Task complexity and cognitive load in simulation-based education: A randomised trial.

INTRODUCTION: When designing simulation for novices, educators aim to design tasks and environments that are complex enough to promote learning but not too complex to compromise task performance and cause cognitive overload. This study aimed to determine the impact of modulating task and environment complexity on novices' performance and cognitive load during simulation. METHODS: Second-year pharmacy students (N = 162) were randomly assigned to one of four conditions (2 × 2 factorial design) in simulation: simple task in simple environment, complex task in simple environment, simple task in complex environment and complex task in complex environment. Using video recordings, two raters assessed students' performance during the simulation. We measured intrinsic cognitive load (ICL) and extraneous cognitive load (ECL) with questionnaires after the task and tested knowledge after task and debriefing. RESULTS: Mean performance scores in simple environment were 28.2/32 (SD = 3.8) for simple task and 25.8/32 (SD = 4.2) for complex task. In complex environment, mean performance scores were 24.6/32 (SD = 5.2) for simple task and 25.6/32 (SD = 5.3) for complex task. We found significant interaction effects between task and environment complexity for performance. In simple environment, mean ICL scores were 4.2/10 (SD = 2.2) for simple task and 5.7/10 (SD = 1.5) for complex task. In complex environment, mean ICL scores were 4.9/10 (SD = 1.8) for simple task and 5.1/10 (SD = 1.9) for complex task. There was a main effect of task complexity on ICL. For ECL, we found neither an interaction effect nor main effects of task and environment complexity. There was a main effect of task complexity on knowledge test after task and main effects of both task and environment complexity on knowledge after debriefing. CONCLUSIONS: Performance was good, and cognitive load remained reasonable in all conditions, which suggests that, despite increased complexity, students seemed to strategically manage their own cognitive load and learn from the simulations. Our findings also indicate that environmental complexity contributes to ICL.

Effectiveness of simulation in psychiatry for nursing students, nurses and nurse practitioners: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Mental disorders constitute one of the main causes of disease and disability worldwide. While nurses are often at the frontline of mental health care, they have limited access to dedicated psychiatric training opportunities. Simulation training may foster the development of the appropriate competencies required when supporting people with mental disorders. To evaluate the effectiveness of simulation training in psychiatry for nursing students, nurses and nurse practitioners. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Eight electronic databases, trial registries, key journals and reference lists of selected studies were searched from inception to August 20, 2020 without language restriction. REVIEW METHODS: We included randomized and non-randomized controlled studies and single group pre/post studies. Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 was used for randomized controlled study appraisal, and the Medical Education Research Study Quality instrument was completed for all other studies. Meta-analysis was restricted to randomized controlled studies. The other studies were synthesized narratively. The main outcomes were based on Kirkpatrick levels. RESULTS: A total of 118 studies (6738 participants) were found. Interventions included simulated patients (n = 55), role-plays (n = 40), virtual reality (n = 12), manikins (n = 9) and voice simulations (n = 9). Meta-analyses based on 11 randomized controlled studies found a significant large effect size on skills at immediate post-test for simulation compared with active control; and a small and medium effect size on learners' attitudes for simulation compared with inactive control, at immediate post-test and at three-month follow-up respectively. Three quarters of non-randomized controlled studies and pre/post-tests assessing attitudes and skills showed significant differences, and three quarters of participants in randomized controlled studies and pre/post-tests showed significant differences in behaviours. Among the few studies assessing people with mental health outcomes, almost all reported significant differences. CONCLUSION: These findings support the effectiveness of simulation training in psychiatric nursing throughout professional development grades, despite heterogeneity in methods and simulation interventions.

Fifteen simulated patient working formats to use in communication skills training: Report of a survey.

OBJECTIVE: Simulated and standardized patients (SPs) are increasingly being used in communication skills training for healthcare professionals' education. Despite this broad use of SPs, there is no recent literature with an overview on SP working formats being used. We ran a study to fill this gap. METHODS: First, a survey on formats on the use of SPs in various curricula for education of healthcare professionals in Belgium and The Netherlands was run by members of the Dutch Association of Medical Education Special Interest Group on Simulated and Standardized patients (SIG-NL/B). Then the SIG-NL/B organized a national workshop where professionals working with or interested in SPs were invited to come forward with SP working formats they used. They were also asked to provide relevant details about the use. Finally, the outcomes of these two phases were combined. RESULTS: Fifteen SP working formats were found. Six of them were described before. The details of all formats are listed and discussed. CONCLUSION: We categorised 15 SP working formats. The choice to use a particular format is mainly based on the learning objectives of the session involved and the expertise at hand.

