis through cytoplasm-based gain-of-function mechanisms in addition to dysregulation in the nucleus.This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

Optimizing the Utility of Anorectal Manometry for Diagnosis and Therapy: A Roundtable Review and Recommendations.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Anorectal manometry (ARM) is a comprehensive diagnostic tool for evaluating patients with constipation, fecal incontinence, or anorectal pain; however, it is not widely utilized for reasons that remain unclear. The aim of this roundtable discussion was to critically examine the current clinical practices of ARM and biofeedback therapy by physicians and surgeons in both academic and community settings. METHODS: Leaders in medical and surgical gastroenterology and physical therapy with interest in anorectal disorders were surveyed regarding practice patterns and utilization of these technologies. Subsequently, a roundtable was held to discuss survey results, explore current diagnostic and therapeutic challenges with these technologies, review the literature, and generate consensus-based recommendations. RESULTS: ARM identifies key pathophysiological abnormalities such as dyssynergic defecation, anal sphincter weakness, or rectal sensory dysfunction, and is a critical component of biofeedback therapy, an evidence-based treatment for patients with dyssynergic defecation and fecal incontinence. Additionally, ARM has the potential to enhance health-related quality of life and reduce healthcare costs. However, it has significant barriers that include a lack of education and training of healthcare providers regarding the utility and availability of ARM and biofeedback procedures, as well as challenges with condition-specific testing protocols and interpretation. Additional barriers include understanding when to perform, where to refer, and how to use these technologies, and confusion over billing practices. CONCLUSIONS: Overcoming these challenges with appropriate education, training, collaborative research, and evidence-based guidelines for ARM testing and biofeedback therapy could significantly enhance patient care of anorectal disorders.

Pathoetiology of Levator Ani Syndrome and Its Treatment With Translumbosacral Neuromodulation Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: The pathoetiology and treatment of levator ani syndrome (LAS) remain unclear. METHODS: We evaluated pathophysiology using translumbosacral motor-evoked potentials and anorectal manometry in patients with LAS and compared with healthy controls. A cohort underwent translumbosacral neuromodulation therapy (TNT). RESULTS: Lumbar and sacral motor-evoked potential latencies were prolonged in 32 patients with LAS compared with 31 controls ( P < 0.013), with higher prevalence of anal neuropathy ( P = 0.026). TNT improved anorectal pain ( P = 0.003) and neuropathy ( P < 0.02) in 13 patients with LAS. DISCUSSION: Patients with LAS demonstrate significant lumbosacral neuropathy that may cause anorectal pain. TNT improved anorectal pain and neuropathy, providing a novel therapeutic option.

Intestinal Disaccharidase Deficiency in Adults: Evaluation and Treatment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Disaccharidase deficiency in adults causes carbohydrate malabsorption, resulting in symptoms which significantly overlap with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). This article discusses the diagnosis and treatment of disaccharidase deficiency within the context of recent literature. RECENT FINDINGS: Disaccharidase deficiency in adults is more common than previously thought, which includes lactase, sucrase, maltase and isomaltase enzymes. Deficiency in disaccharidases, which are produced by the intestinal brush border, will interfere with the breakdown and absorption of carbohydrates and may result in abdominal pain, gas, bloating and diarrhea. Patients deficient in all 4 disaccharidases are known as having "pan-disaccharidase" deficiency, which has a distinct phenotype with more reported weight loss than patients deficient in one enzyme. IBS patients who do not respond to low FODMAP dietary restriction may have undiagnosed disaccharidase deficiency and may benefit from testing. Diagnostic testing methods are limited to duodenal biopsies, which is the gold standard, and breath testing. Dietary restriction and enzyme replacement therapy have been shown to be effective treatments in these patients. Disaccharidase deficiency is an underdiagnosed condition in adults with chronic GI symptoms. Patients who do not respond to traditional treatment strategies for DBGI may benefit from testing for disaccharidase deficiency. Further studies delineating the distinctions between disaccharidase deficient patients and those with other motility disorders are needed.

