Progress against lung cancer, Denmark, 2008-2022.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There has been marked progress against lung cancer in Denmark. To gain further insight into the different aspects of the improvement, we examined the stage-specific incidence rates, stage-specific survival and mortality rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used information from the Danish Lung Cancer Registry on date of diagnosis and clinical stage to calculate age-standardised incidence rates and patient survival by sex, period and stage. Information about age-standardised lung cancer-specific mortality rates by sex and period was extracted from The Danish Health Data Authority. RESULTS: Firstly, the decrease in incidence rates was due to a reduction in the rates of advanced stages. Secondly, there was a gradual increase in survival across all stages, and thirdly, the mortality rates gradually decreased over time. INTERPRETATION: The improvements in survival and mortality from lung cancer were due to decreasing incidence rates of advanced cancer and improvement in survival at all stages of the disease.

Consequences of Losing Incidental Pulmonary Nodules to Follow-Up: Unmonitored Nodules Progressing to Stage IV Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death globally. Incidental pulmonary nodules represent a golden opportunity for early diagnosis, which is critical for improving survival rates. This study explores the impact of missed pulmonary nodules on the progression of lung cancer. METHODS: A total of 4,066 stage IV lung cancer cases from 2019 to 2021 in Danish hospitals were investigated to determine whether a chest computed tomography (CT) had been performed within 2 years before diagnosis. CT reports and images were reviewed to identify nodules that had been missed by radiologists or were not appropriately monitored, despite being mentioned by the radiologist, and to assess whether these nodules had progressed to stage IV lung cancer. RESULTS: Among stage IV lung cancer patients, 13.6% had undergone a chest CT scan before their diagnosis; of these, 44.4% had nodules mentioned. Radiologists missed a nodule in 7.6% of cases. In total, 45.3% of nodules were not appropriately monitored. An estimated 2.5% of stage IV cases could have been detected earlier with proper surveillance. CONCLUSION: This study underlines the significance of monitoring pulmonary nodules and proposes strategies for enhancing detection and surveillance. These strategies include centralized monitoring and the implementation of automated registries to prevent gaps in follow-up.

Increased use of diagnostic CT imaging increases the detection of stage IA lung cancer: pathways and patient characteristics.

BACKGROUND: At Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Denmark, the number of stage IA lung cancer increased after implementation of increased use of CT investigations and a corresponding reduction in chest X-ray. The aim of the present study was to understand the changes in referral pathways, patient characteristics and imaging procedures behind the observed increase in early-stage lung cancer. METHODS: The referral and imaging pathways for all patients diagnosed with lung cancer in 2013-2018 were described based on manually curated information from the electronic health care systems and staging information from the Danish Lung Cancer Registry. We compared the clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed in 2013-2015 and in 2016-2018 after implementation of a change in the use of low dose CT scan (LDCT). For patients diagnosed in 2016-2018, stage IA lung cancer were compared to higher stages using univariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Five hundred and forty-seven patients were diagnosed with lung cancer in 2013-2018. Stage IA constituted 13.8% (34/247) in 2013-2015, and 28.3% (85/300) in 2016-2018. Stage IA patients in 2016-2018 were characterised by more comorbidity, fewer packyears and tended to be older than patients with higher stages. In 2016-2018, the largest proportion of stage IA patients (55%) came from within-hospital referrals. The majority of these lung cancers were detected due to imaging procedures with other indications than suspicion of lung cancer. The proportion of stage IA increased from 12% (12/99) to 36% (47/129) (p < 0.001) for hospital referrals and from 17% (22/129) to 23% (38/165) for GP referrals (p = 0.21). The imaging procedures contributing to the increase in stage IA was contrast enhanced CT (22%¸11/51), LDCT (35%; 18/51) and X-ray followed by LDCT (25%; 13/51). CONCLUSION: The increased access to LDCT for patients referred from general practice and the increased hospital requested CT activity resulted in an increase in the number of stage IA lung cancers. Incidental findings on imaging performed for diagnostic purposes unrelated to suspicion of lung cancer contributed a large proportion of the increase.

