Barriers and drivers to COVID-19 vaccination among the migrant and non-migrant population in Germany, 2021.

BACKGROUND: During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, immunization programmes struggled to reach all population groups equally. While migrant groups face multiple barriers to health systems, including vaccination, little is known about their vaccine uptake. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey on adults with and without migration history in Germany to investigate barriers and drivers to COVID-19 vaccination (11 April 2021 to 18 December 2021). Interviews were conducted in six languages. We used logistic regression models and a mediation model to analyze the association between migration history and vaccine uptake. Furthermore, we determined the effect of psychological determinants (5C model) on vaccine uptake. RESULTS: The survey comprised 2039 individuals, including 1015 with migration history. Of these, 448 were interviews conducted in languages other than German. Individuals with migration history had a significantly lower vaccine uptake but, while still unvaccinated, had a higher intention to get vaccinated (P = 0.015) compared with those without migration history. The association between migration history and vaccine uptake was no longer significant when other factors were included in the regression model (odds ratio = 0.9; 95% confidence interval: 0.57-1.47). Socio-economic index, language skills and discrimination experience fully mediated this association. Among the psychological determinants, 'higher confidence' and 'higher collective responsibility' increased the chance of individuals with migration history to be vaccinated. CONCLUSION: Migration history alone cannot explain vaccine uptake; socio-economic index, language skills and discrimination experiences need to be considered. To achieve vaccine equity, future public health policy should aim to reduce relevant barriers through tailored interventions.

[Supporting rehabilitation facilities in implementing diversity-sensitive care: Development of the DiversityKAT manual]. / Unterstützung von Rehabilitationseinrichtungen bei der Umsetzung einer diversitätssensiblen Versorgung: Entwicklung der DiversityKAT-Handreichung.

BACKGROUND: Expectations regarding health care including rehabilitation differ depending on age, gender, and also the migration history of the patient population. To meet the diverse expectations, health care needs to be diversity-sensitive, which can have a positive effect on the utilization and outcomes of care. Diversity-sensitive care, however, should take into consideration not only the expectations of diverse patient groups but also the opportunities and challenges offered by diversity of staff. Managers of health care facilities and health care staff in Germany are well aware of the need for diversity-sensitive care, but corresponding measures, so far, have been applied rarely and only unsystematically. The aim of the study was to develop a manual consisting of a catalogue of instruments and a guideline that can support rehabilitation facilities in implementing diversity-sensitive care. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was used for the study. Based on a scoping review, suitable instruments (n=34) were identified that can be used for the implementation of diversity-sensitive health care. Consensus on a draft of the manual was then reached in seven focus group discussions with health care staff (n=44) and a discussion circle consisting of n=5 representatives of the rehabilitation providers. RESULTS: The DiversityKAT manual, which was developed in a participatory manner, presents diversity-sensitive tools, including instructions, questionnaires, checklists and concepts that can be used to take into account the diversity of needs and expectations in everyday health care. In line with the feedback from health care staff, the manual includes information that can be used as a step-by-step guide to select and implement appropriate tools. At the request of the staff and the rehabilitation providers, exemplary case descriptions were added to present the use of selected instruments in specific situations. A matrix was developed for purposes of quick orientation and pre-selection of suitable instruments. DISCUSSION: Through practice-oriented advice and low-threshold guidance, the DiversityKAT-manual can increase user orientation in rehabilitation but needs to be further examined in future evaluation studies.

Operationalising masculinities in theories and practices of gender-transformative health interventions: a scoping review.