Baseline Predictors of Longitudinal Changes in Symptom Severity and Quality of Life in Patients With Suspected Gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Whether gastric emptying tests predict longitudinal outcomes in patients with symptoms of gastroparesis is unclear. We aimed to determine whether baseline gastric emptying tests and gut motility parameters could impact longitudinal symptom(s) and quality of life (QOL) in a prospective, observational cohort study of patients with symptoms of gastroparesis. METHODS: One hundred fifty patients with gastroparesis symptoms underwent simultaneous scintigraphy (GES) and wireless motility capsule (WMC) measurement of gastric emptying and other motility parameters. Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Quality of Life were administered at baseline, and 3 and 6 months after testing. Multivariable generalized linear marginal models were fit to determine which baseline parameters predict longitudinal changes in symptoms and QOL. RESULTS: Overall upper GI symptoms and QOL scores were moderate in severity at baseline and significantly improved over 6 months. Clinical variables, including female gender, harder stools by Bristol stool form score, and presence of functional dyspepsia (FD) by Rome III criteria, were predictive of more severe upper GI symptoms. Even after controlling for these clinical factors, delayed gastric emptying by GES or WMC was associated with worse symptom severity and QOL scores. Low gastric and elevated small bowel contractile parameters by WMC were also independently associated with more severe upper GI symptoms and worse QOL scores. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline features, including demographic and clinical variables, delayed gastric emptying and abnormal gastrointestinal contractility, were independent predictors of more severe longitudinal symptoms and worse quality of life outcomes. These factors may help to risk stratify patients and guide treatment decisions. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02022826.

Recognizing and Defining Occasional Constipation: Expert Consensus Recommendations.

Constipation is a common problem, affects 15% of the population, and is often self-diagnosed and self-managed. Over the past 3 decades, there have been significant advances in our understanding and management of chronic constipation, with the emerging recognition that occasional constipation (OC) is another subtype that falls outside current classifications. The purpose of this review was to describe the process of developing and proposing a new definition for OC based on expert consensus and taking into consideration the multifactorial nature of the problem such as alterations in bowel habit that include stool frequency and difficulty with stool passage, perception of the sufferer, duration of symptoms, and potential responsiveness to treatment. Leading gastroenterologists from 5 countries met virtually on multiple occasions through an online digital platform to discuss the problem of OC and recommended a practical, user-friendly definition: "OC can be defined as intermittent or occasional symptomatic alteration(s) in bowel habit. This includes a bothersome reduction in the frequency of bowel movements and/or difficulty with passage of stools but without alarming features. Bowel symptoms may last for a few days or a few weeks, and episodes may require modification of lifestyle, dietary habits and/or use of over-the-counter laxatives or bulking agents to restore a satisfactory bowel habit." Prospective studies are required to validate this definition and determine OC prevalence in the community. This review highlights current knowledge gaps and could provide impetus for future research to facilitate an improved understanding of OC and development of evidence-based management guidelines.

A Single Fasting Exhaled Methane Level Correlates With Fecal Methanogen Load, Clinical Symptoms and Accurately Detects Intestinal Methanogen Overgrowth.

INTRODUCTION: A 2-hour breath test is the gold standard for diagnosing intestinal methanogen overgrowth (IMO). This method can be cumbersome especially if used repetitively to monitor treatment response. Therefore, we aimed to assess the reliability of a fasting single methane measurement (SMM) in diagnosing IMO and its utility as a biomarker to monitor treatment response in subjects with IMO. METHODS: First, we calculated the test characteristics of SMM compared with lactulose and glucose breath test in 2 large-scale retrospective cohorts. Second, the symptomology associated with SMM using various cutoffs was analyzed. Third, in a double-blind randomized control trial, the temporal stability of SMM levels in subjects taking placebo was analyzed. Fourth, stool Methanobrevibacter smithii loads were quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and compared with SMM levels. Last, the change in SMM over time during antibiotic therapy was analyzed. RESULTS: Using the cutoff of SMM ≥10 ppm, SMM had a sensitivity of 86.4% and specificity of 100% for diagnosing IMO on the glucose and lactulose breath tests and was associated with constipation (5.65 ± 3.47 vs 4.32 ± 3.62, P = 0.008). SMM remained stable for 14 weeks without treatment (P = 0.45), and antibiotics lead to a decrease in SMM after 2 days (P < 0.0001). SMM was positively associate with stool M. smithii load (R = 0.65, P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Fasting SMM ≥10 ppm seems to accurately diagnose IMO, is associated with constipation, and correlates with stool M. smithii. SMM seems to be stable without treatment and decreases after antibiotics. SMM may be a useful test to diagnose IMO and monitor treatment response.