Does the Addition of Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound Improve the Diagnostic Yield of Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy? A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Early diagnosis is crucial to increased survival rates. Radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS) and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) have been developed for the diagnosis of small lung lesions. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate whether the combination of rEBUS and ENB is superior to ENB alone. METHOD: A systematic search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases on "ENB," and conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The project was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020214682. RESULTS: In total, 2,092 studies were identified through a literature search. Five studies were included in the final review. One study found that the addition of rEBUS increased diagnostic yield, while another concluded the converse. Three studies did not have significant results. Meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity and the small number of studies. CONCLUSION: As the current evidence on the topic is sparse and heterogeneous, it is not possible to conclude whether the addition of rEBUS to ENB has a significant impact on diagnostic yield. Further studies are needed to illuminate this question in order to ensure optimal choice of endoscopic technique as well as used time and resources. The project received funding from the Region of Southern Denmark's PhD fund.

Stage I lung cancer patients with or without symptoms - are the patients different and should we treat them differently?

INTRODUCTION: A large proportion of stage I cancers are found incidentally, which appears to be a prognostic factor. We investigated stage I lung cancers according to whether, or not, there had been clinical suspicion of lung cancer prior to referral and to see, if we could detect any difference regarding patient characteristics, work-up and mortality for incidental vs non-incidental findings as well as for asymptomatic vs symptomatic patients. METHODS: Medical records and referral documents for 177 patients diagnosed with stage I lung cancer were reviewed and divided based on whether the initial CT scan leading to diagnosis had been made due to suspicion of lung cancer or not. Patient characteristics and mortality between groups were compared, as well as mortality between patients with and without symptoms at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: One-hundred-and-eight patients were diagnosed incidentally, while 69 patients were non-incidental findings. Among the incidental findings, 55% had no symptoms, whereas none in the non-incidental group were asymptomatic. Personal characteristics were comparable between the groups. Significantly more patients in the incidental group had malignant comorbidity. Non-malignant chronic co-morbidity was more prevalent in the non-incidental group, in particular lung disease. There was no difference in tumour size, histology, or survival for incidental vs non-incidental or for asymptomatic vs symptomatic patients. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of stage I lung cancers are found incidentally, especially in patients with malignant co-morbidity. We found no difference in survival to indicate that we did or should handle these patient groups differently.

Comorbidity and early death in Danish stage I lung cancer patients - an individualised approach.

Background: Comorbidity is an important prognostic marker and a treatment indicator for lung cancer patients. Register-based studies often describe the burden of comorbidity by the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) based on hospital discharge data. We assessed the association between somatic and psychiatric comorbidity and death within one year in early lung cancer and, furthermore, the burden of comorbidity according to treatment type.Material and methods: We conducted a population-based matched case-control study of stage I lung cancer identifying all treated patients who died (all-cause) within one year after diagnosis (early death group, cases). On the basis of data from the Danish Lung Cancer Registry these patients were then matched with two controls who survived more than one year (survivors). Through a review of the medical records, we validated inclusion criteria and collected data on somatic and psychiatric comorbidity. We assessed the association between comorbidity and early death with multivariate conditional logistic regression.Results: We included 221 cases and 410 controls. The mean CCI score in the early death group was 2.3 vs. 1.3 in the survivor group (p < .001). Still, 22% vs. 30% had a CCI score of zero (p = .04) with an average number of comorbidities among these patients of 1.63 vs. 1.06 respectively (p = .006). Among women, 23% in the early death group had depression vs. 13% in the survivor group, corresponding to an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of 2.0 (CI 95% 1.0-3.7). However, in an adjusted analysis (incl. somatic comorbidities) the OR was 1.7 (CI 95% 0.8-3.5). Patients undergoing oncological therapy were older and tended to have more somatic comorbidities than the surgically treated patients.Conclusion: Comorbidity remains a significant prognostic marker even for stage I lung cancer patients with a CCI score of zero. The suggested association between early death and depression among women needs to be studied further.

