Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Urol ; 197(2): 287-295, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27664578

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Carcinoma in situ of the urinary tract is a high grade form of nonmuscle invasive urothelial cancer. Our understanding of this entity in the upper tract is poor, and case management remains challenging due to knowledge gaps regarding the definition, diagnosis, treatment options and followup of the disease. We reviewed the available literature for similarities and differences between bladder and upper tract carcinoma in situ, and herein summarize the best available data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed PubMed® and MEDLINE™ databases from January 1976 through September 2014. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement was used to screen publications. All authors participated in the development of a consensus definition of disease. RESULTS: A total of 61 publications were found suitable for this review. All studies were retrospective. Compared to bladder carcinoma in situ, upper tract carcinoma in situ appears to have lower progression rates and improved survival. All available studies demonstrate topical therapy to be effective in treating upper tract carcinoma in situ, with decreased recurrence rates compared to bladder carcinoma in situ. Highlighted areas of current knowledge gaps include variable definitions of disease, methods of drug delivery and ideal treatment course. Improving methods for detection may allow easier diagnosis and more effective treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available data, organ preserving therapy with topical agents is an alternative to radical surgery in select patients with upper tract carcinoma in situ, although this method has not been evaluated in prospective trials. A paradigm shift regarding detection and treatment is needed to improve care and allow better renal preservation. A consensus definition of the disease is offered, and several areas of major knowledge gaps and opportunities for future research are identified.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma in Situ/patología , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Carcinoma in Situ/diagnóstico , Carcinoma in Situ/terapia , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Sistema Urinario/patología , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia
2.
Minerva Urol Nefrol ; 68(4): 350-8, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27008468

RESUMEN

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare but highly morbid genitourinary malignancy. In 2014 approximately 15,000 new cases were diagnosed in the United States. It accounts for approximately 5-10% of all urothelial cell carcinomas, and 10% of renal tumors. Recent research has increased understanding of the epidemiology of this disease, including several high-risk populations. Environmental exposure to tobacco as well as aristolochic acid, and other carcinogens significantly increase the development of UTUC. Additionally, the genetic condition of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC), also known as Lynch Syndrome (LS) is linked to development of UTUC. Advances in imaging, ureteroscopy, cytological techniques and pathological recognition have allowed for improved detection of primary tumors and recurrent disease. Non-invasive imaging with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) now represent the gold standard in imaging detection and surveillance, while technological advances in ureteroscopy allow for minimally invasive approaches to obtain pathologic diagnosis anywhere within the upper tracts. This review will highlight these recent improvements to allow better understanding of who is affected by this rare and morbid disease, as well as the latest developments in detection and surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Urológicas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/diagnóstico , Humanos , Sistema Urinario/patología , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnóstico
3.
Urology ; 87: 216-23, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26494291

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of traditional laparoscopy and a simple, single-docking robotic approach for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), nephroureterectomy, and bladder cuff excision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 63 and 37 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic and robotic nephrouretectomy with RPLND, respectively, for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). RESULTS: Our robotic approach was associated with improved lymph node procurement (21.0 nodes [interquartile range 16.0-30.0]) when compared with laparoscopy (11.0 nodes [interquartile range 5.5-21.0]) (P < .0001). Major blood loss as defined by requiring a blood transfusion was less for the robotic group than for the laparoscopic cohort (8% vs 30%) (P = .012). In contrast, the robotic group had longer operative times (5.1 vs 3.9 hours) (P = .0001) and longer hospital stays (5.0 vs 4.0 days) (P = .0002). CONCLUSION: Our single-docking robotic technique for concomitant RPLND during nephrouretectomy is associated with improved lymph node yield.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía/métodos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Robótica/métodos , Uréter/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Espacio Retroperitoneal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología
4.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 15(13): 1827-36, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24976035

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most common complications of diabetes. The complex pathophysiology of this disease makes it difficult to create clinical treatments tailored specifically for diabetic patients. AREAS COVERED: This article will provide an update of both medical and surgical treatment approaches for diabetic ED, as well as discuss established treatments that are the cornerstone of this field. EXPERT OPINION: Currently, PDE type 5 inhibitors represent the first-line treatment for all patients with ED. In the interim since this article's first publication several new PDE5 inhibitors have come to market. Several others that were previously on the market are now available for daily dosing. Analysis of both testosterone level and hemoglobin A1c is an essential part of treatment. Intracavernosal injections and vacuum constriction devices remain safe, and are highly effective treatment options. The implantable penile prosthesis remains a safe, and definitive treatment modality for those patients with refractory ED. Over the coming years as the understanding of the underlying causes of diabetic ED continues, the development of new, noninvasive, but effective medical treatments will lead to even more options for the treatment of this difficult disease.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones de la Diabetes/terapia , Disfunción Eréctil/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/cirugía , Disfunción Eréctil/tratamiento farmacológico , Disfunción Eréctil/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Prótesis de Pene , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 5/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Hosp Pract (1995) ; 40(2): 158-64, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22615090

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to evaluate the minor criteria recommended by the 2007 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) as predictors of 30-day mortality, the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and/or the need for vasopressor support as markers of severity in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: Patients admitted to 2 academic teaching hospitals over a 4-year period (January 1, 1999 to December 1, 2002) were identified as having CAP. We used modified minor criteria established by the 2007 IDSA/ATS guidelines. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality, and the secondary outcome measures were need for invasive mechanical ventilation and/or need for vasopressor support. RESULTS: About half of the patients in the cohort (n = 352/787 [46%]) had ≥ 1 minor criterion, but only 128 (16.3%) had ≥ 3 minor criteria present at hospital admission. In the multivariable analysis, hypoxemia, multilobar infiltrates, and leukopenia were associated with 30-day mortality (P < 0.05). In addition, hypoxemia and confusion/disorientation were associated with the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and/or vasopressor support (P < 0.05). The presence of ≥ 3 minor criteria was associated with 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 4.82), and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and/or vasopressor support (odds ratio, 2.59). CONCLUSION: Our results show that hypoxemia, multilobar infiltrates, and leukopenia were the most predictive minor criteria for 30-day mortality. In contrast, hypoxemia and confusion/disorientation were the 2 individual minor severe criteria that were more likely to require invasive mechanical ventilation and/or vasopressor support. At least 3 2007 IDSA/ATS minor severe criteria were associated with 30-day mortality and need for invasive mechanical ventilation and/or vasopressor support.


Asunto(s)
Neumonía/mortalidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Masculino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sociedades Médicas , Texas , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA