RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The medical care of pediatric cancer patients in the German health care system relies on special structures. All children and adolescents with a diagnosis of cancer receive uniform treatment within clinical studies or registers and exclusively at centers which can ensure interdisciplinary care by a multiprofessional team. Reimbursement of outpatient services is highly heterogeneous among the centers, and the expenses are often not adequately compensated. METHOD: A nation-wide survey was performed among all centers of the German Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, with a standardized questionnaire inquiring which reimbursement models are used to finance outpatient treatment and whether full coverage of the expenses is achieved. RESULTS: Of 58 Pediatric Oncology Centers in Germany 18 (33%) participated in the survey, including 8 (44%) University Hospitals. The use of available reimbursement tools was highly heterogeneous. Reimbursement for outpatient service was based on a mean of 3,33±1,49 individual components. Of the 18 responding centers, 17 indicated that the revenues do not fully cover the expenses. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Pediatric oncology centers in Germany can not achieve full coverage of expenses in the outpatient setting. Nationally uniform cost-covering remuneration strategies are needed. This article proposes three individual models for an adequate nationwide financial framework for the outpatient care of pediatric cancer patients.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Oncología Médica , Neoplasias/terapia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Adolescente , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Niño , Alemania , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Pediatría/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2015 the proposed period ended for achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) of the United Nations targeting to lower maternal mortality worldwide by ~ 75%. 99% of these cases appear in developing and threshold countries; but reports mostly rely on incomplete or unrepresentative data. Using Indonesia as example, currently available data sets for maternal mortality were systematically reviewed. METHODS: Besides analysis of international and national data resources, a systematic review was carried out according to Cochrane methodology to identify all data and assessments regarding maternal mortality. RESULTS: Overall, primary data on maternal mortality differed significantly and were hardly comparable. For 1990 results varied between 253/100 000 and 446/100 000. In 2013 data appeared more conclusive (140-199/100 000). An annual reduction rate (ARR) of -2.8% can be calculated. CONCLUSION: Reported data quality of maternal mortality in Indonesia is very limited regarding comprehensive availability and methodology. This limitation appears to be of general importance for the targeted countries of the MDG. Primary data are rare, not uniformly obtained and not evaluated by comparable methods resulting in very limited comparability. Continuous small data set registration should have high priority for analysis of maternal health activities.