Vitamin B12 and its binding proteins in patients with non-small cell lung cancer referred to fast-track diagnostic work-up for lung cancer.

High cobalamin levels have previously been associated with short-term cancer risk, including lung cancer. We explored whether levels of cobalamin and/or its binding proteins are useful as a diagnostic tool in patients suspected of non-small cell lung cancer. We included 889 patients referred for fast-track diagnosis of lung cancer to Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. We analyzed plasma concentrations of cobalamin, transcobalamin, holotranscobalamin and haptocorrin. Information on lung cancer diagnosis was retrieved from a national database. The study cohort showed levels above reference intervals for cobalamin 12%, holotranscobalamin 25%, transcobalamin 9% and haptocorrin 36% (all p-values <.05). We observed no difference in cobalamin or holotranscobalamin levels when comparing patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (n = 161, 18%) to patients without lung cancer (n = 742, 80%), while transcobalamin showed minor differences. Haptocorrin was significantly higher in those with cancer, mainly among patients with adenocarcinoma (n = 94). A comparison of patients with the highest vs. lowest quartile levels of haptocorrin yielded an adjusted odds ratio for adenocarcinoma of 2.39 (95% confidence interval: 1.26-4.55). However, ROC curve analyzes showed haptocorrin (AUC = 0.55) and total transcobalamin (AUC = 0.56) to be poor diagnostic markers for lung cancer. A high proportion of patients suspected for non-small cell lung cancer showed increased levels of cobalamin-binding proteins. We thereby confirm the association between non-small cell lung cancer and high cobalamin levels and found that haptocorrin was the major underlying factor causing high cobalamin levels. However, none of these biomarkers were of diagnostic use among patients referred for suspected lung cancer.

Early death in Danish stage I lung cancer patients: a population-based case study.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical stage (c-stage) at diagnosis is the most significant prognostic marker for patients with cancer, where 1- and 5-year survival rates as main landmarks when assessing outcomes. This is a population-based case study of Danish c-stage I lung cancer patients who were considered candidates for curative therapy and then died within 1 year after diagnosis (cases). Cases were identified in the Danish Lung Cancer Register (DLCR), and medical records were used to retrieve treatment details and cause of death (CoD). Our aims were, if possible, to identify and describe clusters of patients, in terms of CoD and treatment modality at risk for an adverse short-term outcome. RESULTS: Patients who died early were more frequently male, older, had squamous-cell histology, were less frequently surgically treated and generally had a higher burden of comorbidity. In terms of CoD, 29% died of lung cancer with distant recurrence (DR) as the most common type of recurrence (55%). Death from co-morbidity occurred for 23%, where the largest proportion (36%) died from another cancer. Nineteen percentage died from treatment complications, with the majority being male (p < .001). The remainder died of unknown or other causes. CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer with DR remains the most common CoD. Identifying and accordingly treating patients at risk for DR could potentially improve outcomes. Further studies of the predominantly male subgroup of patients who die of treatment complications are needed. Death from co-morbidity especially in patients with another cancer is a significant CoD and when assessing the quality of lung cancer care a competing event.

Assessing the pattern of recurrence in Danish stage I lung cancer patients in relation to the follow-up program: are we failing to identify patients with cerebral recurrence?

