Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Hum Mol Genet ; 25(12): 2612-2620, 2016 06 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27008869

RESUMEN

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in the developed world. Although there is evidence of genetic predisposition to the disease, most of the genetic risk remains unexplained. We present the meta-analysis results of four genome-wide association studies (4907 cases and 11 945 controls total) in women of European ancestry. We describe one new locus reaching genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10 -8) at 6p22.3 (rs1740828; P = 2.29 × 10 -8, OR = 1.20), providing evidence of an additional region of interest for genetic susceptibility to endometrial cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Cromosomas Humanos Par 6/genética , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Femenino , Genotipo , Humanos , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Población Blanca/genética
2.
Am J Hum Genet ; 96(3): 487-97, 2015 Mar 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25748358

RESUMEN

Analyses of genome-wide association study (GWAS) data have revealed that detectable genetic mosaicism involving large (>2 Mb) structural autosomal alterations occurs in a fraction of individuals. We present results for a set of 24,849 genotyped individuals (total GWAS set II [TGSII]) in whom 341 large autosomal abnormalities were observed in 168 (0.68%) individuals. Merging data from the new TGSII set with data from two prior reports (the Gene-Environment Association Studies and the total GWAS set I) generated a large dataset of 127,179 individuals; we then conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the patterns of detectable autosomal mosaicism (n = 1,315 events in 925 [0.73%] individuals). Restricting to events >2 Mb in size, we observed an increase in event frequency as event size decreased. The combined results underscore that the rate of detectable mosaicism increases with age (p value = 5.5 × 10(-31)) and is higher in men (p value = 0.002) but lower in participants of African ancestry (p value = 0.003). In a subset of 47 individuals from whom serial samples were collected up to 6 years apart, complex changes were noted over time and showed an overall increase in the proportion of mosaic cells as age increased. Our large combined sample allowed for a unique ability to characterize detectable genetic mosaicism involving large structural events and strengthens the emerging evidence of non-random erosion of the genome in the aging population.


Asunto(s)
Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Genoma Humano , Mosaicismo , Anciano , Femenino , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Genotipo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/genética
3.
Hum Genet ; 133(2): 211-24, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24096698

RESUMEN

Endometrial cancer (EC), a neoplasm of the uterine epithelial lining, is the most common gynecological malignancy in developed countries and the fourth most common cancer among US women. Women with a family history of EC have an increased risk for the disease, suggesting that inherited genetic factors play a role. We conducted a two-stage genome-wide association study of Type I EC. Stage 1 included 5,472 women (2,695 cases and 2,777 controls) of European ancestry from seven studies. We selected independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that displayed the most significant associations with EC in Stage 1 for replication among 17,948 women (4,382 cases and 13,566 controls) in a multiethnic population (African America, Asian, Latina, Hawaiian and European ancestry), from nine studies. Although no novel variants reached genome-wide significance, we replicated previously identified associations with genetic markers near the HNF1B locus. Our findings suggest that larger studies with specific tumor classification are necessary to identify novel genetic polymorphisms associated with EC susceptibility.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/genética , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética , Negro o Afroamericano/genética , Anciano , Pueblo Asiatico/genética , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Sitios Genéticos , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Factor Nuclear 1-beta del Hepatocito/genética , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/genética
4.
Am J Epidemiol ; 176(4): 269-78, 2012 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22831825

RESUMEN

Childbearing at an older age has been associated with a lower risk of endometrial cancer, but whether the association is independent of the number of births or other factors remains unclear. Individual-level data from 4 cohort and 13 case-control studies in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium were pooled. A total of 8,671 cases of endometrial cancer and 16,562 controls were included in the analysis. After adjustment for known risk factors, endometrial cancer risk declined with increasing age at last birth (P(trend) < 0.0001). The pooled odds ratio per 5-year increase in age at last birth was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.85, 0.90). Women who last gave birth at 40 years of age or older had a 44% decreased risk compared with women who had their last birth under the age of 25 years (95% confidence interval: 47, 66). The protective association was similar across the different age-at-diagnosis groups and for the 2 major tumor histologic subtypes (type I and type II). No effect modification was observed by body mass index, parity, or exogenous hormone use. In this large pooled analysis, late age at last birth was independently associated with a reduced risk of endometrial cancer, and the reduced risk persisted for many years.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/etiología , Edad Materna , Adulto , Australia/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , China/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , Paridad , Polonia/epidemiología , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
5.
J Clin Oncol ; 31(20): 2607-18, 2013 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23733771

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Endometrial cancers have long been divided into estrogen-dependent type I and the less common clinically aggressive estrogen-independent type II. Little is known about risk factors for type II tumors because most studies lack sufficient cases to study these much less common tumors separately. We examined whether so-called classical endometrial cancer risk factors also influence the risk of type II tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual-level data from 10 cohort and 14 case-control studies from the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium were pooled. A total of 14,069 endometrial cancer cases and 35,312 controls were included. We classified endometrioid (n = 7,246), adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (n = 4,830), and adenocarcinoma with squamous differentiation (n = 777) as type I tumors and serous (n = 508) and mixed cell (n = 346) as type II tumors. RESULTS: Parity, oral contraceptive use, cigarette smoking, age at menarche, and diabetes were associated with type I and type II tumors to similar extents. Body mass index, however, had a greater effect on type I tumors than on type II tumors: odds ratio (OR) per 2 kg/m(2) increase was 1.20 (95% CI, 1.19 to 1.21) for type I and 1.12 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.14) for type II tumors (P heterogeneity < .0001). Risk factor patterns for high-grade endometrioid tumors and type II tumors were similar. CONCLUSION: The results of this pooled analysis suggest that the two endometrial cancer types share many common etiologic factors. The etiology of type II tumors may, therefore, not be completely estrogen independent, as previously believed.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Carcinoma Endometrioide/epidemiología , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patología , Carcinoma Endometrioide/terapia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Anticonceptivos Orales/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Obesidad/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Fumar/epidemiología , Análisis de Supervivencia
6.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 21(5): 753-60, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22426148

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Poorer survival from endometrial cancer in blacks than in whites is well documented. The aims of this study were to determine whether diabetes, hypertension, or other conditions influence survival and whether accounting for these conditions reduces this racial disparity. METHODS: Using the SEER-Medicare database, we investigated the influence of diabetes, hypertension, and other comorbid conditions on survival in black and white women age ≥66 with endometrial cancer. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the influence of comorbidities on survival for blacks and whites separately and to study survival differences between blacks and whites after adjustment for diabetes, hypertension, and other medical conditions, as well as for demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment. RESULTS: In both racial subgroups, women with diabetes or other conditions had poorer overall survival, whereas hypertensive black women experienced better survival [HR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60-0.92]. For disease-specific survival, diabetes was associated with poorer survival in white women (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06-1.35) but not in blacks (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73-1.30); hypertension and other conditions were not significantly related to survival. After adjustment, black women had poorer survival than white women, with HRs of 1.16 (95% CI, 1.05-1.28) for overall and 1.27 (95% CI, 1.08-1.49) for disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes influences disease-specific survival in white women but not in blacks. The racial disparity in survival is not explained by the presence of other health conditions. IMPACT: Further research should focus on the unknown factors that lead to poorer survival in black women compared with whites.


Asunto(s)
Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Endometriales/etnología , Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Humanos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo , Programa de VERF , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA