Topical application of a novel anti-interleukin-17A antibody fragment penetrates psoriatic skin: Results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase Ib study.

Interleukin (IL)-17A underlies the pathogenesis of chronic plaque psoriasis (CPP). Well-tolerated, effective IL-17A inhibitors for mild-to-moderate CPP are needed. ZL-1102 is a novel antibody fragment targeting IL-17A. To assess the safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy and skin penetration of a topical 1% ZL-1102 hydrogel in patients with mild-to-moderate CPP, a two-part, Phase Ib study was conducted. Open-label Part A: six patients received a single topical application of ZL-1102 onto a psoriatic plaque; double-blind Part B: 53 patients were randomised 1:1 to twice-daily ZL-1102 or vehicle for 4 weeks. Key primary endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), tolerability and changes in local psoriasis area and severity index (PASI). TEAEs occurred in two (33.3%) patients in Part A and in 16 (59.3%) and 13 (50.0%) patients in the ZL-1102 and vehicle arms, respectively, in Part B. No grade ≥3 TEAEs were seen with ZL-1102. ZL-1102 led to numerically greater changes in local PASI versus vehicle (-28.8% vs. -17.2%), with good local tolerability. The trend towards local PASI improvement was accompanied by biomarker changes based on RNA sequencing, indicative of ZL-1102 penetration into psoriatic plaques. Topical ZL-1102 showed good safety, local tolerability and a trend towards improved local PASI; skin penetration was observed without measurable systemic exposure. ACTRN12620000700932.

In vitro activity of sulbactam/durlobactam against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii collected in China.

BACKGROUND: Durlobactam is a broad-spectrum inhibitor of class A, C and D ß-lactamases. Sulbactam is a generic ß-lactam most commonly used as a ß-lactamase inhibitor in combination with ampicillin; however, it has a unique property in that it has selective intrinsic activity against Acinetobacter baumannii. Currently, there is widespread resistance caused by multiple ß-lactamases including class A carbapenemases and class C and class D enzymes. The addition of durlobactam to sulbactam restores in vitro activity against MDR A. baumannii that possess multiple ß-lactamases. OBJECTIVES: Previously, susceptibility data for sulbactam/durlobactam were limited to isolates from patients in Western countries. This study was undertaken to determine the activity of sulbactam/durlobactam against A. baumannii isolated from patients in mainland China. METHODS: Nine hundred and eighty-two recent A. baumannii clinical isolates were collected from 22 sites across mainland China during 2016-18. The isolates were collected from lower respiratory tract, intra-abdominal, urinary tract and skin and skin structure infections. The in vitro activities of sulbactam/durlobactam and comparators were determined by broth microdilution. RESULTS: The addition of durlobactam restored the activity of sulbactam against the majority of the strains tested. The MIC90 of sulbactam/durlobactam was 2 mg/L for all A. baumannii, compared with 64 mg/L for sulbactam alone. The MIC90 of sulbactam/durlobactam of 2 mg/L remained unchanged for 831 carbapenem-resistant isolates. Colistin was the only comparator with comparable activity (MIC90 = 1 mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the potential utility of sulbactam/durlobactam for the treatment of infections caused by A. baumannii in China.

In vitro activity of omadacycline against pathogens isolated from Mainland China during 2017-2018.

Antibiotic resistance of bacterial pathogens isolated in China is a major concern. Omadacycline is a novel tetracycline derivative that has been approved for use in skin infections and community-acquired pneumonia. This study was conducted to determine the in vitro activity of omadacycline against a large collection of patient isolate medical centers across Mainland China. A total of 1041 recent clinical isolates are obtained from patients hospitalized in 29 provinces and municipalities across China. The in vitro activity of omadacycline and comparator agents was assessed using the microbroth dilution methodology. Omadacycline was active against methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus with MIC90 values of 0.25 and 1 mg/L, respectively. All isolates of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, including vancomycin-resistant isolates, were inhibited by ≤ 0.25 mg/L of omadacycline. It was active against Streptococcus pneumoniae irrespective of susceptibility to penicillin or macrolides (MIC90 =0.12 mg/L). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution of omadacycline was nearly identical against (extended-spectrum beta-lactamases) ESBL-positive, ESBL-negative, and carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli (MIC90 = 4 mg/L). Omadacycline also showed good activity against Acinetobacter baumannii, inhibiting all isolates at ≤ 8 mg/L. Against Hemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis, the MICs of omadacycline were low and not influenced by the presence of ß-lactamase. Overall, the activity of omadacycline was very good against isolates commonly associated with skin infections and pneumonia, and the susceptibility of Chinese isolates was similar to that reported for these pathogens from large surveillance studies outside China. This suggests that omadacycline could be an option for treatment of these infections in Chinese patients.