BACKGROUND: There is paucity of evidence regarding the optimal follow-up (FU) regimen for lung cancer. Consequently, FU is organized differently across countries. The Danish FU regimen has short FU intervals with a computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest and upper abdomen every three months in the early phase (first 2 years), then every six months in the late phase of FU (3rd, 5th year). Characterizing recurrences missed by the FU program in terms of site, tumor histology, department, and phase of FU, could improve the FU program. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A case-control study of curatively treated stage I lung cancer patients who attended the Danish FU-program and had recurrence identified through the follow-up program (controls, FU group) or outside FU program (cases, symptomatic group). RESULTS: Of 233 included patients with recurrence, the FU group constituted 85% (n = 197). Among the 15% (n = 36) in the symptomatic group, 53% had involvement of the central nervous system compared with 3% in the FU group. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for having an isolated brain recurrence (IBR) in the symptomatic group was 52.3 (95%CI: 15.1-181.4) as compared with the FU group. The OR for having a symptomatic recurrence in the early phase of FU was 2.5 (95%CI: 0.7-8.7) compared with the late phase. CONCLUSIONS: The FU program did not identify the majority of patients with IBR. Including cerebral imaging in the FU program may result in an earlier detection of brain metastases. These matters should be studied in a prospective setting.

Lung cancer guidelines in Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland: a comparison.

BACKGROUND: The Nordic countries are similar in terms of demographics and health care organization. Yet there are marked differences in lung cancer mortality, for which Denmark historically has had the poorest outcome. One of several possible reasons for these differences could have to do with how lung cancer is diagnosed and treated in the different Nordic countries. However, among the four most populous Nordic countries: Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland, there is a paucity of knowledge about differences and similarities in recommendations in the national guidelines for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the methodology by which the guidelines are developed. METHODS: We identified and evaluated the development and content of the available clinical care guidelines for NSCLC in the four countries. Moreover, we compared the integrated cancer pathways in these countries. We have used case examples to illustrate areas with clear differences in clinical care recommendations. RESULTS: There are notable differences in the methodology by which the guidelines are developed, published and updated to comply with international recommendations. The Norwegian guidelines are developed and updated according to the most rigorous methodology and have so far been updated most frequently. We found that on the basis of recommendations patients with NSCLC are treated differently with regard to bevacizumab therapy and radiation dosing regimens. Cerebral imaging practices in patients with locally advanced NSCLC also differ. There is, moreover, a marked difference with regard to efforts to help patients to quit smoking. All except Finland have integrated cancer pathways for fast track diagnosis and treatment. Guidelines for follow-up of lung cancer patients also differ, with the Danish follow-up regimen as the most comprehensive. To obtain consensus on optimal clinical care, areas with differences in recommendations or where recommendations are based on a low level of evidence should be subjected to further studies.

Mortality and survival of lung cancer in Denmark: Results from the Danish Lung Cancer Group 2000-2012.

Background In the 1990s outcomes in Danish lung cancer patients were poor compared with the other Nordic countries. The five-year survival was only about 5%, only 10% of patients were operated on and less than 60% received active surgical or oncologic treatment. This paper describes trends in mortality and survival of lung cancer in Denmark from 2000 to 2012. Methods The study population comprised 52 435 patients with a diagnosis of cancer of the trachea and the lung, primarily ascertained from the Danish Lung Cancer Register and grouped into three cohorts by year of diagnosis. The outcome measures covered the first year as well as the first full five-year period after diagnosis and comprised absolute mortality rate (per 100 patient years), absolute survival, and the relative survival. All outcomes were estimated for the overall patient population as well as after stratification by covariates. Results Overall, the mortality rates have declined significantly over time from 117 per 100 patient years to 88 for the one-year mortality and from 75 to 65 for the five-year mortality rates, respectively. With the exception of patients with advanced stage, declining mortality was observed for all strata by gender, comorbidity, stage and surgery status and was accompanied by corresponding improvements in both absolute and relative survival. Conclusions The mortality has been significantly declining and the prognosis correspondingly improving in lung cancer in Denmark since the turn of the millennium. As of today, survival after lung cancer in Denmark is probably in line with the international standard. Based on our results we recommend introducing mortality indicators based on all-cause mortality within the patient population in international benchmarking studies as comparisons based on cancer-specific mortality relative to the total general population may be misleading when interpreted in the context of outcomes and quality of care.