Bacterial overgrowth and lactose intolerance: how to best assess.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an up-to-date review on the clinical assessment of two important gastrointestinal problems with overlapping symptomatology but diverse cause and testing methods. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is characterized by the presence of excess bacteria in the small intestine associated with bloating, distention, gas, and diarrhea. Lactose intolerance is caused by lactase enzyme deficiency in the small bowel mucosa leading to lactose malabsorption and symptoms of bloating, gas, and diarrhea. RECENT FINDINGS: SIBO is assessed by hydrogen/methane breath test using glucose as a substrate and/or small bowel aspirate and culture but these tests have shortcomings. Consequently, several new diagnostic techniques, including novel capsule technologies and other approaches are being evaluated. Lactose intolerance can be assessed by hydrogen/methane breath test using lactose as a substrate, or small bowel mucosal lactase assay, genetic testing and lactose tolerance test, although the efficacy and practicality of these diagnostic modalities are not equal. SUMMARY: In clinical practice, gas, bloating, distention, pain, and diarrhea are common gastrointestinal symptoms that often remain unexplained when routine gastrointestinal endoscopy, imaging, and stool tests are negative. These patients should be evaluated for SIBO and/or food intolerances including lactose intolerance.

Translumbosacral Anorectal Magnetic Stimulation Test for Fecal Incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Neuropathy may cause fecal incontinence and mixed fecal incontinence/constipation, but its prevalence is unclear, partly due to the lack of comprehensive testing of spino-anorectal innervation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and determine the clinical usefulness of a novel test, translumbosacral anorectal magnetic stimulation for fecal incontinence. DESIGN: This observational cohort study was conducted from 2012 to 2018. SETTINGS: This study was performed at a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients with fecal incontinence, patients with mixed fecal incontinence/constipation, and healthy controls were included. INTERVENTIONS: A translumbosacral anorectal magnetic stimulation test was performed by using an anorectal probe with 4 ring electrodes and magnetic coil, and by stimulating bilateral lumbar and sacral plexuses, uses and recording 8 motor-evoked potentials at anal and rectal sites. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence of lumbar and/or sacral neuropathy was examined. Secondary outcomes were correlation of neuropathy with anorectal sensorimotor function(s) and morphological changes. RESULTS: We evaluated 220 patients: 144 with fecal incontinence, 76 with mixed fecal incontinence/constipation, and 31 healthy controls. All 8 lumbar and sacral motor-evoked potential latencies were significantly prolonged (p < 0.01) in fecal incontinence and mixed fecal incontinence/constipation groups compared with controls. Neuropathy was patchy and involved 4.0 (3.0) (median (interquartile range)) sites. Lumbar neuropathy was seen in 29% to 65% of the patients in the fecal incontinence group and 22% to 61% of the patients in the mixed fecal incontinence/constipation group, and sacral neuropathy was seen in 24% to 64% and 29% to 61% of these patients. Anal neuropathy was significantly more (p < 0.001) prevalent than rectal neuropathy in both groups. There was no correlation between motor-evoked potential latencies and anal sphincter pressures, rectal sensation, or anal sphincter defects. LIMITATIONS: No comparative analysis with electromyography was performed. CONCLUSION: Lumbar or sacral plexus neuropathy was detected in 40% to 75% of patients with fecal incontinence with a 2-fold greater prevalence at the anal region than the rectum. Lumbosacral neuropathy appears to be an independent mechanism in the pathogenesis of fecal incontinence, unassociated with other sensorimotor dysfunctions. Translumbosacral anorectal magnetic stimulation has a high yield and is a safe and clinically useful neurophysiological test. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B728. PRUEBA DE ESTIMULACIN MAGNTICA TRANSLUMBOSACRAL ANORECTAL PARA LA INCONTINENCIA FECAL: ANTECEDENTES:La neuropatía puede causar incontinencia fecal y una combinación de incontinencia fe-cal/estreñimiento, pero su prevalencia no está clara, en parte debido a la falta de pruebas comple-tas de inervación espino-anorrectal.OBJETIVO:Desarrollar y determinar la utilidad clínica de una nueva prueba, estimulación magnética trans-lumbosacral anorrectal para la incontinencia fecal.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte observacional del 2012 al 2018.ENTORNO CLINICO:Centro de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Pacientes con incontinencia fecal, combinación de incontinencia fecal/estreñimiento y controles sanos.INTERVENCIONES:Se realizó una prueba de estimulación magnética translumbosacral anorrectal utilizando una sonda anorrectal con 4 electrodos anulares y bobina magnética, y estimulando los plexos lumbares y sacros bilaterales y registrando ocho potenciales evocados motores las regiones anal y rectal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se examinó la prevalencia de neuropatía lumbar y/o sacra. Los resultados secundarios fueron la correlación de la neuropatía con las funciones sensitivomotoras anorrectales y cambios morfológi-cos.RESULTADOS:Evaluamos 220 pacientes, 144 con incontinencia fecal, 76 con combinación de incontinencia fe-cal/estreñimiento y 31 sujetos sanos. Las ocho latencias de los potenciales evocadas motoras lum-bares y sacras se prolongaron significativamente (p <0,01) en la incontinencia fecal y el grupo mixto en comparación con los controles. La neuropatía fue irregular y afectaba 4,0 (3,0) (mediana (rango intercuartílico) sitios. Se observó neuropatía lumbar en 29-65% en la incontinencia fecal y 22-61% en el grupo mixto, y neuropatía sacra en 24-64% y 29-61 % de pacientes respectivamen-te. La neuropatía anal fue significativamente más prevalente (p <0,001) que la rectal en ambos grupos. No hubo correlación entre las latencias de los potenciales evocadas motoras y las presio-nes del esfínter anal, la sensación rectal o los defectos del esfínter anal.LIMITACIONES:Sin análisis comparativo con electromiografía.CONCLUSIÓNES:Se detectó neuropatía del plexo lumbar o sacro en el 40-75% de los pacientes con incontinencia fecal con una prevalencia dos veces mayor en la región anal que en el recto. La neuropatía lumbo-sacra parece ser un mecanismo independiente en la patogenia de la incontinencia fecal, no asocia-do con otras disfunciones sensitivomotoras. La estimulación magnética translumbosacral anorrec-tal tiene un alto rendimiento, es una prueba neurofisiológica segura y clínicamente útil. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B728.