Assessing the validity of an OSCE developed to assess rare, emergent or complex clinical conditions in endocrinology & metabolism.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of emergent, rare or complex medical conditions in Endocrinology and Metabolism (E&M) is an integral component of training. However, data is lacking on how this could be best achieved. The purpose of this study was to develop and administer an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) for E&M residents, and to gather validity evidence for its use. METHODS: A needs assessment survey was distributed to all Canadian E&M Program Directors and recent graduates to determine which topics to include in the OSCE. The top 5 topics were selected using a modified Delphi technique. OSCE cases based on these topics were subsequently developed. Five E&M residents (PGY4-5) and five junior Internal Medicine (IM) residents participated in the OSCE. Performance of E&M and IM residents was compared and results were analyzed using a Generalizability study. Examiners and candidates completed a survey following the OSCE to evaluate their experiences. RESULTS: The mean score of IM and E&M residents was 41.7 and 69.3 % (p < 0.001), respectively, with a large effect size (partial η2 = 0.75). Overall reliability of the OSCE was 0.74. Standard setting using a borderline regression method resulted in a pass rate of 100 % of E&M residents and 0 % of IM residents. All residents felt the OSCE had high value for learning as a formative exam. CONCLUSIONS: The E&M OSCE is a feasible method for assessing emergent, rare and complex medical conditions and this study provides validity evidence to support its use in a competency-based curriculum.

Learning in Pediatric Emergency Situations: A Qualitative Study of Residents' Perspectives.

OBJECTIVES: To explore resident learning in the context of emergency situations. The guiding research questions were: How do residents learn in emergency situations? What factors facilitate or hinder their learning? DESIGN: A qualitative approach was used in order to understand the different perspectives of participants and explore the context of emergency situations. Aware of the complex sociocultural interactions in emergency situations, we used the methodology of constructivist grounded theory. SETTING: A medium-sized pediatric academic hospital in San Antonio, TX. SUBJECTS: Twenty pediatric residents participated in semi-structured interviews. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used an iterative process of data collection and analysis. The process continued until thematic saturation was reached. The data were coded and analyzed using constant comparison. Codes were clustered into themes informed by the theory of situated learning. Several methods were used to ensure trustworthiness of results. Three main themes were identified. First, resident participation in emergency situations takes different forms. Residents participate mostly in helping roles. Watching is an under-recognized form of participation yet offered unique experiences. Managing roles are rarely afforded to residents. Second, resident participation is informed by the context of the emergency situation. Based on contextual clues (e.g., safety, needs), residents infer potential risks and values from their participation, which guides their participatory role. Residents may shift their form of participation, based on changes in the context. Supervisors play a significant role in guiding resident participation. Third, engagement, a state of cognitive and emotional focus, is critical in learning. The context of the emergency situation plays a role in the level of resident engagement. Supervisors may also foster resident engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Resident participation in emergency situations is complex and informed by the context. Learning in emergency situations is influenced by residents' level of mental engagement. Supervisors may positively guide resident participation, foster engagement, and enable them to reach their learning goals in emergency situations.

Simulation in psychiatry for medical doctors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Most medical doctors are likely to work with patients experiencing mental health conditions. However, educational opportunities for medical doctors to achieve professional development in the field of psychiatry are often limited. Simulation training in psychiatry may be a useful tool to foster this development. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of simulation training in psychiatry for medical students, postgraduate trainees and medical doctors. METHODS: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched eight electronic databases and trial registries up to 31 August 2018. We manually searched key journals and the reference lists of selected studies. We included randomised and non-randomised controlled studies and single group pre- and post-test studies. Our main outcomes were based on Kirkpatrick levels. We included data only from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using random-effects models. RESULTS: From 46 571 studies identified, we selected 163 studies and combined 27 RCTs. Interventions included simulation by role-play (n = 69), simulated patients (n = 72), virtual reality (n = 22), manikin (n = 5) and voice simulation (n = 2). Meta-analysis found significant differences at immediate post-tests for simulation compared with active and inactive control groups for attitudes (standardised mean difference [SMD] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.73 [I2  = 0.0%] and SMD = 0.28, 95% CI 0.04-0.53 [I2  = 52.0%], respectively), skills (SMD = 1.37, 95% CI 0.56-2.18 [I2  = 93.0%] and SMD = 1.49, 95% CI 0.39-2.58 [I2  = 93.0%], respectively), knowledge (SMD = 1.22, 95% CI 0.57-1.88 [I2  = 0.0%] and SMD = 0.72, 95% CI 0.14-1.30 [I2  = 80.0%], respectively), and behaviours (SMD = 1.07, 95% CI 0.49-1.65 [I2  = 68.0%] and SMD = 0.45, 95% CI 0.11-0.79 [I2  = 41.0%], respectively). Significant differences in terms of patient benefit and doctors' behaviours and skills were found at the 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Despite heterogeneity in methods and simulation interventions, our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of simulation training in psychiatry training.

Simulation-based education for novices: complex learning tasks promote reflective practice.

CONTEXT: Simulated clinical immersion (SCI), in which clinical situations are simulated in a realistic environment, safely and gradually exposes novices to complex problems. Given their limited experience, undergraduate students can potentially be quite overwhelmed by SCI learning tasks, which may result in misleading learning outcomes. Although task complexity should be adapted to the learner's level of expertise, many factors, both intrinsic and extraneous to the learning task, can influence perceived task complexity and its impact on cognitive processes. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to understand the effects of task complexity on undergraduate pharmacy students' cognitive load, task performance and perception of learning in SCI. METHODS: A total of 167 second-year pharmacy students were randomly assigned to undertake one simple and one complex learning task in SCI consecutively. Participants' cognitive load was measured after each task and debriefing. Task performance and time on task were also assessed. As part of a sequential explanatory design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with students showing maximal variations in intrinsic cognitive load to elucidate their perceptions of learning when dealing with complexity. RESULTS: Although the complex task generated significantly higher cognitive load and time on task than the simple task, performance was high for both tasks. Qualitative results revealed that a lack of clinical experience, an unfamiliar resource in the environment and the constraints inherent to SCI, such as time limitations, hindered the clinical reasoning process and led to poorer self-evaluation of performance. Simple tasks helped students gain more self-confidence, whereas complex tasks further encouraged reflective practice during debriefings. CONCLUSIONS: Although complex tasks in SCI were more cognitively demanding and took longer to execute, students indicated that they learned more from them than they did from simple tasks. Complex tasks constitute an additional challenge in terms of clinical reasoning and thus provide a more valuable learning experience from the student's perspective.

Learning how to learn using simulation: Unpacking disguised feedback using a qualitative analysis of doctors' telephone talk.

INTRODUCTION: Telephone talk between clinicians represents a substantial workplace activity in postgraduate clinical education, yet junior doctors receive little training in goal-directed, professional telephone communication. AIM: To assess educational needs for telephone talk and develop a simulation-based educational intervention. METHODS: Thematic analysis of 17 semi-structured interviews with doctors-in-training from various training levels and specialties. RESULTS: We identified essential elements to incorporate into simulation-based telephone talk, including common challenging situations for junior doctors as well as explicit and informal aspects that promote learning. These elements have implications for both junior doctors and clinical supervisors, including: (a) explicit teaching and feedback practices and (b) informal conversational interruptions and questions. The latter serve as "disguised" feedback, which aligns with recent conceptualizations of feedback as "performance relevant information". CONCLUSIONS: In addition to preparing clinical supervisors to support learning through telephone talk, we propose several potential educational strategies: (a) embedding telephone communication skills throughout simulation activities and (b) developing stand-alone curricular elements to sensitize junior doctors to "disguised" feedback during telephone talk as a mechanism to augment future workplace learning, i.e. 'learning how to learn' through simulation.

The use of video in standardized patient training to improve portrayal accuracy: A randomized post-test control group study.