The effect of direct access to CT scan in early lung cancer detection: an unblinded, cluster-randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Lower lung cancer survival rates in Britain and Denmark compared with surrounding countries may, in part, be due to late diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of direct access to low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) from general practice in early lung cancer detection on time to diagnosis and stage at diagnosis. METHODS: We conducted a cluster-randomised, controlled trial including all incident lung cancer patients (in 19-month period) listed with general practice in the municipality of Aarhus (300,000 citizens), Denmark. Randomisation and intervention were applied at general practice level. A total of 266 GPs from 119 general practices. In the study period, 331 lung cancer patients were included. The intervention included direct access to low-dose CT from primary care combined with a 1 h lung cancer update meeting. Indication for LDCT was symptoms or signs that raised the GP's suspicion of lung cancer, but fell short of satisfying the fast-track referral criteria on red flag' symptoms. RESULTS: The intervention did not significantly influence stage at diagnosis and had limited impact on time to diagnosis. However, when correcting for non-compliance, we found that the patients were at higher risk of experiencing a long diagnostic interval if their GPs were in the control group. CONCLUSION: Direct low-dose CT from primary care did not statistically significantly decrease time to diagnosis or change stage at diagnosis in lung cancer patients. Case finding with direct access to LDCT may be an alternative to lung cancer screening. Furthermore, a recommendation of low-dose CT screening should consider offering symptomatic, unscreened patients an access to CT directly from primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov, registration ID number NCT01527214.

The role of general practice in routes to diagnosis of lung cancer in Denmark: a population-based study of general practice involvement, diagnostic activity and diagnostic intervals.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer stage at diagnosis predicts possible curative treatment. In Denmark and the UK, lung cancer patients have lower survival rates than citizens in most other European countries, which may partly be explained by a comparatively longer diagnostic interval in these two countries. In Denmark, a pathway was introduced in 2008 allowing general practitioners (GPs) to refer patients suspected of having lung cancer directly to fast-track diagnostics. However, symptom presentation of lung cancer in general practice is known to be diverse and complex, and systematic knowledge of the routes to diagnosis is needed to enable earlier lung cancer diagnosis in Denmark. This study aims to describe the routes to diagnosis, the diagnostic activity preceding diagnosis and the diagnostic intervals for lung cancer in the Danish setting. METHODS: We conducted a national registry-based cohort study on 971 consecutive incident lung cancer patients in 2010 using data from national registries and GP questionnaires. RESULTS: GPs were involved in 68.3% of cancer patients' diagnostic pathways, and 27.4% of lung cancer patients were referred from the GP to fast-track diagnostic work-up. A minimum of one X-ray was performed in 85.6% of all cases before diagnosis. Patients referred through a fast-track route more often had diagnostic X-rays (66.0%) than patients who did not go through fast-track (49.4%). Overall, 33.6% of all patients had two or more X-rays performed during the 90 days before diagnosis. Patients whose symptoms were interpreted as non-alarm symptoms or who were not referred to fast-track were more likely to experience a long diagnostic interval than patients whose symptoms were interpreted as alarm symptoms or who were referred to fast-track. CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer patients followed several diagnostic pathways. The existing fast-track pathway must be supplemented to ensure earlier detection of lung cancer. The high incidence of multiple X-rays warrants a continued effort to develop more accurate lung cancer tests for use in primary care.

Introduction of the Danish Lung Nodule Registry: A part of the Danish Lung Cancer Registry.