Gender-transformative health interventions that involve men and boys are gaining global reach, adaptability to specific geographical, population and epidemiological contexts, public endorsement, and conceptual sophistication. However, the ways in which masculinities are conceptualised and operationalised in theory and practice across these interventions remains unclear. The purpose of this scoping review is to map intervention studies that conceptually grapple with masculinities and analyse: a) how the concept of masculinities is adapted and operationalised in gender-transformative interventions, with respect to intervention population and context, b) what the relationship between the concept of masculinities and its wider theoretical embedding is, and c) on which levels transformation can be observed when working with 'masculinities'.We conducted a search in APA Psych Articles, APA PsycINFO, and CINAHL via EBSCO, MedLine, PubMed, and Web of Sciences (December 2021) looking for peer-reviewed studies on gender-transformative health interventions which engaged with masculinities conceptually. There were no restrictions regarding language, publication date, or geography. Forty-two articles were included in this review. Our abductive analysis finds that 'hegemonic masculinities' is a central concept in almost all included studies. This shows how the concept is adaptable to a range of different intervention contexts. The review further identifies five theoretical approaches, that help operationalise masculinities on an analytical level: feminist framework, affect theory, critical pedagogy, theories of social change, and ecological approaches. Lastly, this review draws out six levels on which transformation can be observed in the intervention outcomes: relational level, symbolic level, material level, affective level, cognitive-behavioural level, and community-structural level. The discussion underlines that processes and practices of (gender) transformation also require engagement with theories of transformation more widely and advocates for theoretical pluralism. Lastly, implications for practice, including preventative, ecological and community-based care models, are drawn out.

A critical review: developing a birth integrity framework for epidemiological studies through meta-ethnography.

Over the past decade, there has been growing evidence that women worldwide experience sub-standard care during facility-based childbirth. With this critical review, we synthesize concepts and measurement approaches used to assess maternity care conditions and provision, birth experiences and perceptions in epidemiological, quantitative research studies (e.g., obstetric violence, maternal satisfaction, disrespect or mistreatment during childbirth, person-centered care), aiming to propose an umbrella concept and framework under which the existing and future research strands can be situated. On the 82 studies included, we conduct a meta-ethnography (ME) using reciprocal translation, in-line argumentation, and higher-level synthesis to propose the birth integrity multilevel framework. We perform ME steps for the conceptual level and the measurement level. At the conceptual level, we organize the studies according to the similarity of approaches into clusters and derive key concepts (definitions). Then, we 'translate' the clusters into one another by elaborating each approach's specific angle and pointing out the affinities and differences between the clusters. Finally, we present an in-line argumentation that prepares ground for the synthesis. At the measurement level, we identify themes from items through content analysis, then organize themes into 14 categories and subthemes. Finally, we synthesize our result to the six-field, macro-to-micro level birth integrity framework that helps to analytically distinguish between the interwoven contributing factors that influence the birth situation as such and the integrity of those giving birth. The framework can guide survey development, interviews, or interventional studies.

Associations between postmigration living situation and symptoms of common mental disorders in adult refugees in Europe: updating systematic review from 2015 onwards.

BACKGROUND: Refugees and asylum seekers have a high prevalence of psychiatric disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression. The postmigration context inheres different risk and protective factors for mental health of refugees and asylum seekers in host countries. We conducted a systematic review to update knowledge on the association between characteristics of the postmigration living situation (PMLS) and mental health outcomes in Europe since 2015. METHODS: We searched in five databases according to the PRISMA statement. From a total of 5,579 relevant studies published in 2015-22, 3,839 were included for title and abstract screening, and 70 full texts screened for eligibility. Out of these, 19 studies on refugees and asylum seekers conducted in European countries after 2014 were included in this systematic review. The quality of studies was assessed by using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) - version 2018. We performed a narrative synthesis using the four layers of the social determinants of health framework. RESULTS: A wide range of risk and protective factors for mental health in the PMLS were identified as exposure measures, which included individual factors (e.g., language skills), social and community networks (e.g., family concerns, loneliness and social support, discrimination), living and working conditions (e.g., legal status, duration of residence, unemployment and financial hardship, housing) as well as general socio-economic, cultural and environmental factors (e.g., social status, acculturation). We found postmigration stressors are positively associated with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTSD, albeit not consistently so. Especially, the general socio-economic, cultural and environmental factors showed weak associations with mental health. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogenous study characteristics likely explain the inconsistent associations between characteristics of the PMLS and mental health outcomes. However, broken down in its component layers, most risk and protective factors of the PMLS were significantly associated with symptoms of mental disorders showing the same direction of association across the included studies, while the association between some stressors or resources of the PMLS and mental health turns out to be less homogeneous than expected. Characteristics of the PMLS contribute to the high prevalence of mental diseases of refugees and asylum seekers. Disadvantages in general socio-economic conditions, living and working conditions, in access to social and community networks need to be redressed, in addition to better access to health care.