INTRODUCTION: High-stake objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) with standardized patients (SPs) should offer the same conditions to all candidates throughout the exam. SP performance should therefore be as close to the original role script as possible during all encounters. In this study, we examined the impact of video in SP training on SPs' role accuracy, investigating how the use of different types of video during SP training improves the accuracy of SP portrayal. METHODS: In a randomized post-test, control group design three groups of 12 SPs each with different types of video training and one control group of 12 SPs without video use in SP training were compared. The three intervention groups used role-modeling video, performance-feedback video, or a combination of both. Each SP from each group had four students encounter. Two blinded faculty members rated the 192 video-recorded encounters, using a case-specific rating instrument to assess SPs' role accuracy. RESULTS: SPs trained by video showed significantly (p < 0.001) better role accuracy than SPs trained without video over the four sequential portrayals. There was no difference between the three types of video training. DISCUSSION: Use of video during SP training enhances the accuracy of SP portrayal compared with no video, regardless of the type of video intervention used.

Effectiveness of oncogenetics training on general practitioners' consultation skills: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: General practitioners are increasingly called upon to deliver genetic services and could play a key role in translating potentially life-saving advancements in oncogenetic technologies to patient care. If general practitioners are to make an effective contribution in this area, their genetics competencies need to be upgraded. The aim of this study was to investigate whether oncogenetics training for general practitioners improves their genetic consultation skills. METHODS: In this pragmatic, blinded, randomized controlled trial, the intervention consisted of a 4-h training (December 2011 and April 2012), covering oncogenetic consultation skills (family history, familial risk assessment, and efficient referral), attitude (medical ethical issues), and clinical knowledge required in primary-care consultations. Outcomes were measured using observation checklists by unannounced standardized patients and self-reported questionnaires. RESULTS: Of 88 randomized general practitioners who initially agreed to participate, 56 completed all measurements. Key consultation skills significantly and substantially improved; regression coefficients after intervention were equivalent to 0.34 and 0.28 at 3-month follow-up, indicating a moderate effect size. Satisfaction and perceived applicability of newly learned skills were highly scored. CONCLUSION: The general practitioner-specific training proved to be a feasible, satisfactory, and clinically applicable method to improve oncogenetics consultation skills and could be used as an educational framework to inform future training activities with the ultimate aim of improving medical care.

How simulated patients contribute to student learning in an authentic way, an interview study.

INTRODUCTION: Simulated patients (SPs) play an instrumental role in teaching communication skills and enhancing learning outcomes. Prior research mostly focused on the SP's contribution to students' learning outcomes by providing feedback afterwards. A detailed understanding of the contribution of the SP during SP-student encounters is currently lacking although the majority of the interaction between SPs and students occurs during the SP-student encounter. Therefore, this study focuses on how SPs see their contribution to meaningful student learning experiences during SP-student encounters. METHODS: We interviewed fifteen simulated patients from one institution. We explored their perspectives on meaningful learning experiences during SP-student encounters through in-depth, semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: SPs view their contribution to meaningful student learning during SP-student encounters from two perspectives. A collective perspective as a member of the community of SPs and an individual perspective. From the collective perspective, SPs believe that the fact that students deal with multiple varied SP-student encounters over time is of value for meaningful learning. From the individual perspective, we noticed that SPs think, act, and react from three different positions. First, as the patient in the role description, second, as a teaching aid and third, as an individual with personal experiences, beliefs, and values. SPs mentioned that the ratio between these different positions can vary within and between encounters. CONCLUSIONS: According to SPs, we should value the variation between SPs, thereby creating meaningful variation in authentic interactions in SP-student encounters. SPs should be allowed to act and react from different positions during SP-student encounters, including their role description, as teaching aid, and based on their own experiences. In this way, SP-student encounters are optimized to contribute to meaningful student learning through authenticity.

Why should I prepare? A mixed method study exploring the motives of medical undergraduate students to prepare for clinical skills training sessions.