Organizing and Developing a GI Motility Lab in Community Practice: Challenges and Rewards.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Neurogastroenterology and motility is a rapidly evolving subspecialty that encompasses over 33% of gastroenterological disorders, and up to 50% of referrals to gastroenterology practice. It includes common problems such as dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic constipation, gastroparesis, functional dyspepsia, gas/bloating, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, food intolerance and fecal incontinence Standard diagnostic tests such as endoscopy or imaging are normal in these conditions. To define the underlying mechanism(s)/etiology of these disorders, diagnostic motility tests are often required. These are best performed by well-trained personnel in a dedicated motility laboratory. Our purpose is to provide an up-to-date overview on how to organize and develop a motility laboratory based on our collective experiences in setting up such facilities in academia and community practice. RECENT FINDINGS: A lack of knowledge, training and facilities for providing diagnostic motility tests has led to suboptimal patient care. A motility laboratory is the hub for diagnostic and therapeutic motility procedures. Common procedures include esophageal function tests such as esophageal manometry and pH monitoring, anorectal function tests suchlike anorectal manometry, neurophysiology and balloon expulsion, dysbiosis and food intolerance tests such as hydrogen/methane breath tests, and gastrointestinal transit assessment. These tests provide an accurate diagnosis and guide clinical management including use of medications, biofeedback therapy, neuromodulation, behavioral therapies, evidence-based dietary interventions and endoscopic or surgical procedures. Further, there have been recent developments in billing and coding of motility procedures and training requirements that are not well known. This review provides a stepwise approach on how to set-up a motility laboratory in the community or academic practice and includes the rationale, infrastructure, staffing needs, commonly performed motility tests and their clinical utility, billing and coding strategies, training needs and economic considerations for setting up this service.

Long-Term Risks of Parkinson's Disease, Surgery, and Colorectal Cancer in Patients With Slow-Transit Constipation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Long-term outcomes of constipation have not been evaluated fully. We investigated the incidence of Parkinson's disease, constipation-related surgery, and colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with constipation and slow-transit constipation (STC), followed up for up to 20 years. METHODS: We collected data from 2165 patients (33.1% men; median patient age, 54 y; median symptom duration, 5.0 y) with a diagnosis of constipation (based on Rome II criteria) who underwent an anorectal function test and a colonic transit time study, from 2000 through 2010, at a tertiary university hospital in Seoul, South Korea. The presence of STC was determined from colonic transit time. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to analyze and compare cumulative probabilities of a new diagnosis of Parkinson's disease or CRC according to the presence of STC. The patients were followed up until the end of 2019. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 4.7 years (interquartile range, 0.7-8.3 y), 10 patients underwent constipation-related surgery. The cumulative probabilities of constipation-related surgery were 0.7% at 5 years and 0.8% at 10 years after a diagnosis of constipation. Twenty-nine patients (1.3%) developed Parkinson's disease; the cumulative probabilities were 0.4% at 1 year, 1.0% at 5 years, and 2.6% at 10 years after a diagnosis of constipation. At 10 years, 1.3% of patients with STC required constipation-related surgery and 3.5% of patients with STC developed Parkinson's disease; in contrast, none of the patients without STC required constipation-related surgery (P = .003), and 1.5% developed Parkinson's disease (P = .019). In multivariate analysis, patient age of 65 years or older at the diagnosis of constipation (hazard ratio, 4.834; 95% CI, 2.088-11.190) and the presence of STC (hazard ratio, 2.477; 95% CI, 1.046-5.866) were associated independently with the development of Parkinson's disease. Only 5 patients had a new diagnosis of CRC during the follow-up period. The risk of CRC did not differ significantly between patients with vs without STC (P = .575). CONCLUSIONS: In a long-term follow-up study of patients with constipation in Korea, most patients had no severe complications. However, patients older than age 65 years with a new diagnosis of STC might be considered for Parkinson's disease screening.