[Workload and Rehabilitation Needs of Older Workers with and without Migrant Background - Results of the lidA Cohort Study]. / Arbeitsbelastungen und Rehabilitationsbedarf bei älteren Erwerbstätigen mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund ­ Ergebnisse der lidA Kohortenstudie.

BACKGROUND: The need for rehabilitation measures will increase in the future due to increasing retirement age and demographic changes. In addition, the need for rehabilitation measures is determined, among other things, by the strenuousness of work. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether employees with a migrant background (EmM) are exposed to strenuous work more often and have a higher need for rehabilitation than employees without a migrant background (EoM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The lidA study is a nationwide, prospective cohort study focusing on work, age, health and labour force participation. Study subjects (2443 female, 2281 male) were socially secured employees, born in 1959 or 1965. They were personally interviewed with computer assistance. Data from the first study wave (2011) were used. Multiple logistic regression analyses adjusted for socio-demographic factors (age, gender, education and household equivalent income) were carried out to estimate the influence of migrant background, nationality and high workloads on the need for rehabilitation. RESULTS: First generation EmMs were particularly affected by high workloads compared to EoM. The subjectively experienced workloads of EoM and EmM of the second generation were on a comparable level. In contrast, there were no differences between EmM with German and foreign citizenship. After adjustment for sociodemographic and workload-related factors, a higher need for rehabilitation was shown for the first-generation EmM (not significant) in comparison with the second-generation EoM and EmM, but not for EmM with foreign citizenship in comparison with EmM with German citizenship. DISCUSSION: First-generation EmMs are exposed to strenuous work significantly more often and have a higher need for rehabilitation. However, the migrant background itself is not a determinant for increased rehabilitation needs. The significantly higher need for rehabilitation can rather be explained by the strenuousness of work and socio-demographic characteristics that are more frequent in first-generation EmM. Differentiated considerations of the subgroups of EmM are important to identify special needs and to avoid undersupply (e. g. due to access barriers).

[Self-help measures as determinants of emergency department utilization among people with and without a migration history in Germany]. / Selbsthilfemaßnahmen als Determinanten der Inanspruchnahme einer Notfallambulanz bei Menschen mit und ohne Migrationsgeschichte in Deutschland.

INTRODUCTION: We analyzed whether there were differences between people with and without migration history in their implementation of self-help measures before they accessed the services of an emergency department and if there was an association between self-help measures and an appropriate utilization of emergency departments. METHODS: The data basis of this secondary analysis is the EUMaR study, which was conducted from July 2018 to July 2019 and aimed to identify causes contributing to inappropriate and frequent use of emergency departments by migrants. Our study aimed to analyze the differences in self-help measures carried out by the population groups using several multiple logistic regressions. The association between self-help measures implemented and appropriate emergency department utilization was quantified using a multiple logistic regression as well as interactions. RESULTS: The odds of first-generation migrants visiting an emergency department on their own initiative (OR=1.28; 95% CI, 1.01-1.61) was high compared to people without migrant history. Furthermore, the odds of their doing something by themselves against their complaints (OR=0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.86) were low. The odds of appropriate utilization of emergency services by respondents who self-initiated a visit to an emergency department were lower (OR=0.41; 95% CI, 0.34-0.50). The odds of appropriate utilization of emergency department services by respondents who had previously measured vital signs (e. g., blood pressure) were higher (OR=1.28; 95% CI, 1.02-1.59). CONCLUSION: Barriers to the health care system as well as to general practitioners, medicines or medical aids among first-generation migrants could explain the increased odds of their visiting an emergency department on their own and the lower odds of their doing something by themselves about their complaints. A hypothesis of our study is that measuring vital signs may help to better assess individual health status.