BACKGROUND: Although preparation for educational activities is considered beneficial for student learning, many students do not perform preparatory assignments. This phenomenon has received little attention in the literature although it might provide medical educators with the opportunity to enhance student learning. Therefore, we explored why students prepare or not prepare. METHODS: An explorative mixed methods study was performed. In a qualitative study, 24 short group interviews with medical undergraduate students (n=209) were conducted on why they prepared for skills training sessions. In a subsequent quantitative study the resulting themes were used to construct a questionnaire. The questionnaire was presented to all undergraduate medical students at Maastricht University and 847 students completed it. Scales were constructed by a combination of exploratory factor analysis, reliability analysis, and content analysis. Between-class differences in the scale scores were investigated using ANOVA. RESULTS: The qualitative study showed that students' opinions on preparation are influenced by both personal factors, categorized as 'personal learning style', 'attitudes and beliefs', and 'planning and organization', as well as external factors, including 'preparatory advice', 'pressure, consequence, and checking of preparation', 'teacher-related motivations', and 'contents and schedule of the training sessions'. The quantitative study showed that 'the objective structured clinical examination' and 'facilitation of both understanding and memorizing the learning material', were the two most motivating items. The two most demotivating aspects were 'other students saying that preparation was not useful' and 'indistinct preparatory advices'. Factor analyses yielded three scales: 'urge to learn', 'expected difficulties', and 'lack of motivation'. Between group differences were found between the three classes on the first two scales. CONCLUSIONS: Students make an active and complex choice whether to prepare or not, based on multiple factors. Practical implications for educational practice are discussed.

Collaboration Scripts or Checklists to Engage Novice Observers in Immersive Simulation?

INTRODUCTION: In simulation, students often observe their peers perform a task. It is still unclear how different types of instructional guidance can turn the observational phase into an active learning experience for novices. This mixed-method study aims to understand similarities and differences between use of collaboration scripts and checklists by observers in terms of cognitive load and perception of learning. METHODS: Second-year pharmacy students ( N = 162) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 conditions when observing a simulation: collaboration scripts (heuristic to analyze in dyads while observing), checklists, both, or no guidance. We measured observers' intrinsic and extraneous cognitive load and self-perceived learning and conducted focus group interviews. RESULTS: Intrinsic cognitive load was significantly lower for checklists (M = 3.6/10) than for scripts (M = 4.7/10) or scripts and checklists combined (M = 4.7/10). Extraneous cognitive load was significantly lower for checklists (M = 1.5/10) than for scripts combined with checklists (M = 2.6/10) or no guidance (M = 1.8/10). There was no statistical difference between conditions for self-perceived learning. Coding of focus group interviews revealed 6 themes on observers' perception of learning under different conditions of instructional guidance. Students explained that collaboration scripts felt more complex, whereas checklists were perceived as a simple fact-checking exercise. Observing the simulation, regardless of guidance, was a meaningful learning experience. CONCLUSIONS: With or without guidance, observers are actively engaged with the simulation, but their effort differed depending on instructions. When choosing between checklists or collaboration scripts, educators should be guided by the type of simulation task.

Medical Students' Learning Process During Simulated Patient Consultations in Psychiatry: A Grounded Theory Study.

INTRODUCTION: Recent changes in psychiatric care and teaching, which limit patient contact for medical students, can be partially overcome by simulation-based education in psychiatry. The authors explored the learning processes of medical students during meetings with simulated patients to inform efforts to improve this teaching. METHODS: After recruiting 81 undergraduate medical students from 3 universities to participate in 6 simulation sessions in psychiatry, the authors purposively sampled 21 students to participate in face-to-face individual semistructured interviews analyzed with constructivist grounded theory. Integration of this analysis with those of the simulation consultation videotapes and the debriefing audiotapes improved the triangulation process. RESULTS: Three organizational themes were identified: developing and structuring representations of psychiatry; integrating subjectivity into learning; and refining and developing psychiatric praxis. Given the broad and in-depth learning that occurs, simulation in psychiatry should respect content validity of SP portrayals to ensure appropriate learning. However, psychological fidelity seems to provide adequate realism while retaining feasibility. Psychiatric simulation also requires the encouragement of student self-confidence and well-being. Within a reflective framework, simulation triggers cognitive reframing, which can alleviate fears and prejudice toward people with mental disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The holistic interactive learning process involved in simulation can address the complexity of the personal and interpersonal features needed in psychiatry.

