Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis. a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Appendectomy has been the treatment for acute appendicitis for over 120 years. Antibiotic treatment has occasionally been used in small uncontrolled studies, instead of operation, but this alternative has never before been tried in a multicenter randomized trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Male patients, 18-50 years of age, admitted to six different hospitals in Sweden between 1996 and 1999 were enrolled in the study. No women were enrolled by decision of the local ethics committee. If appendectomy was planned, patients were asked to participate, and those who agreed were randomized either to surgery or to antibiotic therapy. Patients randomized to surgery were operated on with open surgery or laparoscopically. Those randomized to antibiotic therapy were treated intravenously for 2 days, followed by oral treatment for 10 days. If symptoms did not resolve within 24 hours, an appendectomy was performed. Participants were monitored at the end of 1 week, 6 weeks, and 1 year. RESULTS: During the study period 252 men participated, 124 in the surgery group and 128 in the antibiotic group. The frequency of appendicitis was 97% in the surgery group and 5% had a perforated appendix. The complication rate was 14% in the surgery group. In the antibiotic group 86% improved without surgery; 18 patients were operated on within 24 hours, and the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was confirmed in all but one patient, and he was suffering from terminal ileitis. There were seven patients (5%) with a perforated appendix in this group. The rate of recurrence of symptoms of appendicitis among the 111 patients treated with antibiotics was 14% during the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Acute non-perforated appendicitis can be treated successfully with antibiotics. However, there is a risk of recurrence in cases of acute appendicitis, and this risk should be compared with the risk of complications after appendectomy.

Facial blushing treated by sympathetic denervation--longlasting benefits in 831 patients.

BACKGROUND: Severe facial blushing may have a strong negative impact on the quality of life and is one of the cardinal symptoms of social phobia. If traditional therapeutic options such as psychotherapy and pharmacological treatment fail, interruption of the sympathetic innervation to the face offers good results, however long-term results may not be good. AIM: To investigate whether endoscopic thoracic sympathecotomy (ETS) remains an effective treatment of facial blushing more than one year's follow up. METHOD: 1314 consecutive patients with severe facial blushing were treated with bilateral ETS. The results were evaluated by questionnaire and symptoms assessed with visual analogue scales (0-10). RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 831 patients (63%) a mean of 29 months (+/- 11 days) after surgery. Facial blushing was reduced from 8.8 +/- 0.05 to 2.5 +/- 0.09, P < 0.0001 by the operation. The quality of life was substantially improved. The main side-effect was redistribution of sweating from the upper to the lower part of the body (compensatory sweating). Increased sweating of the trunk occurred in 83% of the responses. Overall, 85% of the respondents were satisfied with the result and 15% were to some degree not satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: As this is an open study and 37% of patients did not respond to the questionnaire, the results must be viewed with caution. ETS, however, appears to be an effective, safe and lasting surgical method for the treatment of severe facial blushing. Side-effects, especially compensatory sweating on the trunk and legs are common, and may be severe but only rarely result in the patient regretting the operation.