[Implementation Strategies of Diversity-Sensitive Health Care and Administration - A Nationwide Postal Survey of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities]. / Umsetzungsstrategien einer diversitätssensiblen Gesundheitsversorgung und Unternehmensführung ­ Eine bundesweite postalische Befragung von Rehabilitationseinrichtungen.

BACKGROUND: Diversity characteristics such as disability, gender, age or migration background are associated with different expectations towards health care. If these are not sufficiently considered in rehabilitative care, this may have a negative impact on the satisfaction with and outcomes of health care. Sensitivity towards the diversity of patients can promote patient-centered health care by helping to address different needs and expectations. The aim of the present study was to examine what measures inpatient rehabilitation facilities in Germany use to provide diversity-sensitive health care and which barriers prevent their proper implementation. METHODS: Between May and August 2019, administrative managers of rehabilitation facilities were invited to participate in a nationwide postal questionnaire survey (n=1,233). The questionnaire included questions on addressing the diversity of employees and rehabilitation patients. Responses were received from a total of 223 inpatient rehabilitation facilities (response rate: 18.9%). Results were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: The survey shows that diversity-sensitive health care is a relevant topic for many rehabilitation facilities. It is regarded particularly important for the satisfaction of rehabilitation patients, treatment outcomes and employee satisfaction. Obstacles to the implementation of diversity-sensitive care comprise a lack of incentives on the part of health care organization, a lack of financial resources and organizational difficulties. DISCUSSION: The majority of the administrative managers surveyed acknowledge the relevance of diversity-sensitive care. Instruments enabling it, however, are used only sparingly and unsystematically. To promote diversity-sensitive care, health care facilities need support in competence building and in selecting and implementing appropriate measures. A handbook with instructions on how diversity-sensitive care can be implemented can contribute to that goal.

[Consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic: Are there risk groups for reduced subjective well-being after the first lockdown?] / Folgen der COVID-19-Pandemie: Gibt es Risikogruppen für ein verringertes subjektives Wohlbefinden nach dem ersten Lockdown?

BACKGROUND: Measures to contain COVID-19 have created burdens that have widened health inequalities. We examine the extent to which risk groups for reduced subjective well-being can be identified after the 2020 lockdown. In doing so, we also consider possible interactions of different social grouping characteristics as part of an intersectional approach. METHOD: Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) data from the years 2018-2020 were analyzed. A total of 16,000 cases with information on changes in well-being (SF-12 scores and individual indicators) were included in the analyses. We use the classification method "random forests" to identify groups with different trends in well-being. For the interpretation of the content, we also present results from a regression model with social and health aspects as predictors. RESULTS: Demographic and social characteristics explained only a very small part of the changes in subjective well-being (R2 = 0.007-0.012) and did not allow for the differentiation of homogeneous risk groups. Although some significant predictors were found in the regression models, the corresponding effects were mostly small. In addition to the initial state of well-being before the pandemic began, the presence of chronic illnesses and disabilities in particular contributed to the explanation of subjective well-being. DISCUSSION: The currently available data do not allow a clear identification of risk groups for losses in well-being in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Health status before the onset of the pandemic appears to be more important for short-term changes in subjective well-being than socio-demographic and socio-economic categorization characteristics.

[Othering in the context of migration: how Others emerge from social categories]. / Othering am Beispiel von Migration: Wie aus sozialen Kategorien die Anderen entstehen.