BACKGROUND: The majority of lung cancer cases are diagnosed late, resulting in poor prognosis and high mortality rates. Early detection and management of lung cancer can improve patient outcomes and reduce mortality rates. Pulmonary nodules are key factors in the early detection of lung cancer, they are common in high-risk populations and require correct classification to determine whether they are benign or malignant. Over the last decade a steep increase in the number of thoracic CT scans has been seen in Denmark, resulting in substantial resources allocated to CT follow-up of incidentally detected pulmonary nodules. The implementation of a nationwide Danish prospective pulmonary nodule registry is to methodically record pulmonary nodules and thereby evaluate the scope of pulmonary nodule follow-up, the nature of the nodules, and the clinical progression of patients with pulmonary nodules. METHODS: A prospective pulmonary nodule registry (Danish Lung Nodule Registry) will be a natural appendix to the Danish Lung Cancer Registry. Three new ICD-10 classification codes will be introduced, defining the type of nodule: /DR91.1/ Solid nodule /DR91.2/ Part-solid nodule; /DR91.3/ Non-solid nodule. Furthermore, an additional letter will describe whether the imaging exam is performed on suspicion of lung cancer (A), or the finding is incidental (B). Registration of the nodules will be performed by the departments of respiratory medicine who manage follow-up of pulmonary nodules. It is estimated that around 7000 nodules will be registered annually. DISCUSSION: The registration of patients in the lung nodule registry complies with current Danish legislation. The registry will be seamlessly integrated with other nationwide Danish registries, including the Danish Lung Cancer Registry, to collect additional patient data and improve the quality and scope of the data acquired. The results from these comprehensive epidemiological studies will be of significant interest and offer valuable research opportunities.

Use of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography after Curative Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

[¹8F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([¹8F]FDG PET/CT) is a valuable imaging tool in the post-treatment management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the trends in utilization and factors associated with the use of [¹8F]FDG PET/CT after curative-intent treatment. Data from 13,758 NSCLC patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2020 identified in the Danish Lung Cancer Registry, who underwent curative-intent treatment, were analyzed using multivariable regression. The results showed a significant increase in the use of [¹8F]FDG PET/CT scans, from 10.4 per 100 patients per year in 2007 to 39.6 in 2013, followed by a period of stability. Higher utilization rates were observed in patients who received radiotherapy (22% increase compared to surgical resection) and in patients with stage II-III disease (14% and 20% increase compared to stage I, respectively). Additionally, utilization was increased when other diagnostic procedures were performed, such as MRI, ultrasound, endoscopy, and biopsy. These findings highlight an increasing reliance on [¹8F]FDG PET/CT in post-treatment NSCLC, especially after radiotherapy and in patients with locally advanced disease, where treatment-induced radiographic changes and an increased risk of recurrence present a significant diagnostic challenge.

Routes to Diagnosis in Danish Lung Cancer Patients: Emergency Presentation, Age and Smoking History-A Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The fast-track cancer pathway aims to expedite diagnosis of lung cancer and treatment and is the preferred route to diagnosis. Diagnosis following an unplanned admission (unplanned route) has been associated with poor outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study explores factors associated with lung cancer diagnosis following unplanned admissions, focusing on the elderly population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using population-based data from Danish registries. Factors such as age, comorbidity, performance status, smoking history, socioeconomic parameters and treatment modality were analyzed in relation to route to diagnosis and prognosis. RESULTS: Among 17,835 patients, 16% were elderly (≥ 80 years). The unplanned route constituted 28% of diagnostic routes, with higher proportion among the elderly (33%). Poor performance status and advanced disease stage were associated with the unplanned route. Married patients were less likely to undergo an unplanned route to diagnosis. Smoking did not significantly influence diagnostic route. The adjusted odds ratio for curative treatment and dying 12 months after diagnosis, following unplanned route to diagnosis were 0.68 (95% CI, 0.61-0.76) and 1.48 (95% CI, 1.36-1.61), respectively. CONCLUSION: Frailty (poor performance status and high burden of comorbidity) in addition to unfavorable socioeconomic factors, which all were more prevalent among elderly patients, were associated with undergoing an unplanned route to diagnosis. However, age itself was not. Diagnosis following unplanned admission correlated with reduced likelihood of curative treatment and poorer prognosis. Expanding screening initiatives to include frail elderly individuals living alone, along with alertness by primary care clinicians, is warranted to improve outcomes for these patients.

Decision support to general practice in choice of chest imaging for patients with pulmonary symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: The choice of chest imaging for patients with respiratory problems is based on risk profile and symptoms. In 2018-2020, GPs in the catchment area of Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Denmark, were offered direct referral for either X-ray or low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest for patients with respiratory symptoms who did not meet the criteria for a contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) of the chest and upper abdomen as part of the lung cancer referral pathway. The aim of this study was 1) to estimate the percentage of patients referred for LDCT or chest X-ray who met CECT criteria based on the clinical information in the referral letters, and 2) to assess the GPs' response to standard questions regarding the active feedback provided. METHODS: The study was conducted from April to October 2019. Radiographers initially assessed all referrals for X-ray or LDCT, and contacted the GPs if they assessed that symptoms and clinical characteristics justified CECT. RESULTS: In the study period, 1,112 referrals for chest imaging from GPs were received; in 97 cases (9%), the referral information warranted CECT as part of a lung cancer referral package. In 71% (69/97) of these cases, the GP accepted the conversion to CECT; 55 of 73 LDCTs and 14 of 24 X-rays. In 15 cases, the GP adhered to the requested imaging owing to clinical assessment or their agreement with the patient, and in the remaining 13 cases no specific reason was given. CONCLUSION: The feedback provided was well received by GPs and the approach adopted may be a step towards structured decision support to facilitate the choice of chest imaging. FUNDING: None. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.

Outcome of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules in a Real-World Setting.

OBJECTIVES: Early diagnosis of lung cancer is imperative to improve survival. Incidental pulmonary nodules (IPN) may represent early stages of lung cancer and appropriate follow-up and management of these nodules is important, but also very resource demanding. We aim to describe the results of the CT-based follow-up on a cohort of patients with IPN in terms of detected malignancies, the proportion undergoing invasive procedures, and the subsequent outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients in a CT IPN follow-up program who underwent a needle biopsy of the lung from 2018 to 2021 at Aarhus University Hospital. RESULTS: A total of 4181 patients with IPN were followed with CT control scans. Out of these 249 (6%) were diagnosed with lung cancer of which 224 (90%) were diagnosed as a result of the IPN follow-up. Seventy-five percent of the patients were diagnosed in stages I to II and curable treatment was possible in 77.9% of the patients. In the CT IPN follow-up program 449 patients underwent a CT guided needle biopsy. Out of these 190 patients underwent biopsy without the detection of malignancy, corresponding to 4.5% of the entire IPN population. CONCLUSION: The cumulated incidence of lung cancer in our population in the IPN follow-up program was 6%. The probability of malignancy when undergoing an invasive procedure on an IPN was 55.7% of which lung cancer was vastly predominant. The majority of lung cancers were diagnosed in an early and potentially curable stage.

Diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer in Denmark during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: We examined the number of lung cancers diagnosed, the quality of care and the socio-economic and clinical characteristics among patients with lung cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to previous years. METHODS: We included all patients ≥ 18 years old diagnosed with lung cancer from 01 January 2018 to 31 August 2021 as registered in the Danish Lung Cancer Registry. Using a generalised linear model, we estimated prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the associations between the pandemic and socioeconomic and clinical factors, and indicators of quality. RESULTS: We included 18,113 patients with lung cancer (82.0% non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)), which was similar to the preceding years, although a decline in NSCLC cases occurred during the first lockdown period in 2020. No difference in distribution of income or educational level was observed. No difference was observed in the quality of treatment - as measured by curative intent, proportion of patients resected or who died within 90 days of diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Using nationwide population-based data, our study reassuringly shows no adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis, socio-economic characteristics nor quality of treatment of lung cancer, as compared to the preceding years.