Six formats in simulated and standardized patients use, based on experiences of 13 undergraduate medical curricula in Belgium and the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: In Belgium and the Netherlands, 13 medical schools collaborate with regard to the use of simulated patients (SPs) and standardized patients in their undergraduate curricula. All schools use SPs in their curriculum but schools differ in (a) the timing or placement of the SPs and (b) the way they are used. AIM: To give an overview of the formats used most in undergraduate medical education with SPs, including a description of the impact of these formats on the different aspects of SPs. METHODS: Representatives of all medical schools in Belgium and The Netherlands all provided a structured overview of their use of SPs. We then collectively made a description of the main working formats. For each format we identified salient consequences on the SP level, including whether the format requires simulated or standardized patients or patient-actors, what is the impact of a format on the selection of SPs, content and duration of SP training, whether or not to use checklists in role training, feedback training or not, debriefing of training, impact on the case (role) description (e.g. free or structured), the number of SPs needed, and the selection criteria for SPs. CONCLUSION: The working format with SPs more or less determines the whole process of selection, training, performance, and logistics of SPs.

Validity evidence and reliability of a simulated patient feedback instrument.

BACKGROUND: In the training of healthcare professionals, one of the advantages of communication training with simulated patients (SPs) is the SP's ability to provide direct feedback to students after a simulated clinical encounter. The quality of SP feedback must be monitored, especially because it is well known that feedback can have a profound effect on student performance. Due to the current lack of valid and reliable instruments to assess the quality of SP feedback, our study examined the validity and reliability of one potential instrument, the 'modified Quality of Simulated Patient Feedback Form' (mQSF). METHODS: Content validity of the mQSF was assessed by inviting experts in the area of simulated clinical encounters to rate the importance of the mQSF items. Moreover, generalizability theory was used to examine the reliability of the mQSF. Our data came from videotapes of clinical encounters between six simulated patients and six students and the ensuing feedback from the SPs to the students. Ten faculty members judged the SP feedback according to the items on the mQSF. Three weeks later, this procedure was repeated with the same faculty members and recordings. RESULTS: All but two items of the mQSF received importance ratings of > 2.5 on a four-point rating scale. A generalizability coefficient of 0.77 was established with two judges observing one encounter. CONCLUSIONS: The findings for content validity and reliability with two judges suggest that the mQSF is a valid and reliable instrument to assess the quality of feedback provided by simulated patients.

Effects of communication training on real practice performance: a role-play module versus a standardized patient module.

This study investigated the effectiveness of modules involving standardized patients and role-plays on training communication skills. The first module involved standardized patients and an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE); the second module consisted of peer role-plays and a written examination. A randomized posttest-only control group design with first-year nursing students was used. The intervention group received one-to-one communication training with direct oral feedback from the standardized patient. The control group had training with peer role-playing and mutual feedback. The posttest involved students' rating their self-efficacy, and real patients and clinical supervisors evaluated their communication skills. No significant differences were found between self-efficacy and patient ratings. However, the clinical supervisors rated the intervention group's communication skills to be significantly (p < 0.0001) superior. Assessments by clinical supervisors indicate that communication training modules including standardized patients and an OSCE are superior to communication training modules with peer role-playing.

Training Residents in Advance Care Planning: A Task-Based Needs Assessment Using the 4-Component Instructional Design.

BACKGROUND: Residents may learn how to perform advance care planning (ACP) through informal curriculum. Task-based instructional designs and recent international consensus statements for ACP provide opportunities to explicitly train residents, but residents' needs are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We assessed residents' training needs in ACP at the Geneva University Hospitals in Geneva, Switzerland. METHODS: Qualitative data were collected and analyzed iteratively between December 2017 and September 2019. Transcripts were coded using both a deductive content analysis based on the 4-Component Instructional Design (4C/ID) model and an inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Out of 55 individuals contacted by email, 49 (89%) participated in 7 focus groups and 10 individual interviews, including 19 residents, 18 fellows and attending physicians, 4 nurses, 1 psychologist, 1 medical ethics consultant, 3 researchers, and 3 patients. Participants identified 3 tasks expected of residents (preparing, discussing, and documenting ACP) and discussed why training residents in ACP is complex. Participants described knowledge (eg, prognosis), skills (eg, clinical and ethical reasoning), and attitudes (eg, reflexivity) that residents need to become competent in ACP and identified needs for future training. In terms of the 4C/ID, these needs revolved around: (1) learning tasks (eg, workplace practice, simulated scenarios); (2) supportive information (eg, videotaped worked examples, cognitive feedback); (3) procedural information (eg, ACP pocket-sized information sheet, corrective feedback); and (4) part-task practice (eg, rehearsal of communication skills, simulation). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive description of tasks and competencies to train residents in ACP.