'Migrants' and 'refugees' are often categorized as Other, in a process called Othering. Using the example of forced migration, we develop a definition of Othering to make it useful for the analysis of health inequalities. We consider Othering as a social process that constructs and classifies differences in such a way that certain groups become socially visible as essential Others. On one hand, the process of Othering operates through a discursive practice that constructs differences, thereby transforming individuals into visible Others. On the other hand, it is based on a power asymmetry that enables the categorization of people, thereby marking them as different.Othering is not solely based on negative attitudes of individuals or groups. Rather, Othering is the result of a broad and historically evolved system of beliefs that gain credibility through power relations. Thus, we understand Othering as a powerful process that goes substantially beyond concepts of discrimination based on mere categorization processes. The concept of Othering stands out from other concepts of inequality by including the epistemic level as a key factor for inequality. Othering not only produces the Other epistemologically, but at the same time establishes a discursive legitimation for the unequal treatment of the Other.Drawing upon our understanding of Othering, we present practice-related findings on the consequences of Othering for the healthcare of 'migrants' and 'refugees'.

[Life course epidemiology in migrant health research]. / Lebenslauforientierte Epidemiologie in der Migrationsforschung.

From free choice to forced flight, there are many reasons for migration. Accordingly, the backgrounds and living conditions of migrating people are also diverse. The different associated exposures affect the health of migrants and their children. To capture such a complex phenomenon, an approach is required that takes specific living conditions during the life course of migrants into account.An established methodological approach that can accomplish this is life course epidemiology. When applied to migrating populations, it examines exposures before, during, and after migration. In epidemiological research on the health of migrant populations, it is desirable to consider all three phases. This is countered by the fact that reliable data on the entire life course is not always available.A valid, timely collection and data protection-compliant linkage of longitudinal data from different sources can improve life course-related research on the health of migrants in Germany. In the future, corresponding data should also be included from the countries of origin of migrants.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on malaria cases in health facilities in northern Ghana: a retrospective analysis of routine surveillance data.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic and its collateral damage severely impact health systems globally and risk to worsen the malaria situation in endemic countries. Malaria is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Ghana. This study aims to describe the potential effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on malaria cases observed in health facilities in the Northern Region of Ghana. METHODS: Monthly routine data from the District Health Information Management System II (DHIMS2) of the Northern Region of Ghana were analysed. Overall outpatient department visits (OPD) and malaria case rates from the years 2015-2019 were compared to the corresponding data of the year 2020. RESULTS: Compared to the corresponding periods of the years 2015-2019, overall visits and malaria cases in paediatric and adult OPDs in northern Ghana decreased in March and April 2020, when major movement and social restrictions were implemented in response to the pandemic. Cases slightly rebounded afterwards in 2020, but stayed below the average of the previous years. Malaria data from inpatient departments showed a similar but more pronounced trend when compared to OPDs. In pregnant women, however, malaria cases in OPDs increased after the first COVID-19 wave. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study show that the COVID-19 pandemic affects the malaria burden in health facilities of northern Ghana, with declines in inpatient and outpatient rates except for pregnant women. They may have experienced reduced access to insecticide-treated nets and intermittent preventive malaria treatment in pregnancy, resulting in subsequent higher malaria morbidity. Further data, particularly from community-based studies and ideally complemented by qualitative research, are needed to fully determine the impact of the pandemic on the malaria situation in Africa.

Association between housing and health of refugees and asylum seekers in Germany: explorative cluster and mixed model analysis.