Antimicrobial Activity of Omadacycline Tested against Clinical Bacterial Isolates from Hospitals in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan: Results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2013 to 2016).

Omadacycline is a derivative of minocycline and the first agent of the aminomethylcycline class. A total of 3,282 organisms (1 per patient) were consecutively collected from patients hospitalized in China (including Hong Kong) and Taiwan. Susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution methods in a central laboratory (JMI Laboratories). The collection included Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms from patients with pneumonia, bloodstream, skin, community-acquired respiratory, and other infections. Omadacycline was very potent against Staphylococcus aureus (n = 689; MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/liter), including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; n = 299; MIC50/90, 0.12/0.5 mg/liter), and had similar activity across geographic regions. Omadacycline was very active against Streptococcus pneumoniae (highest MIC, 0.25 mg/liter), ß-hemolytic streptococci (highest MIC, 1 mg/liter), viridans group streptococci (highest MIC, 0.25 mg/liter), and Enterococcus spp. (highest MIC, 0.5 mg/liter) from all geographic regions. Overall, 53.8% of S. pneumoniae isolates were penicillin resistant (penicillin MIC, ≥2 mg/liter) and 10.7% of enterococci (21.2% among E. faecium isolates) were vancomycin resistant. Omadacycline was active against Haemophilus influenzae (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 mg/liter) regardless of ß-lactamase production and was active against Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC50/90, ≤0.12/0.25 mg/liter). Against Enterobacteriaceae, omadacycline was most active against Escherichia coli (MIC50/90, 1/2 mg/liter), Klebsiella oxytoca (MIC50/90, 1/4 mg/liter), and Enterobacter cloacae (MIC50/90, 2/4 mg/liter). Omadacycline had potent in vitro activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens isolated from China and Taiwan and retained activity against problem pathogens, such as MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (PRSPN), and extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing E. coli The observed MIC profile in Chinese isolates was very similar to that seen in the U.S. and European surveillance studies.

Evaluation of omadacycline dosing regimens in Chinese using population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis.

PURPOSE: Omadacycline (PTK-0796) is a first-in-class aminomethylcycline for adult patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) caused by susceptible pathogens. We investigated the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of omadacycline, considering the impact of covariates, particularly ethnicity, on PK and determined the PK/PD cutoff values for dosing regimens. METHODS: Utilizing nonlinear mixed-effects modeling, we pooled data from 11 clinical trials for PopPK analysis. The first-order conditional estimation with interaction (FOCEI) method in NONMEM facilitated model parameter estimation. Employing a stepwise model selection strategy, with forward addition (P < 0.01) and backward deletion (P < 0.001), we assessed the potential impacts of covariates on omadacycline PK, including baseline age, body weight, sex, race, body mass index, body surface area, baseline albumin, creatine clearance, and formulation. After validating the model through various methods, the final PopPK model underwent Monte Carlo simulations to generate the PK profile for the Chinese population. This enabled AUC calculation and assessment of the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for various dosing regimens and bacterial strains. RESULTS: Omadacycline's PK can be adequately characterized by a three-compartment model. Body weight, sex, race, and drug formulation statistically influenced its PK. Asians and non-Asians exhibit similar exposure after intravenous infusion, but oral dosing results in much higher exposures than in non-Asians. Monte Carlo simulation indicates that IV-only or IV/PO sequential therapy regimens provide adequate attainment for all major pathogens causing ABSSSI and CABP. PK/PD cutoffs were generally above the MIC90 value of recent clinical isolates from China. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the approved regimen for China achieved adequate target attainment for all pathogens typically associated with these infections. The higher oral exposure observed in Asians may enhance efficacy without affecting safety or tolerability.

Efficacy and safety of sulbactam-durlobactam versus colistin for the treatment of patients with serious infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex: a multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority clinical trial (ATTACK).