The contribution of simulated patients to meaningful student learning.

INTRODUCTION: Communication training with simulated patients (SPs) is widely accepted as a valuable and effective means of teaching communication skills. However, it is unclear which elements within SP-student encounters make these learning experiences meaningful. This study focuses on the SP's role during meaningful learning of the student by giving an in-depth understanding of the contribution of the SP from a student perspective. METHODS: Fifteen bachelor Technical Medicine students were interviewed. Technical medicine students become technical physicians who optimize individual patient care through the use of personalized technology. Their perceptions of meaningful learning experiences during SP-student encounters were explored through in-depth, semi-structured interviews, and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified that described what students considered to be important for meaningful learning experiences. First, SPs provide implicit feedback-in-action. Through this, students received an impression of their communication during the encounter. Implicit feedback-in-action was perceived as an authentic reaction of the SPs. Second, implicit feedback-in-action could lead to a process of reflection-in-action, meaning that students reflect on their own actions during the consultation. Third, interactions with SPs contributed to students' identity development, enabling them to know themselves on a professional and personal level. DISCUSSION: During SP encounters, students learn more than just communication skills; the interaction with SPs contributes to their professional and personal identity development. Primarily, the authentic response of an SP during the interaction provides students an understanding of how well they communicate. This raises issues whether standardizing SPs might limit opportunities for meaningful learning.

Simulation Training in Psychiatry for Medical Education: A Review.

Despite recognised benefits of Simulation-Based Education (SBE) in healthcare, specific adaptations required within psychiatry have slowed its adoption. This article aims to discuss conceptual and practical features of SBE in psychiatry that may support or limit its development, so as to encourage clinicians and educators to consider the implementation of SBE in their practice. SBE took off with the aviation industry and has been steadily adopted in clinical education, alongside role play and patient educators, across many medical specialities. Concurrently, healthcare has shifted towards patient-centred approaches and clinical education has recognised the importance of reflective learning and teaching centred on learners' experiences. SBE is particularly well-suited to promoting a holistic approach to care, reflective learning, emotional awareness in interactions and learning, cognitive reframing, and co-construction of knowledge. These features present an opportunity to enhance education throughout the healthcare workforce, and align particularly well to psychiatric education, where interpersonal and relational dimensions are at the core of clinical skills. Additionally, SBE provides a strategic opportunity for people with lived experience of mental disorders to be directly involved in clinical education. However, tenacious controversies have questioned the adequacy of SBE in the psychiatric field, possibly limiting its adoption. The ability of simulated patients (SPs) to portray complex and contradictory cognitive, psychological and emotional states has been questioned. The validity of SBE to develop a genuine empathetic understanding of patients, to facilitate a comprehensive multiaxial diagnostic formulation, or to develop flexible interpersonal skills has been criticised. Finally, SBE's relevance to developing complex psychotherapeutic skills is much debated, while issues such as symptom induction in SPs or patients involvement raise ethical dilemmas. These controversies can be addressed through adequate evidence, robust learning design, and high standards of practice. Well-designed simulated scenarios can promote a positive consideration of mental disorders and complex clinical skills. Shared guidelines and scenario libraries for simulation can be developed, with expert psychiatrists, patients and students involvement, to offer SPs and educators a solid foundation to develop training. Beyond scenario design, the nuances and complexities in mental healthcare are also duly acknowledged during the debriefing phases, providing a crucial opportunity to reflect on complex interpersonal skills or the role of emotions in clinicians' behaviour. Considered recruitment and support of SPs by clinical educators can help to maintain psychological safety and manage ethical issues. The holistic and reflexive nature of SBE aligns to the rich humanistic tradition nurtured within psychiatry and medicine, presenting the opportunity to expand the use of SBE to support a range of clinical skills and workforce competencies required in psychiatry.