BACKGROUND: Accommodation for asylum seekers and refugees (ASR) in Germany differs in many ways depending on a range of political, structural, social, and environmental factors. These contextual differences present a challenge for assessing health impacts of refugee accommodation. We aimed to devise a broad typology of refugee accommodation that allows to assess associations between housing and health of ASR. METHODS: We performed a cluster analysis of population-based, cross-sectional secondary data in Germany to identify clusters of refugee accommodation. We then assessed health disparities across clusters by performing bivariate analysis and linear mixed model regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified four clusters, three of them reflected different types of private accommodation and one pointed to collective accommodation. The collective accommodation cluster clearly differed from the private accommodation clusters in terms of space, area, level of restrictions, social connections and respondent satisfaction. Across private accommodation clusters we also found differences in space, area, and level of restrictions. In regression analysis, belonging to one of the private accommodation cluster was significantly associated with better mental health compared to belonging to the collective accommodation cluster. Physical health was significantly lower in one private accommodation cluster characterized by poor access to public transport and a higher level of restrictions compared to a private accommodation cluster showing better connections and a lower level of restrictions. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that unfavourable conditions cluster in collective accommodation with negative outcomes for mental health but not for physical health. We also found health disparities across types of private accommodation. We conclude that housing plays a role in the production of health inequalities in ASR but needs to be assessed in a differentiated, multidimensional way.

Decomposing intersectional inequalities in subjective physical and mental health by sex, gendered practices and immigration status in a representative panel study from Germany.

BACKGROUND: The mapping of immigration-related health inequalities remains challenging, since immigrant populations constitute a heterogenous socially constructed group whose health experiences differ by social determinants of health. In spite of the increasing awareness that population mobility and its effects on health are highly gendered, an explicit gender perspective in epidemiology is often lacking or limited. METHODS: To map inequalities in self-reported physical and mental health in Germany at the intersections of sex, gendered practices and immigration status, we used data from the German Socioeconomic Panel (SOEP) and applied an intercategorical intersectional approach conducting multilevel linear regression models. We differentiated between sex (male/female) as reported in the survey and gendered social practices, quantified through a gender score (on a femininity-masculinity continuum). RESULTS: We included 20,897 participants in our analyses. We saw an intersectional gradient for physical and mental health. Compared to the reference group, i.e. non-immigrant males with masculine gendered practices, physical and mental health steadily decreased in the intersectional groups that did not embody one or more of these social positions. The highest decreases in health were observed in the intersectional group of immigrant females with feminine gendered practices for physical health (-1,36; 95% CI [-2,09; -0,64]) and among non-immigrant females with feminine practices for mental health (-2,51; 95% CI [-3,01; -2,01]). CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of physical and mental health vary along the intersectional axes of sex, gendered practices and immigration status. These findings highlight the relevance of intersections in describing population health statuses and emphasise the need to take them into account when designing public health policies aiming at effectively reducing health inequalities.

Diversity-sensitive measures in German hospitals - attitudes, implementation, and barriers according to administration managers.

BACKGROUND: Populations have varying needs and expectations concerning health care that result from diversity characteristics such as a migrant background, gender identity, disability, and age. These needs and expectations must be considered to ensure adequate utilization and quality of health services. Approaches to address diversity do exist, however, little is known about the extent to which they are implemented by health care facilities. The present study aims to examine, which measures and structures hospitals in Germany employ to address diversity, as well as which barriers they encounter in doing so. METHODS: A mixed-mode survey among administration managers of all registered German hospitals (excluding rehabilitation hospitals; n = 1125) was conducted between May and October 2019 using pen-and-paper and online questionnaires. Results were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Data from n = 112 hospitals were available. While 57.1% of hospitals addressed diversity in their mission statement and 59.9% included diversity considerations in quality management, dedicated working groups and diversity commissioners were less prevalent (15.2% each). The majority of hospitals offered multi-lingual admission and exit interviews (59.8%), treatments or therapies (57.1%), but only few had multi-lingual meal plans (12.5%) and seminars or presentations (11.6%). While 41.1% of the hospitals offered treatment and/or nursing exclusively by staff of the same sex, only 17.0% offered group therapies for both sexes separately. According to the managers, the main barriers were a lack of financial resources (54.5%), a lack of incentives from the funding providers (49.1%), and organizational difficulties (45.5%). Other reported barriers were a lack of conviction of the necessity among decision makers (28.6%) and a lack of motivation among staff members (19.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Administration managers from only a small proportion of hospitals participated in our survey on diversity sensitivity. Even hospitals of those who did are currently not adequately addressing the diversity of staff members and patients. Most hospitals address diversity on an ideational level, practical measures are not widely implemented. Existing measures suggest that most hospitals have no overarching concept to address diversity in a broader sense. The main reported barriers relate to economic aspects, a lack of support in organizing and implementing corresponding measures and a lack of awareness or motivation.