BACKGROUND: An urgent need exists for antibiotics to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC). Sulbactam-durlobactam is a ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against Acinetobacter, including multidrug-resistant strains. In a phase 3, pathogen-specific, randomised controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of sulbactam-durlobactam versus colistin, both in combination with imipenem-cilastatin as background therapy, in patients with serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant ABC. METHODS: The ATTACK trial was done at 59 clinical sites in 16 countries. Adults aged 18 years or older with ABC-confirmed hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia, ventilated pneumonia, or bloodstream infections were randomised 1:1 using a block size of four to sulbactam-durlobactam (1·0 g of each drug in combination over 3 h every 6 h) or colistin (2·5 mg/kg over 30 min every 12 h) for 7-14 days. All patients received imipenem-cilastatin (1·0 g of each drug in combination over 1 h every 6 h) as background therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with laboratory-confirmed carbapenem-resistant ABC (the carbapenem-resistant ABC microbiologically modified intention-to-treat population). Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper bound of the 95% CI for the treatment difference was less than +20%. The primary safety endpoint was incidence of nephrotoxicity assessed using modified Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease criteria measured by creatinine level or glomerular filtration rate through day 42. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03894046. FINDINGS: Between Sep 5, 2019, and July 26, 2021, 181 patients were randomly assigned to sulbactam-durlobactam or colistin (176 hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia, or ventilated pneumonia; and five bloodstream infections); 125 patients with laboratory-confirmed carbapenem-resistant ABC isolates were included in the primary efficacy analysis. 28-day all-cause mortality was 12 (19%) of 63 in the sulbactam-durlobactam group and 20 (32%) of 62 in the colistin group, a difference of -13·2% (95% CI -30·0 to 3·5), which met criteria for non-inferiority. Incidence of nephrotoxicity was significantly (p<0·001) lower with sulbactam-durlobactam than colistin (12 [13%] of 91 vs 32 [38%] of 85). Serious adverse events were reported in 36 (40%) of 91 patients in the sulbactam-durlobactam group and 42 (49%) of 86 patients in the colistin group. Treatment-related adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation were reported in ten (11%) of 91 patients in the sulbactam-durlobactam group and 14 (16%) of 86 patients in the colistin group. INTERPRETATION: Our data show that sulbactam-durlobactam was non-inferior to colistin, both agents given in combination with imipenem-cilastatin, for the primary endpoint of 28-day all-cause mortality. Sulbactam-durlobactam was well tolerated and could be an effective intervention to reduce mortality from serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant ABC, including multidrug-resistant strains. FUNDING: Entasis Therapeutics and Zai Lab.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Analysis of Omadacycline in Chinese Healthy Subjects.

Objective: Omadacycline is a new type of aminomethylcycline antibiotic, having a broad antibacterial spectrum. But the pharmacokinetic characteristics and safety profile of the Chinese population remain unknown. It is also unclear whether the US-approved treatment regimen is applicable for the Chinese population. Methods: In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled dose-escalated trial, the pharmacokinetics of omadacycline was evaluated by a non-compartmental and compartmental model. Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the pharmacokinetic data from the Chinese population to evaluate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of the US FDA-approved dose regimen. Results: The three-compartment model successfully described the rapid distribution and slow elimination of omadacycline after the intravenous infusion (i.v.). The double-peak concentration-time curve of the oral absorption (p.o.) was explained by the two-compartment model with two absorption compartments. The steady-state AUC of 100 mg omadacycline i.v. and 300 mg omadacycline p. o. were 12.1 and 19.4 mg h/L, respectively. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) analysis showed that the omadacycline dosing regimen with a loading dose (200 mg i.v. q24 h, 100 mg i.v. q12 h, 450 mg p. o. q24 h × 2 days or 300 mg p. o. q12 h) and maintenance dose (100 mg i.v. q24 h or 300 mg p. o. q24 h) could cover the main pathogens of the indications acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP): Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Also, omadacycline had showed a good safety profile in the Chinese population. Conclusions: With the evidence provided, omadacycline could be a novel treatment option to Chinese patients with ABSSSI and CABP.

Urinary concentrations and antimicrobial activity of tobramycin in healthy volunteers receiving a single oral dose of a novel formulation for improved absorption.

Oral antibiotics for the treatment of urinary tract infections are scarce. In this ex vivo phase 1 annex study, the clinical safety, urinary concentrations and bactericidal activity of a new formulation for improved oral absorption of tobramycin (Tobrate™) were evaluated. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of five test strains, one reference strain and four clinical uropathogenic strains were determined in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CA-MHB) and in pooled antimicrobial agent-free subjects' urine at different pH values (5.5, 6.5, 7.5 and 8.5). Urinary concentrations and urinary bactericidal titres (UBTs) following single oral administration of 600 mg Tobrate™ were measured in nine healthy volunteers up to 24 h. The MIC/MBC values in CA-MHB were 2-4/2-4 mg/L for two Escherichia coli strains, 2/2 mg/L for Klebsiella pneumoniae, 0.5/1 mg/L for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 8/1 mg/L for Proteus mirabilis. MBCs in pooled alkaline urine were significantly lower than those in acidic urine. The mean maximum urinary concentration following 600 mg tobramycin was 83.9 mg/L (2-4 h collection period). The highest reciprocal median UBT values for each test strain were between 2 and 4 during the collection periods 2-4 h and 4-8 h, respectively. The new enteric oral tobramycin formulation significantly improved the very poor oral absorption of standard tobramycin salt. For all pathogens tested, maximum urinary concentrations of tobramycin were at least two times above the urinary MBC. A twice- or three-times daily dosage regimen and alkalising co-medication may further improve urinary bactericidal activity.