Efficacy and Safety of Over-the-Counter Therapies for Chronic Constipation: An Updated Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Constipation is commonly treated with over-the-counter (OTC) products whose efficacy and safety remain unclear. We performed a systematic review of OTC therapies for chronic constipation and provide evidence-based recommendations. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase for randomized controlled trials of ≥4-week duration that evaluated OTC preparations between 2004 and 2020. Studies were scored using the US Preventive Services Task Force criteria (0-5 scale) including randomization, blinding, and withdrawals. The strengths of evidence were adjudicated within each therapeutic category, and recommendations were graded (A, B, C, D, and I) based on the level of evidence (level I, good; II, fair; or III, poor). RESULTS: Of 1,297 studies identified, 41 met the inclusion criteria. There was good evidence (grade A recommendation) for the use of the osmotic laxative polyethylene glycol (PEG) and the stimulant senna; moderate evidence (grade B) for psyllium, SupraFiber, magnesium salts, stimulants (bisacodyl and sodium picosulfate), fruit-based laxatives (kiwi, mango, prunes, and ficus), and yogurt with galacto-oligosaccharide/prunes/linseed oil; and insufficient evidence (grade I) for polydextrose, inulin, and fructo-oligosaccharide. Diarrhea, nausea, bloating, and abdominal pain were common adverse events, but no serious adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION: The spectrum of OTC products has increased and quality of evidence has improved, but methodological issues including variability in study design, primary outcome measures, trial duration, and small sample sizes remain. We found good evidence to recommend polyethylene glycol or senna as first-line laxatives and moderate evidence supporting fiber supplements, fruits, stimulant laxatives, and magnesium-based products. For others, further validation with more rigorously designed studies is warranted.

Translumbosacral Neuromodulation Therapy for Fecal Incontinence: A Randomized Frequency Response Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Treatments for fecal incontinence (FI) remain unsatisfactory because they do not remedy the underlying multifactorial dysfunction(s) including anorectal neuropathy. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal dose frequency, clinical effects, and safety of a novel treatment, translumbosacral neuromodulation therapy (TNT), aimed at improving neuropathy. METHODS: Patients with FI were randomized to receive 6 sessions of weekly TNT treatments consisting of 600 repetitive magnetic stimulations over each of 2 lumbar and 2 sacral sites with either 1, 5, or 15 Hz frequency. Stool diaries, FI severity indices, anorectal neurophysiology and sensorimotor function, and quality of life were compared. Primary outcome measure was the change in FI episodes/week. Responders were patients with ≥50% decrease in weekly FI episodes. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with FI participated. FI episodes decreased significantly (∆ ±95% confidence interval, 4.2 ± 2.8 (1 Hz); 2 ± 1.7 (5 Hz); 3.4 ± 2.5 (15 Hz); P < 0.02) in all 3 groups when compared with baseline. The 1 Hz group showed a significantly higher (P = 0.04) responder rate (91 ± 9.1%) when compared with the 5 Hz group (36 ± 18.2%) or 15 Hz (55 ± 18.2%); no difference was found between the 5 and 15 Hz groups (P = 0.667). Anal neuropathy, squeeze pressure, and rectal capacity improved significantly only in the 1 Hz (P < 0.05) group compared with baseline, but not in other groups. Quality of life domains improved significantly (P < 0.05) with 1 and 5 Hz groups. No device-related serious adverse events were noted. DISCUSSION: TNT significantly improves FI symptoms in the short term, and the 1 Hz frequency was overall better than 5 and 15 Hz. Both anorectal neuropathy and physiology significantly improved, demonstrating mechanistic improvement. TNT is a promising, novel, safe, efficacious, and noninvasive treatment for FI (see Visual Abstract, Supplementary Digital Content 3, http://links.lww.com/AJG/B598).