[Is There a Association Between the Conditions in Accommodations and the Mental Health of Refugees in Germany? - A Cross-Sectional Study]. / Gibt es einen Zusammenhang zwischen der Zufriedenheit mit der Unterkunft und der psychischen Gesundheit Geflüchteter in Deutschland? ­ Eine Querschnittstudie.

BACKGROUND: Crowded conditions, noise and little privacy and other characteristics of refugee accommodations can have a negative impact on the mental health of the partially traumatized refugees. The study investigates, whether there are correlations between satisfaction with certain accommodation features in individual and shared accommodation and mental health. METHOD: We used the IAB-BAMF-SOEP survey from Germany 2016 (n=4491 refugees). Linear regression models are calculated to test the association between mental health and the type of accommodation (single accommodation/shared accommodation) and satisfaction with the accommodation (general satisfaction, satisfaction with food quality/noise level/privacy/leisure activities/access to public transport/security, german language courses). We adjust for sociodemographic factors, potentially traumatic experiences prior to arrival in Germany and postmigrant exposures (e. g. asylum status). RESULTS: Within the two accommodation types, there is high heterogeneity with respect to the characteristics examined. Refugees with poor mental health were significantly more likely to live in shared accommodation. When the above covariates were controlled for, the association disappeared. The other eight accommodation characteristics remained significantly associated with poorer mental health. The largest effects on mental health were observed for the satisfaction with safety, privacy, and general satisfaction. Here, the difference between persons who were barely satisfied compared with persons who were very satisfied amounted to 5-6 points on the SF-12 mental sum scale. CONCLUSION: International results on the relationship between accommodation conditions and mental health of refugees were confirmed for Germany. This results in an increased need for mental health services in subjectively worse housing. Questions about satisfaction (especially safety, privacy, and general satisfaction) are more suitable for identifying critical accommodations than the classification into single or shared accommodations, because shared accommodations were assessed very differently. Screening instruments can help identify problematic shelters. However, reverse causality cannot be conclusively ruled out.

[Health Situation in Ukraine Before Onset of War and Its Relevance for Health Care for Ukrainian Refugees in Germany: Literature Review, Risk Analysis, and Priority Setting]. / Gesundheitliche Lage in der Ukraine vor Kriegsbeginn und ihre Relevanz für die Versorgung ukrainischer Geflüchteter in Deutschland: Literaturdurchsicht, Risikoanalyse und Prioritätensetzung.

BACKGROUND: Health needs of refugees are not only determined by exposure to war and fleeing. Determinants during the life course also play a role. We therefore examined the health situation in Ukraine before Russia's invasion in 2022 and its relevance for health care for Ukrainian refugees in Germany from the perspective of the Public Health Service. METHOD: Rapid search in the Medline data base, and in relevant Ukrainian and international health data bases; narrative synthesis of findings, followed by a prioritization of health problems and interventions by two medical doctors, using the risk matrix approach. RESULTS: Immunization coverage is low for Covid-19, resulting in outbreaks in refugee shelters. There are vaccination gaps for measles and other basic immunizations, particularly in older children; children aged 2-5 years have not received the second measles dose. HIV and TB therapies may be interrupted due to the need to flee. Among elderly refugees, insufficiently treated cardiovascular diseases and pre-existing psychological trauma as well as cancers in need of acute care predominate. Ukrainian refugees may mistrust state-associated health measures, as the vaccination gaps indicate. CONCLUSION: Refugees should be able to access curative and preventive health care without bureaucratic obstacles and entitlement restrictions. Analyzing Ukrainian health statistics and respective scientific publications helps the Public Health Service to adapt its interventions, and to avoid inefficient allocation of resources.

Influence of appropriate emergency department utilization and verbal communication on physicians' (dis)satisfaction with doctor-patient interactions with special consideration of migrational backgrounds.

In recent years, utilization of emergency departments (EDs) has increased continuously, both in Germany and internationally. Inappropriate use of EDs is believed to be partly responsible for this trend. The topic of doctor-patient interaction (DPI) has received little attention in research. However, successful DPI is not only important for adherence and treatment success, but also for the satisfaction of medical staff. This non-interventionl cross-sectional study attempts to identify factors influencing physicians' satisfaction with DPIs, with a particular focus on the appropriate utilization of EDs and verbal communication. We carried out tripartite data collection in three EDs of major referral hospitals in Berlin between July 2017 and July 2018. Migration experience, communication and language problems, level of education, and a large gap between physicians' and patients' perceived urgency regarding the utilization of EDs influence the quality of the doctor-patient relationships and interactions.

[A guideline on discrimination-sensitive language in research on migration and health]. / Diskriminierungssensible Sprache in der Forschung zu Migration und Gesundheit ­ eine Handreichung.

BACKGROUND: Public health research has increasingly focused on migration as a determinant of health. Responsible research in this area requires an anti-discriminatory approach in its conduct, reporting and dissemination. A discrimination-sensitive use of language is a central element. Guidelines in this regard do not yet exist for the field of public health in German-speaking countries. METHODS: Within the framework of the project Improving Health Monitoring in Migrant Populations (IMIRA) at the Robert Koch Institute, a guideline on anti-discriminatory language in research on migration and health was developed. It consists of a manual and an overview of relevant terms and concepts. The needs, content and form of the guideline were developed in an action research process with project staff from the IMIRA project. RESULTS: The manual shows the following five basic principles for anti-discriminatory language use: (1) avoid generalisations, (2) formulate in a discrimination-sensitive way, (3) use self-designations and external designations, (4) recognise that terms are subject to constant change and (5) openly communicate one's own uncertainties. The overview, which is available online as a "living document", contains terms and concepts that are frequently used in association with the topic of migration. CONCLUSION: The guideline is intended to support researchers in using language in an anti-discriminatory way. This goes hand in hand with a reflection on one's own language use and strengthens responsible research on the topic of migration and health.

Un regard théorique sur l'intégrité à la naissance : médicalisation, théories du risque, embodiment et intersectionnalité.

INTRODUCTION: Recent quantitative research in public health indicates that women across the globe report suboptimal treatment during institutional deliveries. The most common approaches used to comprehend this abuse, violence, or mistreatment have not fully achieved a balance between theoretical perspectives and empirical assessment. To contribute to a more accurate account of the cultural driving forces, institutional conditions, direct expressions, and individual perceptions that undermine or preserve what we define as “integrity at birth”, we develop a new theoretical approach and a multi-level model. PURPOSE OF RESEARCH: We ground the terminology for integrity at birth upon theoretical foundations, referring to two theoretical discourses: medicalization and risk theory on the one hand, and embodiment and intersectionality theory on the other. We then contextualize this in a multi-level model in order to operationalize its potential for public health research. RESULTS: The concept and model of “integrity at birth” recognize that women in labor suffer from a number of gender-specific violations, which can be expressed at all levels (macro to micro) as implicit, inherent, normalized and invisible, or explicit, intentional, visible and socially accepted. In distinguishing six separate domains, we propose a theoretical contribution for obstetric care practices. CONCLUSION: Integrity at birth, as a multi-level and theoretically grounded approach, constitutes an important step towards raising awareness about this issue beyond the dimensions that have been studied to date in quantitative health research. Beyond available evidence of disrespectful and abusive practices constituting violations to integrity at birth, this study takes a step towards understanding gender-based violence and inequalities of health at childbirth.